The Man is a Boor and a Bore

 

Let me say first that I still plan on voting for Trump in November. He’s done great things for the economy, for unemployment, new job creation, and has done a pretty good job on coronavirus, sanctioned Iran, supported Israel, as well as other achievements.

But my ability to listen to the man has been tapped out.

I know he can do whatever he wants when he calls a press conference, but he announced he was going to speak about China, which he did for about a total of (generously) 10 minutes of the 52 minutes he spoke, mostly at the end. I was about to tear out my hair listening to the same liturgy about all his achievements; I can almost recite them along with him. And don’t try to tell me that he’s doing it for all those people who’ve not heard him provide his long list of claims. By now, I’ll bet most people can recite them right along with me: more virus tests than anyone in the world, ventilators, respirators, facilities, testing leads to more cases, improved black employment, punishing China. It makes me crazy.

At this point, I realize he will not change his style or content. I know that he loves to hear himself talk. I know that he misses campaign rallies (which was essentially what he gave tonight). I know that he doesn’t care about persuading anyone to vote for him except his base: screw the independents or doubting Liberals.

I also know that many of you will want to persuade me to (1) stop listening to him; (2) accept his job performance, not his personality; and (3) just vote for him in November.

I will vote for him.

But I will go to the polls gritting my teeth.

Published in Elections
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 285 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Arvo (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin Doesn’t C… (View Comment):
    I would think it would resonate with anyone who believes in a government “of the people, by the people, for the people”…

    Your lofty estimation of the engagement of the average American voter is heartwarming.

    Alas, I think the example of the mean is the guy on American Idol. They were shooting in Hawaii, and he was startled by military aircraft overhead. He asked, “What’s the deal with all the jets?” Someone answered, “We’re next to Pearl Harbor.” He really said, I’m not kidding, surprised, “Pearl Harbor? That’s a real place? I thought it was just a movie.”

    And he’ll probably vote Democrat.

    Fixed it for you. :-)

    • #271
  2. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    I could be wrong, but I just don’t see many people who voted for Trump in 2016 – if only to defeat Hillary – being so put off by… whatever… that they would just stay home THIS time and let Biden win. 

    On the other hand, many of those who DIDN’T vote in 2016 because Trump was a “risky, unknown quantity” have had 4 years to see that he selects good judges, etc.

    As Michael Garibaldi said, he always gives people room to disappoint him.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEX-XNnSrck

    • #272
  3. Mark Camp Member
    Mark Camp
    @MarkCamp

    kedavis (View Comment):

    I could be wrong, but I just don’t see many people who voted for Trump in 2016 – if only to defeat Hillary – being so put off by… whatever… that they would just stay home THIS time and let Biden win.

    On the other hand, many of those who DIDN’T vote in 2016 because Trump was a “risky, unknown quantity” have had 4 years to see that he selects good judges, etc.

    As Michael Garibaldi said, he always gives people room to disappoint him.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEX-XNnSrck

    I think this logical analysis is spot on, thanks.

    • #273
  4. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    kedavis (View Comment):

    I could be wrong, but I just don’t see many people who voted for Trump in 2016 – if only to defeat Hillary – being so put off by… whatever… that they would just stay home THIS time and let Biden win.

    On the other hand, many of those who DIDN’T vote in 2016 because Trump was a “risky, unknown quantity” have had 4 years to see that he selects good judges, etc.

    As Michael Garibaldi said, he always gives people room to disappoint him.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEX-XNnSrck

    Hillary is nails-on-chalkboard and that quality got a lot of people off their duffs to vote against her. Biden is merely pathetic and might not be quite as inspiring. 

    • #274
  5. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Mark Camp (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    I could be wrong, but I just don’t see many people who voted for Trump in 2016 – if only to defeat Hillary – being so put off by… whatever… that they would just stay home THIS time and let Biden win.

