Is Voting a Behavior or an Identity?

 

Perhaps we got it all wrong.

Since 1964, black voters migrated to the Democrat Party and never looked back. At this point, they support Democratic presidential candidates at rates anywhere between 90-94%. Why?

One approach is to say that black voters are on the Democratic plantation and are unwilling to consider alternatives for a variety of unflattering reasons. I’m with Kevin Williamson in not buying this argument and being a bit repulsed by its condescension. Plus, it’s a bit counter-productive to persuade people to agree with you after you tell them they’ve been duped all along.

However, I’m not with Williamson when he says it’s simply because they prefer the policies of the Democrats to Republicans. Here, we know that blacks are not monolithic in their views, even though they’re monolithic in their voting behavior. I think of the many blacks I know who are religious and very much conservative in their views about economics and welfare, among other issues. Even though they agree with Republicans when it comes to their most deeply held convictions, they still vote for Democrats who disagree with them. But, as a researcher, I know that correlation doesn’t necessarily imply causation.

To bring it back to my opening point, maybe we’ve been going about it the wrong way. As I think about the black voters I know of, it’s apparent to me that voting Democrat is the default option. When everyone you know votes Democrat, it’s only natural that you will also act accordingly, and I’ve heard people tell me as much. So, to me, while black voters may have gone to the Democrats for historical reasons back in the ’60s/’70s, today I think it’s mainly inertia. But it’s so strong that it seems to be more of an attribute than a behavior. That is, Democrat is who we are rather than how we vote. It’s like one’s ethnicity or religion.

What I like about this hypothesis is that it is simple, elegant, and yet explanatory. It explains cognitive dissonance that so many black voters are in when they support candidates who push an agenda they do not believe in at all. I think it also shows that discussions about what the GOP can do to win over black voters are usually exercises in vanity. It’s far too convenient to say the GOP repels black voters when they have no real interest in considering supporting the party.

Now, I should be clear that I’m not arguing the GOP should write-off black voters. I’m a good enough student of politics to know that no trend is ever permanent. It’s possible that black voters will become more polarized than they are now but I don’t know how that will happen, or when. But thinking of black voting as an attribute rather than a behavior can possibly help the GOP figure out ideas to increase their support or, at the very least, eliminate bad ideas that won’t work.

Published in Politics
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 70 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Gumby Mark (R-Meth Lab of Demo… (View Comment):

    I agree with you that default ideas of identity and community are as or more powerful than policies. Growing up in a firmly Democrat (but not Left) family the thought of being a Republican never entered my mind and I voted for every Democrat on the ballot from 1972 thru 1978.

    In 1980 I voted for Reagan and it was very hard for me to do so and even then I voted D for every other office. Even though I gradually began to vote R for offices other than president during the 80s I still thought of myself as a D and it wasn’t until the mid-90s I changed my registration from D to Independent.

    The key for me in voting for Reagan was getting comfortable with the man even though I agreed with him on many policies. I just liked the guy and his temperament and was willing to take a chance with him. In contrast in 1980 I could never have been persuaded to vote for Donald Trump no matter that I agreed with many of his policies because I don’t like the guy. I voted for him in 2016 because I’d already crossed the bridge.

    Over the years, I’ve had a number of conversations with friends in which I’ve pointed out that there actual political views align more with R than D but they usually give me a sheepish look and say “Yeah, but I’m a Democrat” and shrug their shoulders because they simply can’t conceive of voting R.

    If only we could identify as voters instead of R/D, to think of our votes as something valuable to bestow to the most deserving instead of something we owe in fealty. 

    • #61
  2. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Clifford A. Brown (View Comment):

    JoelB (View Comment):

    E. Kent Golding (View Comment):

    Maybe we should run candidates in Black districts, campaign there , and ask for their votes.

    I live in a Democrat, majority white district, and frequently there are no Republicans running for some local offices. Perhaps some see it as a waste of resources, but how can you win if you don’t even show up for the game?

    When local GOP officials can’t even be bothered to show up and march in the MLK Day parade, while the Democrats have multiple entries, representing different precincts, the Republican Party displays casual disregard, which is deservedly returned on Election Day.

    While I certainly don’t disagree, I do understand not wanting to go where one isn’t wanted. Any attempt to GOP at an MLK parade is going to be met with mockery and worse by POC and the MSM. So any of ‘ours’ who show up are risking likely bad press for unlikely votes. 

    • #62
  3. EB Thatcher
    EB
    @EB

    Hang On (View Comment):

    Which is more difficult to change: identity or behavior?

     

    I’m not sure how my friend’s example fits the question – which did he change?

    My friend grew up in the Southern Baptist church.  After college, he switched to the Episcopal Church and was very critical (and rather condescending) about Baptist’s, Baptist theology, and Baptist practices.  But here’s the thing; whenever he discussed (argued) theology with anyone, although he presented himself as arguing for his new denomination, all of his positions were argued from the Baptist point of view.  He even sometimes used typical Baptist phraseology.  

    It wasn’t obvious to him because it was so ingrained from his upbringing that he thought of it as “just truth.”  To me, who grew up in the Episcopal Church, it was pretty glaring.

