Recommended by Ricochet Members Created with Sketch. Tulsi Unloads on Hillary. Have Popcorn?

 

This explosion occurred when the forlorn and pathetic Hillary Clinton called candidate Tulsi Gabbard a Russian asset. A Uranium-rich remark. Now, there’s a lot to like about Tulsi Gabbard, even though I think she’s wrong about a number of social policy issues and if she had a different educational path might have come out more on the conservative end of the spectrum … but damn! She certainly has Hillary Clinton pegged. We’ll see if this boosts her standing in the Democrat field even as some diehard Hillary fans are affronted by the broadside. Who cares about Biden, Warren, or Bernie. This is where all the action is.

.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s growing community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Get your first month free.

There are 63 comments.

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  1. Matt Bartle Member

    I don’t like Hillary but I honestly never thought she was nuts. But now it looks like she really has gone around the bend. This is delusional. 

    • #1
    • October 18, 2019, at 3:38 PM PST
    • 13 likes
  2. Percival Thatcher

    • #2
    • October 18, 2019, at 3:43 PM PST
    • 8 likes
  3. Brian Watt Member
    Brian Watt Post author

    Matt Bartle (View Comment):

    I don’t like Hillary but I honestly never thought she was nuts. But now it looks like she really has gone around the bend. This is delusional.

    Really?

    • #3
    • October 18, 2019, at 3:46 PM PST
    • 17 likes
  4. David Foster Member

    If anything reaches the “actual malice” threshold for a defamation claim by someone who is a public figure, I’d think this statement would be it.

    • #4
    • October 18, 2019, at 3:52 PM PST
    • 10 likes
  5. Brian Watt Member
    Brian Watt Post author

    David Foster (View Comment):

    If anything reaches the “actual malice” threshold for a defamation claim by someone who is a public figure, I’d think this statement would be it.

    Which tweet? Hillary’s or Tulsi’s? Tulsi’s is hyperbolic. Hillary’s, it could be claimed, is a defamatory assertion that Gabbard is working for the Russian government, which Clinton must prove.

    • #5
    • October 18, 2019, at 4:03 PM PST
    • 12 likes
  6. Matt Bartle Member

    https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/10/is-hillary-drunk-podcasting.php

    • #6
    • October 18, 2019, at 4:06 PM PST
    • 7 likes
  7. She Thatcher
    She

    Matt Bartle (View Comment):

    https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/10/is-hillary-drunk-podcasting.php

    I was just going to post a link to this. It’s the best post title ever!

    • #7
    • October 18, 2019, at 4:15 PM PST
    • 7 likes
  8. David Foster Member

    Brian Watt (View Comment):
    Which tweet? Hillary’s or Tulsi’s? Tulsi’s is hyperbolic. Hillary’s, it could be claimed, is a defamatory assertion that Gabbard is working for the Russian government, which Clinton must prove.

    I’m referring to Hillary’s tweet.

    • #8
    • October 18, 2019, at 4:21 PM PST
    • 6 likes
  9. CJ Coolidge
    CJ

    David Foster (View Comment):

    If anything reaches the “actual malice” threshold for a defamation claim by someone who is a public figure, I’d think this statement would be it.

    Where do I contribute to the fund for Tulsi’s defamation suit against Hillary?

    • #9
    • October 18, 2019, at 4:27 PM PST
    • 11 likes
  10. Patrick McClure Member

    Tulsi,

    (But I still can’t vote for a Democrat)

    • #10
    • October 18, 2019, at 4:28 PM PST
    • 11 likes
  11. Brian Watt Member
    Brian Watt Post author

    David Foster (View Comment):

    Brian Watt (View Comment):
    Which tweet? Hillary’s or Tulsi’s? Tulsi’s is hyperbolic. Hillary’s, it could be claimed, is a defamatory assertion that Gabbard is working for the Russian government, which Clinton must prove.

    I’m referring to Hillary’s tweet.

    Whew! I panicked there for a second. 

