[Member Post]

 

In 1980, Stanford Law School Professor Paul Brest wrote his famous article, “The Misconceived Quest for An Original Understanding,” in which he defined “originalism” as an “approach to constitutional adjudication that accords binding authority to the text of the Constitution or the intentions of its adopters.” Brest concluded that originalism failed to deal adequately with […]

⚠️ This is a members-only post on Ricochet's Member Feed. Want to read it? Join Ricochet's community of conservatives and be part of the conversation.

Join Ricochet for free.


There are 6 comments.
But you can't read them because you're not signed in!

Become a member to read the comments and join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
Become a member to read the comments and join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.