The Gates of Hell Hath Seen His Shadow…

 

…and declared 18 more months of quarantine:

You will be tested, whether you like it or not. You will be vaccinated, with his vaccine, whether you like it or not. You will not be allowed outside until late May at the earliest, and you won’t be allowed to gather in groups for 18 months, because that’s how long the vaccine takes. This is the plan, folks.

I enjoyed the part where he was anointed Emperor Zod, ruler of planet earth without a paper ballot. Where do you want to go today? It doesn’t matter, all yours freedoms belongs to him.

Published in Healthcare
Tags:

This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 77 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Ultron Will Inject You Now Inactive
    Ultron Will Inject You Now
    @Pseudodionysius

    But he’s also given tens of billions of dollars of his own money to efforts to lift the poorest people in the world out of poverty and illness. 

    He wants to vaccinate them. And track them. Rinse, lather, repeat.

    • #61
  2. Ultron Will Inject You Now Inactive
    Ultron Will Inject You Now
    @Pseudodionysius

    Bill, Bill, Bill, what’s wrong with your math?

    In New York State, the Bill Gates-subsidized Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IMHE) “model” predicting doom in that state has been exposed as little short of a hoax, as its dire predictions are continually being slashed to match actual numbers and are still wildly off the mark. Yet, in New York City, hovering drones bark out commands to observe “social distancing” of “at least six feet” in a message that ends on a chillingly Orwellian note: “We are all in this together!”

    • #62
  3. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Ultron Will Inject You Now (View Comment):

    But he’s also given tens of billions of dollars of his own money to efforts to lift the poorest people in the world out of poverty and illness.

    He wants to vaccinate them. And track them. Rinse, lather, repeat.

    Hmm. Vaccination. Well, I guess we wouldn’t want that.

    • #63
  4. Ultron Will Inject You Now Inactive
    Ultron Will Inject You Now
    @Pseudodionysius

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Ultron Will Inject You Now (View Comment):

    But he’s also given tens of billions of dollars of his own money to efforts to lift the poorest people in the world out of poverty and illness.

    He wants to vaccinate them. And track them. Rinse, lather, repeat.

    Hmm. Vaccination. Well, I guess we wouldn’t want that.

    November 14, 2014 at 11:02 a.m. CST
    The Kenya Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Kenyan Health Ministry are locked in a heated battle over the safety of a tetanus vaccine that’s being administered to women in the country. Although the government, UNICEF and the World Health Organization have all said that the vaccine is safe, the country’s Catholic leaders say they have proof that the doses given to Kenyan women since March are “laced” with a fertility-inhibiting hormone.

     

    • #64
  5. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Ultron Will Inject You Now (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Ultron Will Inject You Now (View Comment):

    But he’s also given tens of billions of dollars of his own money to efforts to lift the poorest people in the world out of poverty and illness.

    He wants to vaccinate them. And track them. Rinse, lather, repeat.

    Hmm. Vaccination. Well, I guess we wouldn’t want that.

    November 14, 2014 at 11:02 a.m. CST
    The Kenya Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Kenyan Health Ministry are locked in a heated battle over the safety of a tetanus vaccine that’s being administered to women in the country. Although the government, UNICEF and the World Health Organization have all said that the vaccine is safe, the country’s Catholic leaders say they have proof that the doses given to Kenyan women since March are “laced” with a fertility-inhibiting hormone.

    Preventing tetanus is pretty important. I think I’d want to see the proof that these people claim to have.

    Yes, I saw your Mrs. Lincoln post. As I recall, it was essentially a block quotation from another web site.

    So I went to that site and read what it said. It said we were a virtual “police state” now. That nothing had been accomplished as a result of the shutdowns.

    Do we actually know that? I mean, there are now almost 400,000 confirmed cases of the Wuhan virus in America and about 13,000 deaths. There is a confirmed-case to fatality ratio of over three percent, which is pretty high. So what I’m wondering is, how do the people at the web site you linked know that we wouldn’t have had, say ten times the number of cases, and ten times the number of deaths, had we not done what we did?

    Personally, I’d have accepted 150,000 deaths to avoid the shutdown. As I’ve written elsewhere, I’d accept quite a large number of deaths. But preventing 100,000+ deaths isn’t “nothing,” and I wonder how then people you linked know they’re right.

    The IHME numbers are bad, as most models of poorly understood systems are bad. IHME deserves to be taken to task over that, and our leaders as well for believing those models and the ones out of London (which are probably actually the ones that triggered the shutdown in the firstplace).

    But I don’t think the people running the numbers at IHME are part of a vast Gates-led conspiracy to, I don’t know, vaccinate children in Africa.