    • #11
    • October 18, 2019, at 4:31 PM PST
    • 3 likes
  12. E. Kent Golding Member

    Tulsi could give Trump a run for his money. I prefer Trump’s policies, but would really rather listen to and look at Tulsi. I think most Americans would rather look at and listen to Tulsi than Trump.

    I would rather have a root canal than listen to Warren, Biden, Castro, Sanders, Beato, etc. Yang would be tolerable.

    • #12
    • October 18, 2019, at 4:40 PM PST
    • 17 likes
  13. Matt Bartle Member

    So the harshest political tweet of the day was not written by Trump??

     I feel a little disoriented.

     

    • #13
    • October 18, 2019, at 4:52 PM PST
    • 18 likes
  14. Jerry Giordano (Arizona Patrio… Member

    David Foster (View Comment):

    If anything reaches the “actual malice” threshold for a defamation claim by someone who is a public figure, I’d think this statement would be it.

    David Foster (View Comment):

    Brian Watt (View Comment):
    Which tweet? Hillary’s or Tulsi’s? Tulsi’s is hyperbolic. Hillary’s, it could be claimed, is a defamatory assertion that Gabbard is working for the Russian government, which Clinton must prove.

    I’m referring to Hillary’s tweet.

    Thanks for clarifying, David. If you were referring to Tulsi’s, she could offer truth as a defense.

    E. Kent Golding (View Comment):

    Tulsi could give Trump a run for his money. I prefer Trump’s policies, but would really rather listen to and look at Tulsi. I think most Americans would rather look at and listen to Tulsi than Trump.

    I would rather have a root canal than listen to Warren, Biden, Castro, Sanders, Beato, etc. Yang would be tolerable.

    I will agree that I prefer to look at Tulsi. I cannot stand to listen to her. I actually find her more grating and annoying than most of the others. She is easy on the eyes, as my father-in-law used to say.

    • #14
    • October 18, 2019, at 5:09 PM PST
    • 3 likes
  15. Dave of Barsham Member

    Matt Bartle (View Comment):

    https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/10/is-hillary-drunk-podcasting.php

    I sure hope so, I’d subscribe to that.

    • #15
    • October 18, 2019, at 5:12 PM PST
    • 4 likes
  16. Franco Member

    This is an historic tweet. Tulsi throws down.

    • #16
    • October 18, 2019, at 5:43 PM PST
    • 7 likes
  17. Matt Bartle Member

    In the old days she would have challenged Hillary to a duel.

    “You have offended my honor! Swords at daybreak!”

     

    • #17
    • October 18, 2019, at 5:54 PM PST
    • 13 likes
  18. Percival Thatcher

    Somebody needs to tell Tulsi that her problem isn’t just with Hillary. It is with everybody else in her party who thinks she’s not woke enough. That would be … everybody else in her party.

    • #18
    • October 18, 2019, at 5:57 PM PST
    • 16 likes
  19. Franco Member

    Percival (View Comment):

    Somebody needs to tell Tulsi that her problem isn’t just with Hillary. It is with everybody else in her party who thinks she’s not woke enough. That would be … everybody else in her party.

    Yes and no. The whole Russia asset thing is coming directly from the Hillary camp, and the media suppression and the DNC debate manipulations come from Hillary allies too. Ordinary Democrats are told what to think by their media mesmerizers.

     

    • #19
    • October 18, 2019, at 6:02 PM PST
    • 6 likes
  20. MichaelKennedy Coolidge

    Where’s Gary Robbins? He needs to see and comment on this.

    https://twitter.com/EvanMcMullin/status/1185355016393166849

    Mcmuffin buying Hillary Russian hoaxes

    • #20
    • October 18, 2019, at 7:32 PM PST
    • 9 likes
  21. Dave of Barsham Member

    MichaelKennedy (View Comment):

    Where’s Gary Robbins? He needs to see and comment on this.

    https://twitter.com/EvanMcMullin/status/1185355016393166849

    Mcmuffin buying Hillary Russian hoaxes

    Did he seriously just use a line from Star Wars: Rogue One to push this nonsense? 

