Mitt Romney’s Gary Hart Moment

 

In 1987, with rumors circulating of affairs, Gary Hart challenged the media to follow him around. They did and soon found out that he was having an affair with Donna Rice. In an article published Sunday, Mitt Romney revealed that he had an anonymous Twitter account. The reporters looked for Romney relatives who had few followers and soon found out that the account was named “Pierre Delecto.” It’s now been made private, but people took screenshots. I assume that these have not been doctored.

Talk about an unforced error. If Mitt had not revealed the existence of the account, it’s very unlikely that its existence would ever have been discovered. It was established in 2011 and no one had commented about it. It only took reporters a few hours to figure out its name. He looks like a hypocrite, attacking Trump for acting unpresidential while using an anonymous account to defend himself.

Published in Politics
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 179 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Richard Easton Coolidge
    Richard Easton
    @RichardEaston

    rgbact (View Comment):

    Richard Easton (View Comment):

    rgbact (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    My fun activity is go on to social media and ask a John McCain supporter how he moved the ball politically to the right for them.

    The better question is how Trump has moved anything to the right that McCain wouldn’t have done.

    I wonder if FOX will spend more time on impeachment and Syria or on this huge Mitt Romney’s Twitter scandal. Tough choice.

    I doubt if McCain would have done anything about illegal immigration. Trump’s been rolling back ObamaCare to the extent he can without Congress passing a bill.

    Fair points, at least on illegal immigration. On ACA, I sort of assume his mind was too messed up at that point. Trump’s kept ALL the benefits of ACA. and made some lame attempts at reducing its revenue….so overall useless.

    You should check out Steve Moore’s appearance last Thursday on the John Batchelor Show.

    • #61
  2. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    rgbact (View Comment):
    Trump’s kept ALL the benefits of ACA. and made some lame attempts at reducing its revenue….so overall useless.

    No, dude. My brothers own a small business they were keeping under 50 employees because of Obamacare. The changes Trump has made have allowed them to expand — in small-town Ohio. They employ people who commute now!

    • #62
  3. Jon1979 Inactive
    Jon1979
    @Jon1979

    Mollie Hemingway (View Comment):

    Someone on Twitter (@hradzka) recommended that people come up with their own “Pierre Delecto/Carlos Danger” style name for political fake online presence.

    The rules are that the first name has to be a common name from an ethnicity or country to which you do not belong and the last name has to start with “D” and be vaguely ridiculous.

    I went with Renee Deviant.

    If Romney  had been a fan of “The Odd Couple” he would have chosen Andre Le Plume as his pen name (though Mitt does seem more like a Felix Unger than an Oscar Madison type….)

    • #63
  4. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    The Cloaked Gaijin (View Comment):
    I was thinking that Trump should have used the out-of-work Romney for something.

    Door stop. Boat anchor. Something non-kinetic.

    • #64
  5. The Cloaked Gaijin Member
    The Cloaked Gaijin
    @TheCloakedGaijin

    Mollie Hemingway (View Comment):

    Someone on Twitter (@hradzka) recommended that people come up with their own “Pierre Delecto/Carlos Danger” style name for political fake online presence.

    The rules are that the first name has to be a common name from an ethnicity or country to which you do not belong and the last name has to start with “D” and be vaguely ridiculous.

    I went with Renee Deviant.

    I don’t know what mine would be, but I suggest the following:

    Peter Robinson — Wallach Dartmouth

    James Lileks — Taka Duluth

    Kevin D. Williamson — Sanjay Dallas

    Jay Nordlinger — Elijah Dulcimer

    Jonah Goldberg — Mohamed Dingo

    Hmm, there actually are a bunch of Mohamed Dingos on Facebook.

    • #65
  6. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

     

     

     

    • #66
  7. rgbact Inactive
    rgbact
    @romanblichar

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    rgbact (View Comment):
    Trump’s kept ALL the benefits of ACA. and made some lame attempts at reducing its revenue….so overall useless.

    No, dude. My brothers own a small business they were keeping under 50 employees because of Obamacare. The changes Trump has made have allowed them to expand — in small-town Ohio. They employ people who commute now!

    I’m assuming he’s letting small employers get by with offering bare bones policies….which is probably fine, so long as all your employees are young and healthy.  Course, the downside is that now liberals are agitating for M4A.

    • #67
  8. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Raoul Dactyloid.

    • #68
  9. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    rgbact (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    rgbact (View Comment):
    Trump’s kept ALL the benefits of ACA. and made some lame attempts at reducing its revenue….so overall useless.

