Contributor Post Created with Sketch. Democrat Candidate for NH Governor, Andru Volinsky, Blocks Media Outlet on Twitter

 

Andru Volinsky, a Democrat, announced this morning that he will seek the Democrat nomination to run for governor of New Hampshire against incumbent Chris Sununu, a Republican. New Hampshire Journal, run by friend of Ricochet @michaelgraham, naturally wanted to get a comment from the candidate, but noticed that Volinsky has blocked New Hampshire Journal’s twitter account.

Volinsky is engaging in unconstitutional “view point discrimination” according to the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled unanimously this past July in upholding a lower court’s decision in Knight First Amendment Institute v. Trump:

This case requires us to consider whether a public official may, consistent with the First Amendment, “block” a person from his Twitter account in response to the political views that person has expressed, and whether the analysis differs because that public official is the President of the United States. The answer to both questions is no. …blocking of the plaintiffs based on their political speech constitutes viewpoint discrimination that violates the First Amendment.

This summer, Rep. Rashida Tlaib blocked Steven Crowder on Twitter. However, after Crowder’s attorney threatened the congresswoman with legal action Crowder’s account was unblocked.

Now, whether you agree with the court ruling or not (I don’t), we can all agree that everyone should be held to the same standard. Andru Volinsky must immediately unblock the NewHampJournal twitter account (and all other he has blocked). If he doesn’t, then he should be sued for violating the Constitution.

There are 4 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Bryan G. Stephens Thatcher
    Bryan G. StephensJoined in the first year of Ricochet Ricochet Charter Member

    Sue!

    • #1
    • October 23, 2019, at 3:51 PM PDT
    • 2 likes
  2. JoelB Member

    If it had not been Trump, I believe the original decision would have gone the other way. So, yes. Give it to them good and hard.

    • #2
    • October 23, 2019, at 4:58 PM PDT
    • 3 likes
  3. CarolJoy, Thread Hijacker Coolidge

    AOC seems to suggest via her questioning of Zuckerberg that it is an absolute given that a social media behemoth like FB should “fact check” and then prevent any politician who might make a statement that is considered a lie, by the association that Zuckerberg has chosen to fact check the politician. I can see where this is going: Trump could be prevented from saying anything on FB, as the Left considers everything he states as being a lie:

    • #3
    • October 23, 2019, at 5:37 PM PDT
    • 2 likes
  4. Clifford A. Brown Contributor

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    Sue!

    Sue and demand attorney’s fees.

    • #4
    • October 23, 2019, at 8:51 PM PDT
    • 1 like

Comments are closed because this post is more than six months old. Please write a new post if you would like to continue this conversation.