Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. The Benghazi Attack: The Forgotten History of the 2012 Attack on the US Consulate in Libya

 

If you say “September 11,” most people automatically think of the attacks on the World Trade Center buildings and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. What they probably don’t even remember happened on September 11, were the attacks on the United States Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, in 2012.

Once the Libyan Revolution began in February 2011, the CIA began placing assets in the region, attempting to make contacts within the region. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, whose name and image would soon become synonymous with the Benghazi attacks, was the first liaison between the United States and the rebels. The task before the American intelligence community at that time was securing arms in the country, most notably shoulder-fired missiles, taken from the Libyan military.

Eastern Libya and Benghazi were the primary focal points of intelligence-gathering in the country. But there was something else at work here: The CIA was using the country as a base to funnel weapons to anti-Assad forces in Syria, as well as their alleged diplomatic mission.

Early Rumblings of Disorder in Benghazi

Trouble started in April 2012. This was when two former security guards of the consulate threw an IED over the fence. No casualties were reported, but another bomb was thrown at a convoy just four days later. Soon after, in May, the office of the International Red Cross in Benghazi was attacked and the local al-Qaeda affiliate claimed responsibility. On August 6, the Red Cross suspended operations in Libya.

This was all part of a troubling escalation of violence in the region. The British Ambassador Dominic Asquith was the victim of an assassination attempt on June 10, 2012. As a result of this and of rocket attacks on convoys, the British withdrew their entire consular staff from Libya in late June of that year.

American military and consular personnel on the scene were increasingly troubled by the situation and communicated their concerns to top brass through official channels. Two security guards in the consulate noticed a Libyan police officer (or at least someone dressed as one) taking pictures of the building, which raised alarms. Indeed, consular officials had been requesting additional security as far back as March.

On June 6, 2012, a large hole was blown in the wall of the consulate gate. It was estimated that 40 men could go through the hole in the wall. In July, the State Department informed officials on the ground that the existing security contract would not be renewed. On August 2, Ambassador Stephens requested additional security detail. The State Department responded by completely removing his security detail three days later. Three days after this, his security detail had left Libya entirely. On August 16, the regional security officer warned then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that the security situation in Libya was “dire.”

The Day of the Attack on Benghazi: The Cover-Up Begins

The September 11, 2012 attack was actually two attacks by two separate militias. The first was the attack on the diplomatic mission, the second was a mortar attack on the CIA annex. But the attacks themselves were effectively watched in real-time by the White House, thanks to security drones in the region. By 5:10 pm ET, President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta were watching real-time footage via a drone deployed to the area. 

Half an hour later, the State Department officially refused to deploy the Foreign Emergency Support Team (FEST). FEST exists specifically for rapid response to terrorist attacks around the world and have special training with regard to defending American embassies. Within three hours, an Islamic group in the region had claimed responsibility for the attack. Approximately six hours after the first shots were fired, two former Navy SEALs who constituted the only serious defense forces for the consulate were killed by enemy fire. The surveillance drone had been watching them fight on their own for over two hours.

At 10:30 that night, Hillary Clinton nebulously blamed “inflammatory material on the Internet” for the attack. The notion that the attack was motivated by Innocence of Muslims was absurd: On the day before the attack, the leader of al-Qaeda in the region called for vengeance due to the death of his secretary. Three days after the attack, Stephens’ personal diary was found unsecured, along with all the other sensitive intelligence information in the compound.

For days, the film was blamed despite the White House having full knowledge that it was a terrorist attack. Indeed, on September 14, Barack Obama promised the father of one of the slain Navy SEALs not that he would bring to justice those who planned the attack, but the man who made the movie.

On September 20, 2012, the White House spent $70,000 on apology videos for the film. One day later, ten days after the attack, Clinton admitted to the public what she had known for over a week: That this was a coordinated terrorist attack. However, on the 25th, President Barack Obama addressed the United Nations once again blaming the video, giving what is perhaps one of the more memorable quotes of his presidency: “The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam.”

On September 27, 2012, Nakoula Basseley Nakoula was arrested in Los Angeles for parole violations, all of which were related to his production of the film and served a year in jail. He was later sentenced to death in absentia by the Egyptian government.

Barack Obama did not attend his daily intelligence briefing for six consecutive days prior to the attacks, instead campaigning for re-election against Mitt Romney.

Susan Rice, then acting as the United States Ambassador to the United Nations, made the rounds on no fewer than five major Sunday morning talk shows, a process known as “the Full Ginsburg.” On these shows, she was armed with a set of talking points from the CIA. These talking points included the false assertion that these were spontaneous protests inspired by similar protests against the American Embassy in Cairo, with no connection to institutional terrorism.

