Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Pundits are buzzing about the idea that Hurricane Sandy may require the postponement of next week’s presidential elections. Although the impact of the storm was devastating, especially in the region where I grew up (I remember visiting Atlantic City as a kid, pre-casino), it does not appear that any nationwide postponement is necessary. But suppose the weather got worse. Luckily, the decision will be up, I believe, to the legislators and governors of the affected states, and not federal officials.
Some who are speculating that President Obama could postpone the elections haven’t read their Constitution (though, to be fair, he has had a habit of doing things that don’t reflect a reading of the Constitution). The Constitution confers no authority on the presidency to postpone an election — in fact, it barely recognizes congressional power to do the same.
Under the Constitution, the primary decision on whether to postpone the election is in the states, where it should be. There are two federal elections to be held next week — congressional and presidential. Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution states that “The Times, Places, and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof.” So the decision on the timing of the election is in the statehouses. Section 4 qualifies this power, however, by stating that “Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.”
If there were to be any emergency postponement power, it would have to come from the power to “make or alter such Regulations” of voting for congressmen. But Congress hasn’t exercised that power. Congress has only set out a common nationwide date for the holding of the congressional election. Other than that, it has recognized that this is a matter to be left in the hands of the states. This makes sense, particularly with natural disasters, which will tend to be localized and best handled by state officials on the ground who can make the best judgments about their severity and the best responses.
The key law, in my view, is 2 U.S.C. Section 8:
Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, the time for holding elections in any State, District, or Territory for a Representative or Delegate to fill a vacancy, whether such vacancy is caused by a failure to elect at the time prescribed by law, or by the death, resignation, or incapacity of a person elected, may be prescribed by the laws of the several States and Territories respectively.
Notice the language, “whether such vacancy is cased by a failure to elect at the time prescribed by law.” In that case, it is up to the state legislatures whether to enact any emergency postponement procedures. The subsection (b) reference is to an emergency that occurs when more than 100 vacancies occur in the House (most likely due to an attack of some kind).
Presidential elections are somewhat different, with Congress playing more of a role, but with the choice still up to the states about what to do if the election cannot be held next Tuesday. Article II, Section 1, says that presidential electors are to be chosen “in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct.” Section 1 also states that “Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.”
So the Constitution gives Congress the authority to set the election date, and presumably the backup date. Those who remember Bush v. Gore will recall that federal law sets out a schedule of when the election is to be held, when electors must send their votes to Washington, and when Congress counts them. In fact, Bush v. Gore turned in part on the fact that the Florida Supreme Court was ordering recounts that would have put it in violation of the federal due date for the presidential electoral count.
For a postponement, though, Congress has recognized that the matter is best left in the hands of the states, just as with the congressional elections. The key provision in my view is 3 U.S.C. Section 2:
Whenever any State has held an election for the purpose of choosing electors, and has failed to make a choice on the day prescribed by law, the electors may be appointed on a subsequent day in such a manner as the legislature of such State may direct.
This says that the state legislature gets to decide how to choose the electors if the election cannot occur next Tuesday. So for both congressional and presidential elections, whether the election will be postponed is up to the state legislators and governors of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia.