The Democrat Dream Ticket

 

Joe Biden has been a Washington politician for nearly 50 years.  His racist statements are legendary, as are his habitual inappropriate touching and sniffing of women and young girls.  His corruption has made him and his family incredibly wealthy, earning millions and millions of dollars by selling influence to foreign interests. He is clearly suffering from rapidly advancing dementia, and at times seems to lose track of where he is.

Given the 22 candidates in the Democrat primary, I suspect that most Republicans would have selected Biden as the easiest to beat in the general election, with maybe two to three exceptions. Kamala Harris slept her way into politics, then used ruthless politics to work her way into national prominence. She exudes the warmth of Hillary Clinton and the ethics of, well, Hillary Clinton.

I only bring all this up to point out that this team of Biden and Harris are going to win around half the vote in the upcoming election. This says a lot about today’s Democratic Party, and it says even more about today’s Democrat voters. I understand that Donald Trump is a hard guy to like. But it’s hard to argue that until COVID, America was doing extremely well under his leadership. Anyone who looks at this situation and decides to vote for Biden/Harris, well, that is simply extraordinary. And tens of millions of Americans are about to do exactly that. Which brings a few questions to my mind:

  1. Who could the Democratic Party possibly nominate who would not get about half the vote in a presidential election? The mind boggles.
  2. Why did Bernie Sanders withdraw from the race when he did?
  3. Who selected Kamala Harris?
  4. Is it possible that the Democrats intend to replace Biden as their presidential nominee before the election?
  5. Are there any Democrat voters out there, looking at their presidential ticket and thinking, “Oh heavens no…?”

If we have mail-in ballots in this election, it doesn’t matter who either party nominates – the Democrats will win, and win big.

But without mail-in ballots, I just can’t imagine Biden/Harris winning more than 10-15 states. But again, I’ll bet they will, somehow.

American politics – it’s bonkers right now.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 70 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Jim McConnell Member
    Jim McConnell
    @JimMcConnell

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):

    Really cynical thought:

    Did Obama agree to support Biden, in exchange for getting to choose his VP? Thus, Obama could control American politics for nearly 2 decades?

    Except that I don’t think Obama is really into politics that kind of corruption. My view of Obama is that he’s pretty lazy; he got everything he was after — adulation from a certain segment of the population and a very large pot full of money. He’s enjoying life now without having to lift a finger.

    • #31
  2. Unsk Member
    Unsk
    @Unsk

     Me: One of the huge outcomes of Trumps 4 EO’s on Saturday is that it effectively takes national mail in ballots off the table.

    Drew: I don’t follow.

    Drew, the CoronaVirus relief bill put forward by the Democrats were demands that Mail In Voting be put in place on a national  level with no verification of legal voting status. With the Senate RINO’s perfidy, that had a real possibility of passing.  Trump’s EO’s essentially removed the need for a CoronaVirus Relief bill entirely before the election, so the Democrats most plausible avenue to getting Mail In Voting has been denied.

    Also not covered in the media , is that the Dem CoronaVirus Relief Bill had massive funding injections for those Blue States and Cities who have gone into a serious lockdown. Again that is kaput, which for a state like mine, California, I would think is a real problem.  Our Governor Newsome has already complained the Trump’s $400 a week injection of cash to the unemployed will cost California $700 million a week, which California clearly doesn’t have. I wouldn’t doubt that California state tax revenue are down over 50% because my state is so addicted to taxing the rich, whose income is way down,  up the wazzoo. 

    • #32
  3. Goldwaterwoman Thatcher
    Goldwaterwoman
    @goldwaterwoman

    Dr. Bastiat (View Comment):
    American politics is bonkers right now.

    I have long thought that voters should be able to answer the following simple questions before receiving their ballot to vote for president:

    1)Who is the president of the US and what is his party affiliation?

    2)Who is the vice president and what is his party?

    3)Who is the leader of the US House of Representatives and  his/her party?

    4)Who is the US Senate Majority Leader and what is his party?

    Anyone who can’t answer those questions has absolutely no right to make a monumental decision that affects the entire country.

    • #33
  4. James Anderson Inactive
    James Anderson
    @JamesAnderson

    What kind of fraud mechanisms are going into the mail in ballot?  I don’t see how they could print unique ids on each, because you take away the anonymity of the vote.  If its just a simple piece of paper, whats preventing the parties from just printing more and paying volunteers to add stamps to stuff the vote?

