Conservative Is As Conservative Does

 

Trump thumbs upPresident Trump is the most conservative president of my lifetime, including President Reagan. This is true, as a matter of fact, across all three of the legs of the old conservative coalition stool: economy, national defense, and social conservatism. With an impressive record of promises kept, despite the worst efforts of Democrats and Conservatism Inc., American voters have a real choice in 2020.

President Trump has done more to strengthen NATO, as opposed to papering over other nations’ hiding under our nuclear umbrella and so shifting the burden onto our taxpayers and our cities under ICBM target designations. He has, without a massive military build-up (despite his hyping of our latest purchases), imposed more economic pain on bad actors (Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran) than any president since at least Reagan, and done so to the advantage of American working families. President Trump’s policies have paid off in growing NATO member states spending at least 2 percent of their GDP on their own defense, from two to eight members, outside the United States. This satisfies Americans’ basic sense of fairness, building a reasonable basis for continued commitment to an alliance that is finally showing signs of taking itself seriously. Such a substantial demonstration of commitment also serves notice to Russia and China that NATO is not a paper tiger.

President Trump has similarly pushed the United Nations to really live up to its fine phrases, its written aspirations. Far from abandoning the world or merely patronizing other nations, he has treated them as adults, as sovereign states who are entitled to pursue their interests while we pursue ours. He made that point again in hosting an on-camera meeting of the U.N. Security Council members. Read or watch the remarks and you will see even China engaging in a mutually respectful manner.

President Trump is the first president since the New Deal to actually attack the onerous burden and unconstitutional arrogation of authority in the regulatory state, resulting in a massive effective tax cut entirely outside of the budget process. The latest jobs report smashed “experts” expectations and provided the occasion for the Office of Management and Budget to trumpet the massive transfer of wealth from the permanent bureaucracy back into the hands of the American people. This is wealth that was being destroyed by regulation, not even having a chance to pass through the taxable economy. These actions, pushed hard by President Trump, unlike any other modern Republican president, are especially advantageous to small businesses, and so to women, minorities, and lower-income whites with a dream of business success.

President Trump has done more for racial harmony and more for minority economic empowerment than any other modern president, as he has ruthlessly pushed for real job creation and real wage growth for those in the lower-income quintiles. This has been cutting the legs out from under the racial resentment industry, including the white racial grifters. TruCons like Ben Shapiro conveniently flip their arguments from claiming, with evidence, that Latin American immigrants vote overwhelmingly for Democrats, to claiming, without evidence, that patterns of immigration have no predictable effect on our electoral and then constitutional system. Yet, it is President Trump, who they find so personally offensive, who is actually, consciously, carrying out a program of programs to shift voting patterns, by listening and responding to needs rather than talking down to people without the right graduate school diplomas. If Latino, African American, and Asian voters really change their voting patterns, it will be thanks to President Trump, and not at all thanks to the Paul Ryan, Chamber of Commerce, AEI, National Review crews.

In the same manner, President Trump, a man whose faith has seemed mostly of the civic religion, basic respect for country, version, has done more to actually fulfill promises to “social conservatives” made by Reagan and every Republican presidential and Congressional leader since. See his very careful selection of judges at every level. See his administrative defunding of Planned Parenthood. See his aggressive promotion of religious liberty in every agency, led by Attorney General Barr’s eloquent defense of our history and liberty. See his relocation of our embassy to the actual capital of the state of Israel. See his personal promotion of protection for religious minorities around the world.

Closely connected with the defense of the first clause of the First Amendment, President Trump’s appointees in the Departments of Justice and Education have also pushed back hard against leftists suppressing conservative speech and assembly in public educational institutions. The Department of Justice revoked all the lawless “dear colleague” letters and ordered all agencies to refrain from any more avoidance of the formal, public, rulemaking process. Just this week, Justice intervened in a court case involving outrageous prior restraint on speech at Jones County Junior College. The statement of interest is devastating, as is the 9 December DOJ press statement:

“The United States of America is not a police state,” said Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband for the Civil Rights Division. “Repressive speech codes are the indecent hallmark of despotic, totalitarian regimes. They have absolutely no place in our country, and the First Amendment outlaws all tyrannical policies, practices, and acts that abridge the freedom of speech.”

“Unconstitutional restrictions on our first freedoms to speak and assemble directly threaten our liberty as Americans,” said U.S. Attorney Mike Hurst for the Southern District of Mississippi. “While some may disagree with the content of one’s speech, we should all be fighting for everyone’s Constitutional right to speak. I pray JCJC will do the right thing, change its policies to comply with the U.S. Constitution, and encourage its students to speak and assemble throughout our free state.”

President Trump is aggressively selling the product of promises made, promises kept, most recently at the Israeli-American Council’s national summit, in Florida, while Vice President Pence drove the points home hard to faith leaders in Kalamazoo, Michigan. We have a real choice, so what will you do about 2020?

Published in Politics
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 70 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Clifford A. Brown Member
    Clifford A. Brown
    @CliffordBrown

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Barfly (View Comment):

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    The problem is that Trump is Sui Generis, and is doing nothing* to lay an intellectual foundation for others to carry on in his stead after he goes (either in 2021 or 2025). So this all may end up as a fart in the wind.

    *yes, judges. I’m talking about on the political side of things, which judges should not be involved in.

    Just how much do you demand from one man? If the intellectual foundation for conservatism requires that DJT build that too, then clearly all is lost when he leaves office in 2025.

    That’s exactly my point.

    Just like most everything Obama did has been swept away, so too with Trump, I expect.

    The “intellectuals” who could be making the case for the good stuff Trump is doing are too busy attacking Trump the person.