    It was sort of like a convert to strict Presbyterian predestination who keeps inserting the term “free will” into every discussion.

    Was this identity or behavior?

    • #63
  4. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    EB (View Comment):

    Hang On (View Comment):

    Which is more difficult to change: identity or behavior?

     

    I’m not sure how my friend’s example fits the question – which did he change?

    My friend grew up in the Southern Baptist church. After college, he switched to the Episcopal Church and was very critical (and rather condescending) about Baptist’s, Baptist theology, and Baptist practices. But here’s the thing; whenever he discussed (argued) theology with anyone, although he presented himself as arguing for his new denomination, all of his positions were argued from the Baptist point of view. He even sometimes used typical Baptist phraseology.

    It wasn’t obvious to him because it was so ingrained from his upbringing that he thought of it as “just truth.” To me, who grew up in the Episcopal Church, it was pretty glaring.

    It was sort of like a convert to strict Presbyterian predestination who keeps inserting the term “free will” into every discussion.

    Was this identity or behavior?

    Does this remind you of behavior among some people going on in politics today? Perhaps the person of whom you speak merely had an unexplained animus that caused the change in denomination.

     

    • #64
  5. EB Thatcher
    EB
    @EB

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):
    an unexplained animus that caused the change in denomination.

    Well, from time to time, I suspected that the change might have been because he decided that Baptists were “tacky” and Episcopalians were “cooler.”  

    • #65
  6. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    EB (View Comment):

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):
    an unexplained animus that caused the change in denomination.

    Well, from time to time, I suspected that the change might have been because he decided that Baptists were “tacky” and Episcopalians were “cooler.”

    Beats conversion by the sword I guess….

    • #66
  7. GrannyDude Member
    GrannyDude
    @GrannyDude

    Henry Castaigne (View Comment):
    Without G-d caring about you, people need the state to care about them. Not even to provide for their physical needs but rather because we yearn for a kind of transcendent love that is better than the love weak humans can provide. 

     

    There is (as the Bible and FFs would remind us) a human tendency, perhaps even a need? to make ordinary men (with some power,  charisma, money, whatever)  into gods. Perhaps it is because there is pleasure in the sensations of worship and comfort  in the anticipation of salvation even if it never materializes?  The worshipper will avoid or even fight recognition of the big clay toes poking out from under the robe, because he doesn’t want the pleasure and comfort to end. Disappointment and disillusionment are (let me tell ya!) painful by contrast. 

     

     

    • #67
  8. Mark Camp Member
    Mark Camp
    @MarkCamp

    TBA (View Comment):

    Bereket Kelile (View Comment):

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Bereket Kelile: o, to me, while black voters may have went to the Democrats for historical reasons back in the 60s/70s, today I think it’s mainly inertia. But it’s so strong that it seems to be more of an attribute than a behavior. That is, Democrat is who we are rather than how we vote. It’s like one’s ethnicity or religion.

    This is a fascinating idea, Bereket.To vote other than Democrat would be like converting to another religion, or denying a part of who you are. Thanks for finding a creative way to look at black voting habits.

    I think it’s easier to convert a Muslim in Mecca to Christianity than it is to persuade a black voter to support a Republican

    The amount of opprobrium a black man would have to endure for announcing he is a Republican is…well, let’s just say there probably wouldn’t be a coming out party thrown.

    But there is still the sanctity of the voting booth.

    Yeah, and there is the heart of the problem. Kelile’s point is that identity voters aren’t simply voting to communicate some identity to others, but because there is a profound, internal emotional sense of who they are that is driving them.

    • #68
  9. Bereket Kelile Member
    Bereket Kelile
    @BereketKelile

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    Great points, all.

    I’ll throw in a curve ball… Most of this talk is somewhat abstract, let’s look at something more concrete. This is a very specific time right now, where something very concrete is available. Maybe take advantage of it.

    A substantial fraction of black poverty and crime is located in the inner city. And most of those inner cities have been under Democrat control for 50 years now, uninterrupted.

    Wikipedia presents this really well… look up the list of US cities with the highest crime rates (I’ll suggest homicide as the most significant and well documented) and look up the history of mayors for those cities. The highest crime cities are all dems for the last 50 years, uninterrupted.

    Thus we have a 50 Year Experiment. And we can examine the results.

    @bereketkelile , my man… you have statistical skillz, data, and resources… What can you do with this?

    What is a good statistical metric of survival/success for a black person in a city that is, over a period of 50 years, significantly Republican vs. Democrat?

    Sorry for the late reply. I don’t think it’ll help that much because I think the barrier is higher and wider than a demonstration of the evidence can overcome. That doesn’t mean they don’t see a problem, and even attribute blame to Democrats. The problem is how they look at the range of possible solutions. What will it take to consider voting for a real alternative, not another Democrat, no matter how moderate he/she might be.

    • #69
  10. namlliT noD Member
    namlliT noD
    @DonTillman

    Maybe something is happening.   Fleccas reports from Newark:

    • #70
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.