    On the other hand, many of those who DIDN’T vote in 2016 because Trump was a “risky, unknown quantity” have had 4 years to see that he selects good judges, etc.

    As Michael Garibaldi said, he always gives people room to disappoint him.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEX-XNnSrck

    I think this logical analysis is spot on, thanks.

    I hope I’m not some kind of oyster that produces one pearl and then I die.  :-)

    • #275
  6. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    TBA (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    I could be wrong, but I just don’t see many people who voted for Trump in 2016 – if only to defeat Hillary – being so put off by… whatever… that they would just stay home THIS time and let Biden win.

    On the other hand, many of those who DIDN’T vote in 2016 because Trump was a “risky, unknown quantity” have had 4 years to see that he selects good judges, etc.

    As Michael Garibaldi said, he always gives people room to disappoint him.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEX-XNnSrck

    Hillary is nails-on-chalkboard and that quality got a lot of people off their duffs to vote against her. Biden is merely pathetic and might not be quite as inspiring.

    Maybe.  But especially considering what else is going on – BLM, etc – it’s difficult to see how any anti-Hillary voter in 2016 would be LESS anti-Biden now.

    • #276
  7. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    kedavis (View Comment):

    TBA (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    I could be wrong, but I just don’t see many people who voted for Trump in 2016 – if only to defeat Hillary – being so put off by… whatever… that they would just stay home THIS time and let Biden win.

    On the other hand, many of those who DIDN’T vote in 2016 because Trump was a “risky, unknown quantity” have had 4 years to see that he selects good judges, etc.

    As Michael Garibaldi said, he always gives people room to disappoint him.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEX-XNnSrck

    Hillary is nails-on-chalkboard and that quality got a lot of people off their duffs to vote against her. Biden is merely pathetic and might not be quite as inspiring.

    Maybe. But especially considering what else is going on – BLM, etc – it’s difficult to see how any anti-Hillary voter in 2016 would be LESS anti-Biden now.

    True, and we haven’t even really started yet. Is Biden even the Dem candidate yet? 

     

    • #277
  8. Mark Camp Member
    Mark Camp
    @MarkCamp

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Mark Camp (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    I could be wrong, but I just don’t see many people who voted for Trump in 2016 – if only to defeat Hillary – being so put off by… whatever… that they would just stay home THIS time and let Biden win.

    On the other hand, many of those who DIDN’T vote in 2016 because Trump was a “risky, unknown quantity” have had 4 years to see that he selects good judges, etc.

    As Michael Garibaldi said, he always gives people room to disappoint him.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEX-XNnSrck

    I think this logical analysis is spot on, thanks.

    I hope I’m not some kind of oyster that produces one pearl and then I die. :-)

    Ingest another grain of sand, and let’s just see what the future brings. As Red Green used to say, “We’re all in this together. I’m rooting for you.”  Or something like that.

    • #278
  9. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Mark Camp (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Mark Camp (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    I could be wrong, but I just don’t see many people who voted for Trump in 2016 – if only to defeat Hillary – being so put off by… whatever… that they would just stay home THIS time and let Biden win.

    On the other hand, many of those who DIDN’T vote in 2016 because Trump was a “risky, unknown quantity” have had 4 years to see that he selects good judges, etc.

    As Michael Garibaldi said, he always gives people room to disappoint him.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEX-XNnSrck

    I think this logical analysis is spot on, thanks.

    I hope I’m not some kind of oyster that produces one pearl and then I die. :-)

    Ingest another grain of sand, and let’s just see what the future brings. As Red Green used to say, “We’re all in this together. I’m rooting for you.” Or something like that.

    Actually I’ve posted numerous pearls on this site, but maybe you haven’t seen them all.  :-)

    • #279
  10. Mark Camp Member
    Mark Camp
    @MarkCamp

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Mark Camp (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Mark Camp (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    I could be wrong, but I just don’t see many people who voted for Trump in 2016 – if only to defeat Hillary – being so put off by… whatever… that they would just stay home THIS time and let Biden win.