    I believe it is not about a self-referential circle of intellectuals, but rather about a change in the electorate, responding to their own perceptions in a “change election,” instilling new habits, crudely expressed in self-placement on Party ID and Ideology 5-point scales.

    • #61
  2. Clifford A. Brown Member
    Clifford A. Brown
    @CliffordBrown

    Bill Nelson (View Comment):

    Stad (View Comment):
    Every time I look at Hillary Clinton, I ask myself, “How can any conservative not be happy Trump won – or at least because Hillary lost?

    To partially quote a conservative polemicist : I thank God daily that Clinton lost. And I prey to God to swiftly end the Trump presidency. Rock->Hard Place.

    What most irritates me bout Trump is that he had a chance to be a real leader, a good president for the country. He has thrown that away. The current crop of democrats is simply terrible. But Trump is giving Joe Biden a real good chance to become president. That is on Trump, no one else. When he loses in 2020, he has only himself to blame. But rest assured he will blame others.

    One of the primary impeachment charges rests on the fact that he prefers Trump of the nation. That is true.

     

    Bitter fiction.

    • #62
  3. Clifford A. Brown Member
    Clifford A. Brown
    @CliffordBrown

    Miffed White Male (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Well, how to be the fly in the ointment while acknowledging the strength of this post?

    Spending has not been abated.

    The swamp, and by that I primarily mean Cabinet agencies, has not been drained.

    I’m in the “tariffs are not conservative” camp.

    I’m good with Trump as a relatively conservative POTUS, but there are a few big boxes that he hasn’t checked.

    He didn’t say most conservative president possible. He said most conservative president of his lifetime.

     

    And meant it, including Ronald Reagan, the first Republican president in my adulthood. I refer to President Reagan the man, not Reagan the icon.

    • #63
  4. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. Stephens
    @BryanGStephens

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Barfly (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):
    I’m in the “tariffs are not conservative” camp.

    Sure they’re conservative. They conserve our economy. What they’re not is Libertarian. There’s an ocean of difference – Libertarianism pretends humans exist wholly as individuals. Conservatism recognizes we live in communities.

    This is a long and involved discussion that we will not resolve. I agree with @bryangstephens above that tariffs are not free market. They are, in fact, interventionist. I understandf that there may be short term rationales for them, but bottom line– they are big government. To me, that’s not conservative.

     

    But, they are a tool used by the founders, and, expected to be a way for the Federal government to raise taxes.

    How can doing that not be conservative? 

    It all depends on meaning of the word.

    Also, they are not big government.  They have nothing to do with big vs. Small. They are Federal,  and the govt. Is empowered to do them without any amendments or emanations from the penumbras.

    • #64
  5. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):
    and only has good judges because he’s using someone else’s list

    And people say Trump is stubborn and doesn’t listen to anybody.  I think he does, but not if his BS detector is pegged high.  Being a successful former NYC real estate tycoon, he must have a pretty good one.  He also doesn’t tolerate anyone who won’t advance his agenda, which is our agenda because we elected him.

    • #65
  6. DrewInWisconsin, Type Monkey Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Type Monkey
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):
    Yeah, Jonah has complained that Trump can’t cite Burke and only has good judges because he’s using someone else’s list. To quote Andrew Breitbart, “So?” Look at the results.

    It’s the Nevers’ position that anything good that happens under Trump is someone else’s doing. Anything bad is all his own.

    They staked out this position before he was even inaugurated. (You will find exactly that position scrawled here on Ricochet by some of the more prominent Nevers.) Three years of success has not convinced them. Nothing will convince them.

    • #66
  7. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    DrewInWisconsin, Type Monkey (View Comment):

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):
    Yeah, Jonah has complained that Trump can’t cite Burke and only has good judges because he’s using someone else’s list. To quote Andrew Breitbart, “So?” Look at the results.

    It’s the Nevers’ position that anything good that happens under Trump is someone else’s doing. Anything bad is all his own.

    They staked out this position before he was even inaugurated. (You will find exactly that position scrawled here on Ricochet by some of the more prominent Nevers.) Three years of success has not convinced them. Nothing will convince them.

    Trump can’t cite Burke?  Heck, I can’t cite Burke.  Yet I don’t consider myself any less of a conservative than Jonah considers himself one.  There are a lot of good Christians who can’t quote the Bible’s chapters and verses, but that doesn’t make them less faithful than someone who can recite the Bible front to back.

    Yet there are cases of required knowledge, such as a physicist knowing Newton’s Three Laws of Motion, or a doctor knowing the head bone connected to the neck bone (Is that right, @drbastiat?).  But those aren’t belief-based knowledge systems like faith and politics . . .

    • #67
  8. Bill Nelson Inactive
    Bill Nelson
    @BillNelson

    WillowSpring (View Comment):
    I really don’t understand why the supposedly conservative Never Trumpers didn’t recognize that there was a lot of energy in Trump that could have been guided if they worked with him. They totally blew it.

    Energy in Trump that could have been guided? How? By who? He is famous for not listening to advisors. One of his first attacks on being inaugurated was on Speaker Paul Ryan, and how often has he gone after McConnell?

    On his first day as president, he put his energy into disputing reported crowd sizes at his inauguration. And when has Trump tried to work with anyone else? His continued war on John McCain says a lot about the man (full disclosure: I was not a supporter of McCain because he was more interested in getting good press for himself-hence McCain-Feinberg).

    • #68
  9. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    Bill Nelson (View Comment):
    Energy in Trump that could have been guided? How? By who?

    Seems like the Federalist Society has been doing just that. Ask them how.

    • #69
  10. DrewInWisconsin, Type Monkey Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Type Monkey
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Bill Nelson (View Comment):
    On his first day as president, he put his energy into disputing reported crowd sizes at his inauguration.

    Never are still banging on about this. Which tells you exactly how trivial they are.

    • #70
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.