    • #34
  5. Basil Fawlty Member
    Basil Fawlty
    @BasilFawlty

    James Anderson (View Comment):
    What kind of fraud mechanisms are going into the mail in ballot? I don’t see how they could print unique ids on each, because you take away the anonymity of the vote.

    We don’t need no stinkin’ Australian ballots.

    • #35
  6. Joseph Stanko Coolidge
    Joseph Stanko
    @JosephStanko

    James Anderson (View Comment):

    What kind of fraud mechanisms are going into the mail in ballot? I don’t see how they could print unique ids on each, because you take away the anonymity of the vote. If its just a simple piece of paper, whats preventing the parties from just printing more and paying volunteers to add stamps to stuff the vote?

    It’s not anonymous: you have to sign the envelope you mail in, and they compare your signature to the one on file when you registered to vote.

    • #36
  7. Jon1979 Inactive
    Jon1979
    @Jon1979

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Biden’s “inner circle” (Biden himself is comatose) knows that the Left has nowhere to go in this election except for the Biden ticket. 

    So, while Harris doesn’t really gain Biden anything, Biden (I mean, Biden’s inner circle) figures that they don’t lose much either.

    There’s a belief among political wonks that a Vice Presidential pick doesn’t gain any presidential candidate any votes. But a Vice Presidential pick can cause a presidential candidate to lose votes. So, the Biden “brain trust” (contradiction in terms?) decided that Kamala Harris is the least worst alternative, the one who hurts Biden the least. 

    That’s my guess. 

    Also, the Biden “brain trust” thinks that Biden is ahead of Trump by about 6 to 10 percentage points in the polls, running about even with Trump in states like Georgia, Texas, Iowa and Ohio. So, they figure that they can coast to November as long as they don’t choose a open (as opposed to a secret) Castro admirer like Karen Bass.

    This could work out like the prevent defense in professional football and cause a loss for the Biden-Harris ticket or maybe they actually can coast for 12 more weeks. With a compliant media giving Biden-Harris a helping hand, who’s to say that the Biden brain trust is wrong?

    I think the question there is what do the hardcore radicals who refuse to stop their rioting do, and what does the new ticket do in reaction? The media has allowed Biden to bunker himself for the better part of five months now, where when he is allowed into the light and makes a gaffe, he’s yanked back into the basement again without much questioning. I don’t think you can bunker Kamala Harris in the same way and have both halves of the ticket go into radio silence for the next 80 days if the left continues to refuse to behave itself, and that’s where her AG history and the left’s open hatred of law enforcement may come into conflict.

    • #37
  8. Vince Guerra Inactive
    Vince Guerra
    @VinceGuerra


    Yep, we’ve got plenty to work with here. Dream ticket indeed.

    • #38
  9. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    Harris was a pick out of weakness.  What does a California Liberal, black feminist, one term senator give Biden that he already doesn’t have?  At least Hillary knew that she had to win Virginia and so picked Keane.  Biden needed to pick a governor.  But he had boxed himself into a corner.  Trump advantage.

    • #39
  10. Jim Wright Inactive
    Jim Wright
    @JimW

    Percival (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat: She exudes the warmth of Hillary Clinton and the ethics of, well, Hillary Clinton.

    Ouch.

    In fairness to Harris, I don’t get from her the same “I hate everything about you and can’t wait to make your life a living hell” vibe that Hillary exuded through every pore.

    Kamala isn’t likely to get my vote, but compared to her Hillary is something eldritch out of H.P. Lovecraft.

    • #40
  11. Jules PA Inactive
    Jules PA
    @JulesPA

    Unsk (View Comment):
    Could it ever get any better than that?

    Joe & Kamala make a baby? 

    • #41
  12. James Gawron Inactive
    James Gawron
    @JamesGawron

    Dr. B,

    More like the Democratic nightmare ticket. A senile bigot teamed up with the hottest piece of xxx in the senate. Pardon me I’ve got to go puke.

    Regards,

    Jim

    • #42
  13. Jules PA Inactive
    Jules PA
    @JulesPA

    Joseph Stanko (View Comment):

    James Anderson (View Comment):

    What kind of fraud mechanisms are going into the mail in ballot? I don’t see how they could print unique ids on each, because you take away the anonymity of the vote. If its just a simple piece of paper, whats preventing the parties from just printing more and paying volunteers to add stamps to stuff the vote?

