If the World Doesn’t Revolve Around Me Then Burn it Down

 

In the July 29, 2019 issue of NR-on-dead-tree, James Lileks riffed on the following headline from The Philadelphia Inquirer:

To end fatphobia, we need to dismantle Western civilization, says Philly therapist Sonalee Rashatwar

Given the utter insanity of the claim and the fact that Lileks’s schtick is parody, I assumed it was a gag. But, no. Not only does Ms. Rashatwar want to shred Western civilization, she gets off on the thought:

I love to talk about undoing Western civilization because it’s just so romantic to me.

My next thought was, “Meh. Lileks is trolling. He’s found some left-wing nutcase and is implying that she’s representative of the left.” The more I think about it, though, the more I think that Rashatwar is just another run-of-the-mill claimant in the grift that is identity politics.

The con goes something like this: I’m a victim of “society.” (Rashatwar, for example, “traces contemporary fatphobia to colonial brutality and how enslaved people were treated.”) Therefore you (i.e., everyone who is not like me) must celebrate me and the choices I make and you (i.e., cis-gendered, white males) must foot the bill for my lifestyle. If you don’t, it’s because Western civilization in general – and the United States in particular – are evil and must be destroyed.

“Give me what I want, or I’ll burn it all down and bring incalculable misery on everyone” is the most infantile, selfish attitude imaginable, yet it’s routinely portrayed as enlightened and caring. And this attitude is, unfortunately, no longer the sole property of the left.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 46 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    GrannyDude (View Comment):

    Completely unrelated note: A mother and four baby bobcats were in our garden this morning! No wonder the red squirrel population has been mercifully reduced as of late!

    Selfies or it didn’t happen! 

    • #31
  2. Ansonia Member
    Ansonia
    @Ansonia

    Re: 31

    I choose to believe. (But I’d love to see a picture of a bobcat. I wish I had a picture of the enormous hawk I saw in the yard this past week.)

    • #32
  3. GrannyDude Member
    GrannyDude
    @GrannyDude

    We’ve never seen bobcats in our backyard before! So it took a minute to register what the heck we were looking at…no time to take photos, and with the uncanny awareness of wild creatures, they seemed to realize that they’d gotten our attention, even through the glass, so they went bounding and dancing wildly away. 

    Since today would have been my late husband’s 58th birthday, I figure it was a present from him! 

     

    • #33
  4. GrannyDude Member
    GrannyDude
    @GrannyDude

    A game warden was telling me about rearing an orphaned baby bobcat he’d found by her road-killed mother. Apparently, they are fearless and ferocious right from the get-go. He had to don his welding gloves and apron* to give a three pound kitten her bottle! Eventually, she was released into the wild. She made friends with a big male, and the wardens occasionally see the two of them hunting in the game preserve near the Gray exit. 

    I loved the freaky dance the four visitors did this morning as they headed for the woods. It was the sort of display that would confuse and even frighten anyone who thought to chase after them! 

     

    *Because of course he has welder’s gloves and an apron.

    • #34
  5. Quietpi Member
    Quietpi
    @Quietpi

    I think she’s on to something.  Given the alternatives to Western Civilization – serfdom, collective farms, etc. I would expect fatphobia to disappear about as quickly as fatness itself.  The new norm would become ultra slimness, a return to the “twiggy” model.  A little plumpness would once again be seen as a sign of health and wealth.  Where’s the downside?

    • #35
  6. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Al French, sad sack (View Comment):

    Lileks’ best line: Western civ’s idea of agriculture is mechanized and soulless, and uses genetic modifications to create innumerable soft, fresh doughnuts glistening with glaze that shimmers like an angel’s tears of gratitude .

    I’m hungry. For doughnuts.

    I recommend Krispy Kreme.

    • #36
  7. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Richard Fulmer (View Comment):

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    In the July 29, 2019 issue of NR-on-dead-tree, James Lilacs riffed on the following headline from The Philadelphia Inquirer:

    I feel oppressed by your spell-checker

    A Lileks by any other name…

    You missed a wonderful opportunity to misspell it again.

    • #37
  8. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    James Lileks (View Comment):

    As not for whom the writer trolls, he trolls for thee. Actually, these days the nutcases are representative, inasmuch as they make a claim that has a tangential connection to contemporary intersectional leftism, and requires the standard-issue leftist to consider it. To wave it away would be to marginalize and erase the anti-capitalist allies of size. 

    Once you evoke all the magic words, you have to be taken seriously. Because inclusion.

