Chicks

 

I see that the Dixie Chicks have officially changed their band name to The Chicks.

I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, I think it’s as stupid and cowardly as most “woke” nonsense.

On the other hand, if it means that calling girls “chicks” is back in fashion, I’m totally down with that. Perhaps, if we’re lucky, “birds” and “dames” will make a comeback as well.

Published in Entertainment
Tags:

This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 107 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    JosePluma (View Comment):

    Dotorimuk (View Comment):
    Dotorimuk

    The Skirts

    How about The {NO!-Moderator}. Or The {Cut it out!}. Or The Three {That’s Enough!!!}.

    Why not The Six {Haven’t You Been Listening?}

    • #31
  2. namlliT noD Member
    namlliT noD
    @DonTillman

    Henry Racette:

    I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, I think it’s as stupid and cowardly as most “woke” nonsense.

    On the other hand, if it means that calling girls “chicks” is back in fashion, I’m totally down with that. Perhaps, if we’re lucky, “birds” and “dames” will make a comeback as well.

    The politically correct term is “persons of gender”.

    • #32
  3. Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing) Member
    Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing)
    @Sisyphus

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Henry Racette: Perhaps, if we’re lucky, “birds” and “dames” will make a comeback as well.

    Did those terms ever go out of fashion?

    Not in my household, no. But my kids tell me that, more often than I’d like to believe, I do not have my finger firmly on the pulse of popular culture.

    Children can be so cruel.

    • #33
  4. Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing) Member
    Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing)
    @Sisyphus

    Vance Richards (View Comment):

    If they really want to show repentance, why not the Yankee Chicks?

    Maybe they’re National League fans.

    • #34
  5. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Shouldn’t they be “cancelled” just for calling themselves Chicks?

    • #35
  6. Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing) Member
    Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing)
    @Sisyphus

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Shouldn’t they be “cancelled” just for calling themselves Chicks?

    Inconsistency is an important part of inducing terror.

    • #36
  7. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Henry Racette: Perhaps, if we’re lucky, “birds” and “dames” will make a comeback as well.

    Did those terms ever go out of fashion?

    Nope.  “Skirts” is another one.

    • #37
  8. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Jon1979 (View Comment):
    “Angry South Lubbock Harridans” would work

    How about “Three Angry Faux-Southern Harpies”?

    • #38
  9. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    namlliT noD (View Comment):
    So they removed the geographical part of their name, and retained the sexist part. Excellent.

    No one said they were rocket scientists . . .

    • #39
  10. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Stad (View Comment):

    Jon1979 (View Comment):
    “Angry South Lubbock Harridans” would work

    How about “Three Angry Faux-Southern Harpies”?

    Are Harpies the same as Valkyries?

    • #40
  11. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Franco (View Comment):
    Imagine a band “Yankee Dudes”

    Ted Nugent used to be in a group “Damn Yankees” . . .

    • #41
  12. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):

    Jon1979 (View Comment):
    “Angry South Lubbock Harridans” would work

    How about “Three Angry Faux-Southern Harpies”?

    Are Harpies the same as Valkyries?

    Naw.  Valkyries scour the battlefiend collecting the heroic dead and taking them to Valhalla, the Hall of the Slain.

    Harpies are hideos monsters who torture people, mainly by virtue signaling and putting out albums . . .

    • #42
  13. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Stad (View Comment):

    Franco (View Comment):
    Imagine a band “Yankee Dudes”

    Ted Nugent used to be in a group “Damn Yankees” . . .

    We all know what Damn Yankees are.

    • #43
  14. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Randy Webster (View Comment):
    Are Harpies the same as Valkyries?

    No.

    • #44
  15. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    You guys can call me a girl anytime!

    • #45
  16. Richard Fulmer Inactive
    Richard Fulmer
    @RichardFulmer

    Arvo (View Comment):

    I’m concerned. Mrs Arvo is Dixie.

    Has she considered changing her name to “Chicks”?

    • #46
  17. Misthiocracy got drunk and Member
    Misthiocracy got drunk and
    @Misthiocracy

    Henry Racette: On the other hand, if it means that calling girls “chicks” is back in fashion, I’m totally down with that.

    Way back when I was a kid in the 80s and 90s, I quickly deduced what was a “bad word” by observing the words used by my two older sisters.  If they used a word and didn’t get in trouble for it, then I knew it wasn’t a “bad word”.

    Long story short: My sisters called other women “chicks”, and that’s how I learned about double-standards.

    • #47
  18. philo Member
    philo
    @philo

    Franco (View Comment): Well, there was The Band, but they were pretty good…

    Are you sure that is still an acceptable assessment?

    (HINT: The Night They Drove Old…)

    • #48
  19. Misthiocracy got drunk and Member
    Misthiocracy got drunk and
    @Misthiocracy

    Henry Racette: Perhaps, if we’re lucky, “birds” and “dames” will make a comeback as well.