The Rice appearances and the talking points she was provided with further confirm a general pattern: The Obama Administration was fundamentally incapable of acknowledging who the real enemy was. And when things went wrong, the focus was not on setting them right to protect Americans in the future, but on protecting the image of the Obama Administration – most notably the President and the Secretary of State. Hence the blame was shifted from Islamic terrorist groups onto a YouTube video.

Continue reading The Benghazi Attack: The Forgotten History of the 2012 Attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya at Ammo.com.

Published in Politics
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

There are 9 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Hoyacon Member

    If a Republican had been in the White House, this would be considered a major scandal.

    Of course, if a Republican had been in the White House, it might not have happened.

    It’s just insipid that this is fading in the national memory banks considering the loss of life by heroes.

     

    • #1
    • September 11, 2020, at 3:18 PM PDT
    • 1 like
  2. Ammo.com Member
    Ammo.com

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    If a Republican had been in the White House, this would be considered a major scandal.

    Of course, if a Republican had been in the White House, it might not have happened.

    It’s just insipid that this is fading in the national memory banks considering the loss of life by heroes.

    Only makes you wonder how much goes completely unregistered by the public. If the Obama administration could have kept this completely underwraps, I’m sure they would have. And it’s a two-sided coin – I’ve always wondered if we ever would have known if Dick Cheney had accidentally killed Harry Whittington instead of just winging him.

    • #2
    • September 12, 2020, at 10:41 AM PDT
    • 1 like
  3. 9thDistrictNeighbor Member

    “What difference, at this point, does it make?”

    • #3
    • September 12, 2020, at 8:29 PM PDT
    • 2 likes
  4. Front Seat Cat Member

    Their foreign policy and all that they touched went sour. This administration fueled the Arab Spring that turned into the Arab disaster, gave billions to Iran and snubbed Israel. That administration stoked the racial divide, which is where we find ourselves today. While they flew rainbows over the WH, they were making a mess of everything else. What actual accomplishments can Obama or Hilary actually take credit for?

    • #4
    • September 13, 2020, at 6:26 AM PDT
    • 3 likes
  5. MISTER BITCOIN Member

    “The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam.”

    I still can’t believe Obama said this.

    Why did Obama, Hillary and Susan Rice sacrifice Christopher Stevens?

    This whole episode makes me sick.

     

    • #5
    • September 13, 2020, at 11:56 AM PDT
    • 3 likes
  6. MISTER BITCOIN Member

    Front Seat Cat (View Comment):

    Their foreign policy and all that they touched went sour. This administration fueled the Arab Spring that turned into the Arab disaster, gave billions to Iran and snubbed Israel. That administration stoked the racial divide, which is where we find ourselves today. While they flew rainbows over the WH, they were making a mess of everything else. What actual accomplishments can Obama or Hilary actually take credit for?

    Alienating our allies?

    Creating internal and external divisions?

    I guess this is why it’s important to have a President who doesn’t hate America

     

    • #6
    • September 13, 2020, at 11:59 AM PDT
    • 3 likes
  7. Podkayne of Israel Member

    MISTER BITCOIN (View Comment):

    “The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam.”

    I still can’t believe Obama said this.

    Why did Obama, Hillary and Susan Rice sacrifice Christopher Stevens?

    This whole episode makes me sick.

     

    I doubt they planned it. I don’t think they were competent enough to do that.

    • #7
    • September 13, 2020, at 2:32 PM PDT
    • 2 likes
  8. Flicker Coolidge

    Podkayne of Israel (View Comment):

    MISTER BITCOIN (View Comment):

    “The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam.”

    I still can’t believe Obama said this.

    Why did Obama, Hillary and Susan Rice sacrifice Christopher Stevens?

    This whole episode makes me sick.

    I doubt they planned it. I don’t think they were competent enough to do that.

    Maybe he was just a bump in the road.

    • #8
    • September 13, 2020, at 3:17 PM PDT
    • 1 like
  9. Cow Girl Thatcher

    I am 100% certain that there are still a huge amount of Americans who still believe the original version that the Obama administration peddled. They have no reason to believe that the Chosen One would ever have allowed something untoward, nor that Hillary would have not told the entire truth. This incident is simply dismissed in their minds as one of those things that can happen. 

    And then, don’t even get me started on that quote about the Prophet of Islam…from a United States president–to the United Nations–after the death of an ambassador and an attack on a U.S. embassy!!

    • #9
    • September 13, 2020, at 3:50 PM PDT
    • 2 likes