Your friend Jim George thinks you'd be a great addition to Ricochet, so we'd like to offer you a special deal: You can become a member for no initial charge for one month!
Ricochet is a community of like-minded people who enjoy writing about and discussing politics (usually of the center-right nature), culture, sports, history, and just about every other topic under the sun in a fully moderated environment. We’re so sure you’ll like Ricochet, we’ll let you join and get your first month for free. Kick the tires: read the always eclectic member feed, write some posts, join discussions, participate in a live chat or two, and listen to a few of our over 50 (free) podcasts on every conceivable topic, hosted by some of the biggest names on the right, for 30 days on us. We’re confident you’re gonna love it.
Few of us would argue that we live in decadent and conflicted times. As a free people, we seem willing to compromise repeatedly our freedoms and blessings, responding to fears that have been inflamed. Our morals are being challenged at every crisis as they eat away at our conviction and determination to be brave, free, and honorable people.
Recognizing that they were forming a nation based on individual liberty; understanding that individuals have ideas that differ one from another and that, when acting as a group, that diversity of ideas will come into conflict; agreeing that government must be with the consent of the governed; the founders created a proposed constitution to be ratified by the people of the States joining and after ratification that Constitution could be amended through a ratification by three-fourths of the States, thus ‘e pluribus unum’. So we have a method to change the fundamentals protecting our freedoms as individuals but it is not easy. The Left gets very frustrated by this and constantly tries other methods..
Thanks, @bobthompson. Yes, the Left often gets its way. It’s much easier for them, because morals and ethics have nothing to do with their decisions. They are free to do whatever they wish without excuses. And we lose so much each time.
It’s the nonstop temper tantrums. Certain jurisdictions were all for banning plastic bags “for the environment.” But reusable bags are prone to both viral and bacterial contamination. And before you can say “I told you so,” the plastic bags are back.
The fasces.
Ah, yes indeed. He made the point so well. Thanks, @rodin.
Oh, I just realized that the bundles/fasces appear in both Lincoln photos. Awesome!!
I like the tale of Avarice and Envy, or Greed and Jealousy (the version below taken from the John Jacobs collection of Aesop’s Fables:
So Jupiter (so wise!) grants them their heart’s desire, on the condition that, whatever each of them wishes for, the other party will have twice as much of the “loot.” And so the greedy man, who dreams of satisfying his cupidity with a room stuffed full of gold, is first deliriously happy with it, but then feels angry, cheated, and victimized when he finds out that, according to the contract with Jupiter, his neighbor has twice as much! And the Envious man, who can’t bear the thought of his neighbor being happy for any reason, and who’s at least thought ahead and understood the “doubling-up” rule before he asks his favor, is willing to lose one of his own eyes, knowing that his neighbor will be blinded in both.
I don’t think it’s at all difficult to find examples of this sort of behavior and attitude, or of the misery they create for the perpetrators and for others, in the the world today.
Oh, the moral? Summed up as “vices are their own punishment.” I really do believe that’s true.
That’s a great one, @she. Thanks!
Divide and conquer is the left’s modus operandi. They are mostly compsed of groups – LGBT, Hollywood celebrities, college professors, the MSM, single mothers. However, they also depend on racial minorities and women in general to put them in office (they’re toast if they ever lose the black vote). They portray most of these groups as victims so as to separate them out of mainstream society, which they define as racist, sexist, bigoted, homophobic, Islamophobic, neo-Nazi, white supremacist, etc.
The truth is, conservatism could support these groups and what they practice. While I’m vehemently against same-sex marriage, the right way to go about changing our laws on the subject would have been to convince a majority their idea was good. However, the left likes to use the courts as a cudgel to get whatever they want because they don’t have the patience to argue or the logic to back their arguments up.
The Horse and the Stag
A quarrel had arisen between the Horse and the Stag, so the Horse came to a Hunter to ask his help to take revenge on the Stag. The Hunter agreed, but said: “If you desire to conquer the Stag, you must permit me to place this piece of iron between your jaws, so that I may guide you with these reins, and allow this saddle to be placed upon your back so that I may keep steady upon you as we follow after the enemy.” The Horse agreed to the conditions, and the Hunter soon saddled and bridled him. Then with the aid of the Hunter the Horse soon overcame the Stag, and said to the Hunter: “Now, get off, and remove those things from my mouth and back.”
“Not so fast, friend,” said the Hunter. “I have now got you under bit and spur, and prefer to keep you as you are at present.”
If you allow men to use you for your own purposes, they will use you for theirs.
@paulstinchfield, wow, talk about the perfect metaphor for our times! The best one yet! We must ask ourselves how much more “reining in” we can take from the Left! Thanks.
I got the Barnes and Noble version several months ago, and intend to read a few a day starting May 1.
Possibly the best known version of this fable is Isaac Asimov’s “Bridle and Saddle”:
Susan doesn’t always offer the balm of affirmation for our feelings. Sometimes, as here, it’s the cleansing flood of cold truth and clear thinking for our minds.
Thought I’d just throw that out there.
I’ve never owned a copy, @kylez, but that sounds like a great idea.
I have noticed some significant stylistic differences between various translations. Some seem to be more literal translations from the original Greek or from Latin, while others seem to be freer translations intended to read more smoothly in modern English.
The Hunter could just move the goalposts. Maybe the horse would be willing to accept it.
Do you have a favorite translation, Paul? Something can be lost when translated for ease of reading.
No, I only have one and cannot lay my hands on it right now to see what is says about translation.
Indeed. Translation can be an extremely difficult task where every choice gains something and loses something. I have read and/or heard a number of authors comment on how a word-for-word translation might lose the literal meaning due to the lack of precisely equivalent words, the emotional sense they want to convey, or the musical/poetic qualities they wish the readers to hear in their heads. This topic comes up now and then in discussions of Bible translations. As has been said many times, if you want to fully appreciate a work you need to read it in the original language. Back in January I commented that Homer’s “rosy fingered dawn” has internal rhymes in the original Greek (“roditos dactylos eos”) which reminds us that we cannot fully enjoy the poems unless we are fluent in Greek.
It does indeed, and makes for fascinating discussions, between Christians and Jews and even just among Jews!
Almost four years ago I wrote a post about “The Fox and the Grapes” because I was aggravated that most people miss-use the phrase “sour grapes.”
That’s a good one, @randyweivoda! I missed the OP and now I’m also set straight!