    Dames should be acceptable, since it’s merely an Anglicized version of the French word for lady.

    Chick should also be acceptable, since it’s merely an Anglicized version of the Spanish word for girl.

    Birds, as well as other infamous words that analogize women as animals, are etymologically more problematic.

    • #49
  20. Misthiocracy got drunk and Member
    Misthiocracy got drunk and
    @Misthiocracy

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):
    Are Harpies the same as Valkyries?

    No.

    They’re not even members of the same mythological pantheon!

    Somebody really needs to reread the Monster Manual.

    • #50
  21. Misthiocracy got drunk and Member
    Misthiocracy got drunk and
    @Misthiocracy

    Stad (View Comment):

    Franco (View Comment):
    Imagine a band “Yankee Dudes”

    Ted Nugent used to be in a group “Damn Yankees” . . .

    The Amboy Dukes were way better.

    • #51
  22. Misthiocracy got drunk and Member
    Misthiocracy got drunk and
    @Misthiocracy

    Sisyphus (hears Xi laughing) (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Henry Racette: Perhaps, if we’re lucky, “birds” and “dames” will make a comeback as well.

    Did those terms ever go out of fashion?

    Not in my household, no. But my kids tell me that, more often than I’d like to believe, I do not have my finger firmly on the pulse of popular culture.

    Children can be so cruel.

    • #52
  23. Misthiocracy got drunk and Member
    Misthiocracy got drunk and
    @Misthiocracy

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    Henry Racette:

    I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, I think it’s as stupid and cowardly as most “woke” nonsense.

    On the other hand, if it means that calling girls “chicks” is back in fashion, I’m totally down with that. Perhaps, if we’re lucky, “birds” and “dames” will make a comeback as well.

    The politically correct term is “persons of gender”.

    Sexualized Persons.

    • #53
  24. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    philo (View Comment):

    Franco (View Comment): Well, there was The Band, but they were pretty good…

    Are you sure that is still an acceptable assessment?

    (HINT: The Night They Drove Old…)

    Even that pillar of leftist radicalism Joan Baez did that one.

    • #54
  25. philo Member
    philo
    @philo

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    Franco (View Comment): Well, there was The Band, but they were pretty good…

    Are you sure that is still an acceptable assessment?

    (HINT: The Night They Drove Old…)

    Even that pillar of leftist radicalism Joan Baez did that one.

    Then she must be made an unperson too.

    • #55
  26. Misthiocracy got drunk and Member
    Misthiocracy got drunk and
    @Misthiocracy

    philo (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    philo (View Comment):

    Franco (View Comment): Well, there was The Band, but they were pretty good…

    Are you sure that is still an acceptable assessment?

    (HINT: The Night They Drove Old…)

    Even that pillar of leftist radicalism Joan Baez did that one.

    Then she must be made an unperson too.

    There was a mini-surge of sympathy for the Confederacy among the 1960s anti-Vietnam Left, because anything that opposed the Federal Government couldn’t be all bad. After all, love it or hate it, the Confederacy never invaded foreign countries, or so went the reasoning.  In the song, the “they” who drove old Dixie down are the same “they” who dropped napalm on Vietnamese villagers.

    e.g. George Carlin mentioned sympathy for the South in his comedy routines of the era.  “I consider the South just another minority that was screwed by the US goverment. I have no prejudice against them. They got it too.”

    It was simply a different manifestation of the same impulse that drives today’s Left to sympathize with Jihad.

    • #56
  27. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Misthiocracy got drunk and (View Comment):
    After all, love it or hate it, the Confederacy never invaded foreign countries.

    I believe you’ll find that Pennsylvania is not within the bounds of the Confederacy, even by the broadest definitions of being below the Mason-Dixon Line.

    • #57
  28. Arvo Inactive
    Arvo
    @Arvo

    Misthiocracy got drunk and (View Comment):
    the Confederacy never invaded foreign countries

    Not long ago someone mentioned that they did involuntary strip a large number of Americans of their US citizenship.

    • #58
  29. Misthiocracy got drunk and Member
    Misthiocracy got drunk and
    @Misthiocracy

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Misthiocracy got drunk and (View Comment):
    After all, love it or hate it, the Confederacy never invaded foreign countries.

    I believe you’ll find that Pennsylvania is not within the bounds of the Confederacy, even by the broadest definitions of being below the Mason-Dixon Line.

    Invading the hated Yankee Empire doesn’t count.

    • #59
  30. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Arvo (View Comment):

    Misthiocracy got drunk and (View Comment):
    the Confederacy never invaded foreign countries

    Not long ago someone mentioned that they did involuntary strip a large number of Americans of their US citizenship.

    And that has always remained, for me, the essential justification for the war to restore the nation. The southern states had no more right to deprive Americans of their citizenship than would the BLM and Antifa thugs of CHAZ to deprive a few thousand Seattlites of theirs.

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.