    You pretty much hit all the buttons.

    • #38
  9. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Ansonia (View Comment):

    This is weird though: why is it a lot of us, including me, didn’t see the same hatefulness, fifty years ago, in people advocating sexual promiscuity to dismantle the patriarchy that I see in this woman’s nonsense now ?

    I was young and horny 50 years ago.

    • #39
  10. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Ansonia (View Comment):

    This is weird though: why is it a lot of us, including me, didn’t see the same hatefulness, fifty years ago, in people advocating sexual promiscuity to dismantle the patriarchy that I see in this woman’s nonsense now ?

    This ‘sticking-it-to-the-man’ thing? You’re doing it wrong. 

    • #40
  11. GLDIII Temporarily Essential Reagan
    GLDIII Temporarily Essential
    @GLDIII

    GrannyDude (View Comment):

    DrewInWisconsin, Thought Leader (View Comment):

    GrannyDude (View Comment):
    Completely unrelated note: A mother and four baby bobcats were in our garden this morning! No wonder the red squirrel population has been mercifully reduced as of late!

    “Liked” for baby bobcats.

    Not for my fatness? Bigot.

    Your Fatness?

    Dear you were barely “rubenesque” last time we met for Brunch. I suspect there is a little fun house warpness to your  bathroom mirror.

    • #41
  12. Addiction Is A Choice Member
    Addiction Is A Choice
    @AddictionIsAChoice

    Who’s reading Ricochet? This post is linked at Instapundit…

    • #42
  13. Ansonia Member
    Ansonia
    @Ansonia

    Re: 39

    Sure. So was I. But people who weren’t young and horny, and who strongly suspected the consequences of the sexual revolution would be disastrous, seemed to think the people pushing it were just wrong, or sinful, and acting out of sexual lust. I don’t think they had much of a sense of something else.

    • #43
  14. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    Ansonia (View Comment):

    Re: 39

    Sure. So was I. But people who weren’t young and horny, and who strongly suspected the consequences of the sexual revolution would be disastrous, seemed to think the people pushing it were just wrong, or sinful, and acting out of sexual lust. I don’t think they had much of a sense of something else.

    More and varied information, much of it wrong. The older generations in the 1960’s had experienced the great depression, WWII, the Korean Conflict, and an economic boon that was a new thing. There were not many who were spoiled, enabled, or used to just having things however they wanted them.

    • #44
  15. Ansonia Member
    Ansonia
    @Ansonia

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    Ansonia (View Comment):

    Re: 39

    Sure. So was I. But people who weren’t young and horny, and who strongly suspected the consequences of the sexual revolution would be disastrous, seemed to think the people pushing it were just wrong, or sinful, and acting out of sexual lust. I don’t think they had much of a sense of something else.

    More and varied information, much of it wrong. The older generations in the 1960’s had experienced the great depression, WWII, the Korean Conflict, and an economic boon that was a new thing. There were not many who were spoiled, enabled, or used to just having things however they wanted them.

    I think the experiences of the older generations in the 1960’s enabled them to know what they knew but largely prevented them from imagining that a kind of spitefulness and hatred might have been part of the motivation of the people advocating the Sexual Revolution. “If the world doesn’t revolve around me then burn it down” is exactly the kind of outlook that they couldn’t imagine, maybe. (The few who did suspect that that was what was really wrong with the children, or with the people to whom the kids were listening, were easily portrayed as nuts.)

    • #45
  16. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Ansonia (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    Ansonia (View Comment):

    Re: 39

    Sure. So was I. But people who weren’t young and horny, and who strongly suspected the consequences of the sexual revolution would be disastrous, seemed to think the people pushing it were just wrong, or sinful, and acting out of sexual lust. I don’t think they had much of a sense of something else.

    More and varied information, much of it wrong. The older generations in the 1960’s had experienced the great depression, WWII, the Korean Conflict, and an economic boon that was a new thing. There were not many who were spoiled, enabled, or used to just having things however they wanted them.

    I think the experiences of the older generations in the 1960’s enabled them to know what they knew but largely prevented them from imagining that a kind of spitefulness and hatred might have been part of the motivation of the people advocating the Sexual Revolution. “If the world doesn’t revolve around me then burn it down” is exactly the kind of outlook that they couldn’t imagine, maybe. (The few who did suspect that that was what was really wrong with the children, or with the people to whom the kids were listening, were easily portrayed as nuts.)

    Worse than nuts; they were uncool. 

    • #46
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.