Your friend Jim George thinks you'd be a great addition to Ricochet, so we'd like to offer you a special deal: You can become a member for no initial charge for one month!
Ricochet is a community of like-minded people who enjoy writing about and discussing politics (usually of the center-right nature), culture, sports, history, and just about every other topic under the sun in a fully moderated environment. We’re so sure you’ll like Ricochet, we’ll let you join and get your first month for free. Kick the tires: read the always eclectic member feed, write some posts, join discussions, participate in a live chat or two, and listen to a few of our over 50 (free) podcasts on every conceivable topic, hosted by some of the biggest names on the right, for 30 days on us. We’re confident you’re gonna love it.
Most conspiracy theories are nuts, but sometimes…
This is the Quote of the Day. It can be the easiest way to start a
conspiracy theoryconversation on Ricochet. Why not choose an open day and sign up for a bit of fun?http://ricochet.com/752667/quote-of-the-day-may-signup-sheet/
Compared to what? Sure, they aren’t common, but they aren’t non existent and, historically, exist among the elite ruling classes throughout history.
Their rarity is not proof of non-existence.
I think the internet joke about Epstein was born out of no one believing Epstein killed himself. We like to chalk things up to incompetence, but I frequently feel that’s a cop out.
Most of the time, there really is incompetence, but that does provide cover for the conspiracies that can explain things away through incompetence. Both guards happened to fall asleep and the tapes went missing? Just incompetence.
Well, not NO one. I believe he most likely killed himself. But the jokes are funny.
I think there is a vast conspiracy to put the label, “Conspiracy theory!” on things that are explicitly not conspiracy theories.
Like the Obama Administration’s attempts to sabotage the incoming Trump Administration?
The word conspiracy is not the label it once was. It’s cousin, the word hoax, can also mean the same thing. For three plus years, many said the Russia investigation was a conspiracy – a hoax. Much time, money and heartache was spent on it, and it turned out to be true. Lies and dis-information can be rampant, so its up to each of us to do our own homework and decide what’s true. Verify as Reagan said. I think there is more truth behind some of these theories than many know.
That’s why I don’t believe in conspiracy theories . . . except when I do
Well, there is the conspiracy “nut” — the one who sees it everywhere, who explains all of existence in some nefarious grand plan being executed by a master mind. This is the James Bond formulation. But I think the 50% number certainly doesn’t describe that. Humans are programmed to see patterns, so it is unsurprising that most people are open to the notion of a conspiracy when events seem to move in a direction they see as bad. (Interesting how the only positive “conspiracy” is seen as the benevolent hand of G-d.) So there is some number of people (I wouldn’t try to estimate a percentage) who are inclined to deep conspiracies, and a much larger number of people who are open to the potential for a transactional conspiracy. Because, in truth, there are transactional conspiracies. Most of them are temporary alliances of mutual benefit rather than long-term controlled coordination. But they do exist. And all of the conspirators only realize a part of their goals since they do not act in a fully disciplined fashion under tight controls. But that does not mean they do not do harm to those in opposition to the ends of the conspirators. So caution and skepticism is always called for.
Worth noting that a writer at the New York Times just won a Pulitzer for a conspiracy theory. Sometimes the source or sources pushing the theory elevate it.
Maybe Epstein did kill himself.
Having (apparently?) tried suicide once before, perhaps he was told that the camera system was going to be defective while the guards would be napping at a certain time.
Maybe he was given a choice between offing himself or something bad happening to someone else. Or maybe he was told what detailed information about himself was going to be revealed and he wanted it hidden for some reason.
Conspiracy theories can be spun in more than one dimension.
Given that it seems reasonable that he knew a lot of very damaging material about a lot of ‘important’ people, it is not ridiculous to believe it possible that his death was more than a spontaneous whim on his own part.
Not dispositive, of course, but not totally implausible. Keeping an open mind here, when I bother to think about it, which is rarely.
My mom is a consumer of more or less exclusively mainstream news. When I visit and fill her in on some news and perspectives which the MSM has denied her, I often find myself sounding and feeling like a conspiracy theorist, despite my knowing that I am not one.
That’s a troubling state of affairs, but a reassuring one for those who caused it.
I’ve had exactly this experience. I’m trying to work on a tone that says I’m not a crazy hater when I tell my sister “Actually, it looks like the FBI set a trap for Michael Flynn to discredit him, and now it looks like Obama knew about it.” Tough one.
I understand the problem. But maybe I’m not keeping up, because I don’t know much about what basis there is for saying Obama knew about it. I guess nothing would surprise me any more, but is there some new news on this front that I don’t know about?
@thereticulator, https://nypost.com/2020/05/08/obama-knew-details-of-michael-flynns-wiretapped-calls-docs/
There’s some excitement on Twitter about documents. I probably should wait for more information before going with this.
Very interesting. Thank you.
Thank you.
One. This proves that my latest settings to block video and audio autoplay on Firefox really work! The settings accessible through the menus were not working, but there are some more obscure settings in about:config that do work. Until now the usual sequence when somebody linked to a Fox article was for me to start reading, and close the browser window the moment I heard it autoplaying. Fox was #1 on my list of offenders. Now I can read such articles! Dealing with those settings is like extracting information from the FBI.
Two. Amazing sentence:
So a possible translation goes as follows: Obama didn’t want to be told more about what he wasn’t supposed to know about and already knew, anyway, but wanted to know how to act on the information he wasn’t supposed to have.
Whether or not my translation is right, there is a lot about this that needs further explaining.
I read somewhere the CIA invented the term. No kidding. It’s one of those notions that shuts down thought. Just because there are plenty of crazy theories out there doesn’t mean that some outlandish things don’t happen. Mueller report, dossier, or Flynn case anyone?
It would certainly be ironic if the CIA invented a term that was used (overused?) to implicate the CIA in so many . . .conspiracy theories.
They invented it as a debunking tool to protect themselves when their deeds were uncovered, no? Drugs and guns passing from lawmen to crooks? Don’t drink the Kool Aid. Couldn’t possibly happen. Coup attemps? Naw. Propagandizing the American citizenry? You must be joking….