[Member Post]

 

In the wake of Bostock v. Clayton County, in which the Supreme Court held that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is necessarily sex-based, a number of conservative legal thinkers have unsheathed rather sharp swords against Republican-appointed Supreme Court justices, past and present. The arguments vary but generally boil down to dissatisfaction with textualism and […]

⚠️ This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet's community of conservatives and be part of the conversation.

Join Ricochet for free.


There are 11 comments.
But you can't read them because you're not signed in!

Become a member to read the comments and join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
Become a member to read the comments and join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.