Your friend Jim George thinks you'd be a great addition to Ricochet, so we'd like to offer you a special deal: You can become a member for no initial charge for one month!
Ricochet is a community of like-minded people who enjoy writing about and discussing politics (usually of the center-right nature), culture, sports, history, and just about every other topic under the sun in a fully moderated environment. We’re so sure you’ll like Ricochet, we’ll let you join and get your first month for free. Kick the tires: read the always eclectic member feed, write some posts, join discussions, participate in a live chat or two, and listen to a few of our over 50 (free) podcasts on every conceivable topic, hosted by some of the biggest names on the right, for 30 days on us. We’re confident you’re gonna love it.
Money talks.
If the Washington Redskins can be forced to change their name using loss of money as a lever, so can public universities. Red states would do well to cut the budgets of every school by an amount equal to their “XYZ Studies” programs and their “Inclusion and Diversity” staff. Better yet, don’t cut the funding – transfer the money to women’s sports. Let’s see the school administrations twist their heads into pretzels trying to come up with arguments against that . . .
I found your post very thought-provoking, and I really want to applaud your detailed and action-based proposal (rather than just a “call-to-thought.”) I also agree with much of your rationale. But I am trying to sort through some of the obvious logistical challenges, and I wondered if you could provide more specifics. These a good-faith questions.
The biggest issue is this: If you call for diversifying the ideology of a faculty, how do you define “ideology?” And how will it be measured? Are you calling for more conservatives on the faculties, or more members of the Republican party? If you are calling for more conservatives, will this simply be a self-report check-mark on a paper application? Or will there have to be a more nuanced and in-depth determination? (Say, a response to an essay question; and again, who is the judge?) Defining “conservative” is a pretty difficult proposition; we have trouble with that on this web site — I’m wondering how you would find some sort of consensus out there as to what it even means. And if it is membership in the Republican party, are you actually making belonging to a political party grounds for employment? And what about Independents? Or people who decide to switch parties later in their careers? Are we talking about a quota system, based on the party-make-up of a state? And does the quota change with the changing party-membership of the state? A state may be Republican today, but what happens if their ideology shifts a decade later — will professors hired during the Republican era suddenly have their jobs on the line?
And this just concerns the paper-application process. It is not unusual for there to be over 100 applications for any single teaching position at a college or university. I’m just trying to imagine how you find conservative/Republican candidates to even interview. Actually, I suppose the first REAL question is how you get conservative/Republican candidates to apply in the first place — how many actually do apply, or don’t, and why they don’t. (That may be the first issue to fix … but that’s probably another post altogether.)
The fact that even red states have these monolithic academic institutions, publicly funded to boot, has frustrated me for years. I have wondered why an organization like ALEC (the American Legislative Exchange Council) (though it’s become a favorite boogey-man of the NPR-listening Left) doesn’t organize an effort like this in the red states. It’s bad enough that this complete Leftist domination of public universities goes on in CA, WA, and NY, but why on earth are the taxpayers of ND, TN, and TX stuck funding this?
Maybe the answer is simply to make the public universities prove that they’ve removed all ideological litmus tests. No fealty oaths to diversity, LGBT causes, safe spaces, etc. No academic record checking for a history of such allegiances. Let conservatives compete.
There’s been a discussion of stopping federal funding of universities, which they would really scream about. More than that, I wonder if the state governors and legislatures have the authority to exercise the power you specifically describe. I’m all for it, if they do!
What is the difference between most non-profit universities and those old scam for-profit universities. Both took money knowing that the students were not going to get a good job. A scam is a scam. The government should require all schools taking federal dollars to give students a cost/benefit-ROI analysis of their degree choice and what their employment prospects are compared with taking the same thing at a community college. We need a lot fewer people spending $70K/year to study art history and more people paying $5K/year to study plumbing.
They need to do three things.
They need to wipe out the accreditation system. This is just a gatekeeping system so people can make money off of higher education. It does not enhance the development of human capital.
In technical fields or subject they need to simply switch to certifications. It’s your own business how you pass the test.
The next thing they need to do is make college largely a al carte. There is nothing wrong with liberal arts but they charge too much for it and you should not be forced to take it. If you want to go through a system where they force you to take it that will be available.
I suppose the main people that can drive this are conservatives and whoever hires the kids.
So true! I deeply appreciate the thoughtful action plan for recovering these lost institutions, but from my view, the corruption of higher education is beyond reform. Better to bypass it entirely. The best way to do that is to make it obsolete. And the best way to make it obsolete is to take away its monopolistic power to “credential” a person.
Ever since Griggs vs. Duke Power Co., businesses have been effectively banned from giving job applicants aptitude tests for high level jobs. That turned out to be boon to colleges and universities. American business had suddenly lost its discretion to screen applicants by its own lights. It had to effectively outsource its employee screening processes to the higher ed establishment. That’s why everyone has to go to university. That’s why universities have grown so powerful. An American business cannot let you walk in the door and sit for a few days of testing even if you both want to. That’s how high the civil liabilities are under Griggs.