    It’s not anonymous: you have to sign the envelope you mail in, and they compare your signature to the one on file when you registered to vote.

    in PA you get an email when you ballot is counted. definitely not anonymous. I bypass for that reason alone. 

    • #43
  14. Jon1979 Inactive
    Jon1979
    @Jon1979

    Jim Wright (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat: She exudes the warmth of Hillary Clinton and the ethics of, well, Hillary Clinton.

    Ouch.

    In fairness to Harris, I don’t get from her the same “I hate everything about you and can’t wait to make your life a living hell” vibe that Hillary exuded through every pore.

    Kamala isn’t likely to get my vote, but compared to her Hillary is something eldritch out of H.P. Lovecraft.

    The most passionate hatred shown towards Harris seems to revolve around her lack of concern for civil liberties, whether it’s uneven enforcement of drug laws or her attempt to use the power of the state against abortion opponents. Gabbard at the second debate gave voice to that first concern, but it’s one the Trump people need to tiptoe lightly around, since hitting Kamala for putting people in jail for drug violations might not play all that badly in certain areas, where city governments have allowed the drug trade to flourish in recent months due to their deliberate pullback in policing.

    The second attack point is better, because it goes toward cancel culture and using the power of progressive government to silence people who voice contrary opinions. That also goes to countering the spin of the moment by Democrats in the media that Harris is a moderate, and puts her in the same type of mindset as the woke politicians around the country who have used their powers to punish people who disagree with them.

    • #44
  15. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    Jim Wright (View Comment):

    Kamala isn’t likely to get my vote, but compared to her Hillary is something eldritch out of H.P. Lovecraft.

    But, to be fair, eldritch monsters out of Lovecraft are kind of cool.

    • #45
  16. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Jim Wright (View Comment):

    Kamala isn’t likely to get my vote, but compared to her Hillary is something eldritch out of H.P. Lovecraft.

    But, to be fair, eldritch monsters out of Lovecraft are kind of cool.

    Not if Hillary is one of them.

    • #46
  17. Randy Weivoda Moderator
    Randy Weivoda
    @RandyWeivoda

    Charlotte (View Comment):

    Literally everything about 2020 makes me want to barf.

    I’m sure there is something about 2020 that is really good.  Just give me a couple days to think of something.   I’ve got it already!  A couple of my Ricochet friends are having a baby, probably in a few weeks.

    • #47
  18. Dr. Bastiat Member
    Dr. Bastiat
    @drbastiat

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):

    I say this with great affection for you Dr. Bastiat, I aspire to your quality of writing and daydream that I could have your fecundity of letters. But you need to wrap your head around that people do what it takes to move up in social status and to feel good about themselves and nothing else

    And from a practical and evolutionary basis, why shouldn’t they? You get ahead by accepting foolishness. Why bother reading Thomas Sowell if people will sneer at you at a party and you can’t change anyone’s mind with evidence? We are genetically designed to fire social ostracism. The people who were socially ostracized tended to end up dead for most of human history and all of human pre-history.

    @henrycastaigne

    First of all, thank you for your kind words.  They mean a lot to me.

    But as you might have guessed, I disagree with your statement that I bolded above.  Although Lord knows, you have adequate evidence in the human record to back up your assertion.  And some actions that I might describe as “noble” you might dismiss as someone just trying to feel good about themselves.  And you’d probably be right.

    When it comes to groups of people (mobs), I agree with your statement wholeheartedly.

    But I consider individual humans capable of so much more than that.  And we frequently do demonstrate more honorable motivations.  

    I hope I’m right.  But I can certainly understand your perspective.

    • #48
  19. Charlotte Member
    Charlotte
    @Charlotte

    Randy Weivoda (View Comment):

    Charlotte (View Comment):

    Literally everything about 2020 makes me want to barf.

    I’m sure there is something about 2020 that is really good. Just give me a couple days to think of something. I’ve got it already! A couple of my Ricochet friends are having a baby, probably in a few weeks.

    Excellent. Yay new baby in 2020!! Good for them.

    • #49
  20. ctlaw Coolidge
    ctlaw
    @ctlaw

    Dr. Bastiat: She exudes the warmth of Hillary Clinton and the ethics of, well, Hillary Clinton.

    Hillary’s last minute plan to derail the pairing went horribly awry:

    https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/wwe-james-kamala-harris-dead-70

    • #50
  21. DrewInWisconsin, Unhelpful Communicator Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Unhelpful Communicator
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Jim Wright (View Comment):
    In fairness to Harris, I don’t get from her the same “I hate everything about you and can’t wait to make your life a living hell” vibe that Hillary exuded through every pore.