    • #21
    • October 18, 2019, at 7:38 PM PST
    • 3 likes
  22. DonG Coolidge

    Tulsi is showing some guts. She is a fighter. That should be good to move her up a few points in the polls. Nobody else in the DNC has shown themselves to be capable of throwing a verbal punch. Warren had a to have a planted question in a town hall to execute a snarky statement–so lame. Liz knows that voters want a fighter so badly that she is willing to fake it. 

    • #22
    • October 18, 2019, at 8:08 PM PST
    • 9 likes
  23. Brian Watt Member
    Brian Watt Post author

    This guy was actually propped up as a sane alternative to Trump:

    • #23
    • October 18, 2019, at 8:32 PM PST
    • 7 likes
  24. TBA Coolidge
    TBA

    Americans love a good underdog story – scrappy outsider closes the distance during the last lap of the race and defeats the conceited opponent, and the guy that was cheating, and the other guy that said hurtful things…good real person wins and the selfish, venal, and cruel are put in their places. 

    Reminds me of Trump’s win to a degree. 

    Maybe the Dems want to do a remake. 

    • #24
    • October 18, 2019, at 8:40 PM PST
    • 4 likes
  25. DonG Coolidge

    Brian Watt (View Comment):

    This guy was actually propped up as a sane alternative to Trump:

    Utah, McMullen and Mitt? Come on man! Even Florida is shaking its head.

    • #25
    • October 18, 2019, at 9:05 PM PST
    • 4 likes
  26. EJHill Podcaster

    This is nuts. These charges of being “unAmerican” are flying from all sides to all sides. Putin wanted Americans to war with each other. Both Democrats and Republicans are handing him his dreams on a silver platter.

     

    • #26
    • October 18, 2019, at 9:07 PM PST
    • 10 likes
  27. Django Member

    Brian Watt (View Comment):

    This guy was actually propped up as a sane alternative to Trump:

    I always thought McMuffin was a fool, but this makes me wonder if he is the political answer to Andy Kaufman, i.e., someone whose idea of humor is just so off-the-wall that most of us don’t get it. 

    • #27
    • October 18, 2019, at 9:19 PM PST
    • 2 likes
  28. Franco Member

    These people are ridiculous. 

    Notice they said nothing about Diane Feinstein with her driver of twenty years literally working as a spy for China.

    They aren’t worried about how Hillary jeopardized our national security by having a remote unsecured server with thousands of classified emails ( I read that somehow the Chi-Coms discovered dozens of CIA assets in 2010 and executed them – probably after torture) 

    Then there was the whole IT scandal in the House where the Awan brothers, men with loyalty to a country that is not our friend, had access to all kinds of classified intelligence.

    John Kerry conducting rogue foreign policy with Iran…

    Clearly our intel agencies, the media and Democrats are conducting subversion in front of our very eyes.

    We can laugh at these people, but I think this is bigger than that. It’s a psy-op being conducted on the American people. Mc Mullin is ex-CIA, and we have Clapper and Brennen all over TV, now this Admiral…

     

     

    • #28
    • October 18, 2019, at 10:12 PM PST
    • 14 likes
  29. Arahant Member

    Matt Bartle (View Comment):

    In the old days she would have challenged Hillary to a duel.

    “You have offended my honor! Swords at daybreak!”

    I’d pay to watch that.

    • #29
    • October 19, 2019, at 1:25 AM PST
    • 5 likes
  30. Arahant Member

    DonG (View Comment):

    Brian Watt (View Comment):

    This guy was actually propped up as a sane alternative to Trump:

    Utah, McMullen and Mitt? Come on man! Even Florida is shaking its head.

    Way to go, Utah. Way to go.

    • #30
    • October 19, 2019, at 1:27 AM PST
    • 1 like
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3