    On the other hand, many of those who DIDN’T vote in 2016 because Trump was a “risky, unknown quantity” have had 4 years to see that he selects good judges, etc.

    As Michael Garibaldi said, he always gives people room to disappoint him.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEX-XNnSrck

    I think this logical analysis is spot on, thanks.

    I hope I’m not some kind of oyster that produces one pearl and then I die. :-)

    Ingest another grain of sand, and let’s just see what the future brings. As Red Green used to say, “We’re all in this together. I’m rooting for you.” Or something like that.

    Actually I’ve posted numerous pearls on this site, but maybe you haven’t seen them all. :-)

    Maybe not.  Or maybe not all were seen as pearls. Maybe they all were but maybe I’m not a competent gemologist.

    Not irregardless, my encouragement stands unaltered.

    • #280
  11. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Mark Camp (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Mark Camp (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Mark Camp (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    I could be wrong, but I just don’t see many people who voted for Trump in 2016 – if only to defeat Hillary – being so put off by… whatever… that they would just stay home THIS time and let Biden win.

    On the other hand, many of those who DIDN’T vote in 2016 because Trump was a “risky, unknown quantity” have had 4 years to see that he selects good judges, etc.

    As Michael Garibaldi said, he always gives people room to disappoint him.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEX-XNnSrck

    I think this logical analysis is spot on, thanks.

    I hope I’m not some kind of oyster that produces one pearl and then I die. :-)

    Ingest another grain of sand, and let’s just see what the future brings. As Red Green used to say, “We’re all in this together. I’m rooting for you.” Or something like that.

    Actually I’ve posted numerous pearls on this site, but maybe you haven’t seen them all. :-)

    Maybe not. Or maybe not all were seen as pearls. Maybe they all were but maybe I’m not a competent gemologist.

    Not irregardless, my encouragement stands unaltered.

    Oh I’m not claiming they ALL were pearls, but NUMEROUS were, for sure.  :-)

    • #281
  12. Mark Camp Member
    Mark Camp
    @MarkCamp

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Mark Camp (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Mark Camp (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Mark Camp (View Comment):

    kedavis (View Comment):

    I could be wrong, but I just don’t see many people who voted for Trump in 2016 – if only to defeat Hillary – being so put off by… whatever… that they would just stay home THIS time and let Biden win.

    On the other hand, many of those who DIDN’T vote in 2016 because Trump was a “risky, unknown quantity” have had 4 years to see that he selects good judges, etc.

    As Michael Garibaldi said, he always gives people room to disappoint him.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEX-XNnSrck

    I think this logical analysis is spot on, thanks.

    I hope I’m not some kind of oyster that produces one pearl and then I die. :-)

    Ingest another grain of sand, and let’s just see what the future brings. As Red Green used to say, “We’re all in this together. I’m rooting for you.” Or something like that.

    Actually I’ve posted numerous pearls on this site, but maybe you haven’t seen them all. :-)

    Maybe not. Or maybe not all were seen as pearls. Maybe they all were but maybe I’m not a competent gemologist.

    Not irregardless, my encouragement stands unaltered.

    Oh I’m not claiming they ALL were pearls, but NUMEROUS were, for sure. :-)

    Checking, checking…please hold.

    • #282
  13. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    I’m going to wait until after the elections before I predict who will win. And even that may be jumping the gun.  

    • #283
  14. lowtech redneck Coolidge
    lowtech redneck
    @lowtech redneck

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    I’m going to wait until after the elections before I predict who will win. And even that may be jumping the gun.

    With all the mail-in ballots and likely fraud, you’re not wrong.

    • #284
  15. Mark Camp Member
    Mark Camp
    @MarkCamp

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    I’m going to wait until after the elections before I predict who will win. And even that may be jumping the gun.

    Touché. 

    Twainian.

    • #285
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.