Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Democrats Impeaching Trump Because Orange Man Bad

 

Donald Trump’s haters have been demanding his impeachment since the day of his inauguration. To that end they have cast about wildly for any reason imaginable. And in the process they have attempted to criminalize the normal actions of the president.

They just don’t like Trump. The Democrats, of course, but also the NeverTrumpers, just want him gone. There have been so many attempts that it is almost too hard to list them all. The Mueller investigation, of course. Remember how Trump was going to be impeached because of the Mueller report? Remember that the next time you hear a news report about a poll showing how the number of Americans who support impeaching the president has supposedly increased since six months ago. All that means is that some Americans, otherwise known as Democrats, wanted to impeach Trump for Russian Collusion before and now want to impeach Trump for Ukrainian…something. They want to impeach Trump no matter the reason and no matter the facts.

Congressional Democrats held a vote on impeachment earlier this year because Trump tweeted about Alexandria Occasional-Cortex, Ilhan Whosemyhusband, Rashida Tableface, and the other one that no one cares about. (Spoiler alert: tweeting is not a high Crime and Misdemeanor).

The current impeachment frenzy was set off when a so-called “whistleblower” ratted on Trump to the intelligence community inspector general over a phone call with the president of Ukraine. The weird thing is, though, that the intelligence community inspector general doesn’t outrank the president of the United States. In fact, the intelligence community whistleblower protection act does not apply to the president. Furthermore, the “whistleblower,” who ReaClearInvestigations and others have identified as an Obama holdover named Eric Ciaramella, had no first-hand knowledge of the phone call. (He’s also suspected by some of being the leaker of parts of the transcripts of Trump’s conversations with the prime minister of Australia and the president of Mexico.)

But when President Trump released the official transcript of the phone call, the claims made by Ciaramella were shown to be false. We can all read the transcript of the call and the “whistleblower” complaint ourselves. Those of us who have read the phone transcript have more first-hand knowledge than Ciaramella did.

How many transcripts of presidential phone calls have you ever read? I’ve read one. This one. When people criticize the call, I roll my eyes. What do they know? Nothing. They have nothing to compare the call to. If they say the call was bad, all that means is they don’t like Trump. And by the way, it’s fine to not like Trump. This is America! However, not liking the president is not a reason to impeach him. I didn’t like Obama. That wasn’t a reason to impeach him.

Even when Obama made foreign policy decisions that I disagreed with, that still wasn’t a reason to impeach him. And there were a lot of those: the apology tour, cancelling missile defense to Poland, Libya, Syria, sending billions of dollars to Iran. And, by the way, Obama withheld military aid to Ukraine. The very thing Trump is accused of — withholding aid to Ukraine — Obama did. And, Actually, Trump sent lethal weapons to Ukraine in 2017. (Something the “Trump’s Putin’s puppet” people never managed to process.)

There was nothing wrong with Trump’s phone call with the Ukrainian President, but Democrats don’t like him so they’re trying to impeach him.

There are 104 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. RufusRJones Member

    DrewInWisconsin, Type Monkey (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Chip Roy is insanely smart.

    The phrase “quid pro quo” is not in the Constitution as a grounds for impeachment. However, “bribery” is a ground for impeachment.

    Why do they keep changing it? All they have to do is sell the public on what he actually did as damaging the country. It’s patently disingenuous.

    They still haven’t found an actual crime.

    This is actually oversight that should be done by the Foreign Affairs Committee not a genuine impeachment process. It’s a marketing scam. 

    • #91
    • November 15, 2019, at 12:18 PM PST
    • 2 likes
  2. Jeff Hawkins Coolidge

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    The phrase “quid pro quo” is not in the Constitution as a grounds for impeachment. However, “bribery” is a ground for impeachment.

    How was Trump bribed, which is what that means.

    Foreign aid that was already promised (which was the old pearl clutching) is now a bribe? 

    Not getting anything in return is called charity, not aid.

    • #92
    • November 15, 2019, at 12:19 PM PST
    • 4 likes
  3. DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone Coolidge

    • #93
    • November 15, 2019, at 12:21 PM PST
    • 3 likes
  4. RufusRJones Member

    Jordan just said that the Democrats are holding back four depositions from the SCIF that they want to use. 

    Now they are going back into the SCIF.

    It looked to me like the Democrats weren’t being fair to the Republicans on parliamentary rules.

    • #94
    • November 15, 2019, at 12:47 PM PST
    • 3 likes
  5. DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone Coolidge

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Jordan just said that the Democrats are holding back four depositions from the SCIF that they want to use.

    Now they are going back into the SCIF.

    Schiff’s gotta do a little more witness tampering before they can continue.

    • #95
    • November 15, 2019, at 1:08 PM PST
    • 3 likes
  6. RufusRJones Member

    DrewInWisconsin, Type Monkey (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Jordan just said that the Democrats are holding back four depositions from the SCIF that they want to use.

    Now they are going back into the SCIF.

    Schiff’s gotta do a little more witness tampering before they can continue.

    There are NT GOP saying this is all OK

    • #96
    • November 15, 2019, at 1:10 PM PST
    • 2 likes
  7. DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone Coolidge

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Type Monkey (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    Jordan just said that the Democrats are holding back four depositions from the SCIF that they want to use.

    Now they are going back into the SCIF.

    Schiff’s gotta do a little more witness tampering before they can continue.

    There are NT GOP saying this is all OK

    Well, of course. The Uniparty protects it own.

    • #97
    • November 15, 2019, at 1:14 PM PST
    • 3 likes
  8. RufusRJones Member

     

     

    • #98
    • November 16, 2019, at 12:20 AM PST
    • 3 likes
  9. RufusRJones Member

    Due process lol

     

     

    • #99
    • November 16, 2019, at 1:09 AM PST
    • 2 likes
  10. RufusRJones Member

     

     

    • #100
    • November 16, 2019, at 3:07 AM PST
    • 3 likes
  11. RufusRJones Member

     

     

     

    • #101
    • November 16, 2019, at 4:51 AM PST
    • 3 likes
  12. RufusRJones Member

    God Bless America And The Democrat Party!

     

     

     

     

    • #102
    • November 16, 2019, at 4:59 AM PST
    • 2 likes
  13. RufusRJones Member

     

     

     

    • #103
    • November 16, 2019, at 8:30 AM PST
    • Like
  14. DrewInEastHillAutonomousZone Coolidge

    I believe her total minutes are high because many, including Nunes, yielded their time to her after Schifty kept shutting her down.

    Republican men making sure a woman gets to speak after a Democrat man kept trying to prevent it.

    • #104
    • November 16, 2019, at 8:34 AM PST
    • 3 likes

Comments are closed because this post is more than six months old. Please write a new post if you would like to continue this conversation.