Can we stop saying “God-damn”?

 

On this week’s podcast, Rob felt it necessary to say, “God-damn.” Last week, James was similarly compelled to say, “God-damn.”

My recollection is that Ricochet has a code of conduct which supports civility and prohibits vulgarity. Does this phrase not violate that code?

I am also going to go out on a limb and postulate that there is a good representation of Evangelical Christians such as myself within the Ricochet community. There are few phrases which are more offensive to Evangelicals than this.

Not to be preachy, but to establish a fact: Not misusing God’s name is the fourth of the 10 Commandments (“You shall not misuse the name of the Lord your God, for the Lord will not hold anyone guiltless who misuses his name.” Exodus 20:7, NIV).

There would be no conservatism without something to conserve, such as the firm, longstanding, moral code of the the 10 Commandments. Haven’t many of us fought hard to keep the 10 Commandments part of our civil tradition?  We are hypocrites if we fight this battle, but flagrantly ignore the Commandments’ teachings.

I am asking the Ricochet community if the momentary endorphin release which may come from saying these words is worth the cost to our cause.

Published in Podcasts
Tags: ,

This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 83 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Archibald Campbell Member
    Archibald Campbell
    @ArchieCampbell

    I have many-handed feelings about it. On the first hand, the father of the modern American conservative movement, William F. Buckley Jr., used it a fair bit, it even being the title of one of his books, “Cancel Your Own G**damn Subscription.” Though if it didn’t lead a sentence, he used a lowercase “g.”  A staunch Catholic, maybe he thought it didn’t count that way.  (See below for more on that.)  There’s enough residual Christianity in me that I understand the objection among our practicing Christian and Jewish folks, though. (That was hand number two.) On the third hand, it is so commonly and plentifully used on one side of my family that not a whit of religious association remains in its use to me.  I say it a lot, though sometimes go with the Hank Hill “Got-dang it!”

    A reasonable end-around the main theological objection to it is to use it in print with a lowercase “g.” Sure it’s a bit pagan, and I suppose could run afoul of the whole false idol thing, since you’d be asking–nay commanding–some random pagan god to damn something for you, but maybe that’s a lower-order offense than calling the big G with the big “G.”  That, of course, doesn’t help us much here, as we’re talking about the spoken version.  So that’s two paragraphs to get us back to where we started. You’re welcome, y’all.

    What if instead we all use “mother****ing?”  Just a thought.

    • #31
  2. OkieSailor Member
    OkieSailor
    @OkieSailor

    Well Cowabunga!!

    • #32
  3. OmegaPaladin Moderator
    OmegaPaladin
    @OmegaPaladin

    Generally, podcasts do not follow the CoC.  I know several shows have not followed it.

    • #33
  4. CACrabtree Coolidge
    CACrabtree
    @CACrabtree

    I guess it’s too late to ask this guy’s opinion.

     

    https://images.app.goo.gl/onwKkH1joFa9omno6

    • #34
  5. Slow on the uptake Coolidge
    Slow on the uptake
    @Chuckles

    Bob Baima: I am also going to go out on a limb and postulate that there is a good representation of Evangelical Christians such as myself within the Ricochet community. There are few phrases which are more offensive to Evangelicals than this

    (Highlights mine.) For this, if for no other reason, maybe consider restraint?

    • #35
  6. Spin Inactive
    Spin
    @Spin

    Misthiocracy ingeniously (View Comment):

    I would have no problem amending the CofC to prohibit blasphemous profanity if the prohibition on scatalogical profanity was lifted.

    I’ve never really understood why North American society has decided that blasphemous language is now acceptable but words about mundane bodily functions are still oh-so shocking. Personally, I think it should be the other way around.

    But that’s just me.

    100% agree.  You and I have done battle on this topic before.

    I’d rather they say [expletive] or [expletive] that the other…

    • #36
  7. Spin Inactive
    Spin
    @Spin

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    Did I? That’s not characteristic. I mean, I’ve said it, but saying it with a microphone in the room goes against my training. I’ll bet you five that if you roll tape you’ll hear I said it with a t, not a d, as if speaking German. Same thing, I know, but it’s somehow . . . Not?

    Same thing, Jimbo!

    • #37
  8. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):

    Generally, podcasts do not follow the CoC. I know several shows have not followed it.

    I even heard Mona Charon use the s-word on one of the “Need to Know” episodes.  No biggie . . .