    No, dude. My brothers own a small business they were keeping under 50 employees because of Obamacare. The changes Trump has made have allowed them to expand — in small-town Ohio. They employ people who commute now!

    I’m assuming he’s letting small employers get by with offering bare bones policies….which is probably fine, so long as all your employees are young and healthy. Course, the downside is that now liberals are agitating for M4A.

    What is he supposed to do? The GOP had eight years to get ready for the moment of total political control that was required. It was handed to them on a plate. 

     

    • #69
  10. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    DrewInWisconsin, Influencer (View Comment):

    rgbact (View Comment):
    The better question is how Trump has moved anything to the right that McCain wouldn’t have done.

    Non-falsifiable hypotheses are always fun.

    But McCain saved Obamacare, and for that he has earned plenty of well-deserved ire.

    And was open borders, and never met a war he didn’t like.

    • #70
  11. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    RufusRJones (View Comment):
    What is he supposed to do? The GOP had eight years to get ready for the moment of total political control that was required.

    This

    They never expected to actual have to do anything.  Hillary was going to win and they could go on posturing and fund raising on the topic. Trump ruined that for Ryan and the rest.

    • #71
  12. Reformed_Yuppie Inactive
    Reformed_Yuppie
    @Reformed_Yuppie

    DrewInWisconsin, Influencer (View Comment):

    So what’s his sock puppet account here?

    It me

    • #72
  13. Reformed_Yuppie Inactive
    Reformed_Yuppie
    @Reformed_Yuppie

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    The Never Trumpers are loving John Kasich right now. Total RINO menace. He changed just as much as Joe Scarborough. All these people care about is money and power.

    Hey, I take offense to that. As someone who lived under the rule of Kasich (did you know his father was a mailman???) I am perfectly capable of hating both Kasich and Trump. He’s a tax-and-spend Democrat who didn’t have the stones to switch parties. He tried to screw over mineral owners in order to pass some questionable middle class tax cut and got laughed out of the room. 

    • #73
  14. rgbact Inactive
    rgbact
    @romanblichar

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

    rgbact (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    rgbact (View Comment):
    Trump’s kept ALL the benefits of ACA. and made some lame attempts at reducing its revenue….so overall useless.

    No, dude. My brothers own a small business they were keeping under 50 employees because of Obamacare. The changes Trump has made have allowed them to expand — in small-town Ohio. They employ people who commute now!

    I’m assuming he’s letting small employers get by with offering bare bones policies….which is probably fine, so long as all your employees are young and healthy. Course, the downside is that now liberals are agitating for M4A.

    What is he supposed to do? The GOP had eight years to get ready for the moment of total political control that was required. It was handed to them on a plate.

     

    I said it was probably fine….just doesn’t drop the cost of ACA one bit, so ultimately the GOP is at “ACA is OK fine now, we just tweaked some of the bad regs”….since Trump has zero plans to do anything else with ACA or Medicare or Soc Sec in the next 5 years.

    GOP had 8 years to do what? We still can’t get agreement on “full repeal” vs. “repeal and replace”. And being angry on social media doesn’t advance that.

     

    • #74
  15. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    rgbact (View Comment):
    GOP had 8 years to do what? We still can’t get agreement on “full repeal” vs. “repeal and replace”.

    Well, I’m glad you are satisfied and this all makes sense to you. 

    • #75
  16. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    rgbact (View Comment):
    I said it was probably fine….just doesn’t drop the cost of ACA one bit, so ultimately the GOP is at “ACA is OK fine now, we just tweaked some of the bad regs”

    I don’t blame Trump for this situation at all. 

    • #76
  17. Judge Mental Member
    Judge Mental
    @JudgeMental

    rgbact (View Comment):

    GOP had 8 years to do what? We still can’t get agreement on “full repeal” vs. “repeal and replace”. And being angry on social media doesn’t advance that.

     

    The sticking point wasn’t between full repeal vs. repeal and replace.  It was between any kind of repeal and no repeal at all.  Look at the Republicans who voted against it.

    • #77
  18. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    Judge Mental (View Comment):

    rgbact (View Comment):

    GOP had 8 years to do what? We still can’t get agreement on “full repeal” vs. “repeal and replace”. And being angry on social media doesn’t advance that.

     

    The sticking point wasn’t between full repeal vs. repeal and replace. It was between any kind of repeal and no repeal at all. Look at the Republicans who voted against it.