    We are in a difficult time. Serious accusations based on tenuous evidence and wild claims are irresponsible. Serious charges demand serious evidence. Sensationalist posts imputing evil intent based on scant evidence are no better than what the mainstream press does every day.

     

    • #65
  6. Stina Member
    Stina
    @CM

    Henry Racette (View Comment):
    Preventing tetanus is pretty important. I think I’d want to see the proof that these people claim to have.

    From https://www.globalresearch.ca/mass-sterilization-kenyan-doctors-find-anti-fertility-agent-in-un-tetanus-vaccine/5431664

    The Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, however, saw evidence to the contrary, and had six different samples of the tetanus vaccine from various locations around Kenya sent to an independent laboratory in South Africa for testing.

    The results confirmed their worst fears: all six samples tested positive for the HCG antigen. The HCG antigen is used in anti-fertility vaccines, but was found present in tetanus vaccines targeted to young girls and women of childbearing age. Dr. Ngare, spokesman for the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, stated in a bulletin released November 4:

    There’s more if you take those key words: kenya tetanus hcg

    A lot of sites trying to debunk and a lot of original reporting including statements from the Kenyan PM some years later. Also verification that the vaccine was only administered to women aged 14-49. Now why would a tetanus vaccine be so targeted?

    • #66
  7. Stina Member
    Stina
    @CM

    Also, Uganda raised similar concerns over another vaccine – Hep B? Also with recorded statements from their governing officers.

    Considering Bill Gates hasn’t been shy about expressing his view of decreasing the human population (global warming), I don’t think this is that much of a stretch.

    Would you really trust someone who actually said we can lower the world’s population through vaccination with vaccine production?

    Exhibit A why my kids won’t be getting Gardasil or any untested vaccines until the original subjects are in their 30s.

    • #67
  8. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Stina (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):
    Preventing tetanus is pretty important. I think I’d want to see the proof that these people claim to have.

    From https://www.globalresearch.ca/mass-sterilization-kenyan-doctors-find-anti-fertility-agent-in-un-tetanus-vaccine/5431664

    The Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, however, saw evidence to the contrary, and had six different samples of the tetanus vaccine from various locations around Kenya sent to an independent laboratory in South Africa for testing.

    The results confirmed their worst fears: all six samples tested positive for the HCG antigen. The HCG antigen is used in anti-fertility vaccines, but was found present in tetanus vaccines targeted to young girls and women of childbearing age. Dr. Ngare, spokesman for the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, stated in a bulletin released November 4:

    There’s more if you take those key words: kenya tetanus hcg

    A lot of sites trying to debunk and a lot of original reporting including statements from the Kenyan PM some years later. Also verification that the vaccine was only administered to women aged 14-49. Now why would a tetanus vaccine be so targeted?

    Thank you.

    There are various tells for conspiratorial garbage stories. They tend to be sensational, they tend to posit a conspiracy, and they tend not to provide supporting evidence.

    The article you linked features the claim that six samples were sent to an independent laboratory in South Africa for testing. But no information is provided about the laboratory, no evidence that can be verified, nothing that can be followed to confirm the story.

    The same site contains all sorts of stuff about GMOs, eugenics, bio-engineered babies, etc.

    Serious accusations demand serious evidence. This isn’t evidence. It’s unsubstantiated sensationalist tabloid pablum.

    Next I’ll be hearing about how Tower 7 couldn’t have fallen down by itself, or some such.

    • #68
  9. Stina Member
    Stina
    @CM

    There’s a reason “evil genius” is a thing. There are no “moral geniuses”.

    I do not trust geniuses to be able to comprehend morality that isn’t founded on reason-able assumptions. I expect them to rely too much on pragmatism and logic with no room for knowledge gained through any other means than science.

    That might be fine for a handful of people, but it’s a recipe for disaster. Even Nietzsche could recognize the limitations of science based reason.

    • #69
  10. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Stina (View Comment):

    There’s a reason “evil genius” is a thing. There are no “moral geniuses”.

    I do not trust geniuses to be able to comprehend morality that isn’t founded on reason-able assumptions. I expect them to rely too much on pragmatism and logic with no room for knowledge gained through any other means than science.

    That might be fine for a handful of people, but it’s a recipe for disaster. Even Nietzsche could recognize the limitations of science based reason.

    I suppose very smart people probably come with the same range of morality as not very smart people. I’m sorry, but I’ll need something better than “he has billions of dollars,” some kind of evidence, to persuade me that Bill Gates is a moral monster. Just as I’d need evidence to be convinced the guy who collects my trash is a moral monster.

