Confidence in Times of Peril

 

What does it mean to have the courage to carry on, to act decisively even in the face of deep uncertainty and unknowable risks? This is, of course, hardly an academic question even in the best of times, and today’s environment of mass-hysteria is not the best of times.

Nevertheless, uncertainty and doubt are the banes of human existence. They are the reasons people do not take risks in love and in capitalism. They stop us from growing into what we are capable of becoming. And so belief systems are “sold” in part because they help people cope with – or merely accept – the fears and risks that otherwise can paralyze any thinking person.

There are, of course, more than enough unknowns to paralyze anyone’s decision-making processes even in everyday life (again, magnified by the current virusmania). What is crazy about Judaism is that the Torah does not merely offer a coping mechanism: the text actually requires uncertainty, forcibly putting us into a place where we are not sure where our next meal is coming from.

Every seven years we are forbidden from planting or harvesting from the land, and the Jubilee forces bulk property reversions. The Torah tells us explicitly that we have no choice: follow the law and trust that G-d will take care of us.

Why?

I think the Torah first makes us insecure, and then actively gives us a means of coping with that very same insecurity. Here is how:

You shall observe My laws and faithfully keep My rules, that you may live upon the land in security; The land shall yield its fruit and you shall eat your fill, and you shall live upon it in security. (Lev: 25:18-19)

The word “security” is not – actually – security. If you look at a range of translations , the word is usually translated as “security” or “safety.” But it is not used that way in the Torah, so to translate it this way is erroneous. The Torah is self-referential for language: we look at how words are used elsewhere in the text to understand what they mean.

How is the word normally translated as “security” (in the Hebrew, “betach”) used? Incredibly, the word “betach” is only found in the Torah one place earlier than this Leviticus usage: when Shimon and Levi go out with swords to kill all the men in Shechem, recapturing their sister from the prince who had taken her.

 And it came to pass … that two of the sons of Jacob, Simeon and Levi, Dinah’s brethren, took each his sword, and came in against the city “betach,” and slayed every male. (Gen. 34:25)

Shimon and Levi were just two men taking on a city. They had a weakened opponent (who had all been circumcised three days before), and they had the element of surprise on their side.

But without the benefit of hindsight, they had no way to know that they would emerge victorious and unharmed. Indeed, two men against an entire city probably looked to them very much like a suicide mission, or at the very least a plan with quite long odds.

But they went ahead anyway. To pull it off, they knew they had to eliminate self-doubt because any second-guessing in combat when outnumbered is sure to be fatal. That is why they were “betach” – they squashed whatever doubts a reasonable person would have in that situation, and they did what they felt was right.

(Note, of course, that their brothers and father did not participate in the attack, and their father was furious after the fact – though notably not because killing a city of men might have been wrong, but because it might add to the family’s list of enemies. Jacob’s objection was pragmatic, not moral. It was Shimon and Levi who showed confidence in the face of this risk.)

It seems to me that the Torah, by using the very same word, “betach,” to describe existence during the fallow and jubilee years, is endorsing Shimon and Levi’s state of mind, and quite possibly the act itself: the decision to confidently and fearlessly proceed, even in the face of deep uncertainty and insecurity is something that the Torah clearly considers to be an extremely valuable trait, something so important that later in the Torah every single person is commanded to try, in the face of food insecurity, to achieve that very same state of mind.

Judaism is not big on digging deep into the soul, inquiring into deep beliefs or faith. Instead, the Torah cares a great deal about what people actually do – their words and deeds. We have few words in Torah for belief, but even in Modern Hebrew we use the same root word as “betach” – bitachon is “having faith.” It is a belief that somehow things are going to work out for the best, even if we cannot see how. And because we can muster that belief, we can move out of the paralysis that strikes people when they are overwhelmed by the fact that they cannot predict the future.

We seek to have that same confidence. Abolish self-doubt. Do what is best, secure that somehow it must work out. Even – or especially – when G-d Himself is the source of the underlying insecurity and doubt.

[This has been another @iWe and @Susanquinn production]

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 4 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    iWe:

    Judaism is not big on digging deep into the soul, inquiring into deep beliefs or faith. Instead, the Torah cares a great deal about what people actually do – their words and deeds.

    The New Testament is much more about this than most people realize.

    The famous definition of faith in Hebrews 11:1 is consistently translated poorly. It’s not primarily about a mode of belief, but a mode of life. You know what? I’ll shut up now. I’m busy, and apparently I already mentioned this on Ricochet.

    • #1
  2. J Climacus Member
    J Climacus
    @JClimacus

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    iWe:

    Judaism is not big on digging deep into the soul, inquiring into deep beliefs or faith. Instead, the Torah cares a great deal about what people actually do – their words and deeds.

    The New Testament is much more about this than most people realize.

    The famous definition of faith in Hebrews 11:1 is consistently translated poorly. It’s not primarily about a mode of belief, but a mode of life. You know what? I’ll shut up now. I’m busy, and apparently I already mentioned this on Ricochet.

    It seems like belief and action are two sides of the same coin: If you want to know what someone really believes, watch what they do more than what they say. This applies most of all to ourselves. What do I really believe? Times of crisis, when our faith is put to the test, are when we reveal ourselves to ourselves.

    I’ll admit it’s from a silly movie and involves poor theology, but one of my favorite lines of all time comes from Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade. When Indy’s father lies dying, the villain asks Indy:

    “I think it’s time to ask yourself, what do you believe in?”

    In other words, is archaeology just a pleasant hobby for Jones, or does it involve the potential discovery of things of transcendent significance that might challenge Jones to his very core as a human being? That’s what belief really is: The staking of one’s life in light of something greater, better and more holy than oneself.

    • #2
  3. iWe Coolidge
    iWe
    @iWe

    J Climacus (View Comment):
    It seems like belief and action are two sides of the same coin: If you want to know what someone really believes, watch what they do more than what they say. This applies most of all to ourselves. What do I really believe? Times of crisis, when our faith is put to the test, are when we reveal ourselves to ourselves.

    This is exactly right.

    I know many religiously observant people who live their lives trying to mitigate every possible risk and uncertainty, choosing safety and security over living every opportunity they get. They are actually putting enormous effort into taking the need for G-d out of their lives.  For them, smart long-term planning to avoid all risk is all-important.

    And so they choose their jobs, at 21, based on the pension plans. They seek “secure” government jobs above jobs in which they might actually accomplish something meaningful. It permeates into all that they choose to do. And it is, in my opinion, deeply anti-Torah.

    • #3
  4. aardo vozz Member
    aardo vozz
    @aardovozz

    @iwe, after reading your post , I could swear that I thought I heard Rabbi Akiva laughing. 

    Excellent post!🙂

    • #4
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.