    They had to come up with some form of universal coverage that dealt with the political problems purposely embedded in the ACA as well. I think places like Alaska need more central planning. The whole damn thing was written by the devil. Obama is a liar and it worked.

    • #78
  19. rgbact Inactive
    rgbact
    @romanblichar

    Judge Mental (View Comment):

    rgbact (View Comment):

    GOP had 8 years to do what? We still can’t get agreement on “full repeal” vs. “repeal and replace”. And being angry on social media doesn’t advance that.

     

    The sticking point wasn’t between full repeal vs. repeal and replace. It was between any kind of repeal and no repeal at all. 

    It was one of those. Point is, people disagree on stuff. 8 years doesn’t change that. Then Trump came along and made big promises, that there was no way could be kept. Legislating is hard. Changing some regs a monkey can do. Tweeting is a monkey job too.

    • #79
  20. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

    rgbact (View Comment):

    Judge Mental (View Comment):

    rgbact (View Comment):

    GOP had 8 years to do what? We still can’t get agreement on “full repeal” vs. “repeal and replace”. And being angry on social media doesn’t advance that.

     

    The sticking point wasn’t between full repeal vs. repeal and replace. It was between any kind of repeal and no repeal at all.

    It was one of those. Point is, people disagree on stuff. 8 years doesn’t change that. Then Trump came along and made big promises, that there was no way could be kept. Legislating is hard. Changing some regs a monkey can do. Tweeting is a monkey job too.

    I’d like to know how why they didn’t just stand down for a year and do some thinking and educating. 

    Not wiping out employer-based insurance after World War II was a disaster. Everything they’ve done since has made it worse.

    • #80
  21. Guruforhire Inactive
    Guruforhire
    @Guruforhire

    Can we all agree that his twitter account is hilarious and we should have a point and laugh, but in the grand scheme of things doesn’t matter at all?

    • #81
  22. RufusRJones Member
    RufusRJones
    @RufusRJones

     

     

     

    • #82
  23. DrewInWisconsin, Influencer Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Influencer
    @DrewInWisconsin

    rgbact (View Comment):
    GOP had 8 years to do what? We still can’t get agreement on “full repeal” vs. “repeal and replace”.

    GOP never expected to win in 2016. They had no plan to accomplish exactly what they campaigned on.

    Tell me again why their promises should be believed?

    • #83
  24. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    DrewInWisconsin, Influencer (View Comment):

    Somehow the best part of this story is that when asked about it, Romney’s response was “C’est moi!”

    “L’tweet?  C’est moi!”

    • #84
  25. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    Molllllie!! (((((group hug everyone!)))))

    Yes!

    Bring back The Hemingways podcast – let’s start chanting . . .

    • #85
  26. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    DrewInWisconsin, Influencer (View Comment):

    rgbact (View Comment):
    The better question is how Trump has moved anything to the right that McCain wouldn’t have done.

    Non-falsifiable hypotheses are always fun.

    But McCain saved Obamacare, and for that he has earned plenty of well-deserved ire Hellfire.

    FIFY . . .

    • #86
  27. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    She (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Influencer (View Comment):

    Somehow the best part of this story is that when asked about it, Romney’s response was “C’est moi!”

    Pretentious Twit. (I’d enter that in Mollie’s contest except it doesn’t exactly follow the rules. At all, actually.)

    Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney smiles with artist Richard Whitney, left, after his official portrait is unveiled during a ceremony on the Grand Staircase at the Statehouse in Boston Tuesday, June 30, 2009. Romney’s portrait was painted by Whitney, of New Hampshire, for $30,000 in private donations and will hang in the lobby of the third-floor Governor’s Office. (AP Photo/Elise Amendola)

    • #87
  28. DrewInWisconsin, Influencer Member
    DrewInWisconsin, Influencer
    @DrewInWisconsin

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

     

    More proof that David French has reached his sell-by date. Will someone people put him out to pasture?

    • #88
  29. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    DrewInWisconsin, Influencer (View Comment):

    RufusRJones (View Comment):

     

    More proof that David French has reached his sell-by date. Will someone people put him out to pasture?

    Speaking of insufferable… 

    • #89
  30. Addiction Is A Choice Member
    Addiction Is A Choice
    @AddictionIsAChoice

    Mollie Hemingway (View Comment):

    The rules are that the first name has to be a common name from an ethnicity or country to which you do not belong and the last name has to start with “D” and be vaguely ridiculous.

    I went with Renee Deviant.

    Otto Didactic

    • #90
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.