    In contrast, out of all the Dem candidates, I found her the most frightening.

    • #51
  22. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    ctlaw (View Comment):

    Dr. Bastiat: She exudes the warmth of Hillary Clinton and the ethics of, well, Hillary Clinton.

    Hillary’s last minute plan to derail the pairing went horribly awry:

    https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/wwe-james-kamala-harris-dead-70

    I laughed.

    • #52
  23. Jules PA Inactive
    Jules PA
    @JulesPA

    Found this on PJ media

     

    • #53
  24. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Jon1979 (View Comment):
    The most passionate hatred shown towards Harris seems to revolve around her lack of concern for civil liberties, whether it’s uneven enforcement of drug laws or her attempt to use the power of the state against abortion opponents. Gabbard at the second debate gave voice to that first concern, but it’s one the Trump people need to tiptoe lightly around, since hitting Kamala for putting people in jail for drug violations might not play all that badly in certain areas, where city governments have allowed the drug trade to flourish in recent months due to their deliberate pullback in policing.

    I don’t know about that. Trump worked for and signed the First Step Act. Kamala locked them up; Donald let them back out again. If she has to defend her record, that’s bad. If Biden has to do it, that’s funny.

    • #54
  25. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    I just saw all that Harris had said about Biden’s flaws (race, groping) and that is devastating.  She brings up all of Biden’s negatives.  This may be a horrendous pick.  Maybe she wasn’t the safest pick after all.

    • #55
  26. HeavyWater Inactive
    HeavyWater
    @HeavyWater

    Percival (View Comment):

    Jon1979 (View Comment):
    The most passionate hatred shown towards Harris seems to revolve around her lack of concern for civil liberties, whether it’s uneven enforcement of drug laws or her attempt to use the power of the state against abortion opponents. Gabbard at the second debate gave voice to that first concern, but it’s one the Trump people need to tiptoe lightly around, since hitting Kamala for putting people in jail for drug violations might not play all that badly in certain areas, where city governments have allowed the drug trade to flourish in recent months due to their deliberate pullback in policing.

    I don’t know about that. Trump worked for and signed the First Step Act. Kamala locked them up; Donald let them back out again. If she has to defend her record, that’s bad. If Biden has to do it, that’s funny.

    Good point regarding the First Step Act.  I am surprised Trump signed that legislation.  It seemed to go against his law and order instincts.  

    • #56
  27. DrewInWisconsin, Unhelpful Communicator Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Unhelpful Communicator
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Percival (View Comment):

    Jon1979 (View Comment):
    The most passionate hatred shown towards Harris seems to revolve around her lack of concern for civil liberties, whether it’s uneven enforcement of drug laws or her attempt to use the power of the state against abortion opponents. Gabbard at the second debate gave voice to that first concern, but it’s one the Trump people need to tiptoe lightly around, since hitting Kamala for putting people in jail for drug violations might not play all that badly in certain areas, where city governments have allowed the drug trade to flourish in recent months due to their deliberate pullback in policing.

    I don’t know about that. Trump worked for and signed the First Step Act. Kamala locked them up; Donald let them back out again. If she has to defend her record, that’s bad. If Biden has to do it, that’s funny.

    If the press actually reports on Trump’s First Step Act, or makes this comparison, that’s miraculous.

    • #57
  28. DrewInWisconsin, Unhelpful Communicator Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Unhelpful Communicator
    @DrewInWisconsin

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Good point regarding the First Step Act. I am surprised Trump signed that legislation. It seemed to go against his law and order instincts.

     But not his people instincts. The President actually likes people, wants them to do well, and wants to help them succeed.

    • #58
  29. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    DrewInWisconsin, Unhelpful Com… (View Comment):
     But not his people instincts. The President actually likes people, wants them to do well, and wants to help them succeed.

    That is so odd. I mean liking people?

    • #59
  30. Aaron Miller Inactive
    Aaron Miller
    @AaronMiller

    Dr. Bastiat: Is it possible that the Democrats intend to replace Biden as their presidential nominee before the election?

    Tucker Carlson says Kamala Harris has always been an empty vessel willing to say or do anything to get elected. If so, then she was selected to be a puppet like Biden. Even if Biden must step down before or after the election, which is unlikely, the Democratic President would be a pawn. 

    The choice this election is between Donald Trump and unknown powers. 

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.