    • #38
  9. iWe Coolidge
    iWe
    @iWe

    I cringe whenever I hear the phrase. And I lose respect for the speaker.

    • #39
  10. Front Seat Cat Member
    Front Seat Cat
    @FrontSeatCat

    Agree and thanks for saying it. You can’t say it on the air, or shouldn’t and it gets bleeped out still (I think).

    • #40
  11. Front Seat Cat Member
    Front Seat Cat
    @FrontSeatCat

    Stad (View Comment):

    Bob Baima: Not to be preachy, but to establish a fact: Not misusing God’s name is the fourth of the 10 Commandments (“You shall not misuse the name of the Lord your God, for the Lord will not hold anyone guiltless who misuses his name.” Exodus 20:7, NIV).

    Taking the Lord’s name in vain does not mean cussing when you accidently hit your thumb with a hammer or when you refer to some as a “g_d_” idiot.

    Taking the Lord’s name in vain means doing evil in God’s name. Cussing on a podcast is not evil.

    Besides, the rule is in place to keep the discussions civil. Heck, listen to the “Walk-ins Welcome” podcast with Christina Hoff Sommers. It was great!

    Nice try…..

    • #41
  12. DrewInWisconsin, Influencer Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Influencer
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Stad (View Comment):

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):

    Generally, podcasts do not follow the CoC. I know several shows have not followed it.

    I even heard Mona Charon use the s-word on one of the “Need to Know” episodes. No biggie . . .

    Gasp! She who says the President is too vulgar?!

    • #42
  13. repmodad Inactive
    repmodad
    @Repmodad

    James Lileks (View Comment):
    Did I? That’s not characteristic. I mean, I’ve said it, but saying it with a microphone in the room goes against my training.

    You know that saying, “Live so that if someone speaks ill of you, no one believes it,” or something like that? I immediately assumed you’d said something that got jumbled in the audio and mis-heard.

    My next thought was, “That doesn’t seem like James. He must have been talking about communism.”

    (I also didn’t catch it when I listened.) 

    • #43
  14. Jeff Hawkins Inactive
    Jeff Hawkins
    @JeffHawkins

    I only seem to notice Podhoretz doing it albeit infrequently but it’s enough for me to notice

    • #44
  15. colleenb Member
    colleenb
    @colleenb

    OkieSailor (View Comment):

    Well Cowabunga!!

    I used to say Sacajewa as my swear word when I was younger. Unfortunately I probably can’t bring it back in use because I’m not a native American, not even 1/2047th.

    • #45
  16. Doug Kimball Thatcher
    Doug Kimball
    @DougKimball

     Coarse language is impolite in polite company, like passing gas.  We like to think that Ricochet is a civil place, so we use polite language.  Why?  Because some words can be embarassing and others, offensive.  There are more polite and less offensive ways to make a point, and making the effort to clean things up is the respectful thing to do.  It’s that simple.  That being said, we live in the real world, a coarse and godless place.  Using coarse language is both common and unremarkable.  When it leaks into polite company or is used purposefully, its effect is amplified.  Try not to take offense.

    • #46
  17. colleenb Member
    colleenb
    @colleenb

    Also I am against using s–t, etc. Now if we wanted to all say ‘merde’ that would be ok because everything sounds better in French.

    • #47
  18. DrewInWisconsin, Influencer Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Influencer
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Doug Kimball (View Comment):
    Coarse language is impolite in polite company

    Is it polite in impolite company?

    • #48
  19. Misthiocracy ingeniously Member
    Misthiocracy ingeniously
    @Misthiocracy

    Doug Kimball (View Comment):

    Coarse language is impolite in polite company, like passing gas. We like to think that Ricochet is a civil place, so we use polite language. 

    Wait, does this mean I’m not allowed to pass gas while surfing Ricochet?

    • #49
  20. BastiatJunior Member
    BastiatJunior
    @BastiatJunior

    EDISONPARKS (View Comment):

    BastiatJunior (View Comment):

    BastiatJunior (View Comment):

    Uh-oh! Don’t read my quote of the day. :-o

    Seriously I agree with what you say. Please take my Quote of the Day in the spirit in which it was intended.

    Also disturbing is that young college graduates are using the F-word in practically every sentence. A phenomenon novelist Tom Wolfe dubbed “F— patois.”

    I recently did some contract work for a trucking company and I heard that word much more frequently from the young women in the office than I did from the drivers.

