Spiritual But Not Religious

 

I’m tired of people describing their spiritual lives as “spiritual but not religious.” I have little respect for people who wear the spiritual label to show how enlightened they are, and how they have freed themselves from the archaic practices of religion.

I know there are many people who have had painful experiences with religion and thus have chosen this narrow journey of spirituality. Many people have had difficult, emotionally wounding experiences with organized religion. They have been betrayed by a spiritual leader or were taught as a child a fearful or hateful version of religions. They were expected to follow rituals they didn’t understand or resented. All in all, early experiences left them empty, without filling their hearts and souls. Even my own mother felt rejected; she had wanted to join a synagogue, but we had limited funds. She left hurt and embarrassed after visiting the synagogue, when they told her they couldn’t adjust the fees for her poor financial situation.

There are also many people who, for one reason or another, never felt connected to their religion. A plethora of people and entities could be blamed for this lack of fulfillment. In many cases, parents didn’t know how to communicate the depth and meaning of the religion; often they themselves had been poorly educated, so that the religious observation was a perplexing combination of ritual, holy days, and practices to which they couldn’t relate. The mix of observances just seemed to interfere with everyday life and didn’t seem to provide a meaningful purpose.

And yet there are many people who have felt that “something was missing” in their lives; it didn’t occur to them that their earlier experiences had to do not just with particular churches or synagogues, or with certain religious leaders, or even with their families, and that their generalizations about religion might be incomplete. Instead, they may have asked themselves why they should go back to something that had already failed them. And there are others who feel moved to “try something” outside of religion. I describe those efforts as “dabbling,” “trial efforts,” or “just spiritual,” or a mixture of all three.

“Dabbling” describes” trying out different practices they’ve heard of or read about. These efforts are often superficial, like trying on a new dress to see how it fits. When a woman dabbles in clothing styles, she often puts a value on whether the color suits her, whether the outfit complements her body type, or whether it’s a practical addition to her wardrobe. If she doesn’t like it, she can always return it. Unfortunately, that’s how some people explore religion: what looks good, which things “feel” right, which make the fewest demands. They move in and out of belief systems as if they are changing outfits. They may assume that they may find something that suits them, but underneath, they are too reticent, too wounded, or too disillusioned to take a risk to make a serious religious commitment. So they spend a lifetime dabbling and call it spiritual.

Trial efforts are made by people who aren’t quite satisfied with their lives but feel they are willing to try something else; this description described me at one time, although at the time, I didn’t see it as a trial effort. I had never deeply connected to Judaism and I liked Zen Buddhism, liked many of the teachings, appreciated meditation and even enjoyed most of the rituals. I felt that it deepened my spiritual life, especially since I felt it brought me closer to G-d. I didn’t go into Zen with that intention, since Zen is not a theistic practice, but it doesn’t forbid believing in G-d; ironically I felt G-d’s presence more deeply when I practiced Zen, and I know that meditation contributed to my experience.

But life was determined to move me away from Zen and in some ways, I sabotaged my own practice. Left bereft with no religious framework and no community, I questioned where to go next. Eventually, as many of you know, I returned to and embraced my original faith of Judaism.

Others who engage in “trial efforts” often try more than one faith. This decision is deeper than dabbling, but it often is fairly limited in the way it works upon the soul of an individual. That result could be due to the ambivalence of the practitioner, or due to a mismatch with a religion, or due to the person expecting the perfect practice and finding problems with it over time. When disillusionment sets in, a person can muddle along indefinitely, or move on to a new religion.

Finally, there are those who want to be “just spiritual.” They’ve had little exposure to formal religion, and what they’ve learned has been critical of religion. They’ve been told that people of faith just believe in a “big man in the sky,” and they perceive religion as primitive and restrictive.

People who want to be just spiritual often don’t even dabble They experience spirituality through a beautiful landscape, brilliant sunset or some other part of nature. They see no need for ritual, for a framework of values and beliefs to build on. They want to be free to be spiritual when the moment moves them.

* * * * *

It’s occurred to me that one of the greatest barriers to others embracing a religion is that it is often filled with paradoxes. How do those of us who are religious explain that the deepest experiences can come from the limits we set in our lives? How do we describe the freedom and satisfaction that comes from following a belief system that seems to restrict us and is even difficult? How do we show people that we grow through spiritual questioning and examination? How do we demonstrate that believing in and opening ourselves up to a divine being can be some of the most intimate and rewarding times of our lives?

* * * * *

The spiritual choices that people reject or embrace not only affect themselves, but affect their families, their communities, even this country. Unless they transcend their self-centered views, they will have restricted their own lives and their ability to influence this country in a wholesome, positive way. Everyone loses.