    • #70
  11. Stina Member
    Stina
    @CM

    Henry Racette (View Comment):
    The article you linked features the claim that six samples were sent to an independent laboratory in South Africa for testing. But no information is provided about the laboratory, no evidence that can be verified, nothing that can be followed to confirm the story.

    Right. So confirmation bias.

    No, you have an odd outlook on humanity that I find strangely popular on the right. We have no problem claiming we limit government because human nature, but have a difficult time applying that thinking to people who are in powerful positions.

    You can’t even manage to entertain the thought that someone may, on a lesser scale, share some common ideas with Margaret Sanger. I mean – she existed and she’s not exactly vilified.

    Use the search terms I gave you and find the rest of the information. There’s information on the testing sites and video statements from the PM. I don’t know how you get to conspiracy theory from there.

    • #71
  12. Stina Member
    Stina
    @CM

    Henry Racette (View Comment):
    Serious accusations demand serious evidence. This isn’t evidence. It’s unsubstantiated sensationalist tabloid pablum.

    This is the same argument Fred Cole used on me when I couldn’t produce a quote from his favored media outlets on European “no-go” zones. I had a local german rag with a video of a local authority figure using the [translated] phrase “no-go” and he said it was unsubstantiated.

    I don’t know what proof you want beyond primary sources. I dug up quotes from authority figures. Those are primary sources. You can’t just wish them away.

    The link I offered was my first find. I’m not going to provide a ton of links where half you won’t accept. It wasn’t widely reported in the states. Should we be surprised? Go do your own leg work. I found a primary source and that satisfies me.

    • #72
  13. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Stina (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):
    The article you linked features the claim that six samples were sent to an independent laboratory in South Africa for testing. But no information is provided about the laboratory, no evidence that can be verified, nothing that can be followed to confirm the story.

    Right. So confirmation bias.

    Well, I have a bias toward wanting evidence before I condemn someone. Yes.

    No, you have an odd outlook on humanity that I find strangely popular on the right. We have no problem claiming we limit government because human nature, but have a difficult time applying that thinking to people who are in powerful positions.

    Again, I just want evidence of wrongdoing before I condemn someone.

    You can’t even manage to entertain the thought that someone may, on a lesser scale, share some common ideas with Margaret Sanger. I mean – she existed and she’s not exactly vilified.

    No, I don’t find it hard to imagine all kinds of awfulness. But, again, I want evidence before I ascribe it to any particular person.

    Use the search terms I gave you and find the rest of the information. There’s information on the testing sites and video statements from the PM. I don’t know how you get to conspiracy theory from there.

    I prefer that people who are making arguments bring their own evidence. If it’s easy to find, that shouldn’t be too hard. I’ll wait until something more convincing than what I’ve heard here comes along.

     

    • #73
  14. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Stina (View Comment):
    I don’t know what proof you want beyond primary sources. I dug up quotes from authority figures. Those are primary sources. You can’t just wish them away.

    I’m sorry, but quotations from “authority figures” that are emphatically refuted by other quotations from other “authority figures” kind of cancel each other out. I mean, unless you just wish away the authority figures you don’t like.

     

    • #74
  15. Leslie Watkins Inactive
    Leslie Watkins
    @LeslieWatkins

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    So, just hypothetically, imagine this. Suppose Bill Gates were simply a man who got filthy stinking rich because he worked hard and made some good calls in the early days of the PC boom and then managed his company well. He then decided that he wanted to be remembered as a great philanthropist, rather than just a rich computer nerd. Being an unusually bright but not particularly socially adept fellow, he figured his computer savvy was proof that he was smarter than most people at everything, not just making money in the software business. So he and his wife poured a few billion dollars into a foundation and decided that fighting disease and crushing poverty in the world’s poorest communities would be its mission. Now he shares his bright ideas as if the world were eager to hear them, as people with lots of money will tend to do, and some of them are pretty good and some of them are the kind of busybody nostrums you’d expect from a guy who probably hasn’t thought much about political ideas or values.

    If, just hypothetically, that were the case, how would he look or sound different than he appears here?

    There are sinister people out there. I just haven’t seen evidence that Bill Gates is one of them.

    JSYK, I certainly don’t begrudge Gates his money or his fame and don’t find him sinister in the least. I’ve always thought of him as a very business-wise rather than tech-savvy guy (the brilliance of making DOS the ubiquitous operating system for PCs, for one). I did not like the government’s case against Microsoft, and to anyone who says he’s too rich I just say I have no idea where we’d be, job wise, if it weren’t for the PC. Just consider the moment we’re in. If this happened before computers and the internet. I suspect that most people’s morale would be much more deflated by now; their actual financial situations, much worse. But that doesn’t make Gates an expert on what’s coming, yet his public stature will suggest to many that it does. And though I do not know, I suspect that his sources would agree with the headlines of late last week warning us that this is to be a devastating week, yet as I write this, early early Wednesday morning, the trajectory seems actually kind of good. It’s psychically bizarre. So any talk of any aspect of this uncertainty going on for another 18 months is a likely candidate for a snowball in the face, however decent a guy he (and his wife Melissa) are.

