Bullsh*t words/expressions that have got to go! 2020 Edition

 

Bullsh*t, non-English expressions that make people irredeemable to me as soon as they use one. Their original English language meanings have been distorted beyond recognition, and in many cases they now exude that unctuous quality that Our Overlords use to conceal their insidious totalitarianism.

No free thinker as defined as such in 2020 should ever use these cringeworthy expressions. They belong to the mob.

Feel free to add. We need a complete list. I am sick of:

validate

platform, especially as in “give a platform to”

share

problematic

move forward

reach out

story/stories 

conversation

inclusive (x 1000000000!!)

diverse/diversity

community/communities

privilege

listen

support

ally

voice(s)

brown

I am actually tempted to add “white” and “Black.”

Those definitely don’t mean what they actually are.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 189 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Tocqueville Inactive
    Tocqueville
    @Tocqueville

    Got another one:

    empower / empowered / empowerment 

    • #151
  2. Tocqueville Inactive
    Tocqueville
    @Tocqueville

    Another, courtesy of Dad: consensus opinion (especially as related to science, which is not, or shouldn’t be, about consensus).

    • #152
  3. JustmeinAZ Member
    JustmeinAZ
    @JustmeinAZ

    Did anyone mention “intersectionality” yet? Ack! Nails on a chalkboard.

    • #153
  4. Thursby Member
    Thursby
    @Thursby

    “Self-styled”

    ”blah blah gate”

     

    • #154
  5. JimGoneWild Coolidge
    JimGoneWild
    @JimGoneWild

    Anything with “Social” in front of it.

    • #155
  6. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    JimGoneWild (View Comment):

    Anything with “Social” in front of it.

    Or “Studies” behind it.

    • #156
  7. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Thanks to Chris Wallace for these:

    UnpackExplain or analyze or even disentangle would be good meaningful words instead.

    In the weeds.  It may not be used so much now, but confused is a good meaningful adjective.  And for get in the weeds, delve too deeply or over-analyze is fine.

    • #157
  8. DrewInWisconsin, Unhelpful Communicator Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Unhelpful Communicator
    @DrewInWisconsin

    I complained earlier about “ask” as a noun, but a co-worker helpfully reminded me that “get” as a noun is just as awful.

    • #158
  9. Fritz Coolidge
    Fritz
    @Fritz

    DrewInWisconsin, Unhelpful Com… (View Comment):

    I complained earlier about “ask” as a noun, but a co-worker helpfully reminded me that “get” as a noun is just as awful.

    I hate “reveal” as a noun (as in the big reveal . . . ).  Bleecch! The noun “revelation” works just fine.

    • #159
  10. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    DrewInWisconsin, Unhelpful Com… (View Comment):

    I complained earlier about “ask” as a noun, but a co-worker helpfully reminded me that “get” as a noun is just as awful.

    Yes.

    It’s a special moment for a football receiver to achieve the all-time record in touchdown receptions “gets”.

    ALERT: $5,000 reward “get” offered for information leading to the arrest and convict…

    • #160
  11. DrewInWisconsin, Unhelpful Communicator Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Unhelpful Communicator
    @DrewInWisconsin

    I’ve been seeing it in the context of something like “Oh, Famous Person is speaking at your event? That’s quite a get!”

    • #161
  12. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    DrewInWisconsin, Unhelpful Com… (View Comment):

    I complained earlier about “ask” as a noun, but a co-worker helpfully reminded me that “get” as a noun is just as awful.

    Maybe he meant “git.”

    • #162
  13. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Fritz (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Unhelpful Com… (View Comment):

    I complained earlier about “ask” as a noun, but a co-worker helpfully reminded me that “get” as a noun is just as awful.

    I hate “reveal” as a noun (as in the big reveal . . . ). Bleecch! The noun “revelation” works just fine.”

    “Reveal” as a noun is fairly common in my work.  If you put accent strips in concrete walls, they’re called reveals.

    • #163
  14. Jules PA Inactive
    Jules PA
    @JulesPA

    Tocqueville (View Comment):
    thought leaders.

    I’m late to this party, but this one has got to go. 

    • #164
  15. Jules PA Inactive
    Jules PA
    @JulesPA

    Bring back Covfefe!

    • #165
  16. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Unhelpful Com… (View Comment):

    I complained earlier about “ask” as a noun, but a co-worker helpfully reminded me that “get” as a noun is just as awful.

