Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
French Court Scrambles the Debate Over What Is “GMO” in Foods
Science has long been embroiled in food safety and labeling debates. Most recently, you’ve probably read or heard about the decades-long debate on whether to mandate labeling or disclosure that “genetically modified organisms” (GMOs) were used to grow or process certain food products.
Think of the “Arctic Apple” (which doesn’t brown when cut, thanks to a little genetic modification, or the “AquAdvantage Salmon,” which merges genes from two separate salmon varieties (Chinook & Atlantic) for a fish that grows faster and bigger (and they’re all female, supposedly). Neither of these products, despite being in development for the better part of two decades is just now, slowly, making their way into retail markets (but not Whole Foods, I assure you).
But I often found it weird that while there’s a cottage industry of activist groups who’ve lobbied for years against GMO food products – among the safest, most tested and environmental friendly ever grown – they’ve been silent about an old technology that was used to create all kinds of varieties a few decades ago, called “mutagenesis.” This technology uses gamma rays or chemicals to scramble the DNA in crops to create new varieties. Think of Ruby Red grapefruit, which was created this way.
Now, a French court has finally spoken up and is seeking labeling or bans of a wide variety of commonly used foods – some even labeled “organic” – because they were developed through mutagenesis.
Have you been eating foods derived from mutagenesis? You betcha. Even you beer drinkers. Watch this space.
“Common foods created using mutagenesis are rice, peas, peanuts, grapefruit, bananas, cassava and sorghum. Mutagenesis wheat is used for bread and pasta and mutated barley is in beer and whiskey. That means no more “bio” beer, bread, or pasta.”
Published in General
Should we use genetic engineering to bring back the older bananas.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw7PUrgU3N0
In a sense, that’s a very pro-GMO observation. There being no rational grounds for fear of such foods, they can compete on rational bases: taste, nutrition, suitability for transport and storage, investment required to farm them, …
Absolutely not – G-d killed them for a reason. Plus there are things that science should never meddle with. Also, they would be born cursed – or worse. Let them lie, we don’t need to release undead bananas onto an unsuspecting population.
You can buy the trees through Amazon.
Too late…
This could be the next SyFy monster movie, “Attack of the Zombie Bananas.”