If Congressional Republicans are interested in NOTHING ELSE, they should pass a federal law overturning the effect of the Griggs decision. Imagine a kid graduating from high school, going straight to some high tech company and sitting for a week of tests. The tests show a strong aptitude for “X” and they offer him an apprenticeship and off he goes. No more mass anti-American indoctrination at Second Tier U!! Getting rid of Griggs would do more to break the power of our anti-American colleges and universities than anything I can think of.
Right. I forgot about that.
Really good post, sir.
One of the best things I’ve ever heard on this is Nick Gillespie of Reason Magazine interviewed Thaddeus Russell. He has a website called Renegade History. Great podcast. He just nails accreditation. He’s hiring all kinds of professors that can’t get jobs they are satisfied with and setting them up to teach online.
All education should be about developing human capital at a fair price. That is not what is happening in any way. Yesterdays Dan Proft podcast laid out all of the crazy social demands and money demands of the LA teachers union or something like that. Why can’t people see the education system is just an edifice for theft.
The Universities can’t be saved. Your prescriptions expect a lot from politicians, and frankly, I haven’t seen any evidence in my lifetime to suggest that there is any more than a tiny fraction of them that would have the guts required to take on this sort of effort. Therefore a political solution is virtually impossible.
You can’t rely on politicians to take action. You must take action yourself.
Mindlessly sending your kids to University is like feeding them toxic garbage. Why would you do that to your children?
It’s unfortunate that there is no place to get a “liberal” education. Supposedly this develops the mind and character and is good for the country. I suppose homeschooling and some co-ops are really the only thing. They have a great private school here in Minnesota I forget what it’s called. Very Judeo Christian and sort of constitutionally oriented. Traditional education.
The country needs a lot of sharp libertarians and conservatives.
This is exactly what we are doing with our four kids: Homeschooling all. We aren’t even saving for college, rather we just started stock accounts that they may use for buying property, buying or starting a business, paying for the higher education they choose, or travel. There is not value in college like there used to be, especially in second or third-tier schools. I think young people’s time would be better spent learning a trade or starting a business.
Higher education is due for a big disruption soon, between COVID showing that most learning can take place remotely, and employer’s knowledge that a college degree doesn’t guarantee even minimal competence in math, writing, or critical thinking.
99th percentile overpriced. It costs way too much for what you get.
Even the ones with huge endowments . . .
I would like to see the Federal government get out of the business of guaranteeing student loans altogether. Put lending organizations totally on the hook financially for student loans, and we’ll see if Little Allie Antifa can get a $100,000k loan for her BA in Women’s Studies at the University of Woke . . .
And now we have basketball coaches and others asking the NCAA to end the SAT/ACT requirement for athletes:
https://footballscoop.com/news/basketball-coaches-association-calls-for-ncaa-to-stop-considering-sat-act-scores/
Just another bigoted way of saying black athletes can’t cut it academically . . .
They cannot fix themselves and we don’t want the government taking over, and if parents don’t pay enough attention to guide their children to sensible schools, what do the rest of us do? As a minimum stop paying a cent for any of them, no federal money for college at all but fix the public schools immediately by eliminating all, that’s all as in every single person, of the public school bureaucratic over structure, i.e. make them all independent, run by teachers and parents and dependent on enrolement so they have to compete with each other for kids. Bad teachers cost and get replaced. New Zealand did this and went from the bottom of the west to the top almost overnight. This is perhaps the most urgent issue we face.
The University of Minnesota Duluth just did this. In my opinion, this is simply about keeping the gravy train going as long as they can. They don’t care what happens to these kids except for them being brainwashed.
Homeschooling has its place, but sooner or later, it becomes just another surrender option – repeating the same abandoning of the institutions that brought us here.
Many conservatives think they can avoid the fight by choosing to homeschool or pay for private schools – even though their taxes are paying for the public school down the street. These people are totalitarians – very soon, even that avenue of surrender will no longer be an option.
Some woke education department or child services bureaucrat may just decide that your child is spending too much time on Booker T. Washington and James Madison instead of Harvey Milk and Jazz Jennings.
Save your children and grandchildren.
To the extent you can, get on the school board, got to school board and PTA meetings, review school curricula and text books amd watch over your kids’ education like a hawk.
Or the millions more kids who don’t get homeschooled, who instead get indoctrinated at public schools will get to have their way with your children and grandchildren when they grow up.
It is interesting that you characterize homeschooling as an “avenue of surrender.” We are not “avoid[ing] the fight,” we are peacefully resisting and undermining the government monopoly. It is something practical that just about any conservative can do right now. Most don’t because they unthinkingly surrender to the inertia of cultural convention on what constitutes “proper education” (it’s how they were educated as kids, and how all other normal kids are educated now), or they just need to surrender their children to indoctrination day camps so that both parents can go to their corporate jobs to support their suburban middle-class lifestyles.