    Maybe he meant “git.”

    https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/3f03aeb8-778f-49b4-a490-51c4b353ab04

    • #166
  17. Tocqueville Inactive
    Tocqueville
    @Tocqueville

    Liberal is not used correctly anymore.

    I am starting to think leftist isn’t good anymore either,

    • #167
  18. DrewInWisconsin, Doormat Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Doormat
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Tocqueville (View Comment):

    Liberal is not used correctly anymore.

    I am starting to think leftist isn’t good anymore either,

    “Insurrectionist.”

    Or maybe just “Enemy”

    • #168
  19. Tocqueville Inactive
    Tocqueville
    @Tocqueville

    DrewInWisconsin, Doormat (View Comment):

    Tocqueville (View Comment):

    Liberal is not used correctly anymore.

    I am starting to think leftist isn’t good anymore either,

    “Insurrectionist.”

    Or maybe just “Enemy”

    Exactly. We are way beyond bickering about the Head Start program at this point. 

    • #169
  20. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Tocqueville (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Doormat (View Comment):

    Tocqueville (View Comment):

    Liberal is not used correctly anymore.

    I am starting to think leftist isn’t good anymore either,

    “Insurrectionist.”

    Or maybe just “Enemy”

    Exactly. We are way beyond bickering about the Head Start program at this point.

    You know, perhaps coincidentally, before the Wuhan, I thought that elections would be more or less fair, and politicians would sugar coat their agendas and things would be more or less civil and potentially winnable.  But now it seems that the election will be “won” by the mob of hecklers vetoing it, and politicians are spouting praise for their new clothes, and the people know he’s lying, and are applauding.

    And rationality and truth are considered historic evils.

    • #170
  21. Tocqueville Inactive
    Tocqueville
    @Tocqueville

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Tocqueville (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Doormat (View Comment):

    Tocqueville (View Comment):

    Liberal is not used correctly anymore.

    I am starting to think leftist isn’t good anymore either,

    “Insurrectionist.”

    Or maybe just “Enemy”

    Exactly. We are way beyond bickering about the Head Start program at this point.

    You know, perhaps coincidentally, before the Wuhan, I thought that elections would be more or less fair, and politicians would sugar coat their agendas and things would be more or less civil and potentially winnable. But now it seems that the election will be “won” by the mob of hecklers vetoing it, and politicians are spouting praise for their new clothes, and the people know he’s lying, and are applauding.

    And rationality and truth are considered historic evils.

    Rationality and truth are White Privilege.

    To which politician are you referring? I hope it isn’t Trump. Or I will cry.

    • #171
  22. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Tocqueville (View Comment):
    To which politician are you referring? I hope it isn’t Trump. Or I will cry.

    Those who are subverting the election process and will only accept the results if the Democrat wins.  Funny thing, they are accusing Trump of trying to subvert the election but it is really they who are doing it.

    • #172
  23. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Tocqueville (View Comment):
    To which politician are you referring? I hope it isn’t Trump. Or I will cry.

    Those who are subverting the election process and will only accept the results if the Democrat wins. Funny thing, they are accusing Trump of trying to subvert the election but it is really they who are doing it.

    Projection is a very long tradition among the left.

    • #173
  24. Tocqueville Inactive
    Tocqueville
    @Tocqueville

    Flicker (View Comment):

    Tocqueville (View Comment):
    To which politician are you referring? I hope it isn’t Trump. Or I will cry.

    Those who are subverting the election process and will only accept the results if the Democrat wins. Funny thing, they are accusing Trump of trying to subvert the election but it is really they who are doing it.

    I thought so. Thank goodness. Just like it was trump who wouldn’t accept Hillary’s loss. Haven’t seen Hillary accept it. Everything that’s happening is linked to the fact that she lost in 2016.

    • #174
  25. Flicker Coolidge
    Flicker
    @Flicker

    Tocqueville (View Comment):
    Haven’t seen Hillary accept it. Everything that’s happening is linked to the fact that she lost in 2016.

    Actually, I think Flynn is the one constant in the whole anti-Trump media and lawfare campaign.  It was known that Trump was going to make Flynn his National Security Advisor, and Flynn had clashed with the CIA since 2014, when as head of the DIA, he wrote a report condemning Middle East policy, and coincidentally was first set up by the CIA with Svetlana Lokhova.  It was also known apparently that Flynn, as incoming National Security Advisor, wanted to audit the CIA.  So they wanted him taken out.