* * * * *

To understand these factors is more than an intellectual exercise; these are not ideas you can read about in a book to determine that they are true. Study is invaluable, but study without experience will rarely fulfill one’s spiritual hopes. But if one studies religion, asks oneself the toughest questions and requests divine guidance, practices with devotion, and an open heart, all things are possible.

Published in Religion & Philosophy
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 129 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    My point was that our scientific understanding of how the world works is often being updated in the light of new discoveries.

    So, if we saw someone fly by flapping his arms, we would have to change our views on whether human beings are capable of flying. We could no longer say that human beings can’t fly. Scientists might then attempt to analyze the muscles and anatomy of this flying man to determine how he can fly.

    Not exactly. If we saw someone fly thus we would have occasion to reconsider our theories.

    If there were no plausible physical explanation, a supernatural one would be much better than abandoning our scientific knowledge on the subject.

    I think a natural explanation would be better because it we would be able to make testable predictions upon a natural explanation.

    No. The best explanation is the one that explains things best.

    For example, let’s say that this flying man had webbed arms and hands, capable of trapping air. We might conclude that if we could find other human beings with webbed arms and hands, they could also fly by flapping their arms.

    So, we would not just observe that a man could fly by flapping his arms. We would also understand the mechanism that allows him to fly.

    And here you are making for me my point in my prior comment.

    • #121
  2. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    HeavyWater (View Comment):

    Saint Augustine (View Comment):

    The second point is that historical evidence for a miracle is logically possible.

    There are lots of things that are logically possible that most of us do not believe.

    Of course.

    So you should argue on the facts next time–not on your theory that historical evidence for a miracle must be ruled out from the start.

    • #122
  3. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):
    Okay, so they’ve come to different conclusions–so what is the point in discussing their ideas all over again?

    Which is why I unfollow threads like this one. By their fruits you will know them.

    • #123
  4. Cato Rand Inactive
    Cato Rand
    @CatoRand

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Cato Rand (View Comment):
    How did I get in this?

    I’m sorry, @catorand. I noticed that you agreed with most of what HeavyWater said, so I assumed you agreed with his writing and point of view. My bad.

    I do pretty much agree with him, but I haven’t been participating much in this thread for precisely the reason you suggest – been there/done that/not much point in continuing to argue about it.  I’m no more going to convince Auggie or WC than flap my arms and fly to the moon.

    • #124
  5. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Cato Rand (View Comment):
    I’m no more going to convince Auggie or WC than flap my arms and fly to the moon.

    I’d give higher odds on getting to the Moon. 😁

    • #125
  6. HeavyWater Inactive
    HeavyWater
    @HeavyWater

    Cato Rand (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Cato Rand (View Comment):
    How did I get in this?

    I’m sorry, @catorand. I noticed that you agreed with most of what HeavyWater said, so I assumed you agreed with his writing and point of view. My bad.

    I do pretty much agree with him, but I haven’t been participating much in this thread for precisely the reason you suggest – been there/done that/not much point in continuing to argue about it. I’m no more going to convince Auggie or WC than flap my arms and fly to the moon.

    I agree.

    And besides, God told me that Auggie and WC have got it all wrong anyway.  :)

    • #126
  7. HeavyWater Inactive
    HeavyWater
    @HeavyWater

    Now, when I talked to God, I knew he’d understand

    He said, “Stick with me and I’ll be your guiding hand.”

    Don’t ask me what I think of you.

    I might not give the answer that you want me to.

    Oh, well.

    Oh, well.

    • #127
  8. HeavyWater Inactive
    HeavyWater
    @HeavyWater

    People, what have you done

    Locked Him in His golden cage

    Golden cage

    Made Him bend to your religion

    Him resurrected from the grave

    From the grave

    He is the God of nothing

    If that’s all that you can see

    You are the God of everything

    He’s inside you and me

     

    So lean upon Him gently

    And don’t call on Him to save you

    From your social graces

    And the sins you used waive

    You used to waive

     

    The bloody Church of England

    In chains of history

    Requests your earthly presence at

    The vicarage for tea

     

    And the graven image you know

    With His plastic crucifix

    He’s got him fixed

    Confuses me as to who and where and why

    As to how he gets his kicks

    He gets his kicks

     

    Confessing to the endless sin

    The endless whining sounds

    You’ll be praying ’til next Thursday to

    All the Gods that you can count

    • #128
  9. HeavyWater Inactive
    HeavyWater
    @HeavyWater

    Tom Jump verses Greg Ganssle: Is there reason to believe in God?

    Tom Jump is atheist.  Greg Ganssle is a Christian.

    • #129
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.