Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Mayors Trying to Outdo One Another
First, it was DeBlasio threatening to permanently close synagogues if New York Jews held services. Not to be outdone, the mayor of Washington DC says, “You’re not so tough on your citizens. Look at what I’m doing!”
Hopefully, the DC police will ignore this civil rights violation, but what I can see are governors and mayors running for re-election on platforms of “Look how tough I fought the virus.” Let’s hope their citizens “thank” them for their efforts by selecting someone else.
Published in Politics
Autocrats revert to type. To paraphrase my patron saint Milton Friedman, people generally get what they vote for. Never truer than in LA specifically and California generally.
When personal choices have the potential to hurt people well beyond oneself and one’s family then of course the government can step in.
No, not really, not in our system of government. In a totalitarian dictatorship, yes.
You need to think through that last statement of yours a lot more carefully and add some modifiers.
This has been the justification for seatbelt and motorcycle helmet laws.
Judgment is required to balance rights against the public interest. There’s a mechanism in place to correct officials who go too far in one way or the other — the ballot box. Or, in some cases, the courts.
Yes, in our American system of government plenary powers are granted to the state and local government. That means that those governments have the authority to do just about anything they deem necessary in the public interest. They aren’t allowed to restrict rights unless there is a compelling reason to do so, but in the case of a rampaging, deadly disease there is a compelling reason to restrict some rights temporarily.
That’s obviously a good reason to be aware of local politics and who is elected to state and local offices.
.
Yes, and it has also been the justification for KGB surveillance and detainment of citizens. There is nothing that can’t be justified if that argument is allowed to rule all others.
Judgment and ballot boxes are far from the only mechanism to correct officials who go too far, as was recognized by our founders. If we relied only on judgment and majority rule, any amount of tyranny would be allowed. And the courts do not step in to protect rights; they sit in judgment when people bring their cases to the courts.
So not true.
I agree, but this is not the case. Ebola was a significantly more deadly disease, but we came nowhere near the restrictions on it than we have for the Chinese flu . . .