    For more, per wikipedia:

    On April 30, 2014, Flynn announced his retirement effective later that year, about a year earlier than he had been scheduled to leave his position. He was reportedly effectively forced out of the DIA after clashing with superiors over his allegedly chaotic management style and vision for the agency. In a private e-mail that was leaked online, Colin Powell said he had heard in the DIA (apparently from later DIA director Vincent R. Stewart) that Flynn was fired because he was “abusive with staff, didn’t listen, worked against policy, bad management, etc.” According to The New York Times, Flynn exhibited a loose relationship with the truth, leading his subordinates to refer to Flynn’s repeated dubious assertions as “Flynn facts”.

    According to what Flynn had said in one final interview as DIA director, he felt like a lone voice in thinking the United States was less safe from the threat of Islamic terrorism in 2014 than it was prior to the 9/11 attacks; he went on to believe he was pressed into retirement for questioning the Obama administration’s public narrative that Al Qaeda was close to defeat. Journalist Seymour Hersh wrote that “Flynn confirmed [to Hersh] that his agency had sent a constant stream of classified warnings … about the dire consequences of toppling [Syrian President] Assad.” Flynn recounted that his agency was producing intelligence reports indicating that radical Islamists were the main force in the Syrian insurgency and “that Turkey was looking the other way when it came to the growth of the Islamic State inside Syria”. According to Flynn, these reports “got enormous pushback from the Obama administration”, who he felt “did not want to hear the truth”. According to former DIA official W. Patrick Lang: “Flynn incurred the wrath of the White House by insisting on telling the truth about Syria … they shoved him out. He wouldn’t shut up.” In an interview with Al Jazeera, Flynn criticized the Obama administration for its delay in supporting the opposition in Syria, thereby allowing for the growth of Al-Nusra and other extremist forces: “when you don’t get in and help somebody, they’re gonna find other means to achieve their goals” and that “we should have done more earlier on in this effort, you know, than we did.”

     

    • #175
  26. Full Size Tabby Member
    Full Size Tabby
    @FullSizeTabby

    DrewInWisconsin, Doormat (View Comment):

    I complained earlier about “ask” as a noun, but a co-worker helpfully reminded me that “get” as a noun is just as awful.

    “Ask” as a verb when the speaker really means “force” or “require.” As in, “We are going to ask the wealthy to pay a little bit more,” when they really mean, “We are going to raise taxes on the wealthy.”

    • #176
  27. Tocqueville Inactive
    Tocqueville
    @Tocqueville

    Full Size Tabby (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Doormat (View Comment):

    I complained earlier about “ask” as a noun, but a co-worker helpfully reminded me that “get” as a noun is just as awful.

    “Ask” as a verb when the speaker really means “force” or “require.” As in, “We are going to ask the wealthy to pay a little bit more,” when they really mean, “We are going to raise taxes on the wealthy.”

    Makes me think about the boss in Office Space: “Yeahhh… we’re just going to have to ask you to get those tps reports in …”

    Anglo-saxons are experts at that passive aggressive, demanding quality. French are very formal and when needed are cold, but that’s much more authentic than this corporate “Hi can we just get” speak. 

    • #177
  28. I Shot The Serif Member
    I Shot The Serif
    @IShotTheSerif

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    Any -ize word. Use is better than utilize. People are trying to sound smart by using a big word where a small one works better.

    Utilize has a specific meaning but people don’t realize that. They use it because they think it sounds smarter than ‘use.’ In reality, people sound much smarter if they stick to ‘little words’ that they know, and avoid ‘big words’ they are not comfortable with.

    • #178
  29. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    I Shot The Serif (View Comment):

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    Any -ize word. Use is better than utilize. People are trying to sound smart by using a big word where a small one works better.

    Utilize has a specific meaning but people don’t realize that. They use it because they think it sounds smarter than ‘use.’ In reality, people sound much smarter if they stick to ‘little words’ that they know, and avoid ‘big words’ they are not comfortable with.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbzPooqlZ84&feature=youtu.be&t=3018

    • #179
  30. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Full Size Tabby (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Doormat (View Comment):

    I complained earlier about “ask” as a noun, but a co-worker helpfully reminded me that “get” as a noun is just as awful.

    “Ask” as a verb when the speaker really means “force” or “require.” As in, “We are going to ask the wealthy to pay a little bit more,” when they really mean, “We are going to raise taxes on the wealthy.”

    That’s right up there with “I’ll let you help me with the dishes.”

    • #180
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.