Bad Eagle’s Question

 

The late Dr. David Yeagley, a Comanche Indian (traditional name ‘Bad Eagle’) and college professor, described an interaction that took place in one of his classes. (excerpted)

“LOOK, DR. YEAGLEY, I don’t see anything about my culture to be proud of. It’s all nothing. My race is just nothing.”

The girl was white. She was tall and pretty, with amber hair and brown eyes. For convenience’ sake, let’s call her “Rachel.”

I had been leading a class on social psychology, in which we discussed patriotism – what it means to be a people or a nation. The discussion had been quite lively. But when Rachel spoke, everyone fell silent.

“Look at your culture,” she said to me. “Look at American Indian tradition. Now I think that’s really great. You have something to be proud of. My culture is nothing.”

Her words disturbed and offended me in a way that I could not quite enunciate.

and

When Rachel denounced her people, she did it with the serene self-confidence of a High Priestess reciting a liturgy. She said it without fear of criticism or censure. And she received none. The other students listened in silence, their eyes moving timidly back and forth between me and Rachel, as if unsure which of us constituted a higher authority.

Yeagley saw a resemblance between Rachel and those Frenchwomen who were quick to associate with the conquering Germans…and he wondered:

Who had conquered Rachel’s people? What had led her to disrespect them? Why did she behave like a woman of a defeated tribe?

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 42 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Suspira Member
    Suspira
    @Suspira

    David Foster: “Look at your culture,” she said to me. “Look at American Indian tradition. Now I think that’s really great. You have something to be proud of. My culture is nothing.”

    I wonder if Yeagley asked her what she considered her culture. Since the topic was patriotism, one could think it was American culture. But she excludes her American Indian prof from that culture, so maybe not. The assumption seems to be whiteness. Certainly, that would be explicit nowadays. 

    I can’t think of a more racist idea than that culture is genetic and attaches to whatever gene it is that determines race. 

    • #31
  2. Ralphie Inactive
    Ralphie
    @Ralphie

    M. Brandon Godbey (View Comment):
    Dr. David Yeagley

    Perhaps it is false modesty.

    • #32
  3. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Suspira (View Comment):

    Jim McConnell (View Comment):

    But you know she doesn’t believe a word of what she’s saying; it’s all theater to feed the ego. She has lots of imitators these days.

    I’m afraid that she, and so many more Rachels today, do believe it.

    People are really good at lying to themselves. Some people are better at it than others.

    • #33
  4. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    MichaelKennedy (View Comment):

    Instugator (View Comment):

    Nah, nothing more than good old fashioned Oikophobia – pick any subject and she will always side with the ‘other’ in conversation.

    My sister has been this way her entire life, anything that is considered normal custom, she is compelled to “the disposition, in any conflict, to side with ‘them’ against ‘us’, and the felt need to denigrate the customs, culture and institutions that are identifiably ‘ours.” — excerpted from the WSJ.

    I have an older son like this. He, of course, is a trial lawyer.

    Sorry dude

    • #34
  5. David Foster Member
    David Foster
    @DavidFoster

    Suspira (View Comment):

    Jim McConnell (View Comment):

    But you know she doesn’t believe a word of what she’s saying; it’s all theater to feed the ego. She has lots of imitators these days.

    I’m afraid that she, and so many more Rachels today, do believe it.

    A present-day Rachel, right here.

    https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/382272/

     

    • #35
  6. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    So now I have to keep track of Karens AND Rachels?  Great.

    • #36
  7. ShaunaHunt Inactive
    ShaunaHunt
    @ShaunaHunt

    Please don’t make Rachels a thing! My daughter’s name is Rachel. 

    • #37
  8. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    ShaunaHunt (View Comment):

    Please don’t make Rachels a thing! My daughter’s name is Rachel.

    As is mine, so I agree.

    • #38
  9. kedavis Coolidge
    kedavis
    @kedavis

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    ShaunaHunt (View Comment):

    Please don’t make Rachels a thing! My daughter’s name is Rachel.

    As is mine, so I agree.

    But what about all the poor innocent Karens out there?

    • #39
  10. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    ShaunaHunt (View Comment):

    Please don’t make Rachels a thing! My daughter’s name is Rachel.

    As is mine, so I agree.

    But what about all the poor innocent Karens out there?

    Karens aren’t innocent. They just want to speak to the manager. About everything.

    • #40
  11. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    ShaunaHunt (View Comment):

    Please don’t make Rachels a thing! My daughter’s name is Rachel.

    As is mine, so I agree.

    But what about all the poor innocent Karens out there?

    Karens aren’t innocent. They just want to speak to the manager. About everything.

    • #41
  12. Zafar Member
    Zafar
    @Zafar

    David Foster:

    Yeagley saw a resemblance between Rachel and those Frenchwomen who were quick to associate with the conquering Germans…and he wondered:

    Who had conquered Rachel’s people? What had led her to disrespect them? Why did she behave like a woman of a defeated tribe?

    On the contrary, it’s only a woman of the conquering tribe who can verbally dismiss her culture’s markers because she remains sure that they will still bring her advantage and privilege in the real world.  She’s so secure she doesn’t even need to ask for respect.

    When ‘privileged groups’ who never asked for respect in the past start demanding it now, it shows the ground is shifting.

    • #42
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.