The Less Government, the Better

 

I’ve been an HOA board member for about eight years now, and only became a member after we had a horrible issue with some residents trying to bully a young couple they didn’t like. Those of us who took over the board have followed an agenda aimed at leaving people alone, and since our covenants are minimal so it’s pretty easy. It got me to thinking, however, about the handful of residents who complain about their neighbors.

The most recent issue was someone complaining about their neighbor’s kids riding dirt bikes on the property. They didn’t like the noise and dust but it’s not an activity prohibited by the covenants. I told the woman complaining that she needed to contact the neighbors directly before we would even consider getting involved. She refused. Another neighbor talked to them and worked it out (keep in mind these are three- or five-acre tracts). The other thing we hear about often is someone not liking their neighbor’s yard clutter. We always tell them to find us where the activity is prohibited in the covenants (and, of course, it’s not).

The point is that we are the closest thing to a local government in our unincorporated community, and I’m sure to these neighborhood complainers it’s frustrating that we won’t do anything about their perceived problem. Yet to me, government (in this case, quasi-government) serves best by doing the least.

We made it clear to the residents (voters) that we felt this way when first elected, and make a point of telling them again every year. Wouldn’t it be great to hear that from political candidates? The Texas Legislature only meets every other year for 140 calendar days, and in every session, the clock runs out on all sorts of mischief. Would that we could enjoy that in our national government.

“If you see ten troubles coming down the road, you can be sure that nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.” — Calvin Coolidge

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 33 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. JustmeinAZ Member
    JustmeinAZ
    @JustmeinAZ

    PHenry (View Comment):

    Pony Convertible (View Comment):

    PHenry (View Comment):
    One woman complained that the kids upstairs ran in their hallway.

    I moved into a new home when my kids were preschool age. The first day in the house, while we were trying to get situated and the kids were outside riding their Big Wheels, we had a neighbor knock on the door. He wasn’t coming over to welcome us to the neighborhood. He came over to insist that we not let our kids play outside.

    What kind of a miserable scold does one have to be to hate seeing or hearing children have fun?

    One like me. Which is why I live in a 55+ community. Thank goodness no one on our street has grandchildren who visit!

    • #31
  2. JustmeinAZ Member
    JustmeinAZ
    @JustmeinAZ

    Duplicate post.

    • #32
  3. Ontheleftcoast Inactive
    Ontheleftcoast
    @Ontheleftcoast

    Mark Camp (View Comment):

    Tex929rr,

    Beware. I fear that those ambitious people who are presently out of power, and disagree with you on this…

    “The less government the better”

    …may set a logical trap for you.

    They will say,

    “In many of the disputes that come before it for a decision, the group currently in power (you and the other board members) must decide whether Less government is better, angering one party and pleasing the other, or More government is better, pleasing the first and angering the second. The case you mention is one such dispute.

    “Are you saying that…

    • Less government is better in every case, or
    • More government in better in some cases, and Less government is better in others

    …?”

    Whichever answer you give will gain you entry to the trap. They will have another question ready for you, depending on your answer, that will force you deeper into it.

    If you refuse to be lured into the debate, you will have entered their trap by your very refusal.

    How can you avoid this trap?

    The only way I can see is amend your assertion as follows. (Added text in italics):

    In some cases more government is better; in others The Less Government, The is Better. We who hold the power can be trusted to decide which is true on a case by case basis.

    But politics is a domain where I have no aptitude or knowledge at all, so there may be a better solution.

    As the anarchists say, There’s no government like no government. It’s lousy political philosophy, but a pretty good advertising slogan. 

    • #33
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.