Your friend Jim George thinks you'd be a great addition to Ricochet, so we'd like to offer you a special deal: You can become a member for no initial charge for one month!
Ricochet is a community of like-minded people who enjoy writing about and discussing politics (usually of the center-right nature), culture, sports, history, and just about every other topic under the sun in a fully moderated environment. We’re so sure you’ll like Ricochet, we’ll let you join and get your first month for free. Kick the tires: read the always eclectic member feed, write some posts, join discussions, participate in a live chat or two, and listen to a few of our over 50 (free) podcasts on every conceivable topic, hosted by some of the biggest names on the right, for 30 days on us. We’re confident you’re gonna love it.
Twenty years ago Wednesday morning, I sat on a hilltop overlooking the northern part of the firing range at Vandenburg Air Force Base. In a pre-internet era for monitoring the umbilical data from what was going to be the first of three climate-research satellites, my go/no duties were completed around 6 a.m. It was just in time to head out of the “blockhouse” (no they don’t really exist anymore) to watch sunrise wash over the SLC-3 launch pad.
Happy birthday man.
Good stuff, GLD, and a great accomplishment. The engineer in me, marginal though I’ve become, is both intrigued and a bit envious.
Over-engineered or not, having a craft far exceed its expected lifespan is the mark of a good design. It’s the results that offer the proof.
Neat.
Heh, heh, heh.
Love the story GLD. Thanks for sharing.
I love the wide range of experience that Rico’s have.
Mr. CowGirl worked in test and development for his whole career, and I can’t imagine how difficult it must have been for you to create something with only one attempt! I know that he was all about the stats, and ONE is not a trend, he’d remind me.
I’m impressed that it is up there still doing its job, after all this time. Good work!
Fantastic post! Thank YOU!!!
Great stuff, GLD. Of course, you could have driven that convertible and gotten out there roughly as fast as the puddle-hoppers go, couldn’t you? Especially on Route 50?
If only they had put Hubble in your capable hands…
Hush you, just keeping up with the flow…..
That sir was my father’s ax to grind. He was one of the half a dozen engineers at GSFC that were aghast that the Hubble verification program was not using an independent set of metrology for demonstrating end to end optical performance. His earlier experience on the first NASA astronomical observatory (called the OAO, designed and built by Grumman during the same era they were designing and building the LEM for Apollo) was to use multiple independent means to measure the critical operating parameters. It was part of the their lesson’s learned.
However he worked for GSFC who’s responsibilities for Hubble was the design and development of the mission’s five instruments. The spacecraft/telescope responsibility was given to Marshal Space Flight Center, who given their very limited experience (i.e. none) in space science missions relied very heavily on the assurances of the primary suppliers for the spacecraft (TRW) and the telescope optics (Perkin Elmer). Those prime contractors were recycling their designs for their successful KH12 spy satellites.
Conceptually it seems like a no brainer, just turn the spy telescope from looking down to looking out. However like many technological failures, carrying some hubris from prior successes without carefully assessing what you think are minor differences from your past designs still need to be critically examined. NASA was fortunate that Hubble was in low orbit, design to be serviceable, and the fix was essentially installing a set of corrective optics (think akin to getting a pair glasses) done by replacing one of the initial instruments with those optics (the COSTAR). All later replacement instruments had the correction optics built into them.
I think the Hubble’s original life requirement was for 15 years (which was an extraordinary requirement for a 1970’s mission design specification). It has been up there since 1990 (It was ready for a 1986 shuttle launch, but the Challenger failure bumped that back four years).
So at 25 years old it has also been an impressive success for it’s longevity.
A great, great post, GLD, Ricochet at its best.
Great story. And thanks for your part in (eventually) saving us from the climate-crazies.
I like how you include characters with whom I can relate.
Flying your kite like airplane within 4 miles of an active rocket launch site, you would think it would behoove the pilot to pay attention to the NOTAM’s (notice to airmen) issued for your area. The FAA will definitely let you know the range is active before you take off. It’s not just a good idea, it’s part of the rules and regulations you agree to abide by to get that license to fly.
Clearly a Clueless Bozo.