80 Years Ago Today: ‘The Battle of Britain’

 

Today is the 80th Anniversary of the Battle of Britain Day. After France fell on June 22, 1940 Hermann Gőring promised Hitler that all that he needed was four intensive days of bombing Britain to be able to support an invasion. Britain had been bombed since July, but the big day for the knockout blow was to be on September 15, 1940. Goering came to the cliffs of Cap Blanc-Nez near Calais to watch his bombers and fighters fly to Britain. In the morning Germany sent hundreds of its bombers and fighters and the RAF fought them off. That was only a prelude. In the afternoon, Germany sent even more of its bombers and fighter against southern England.

Winston Churchill was observing the dispatching RAF from Fighter Command operations center in Uxbridge. He asked, “What other reserves have we?” The understated response was “There are none.” The RAF had committed all of its planes to defend Britain. That day, the report was that Britain had shot down 186 German planes at a cost of only 26 planes. The bombings continued, but the RAF had broken the back of the German bombing of Britain as a prelude to invasion. Never again could the Germans throw so many planes at England; the RAF would match them plane for plane. The planned invasion of 1940 was put off until the next year, but after “Lend Lease” was passed by Congress and FDR was re-elected, in 1941 Germany instead attacked the Soviet Union, taking all of Hitler’s attention. The RAF had saved Britain from invasion.

Churchill said of the RAF, “Never have so many owed so much to so few.”

Today is the 80th Anniversary of that turning point in the war, which is celebrated in the UK as The Battle of Britain Day. God bless Winston Churchill and the RAF and their undaunted courage.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 37 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. James Gawron Inactive
    James Gawron
    @JamesGawron

    Jason Obermeyer (View Comment):

    The idea that German would have invaded Britain was more fanciful than fact. Most of their strategists thought they would have to establish naval as well as air superiority, which was not going to happen in the near term and probably not the long term. The Battle of Britain was more about getting Britain to sue for peace than a conquest plan.

    Jason,

    This is how the issue was treated in the 1969 movie.

    Regards,

    Jim

    • #31
  2. Jeffery Shepherd Inactive
    Jeffery Shepherd
    @JefferyShepherd

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    This is a summary from the best book I have read this year, “The Splendid and the Vile.” https://ricochet.com/790562/the-splendid-and-the-vile/

    Just finished this book on audible.  It was great.

    • #32
  3. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Jeffery Shepherd (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    This is a summary from the best book I have read this year, “The Splendid and the Vile.” https://ricochet.com/790562/the-splendid-and-the-vile/

    Just finished this book on audible. It was great.

    The best book of the year.  I think that it would be really good on audible.

    • #33
  4. Richard Easton Coolidge
    Richard Easton
    @RichardEaston

    Jeffery Shepherd (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    This is a summary from the best book I have read this year, “The Splendid and the Vile.” https://ricochet.com/790562/the-splendid-and-the-vile/

    Just finished this book on audible. It was great.

    It started off with a huge error. The British and French were optimistic when Churchill became PM on May 10th.  The French had more and better tanks than the Germans. However, they did not anticipate an attack through the Ardennes. Their best mobile troops were on the far left and their command structure was unwieldy.  It’s a big error to read back from the situation on May 20th to that on the 10th. 

    • #34
  5. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

    Jeffery Shepherd (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    This is a summary from the best book I have read this year, “The Splendid and the Vile.” https://ricochet.com/790562/the-splendid-and-the-vile/

    Just finished this book on audible. It was great.

    It started off with a huge error. The British and French were optimistic when Churchill became PM on May 10th. The French had more and better tanks than the Germans. However, they did not anticipate an attack through the Ardennes. Their best mobile troops were on the far left and their command structure was unwieldy. It’s a big error to read back from the situation on May 20th to that on the 10th.

    The French had problems with their tactical doctrine too. Tanks were seen as mostly for support of infantry attacks, and it took too long to shift the infantry. The Germans coming out of the Ardennes was huge, though.

    • #35
  6. Goddess of Discord Member
    Goddess of Discord
    @GoddessofDiscord

    Recently finished The Splendid and the Vile by Erik Larson about the Blitz. Excellent book.

    • #36
  7. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Goddess of Discord (View Comment):

    Recently finished The Splendid and the Vile by Erik Larson about the Blitz. Excellent book.

    The best book of the year!  

     

    • #37
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.