    I’m in the trucking industry and the F-bomb is ubiquitous. Therefore, it does become a challenge to not to use the all purpose, absolutely unnecessary F bomb, for no other reason than to try to keep up and show the others you’re MOT (the Trucking Industry Tribe).

    Oh I heard plenty of it from the drivers, but heard it even more from the young women.  Maybe it seemed like more because it’s more jarring to hear it from a young woman’s voice.

    • #50
  21. Joseph Stanko Coolidge
    Joseph Stanko
    @JosephStanko

    PHenry (View Comment):

    Bob Baima: Not misusing God’s name

    This always confused me. Is G-d’s name ‘G-d’?

    No, in the Old Testament his name is represented by the Tetragrammaton, which some traditions consider too sacred to pronounce.  In most (but not all) English translations the term “Lord” is used instead.

    • #51
  22. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Misthiocracy ingeniously (View Comment):

    Doug Kimball (View Comment):

    Coarse language is impolite in polite company, like passing gas. We like to think that Ricochet is a civil place, so we use polite language.

    Wait, does this mean I’m not allowed to pass gas while surfing Ricochet?

    And you’d better be wearing pants too, mister! 

    • #52
  23. Misthiocracy ingeniously Member
    Misthiocracy ingeniously
    @Misthiocracy

    Slow on the uptake (View Comment):

    Misthiocracy ingeniously (View Comment):
    I’ve never really understood why North American society has decided that … words about mundane bodily functions are still oh-so shocking.

    A number of the previous comments appear to deny that such words “oh-so shocking.”

    While I might wish they were, evidence seems to be to the contrary.

    Counter-point: One still can’t use scatological language on North American broadcast television, but there’s no prohibition against blasphemous language.

    • #53
  24. Slow on the uptake Coolidge
    Slow on the uptake
    @Chuckles

    Misthiocracy ingeniously (View Comment):

    Slow on the uptake (View Comment):

    Misthiocracy ingeniously (View Comment):
    I’ve never really understood why North American society has decided that … words about mundane bodily functions are still oh-so shocking.

    A number of the previous comments appear to deny that such words “oh-so shocking.”

    While I might wish they were, evidence seems to be to the contrary.

    Counter-point: One still can’t use scatological language on North American broadcast television, but there’s no prohibition against blasphemous language.

    Throwback.  Try cable.  

    (I’m guessing federal regs still prohibit the former but the latter might be seen as a violation of 1st Amendment.)

    • #54
  25. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    I think we’re throwing around the word “blasphemous” a little too casually. Next thing you know, people will be afraid to draw cartoons of Mohammed!

    My problem with GD is the seriousness of the call for God to damn someone (especially a person, more than a thing or ideology). Is that a prayer you really want to say? Do unto others. . .?

    I agree with Prager (and @josephstanko) that God is not God’s name. “God” is a type which everyone recognizes, whether faithful or not. “Gods of the Copybook Headings.” “Lesser gods.” God has an OT name and a NT name — “Jesus.” I am much more distressed when people use “Jesus” as an exclamation, which happens here occasionally on R> in the comments and all the time on TV. What did Jesus ever do to deserve that??

    • #55
  26. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    I agree with Prager (and @josephstanko) that God is not God’s name. “God” is a type which everyone recognizes, whether faithful or not. “Gods of the Copybook Headings.” “Lesser gods.” God has an OT name and a NT name — “Jesus.” I am much more distressed when people use “Jesus” as an exclamation, which happens here occasionally on R> in the comments and all the time on TV. What did Jesus ever do to deserve that??

    That’s sort of a distinction I was raised with, too.  So it bugs me when English subtitle writers for Russian movies take a very mild spoken utterance, “my god!” and translate it in the subtitles as, “Jesus!” 

    • #56
  27. Spin Inactive
    Spin
    @Spin

    John Yoo should be slapped.

    • #57
  28. colleenb Member
    colleenb
    @colleenb

    Spin (View Comment):

    John Yoo should be slapped.

    But only if you slap him with a McRib.

    • #58
  29. JimGoneWild Coolidge
    JimGoneWild
    @JimGoneWild

    I thought they were talking about beaver damns.

    • #59
  30. E. Kent Golding Moderator
    E. Kent Golding
    @EKentGolding

    There is a sign in Wisconsin Dells ( on a dam ), that says “Dam.  Danger”.

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.