    • #75
  16. Stina Member
    Stina
    @CM

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    Stina (View Comment):
    I don’t know what proof you want beyond primary sources. I dug up quotes from authority figures. Those are primary sources. You can’t just wish them away.

    I’m sorry, but quotations from “authority figures” that are emphatically refuted by other quotations from other “authority figures” kind of cancel each other out. I mean, unless you just wish away the authority figures you don’t like.

     

    Which, when ascertaining truth between contradictory statements, you are in fact doing.

    You have no evidence to support any of your opinions. Just that you like the guy and you don’t believe statements made by people who make him look bad.

    https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/human-rights/hcg-found-in-who-tetanus-vaccine-in-kenya/

    Origin paper no longer available. Named laboratory AriQ Quest in Nairobi, though it says 3 independent labs were involved.

    Kenya PM statements:

    https://www.nation.co.ke/news/Raila-joins-Catholic-Church-in-opposing-tetanus-vaccine/1056-4091820-11g3lhi/index.html

    Includes statements from Odinga, WHO, and UNICEF as well as all laboratories used for testing. I’ll leave it to you to figure out who you believe – that the testing sites are reputable… or not.

    I expect you to amend towards reasonable conclusion even if you choose to think differently instead of “conspiracy theory”.

    • #76
  17. Henry Racette Member
    Henry Racette
    @HenryRacette

    Leslie Watkins (View Comment):

    Henry Racette (View Comment):

    So, just hypothetically, imagine this. Suppose Bill Gates were simply a man who got filthy stinking rich because he worked hard and made some good calls in the early days of the PC boom and then managed his company well. He then decided that he wanted to be remembered as a great philanthropist, rather than just a rich computer nerd. Being an unusually bright but not particularly socially adept fellow, he figured his computer savvy was proof that he was smarter than most people at everything, not just making money in the software business. So he and his wife poured a few billion dollars into a foundation and decided that fighting disease and crushing poverty in the world’s poorest communities would be its mission. Now he shares his bright ideas as if the world were eager to hear them, as people with lots of money will tend to do, and some of them are pretty good and some of them are the kind of busybody nostrums you’d expect from a guy who probably hasn’t thought much about political ideas or values.

    If, just hypothetically, that were the case, how would he look or sound different than he appears here?

    There are sinister people out there. I just haven’t seen evidence that Bill Gates is one of them.

    JSYK, I certainly don’t begrudge Gates his money or his fame and don’t find him sinister in the least. I’ve always thought of him as a very business-wise rather than tech-savvy guy (the brilliance of making DOS the ubiquitous operating system for PCs, for one). I did not like the government’s case against Microsoft, and to anyone who says he’s too rich I just say I have no idea where we’d be, job wise, if it weren’t for the PC. Just consider the moment we’re in. If this happened before computers and the internet. I suspect that most people’s morale would be much more deflated by now; their actual financial situations, much worse. But that doesn’t make Gates an expert on what’s coming, yet his public stature will suggest to many that it does. And though I do not know, I suspect that his sources would agree with the headlines of late last week warning us that this is to be a devastating week, yet as I write this, early early Wednesday morning, the trajectory seems actually kind of good. It’s psychically bizarre. So any talk of any aspect of this uncertainty going on for another 18 months is a likely candidate for a snowball in the face, however decent a guy he (and his wife Melissa) are.

    I agree, and tend to think we’ve wildly overestimated this thing and made a lot of mistakes out of fear and uncertainty and the cowardice of politicians. Never again. I’ll accept the risk, even of hundreds of thousands dead, over another shutdown like this.

    I am about as interested in Bill Gates’ opinions about things as I am in [name your random rich person]. I don’t expect that he and I agree about almost anything. However, I have a passion for a small rural hospital in Ghana that’s been started by a friend of mine. Supporting it is a personal mission for me and my family. I’ve helped ship tons of medical equipment and supplies to Africa, and spent countless hours talking with people there and learning their needs. I have a different, more detailed sense than most, perhaps, of the challenges they face. And I won’t casually fault someone who has contributed an enormous amount of his own wealth to helping the least among us. Not without some fairly compelling evidence.

     

    • #77
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.