Your friend Jim George thinks you'd be a great addition to Ricochet, so we'd like to offer you a special deal: You can become a member for no initial charge for one month!
Ricochet is a community of like-minded people who enjoy writing about and discussing politics (usually of the center-right nature), culture, sports, history, and just about every other topic under the sun in a fully moderated environment. We’re so sure you’ll like Ricochet, we’ll let you join and get your first month for free. Kick the tires: read the always eclectic member feed, write some posts, join discussions, participate in a live chat or two, and listen to a few of our over 50 (free) podcasts on every conceivable topic, hosted by some of the biggest names on the right, for 30 days on us. We’re confident you’re gonna love it.
H. Ross Perot, the man who could have been America’s first Independent President, died today at age 89. When he ran in 1992 against the incumbent George H.W. Bush and the Democratic Party nominee Bill Clinton he received 19% of the popular vote, the highest since Teddy Roosevelt’s Bull Moose bid in 1912.
It’s too bad he was nuts.
When I lived in Dallas, I discovered that everyone loved his wife and everyone didn’t love him.
Every positive trait or story was, at a minimum, balanced with equal negatives. A large portion of the stories about his stellar salesmanship/entrepreneurship were mostly hype and sometimes outright fabrications.
His ego in getting back into the election, handed the presidency to Clinton. I really could never forgive him for that.
My first exposure to H. Ross Perot was via Ken Follett’s non-fiction book On Wings of Eagles. Some of his employees were arrested and held for ransom by the revolutionary government of Iran. Perot tried to pay the ransom, but when that deal fell through, he resorted to other means.
Whatever his qualities as a president might have been, Ross Perot was the kind of boss you would want to have if you get jammed up in some foreign poop-hole of a country.
Unfortunately, the folks at the US embassy had a very different type of boss.
He was correct about NAFTA.
In 1987 my fire department responded to a huge flood disaster in adjacent Comfort, TX. 10 kids died when a church camp bus washed off of a bridge (one has never been recovered). A few days into the recovery operation Perot showed up and offered massive financial and other assistance; he asked for it to be kept completely quiet. As much as he drove me crazy about politics he was righteous about helping people.
Um, I do so hate to quibble, but NAFTA didn’t send any American jobs over any sea.
;-)
You love to quibble.
I know. But it still needed to be said.
Now, kids. If I have to stop the car…
Why don’t we do this: Judge, you can have the last word this time, and Mis., you can have it next time.
Hijacking an obituary? Really?
So he was right about everything – big deal. He still gave us Bill Clinton.
And a Republican House.
I worked for EDS. ’nuff said.
Although, adding to the “quirks” list, every system that EDS made while Ross owned the company was capable of handling first initial and middle name, rather than only first name and middle initial.
RIP, Ross.
Yes he was, and about a few other important things. What he was not right about was the conceit that his 3rd party candidacy could ever deliver on any of them.
As big a disappointment as GHWB was, he wasn’t a danger to the Republic. If Ross Perot couldn’t win the Republican primary, then he should have shut up and supported the nominee.
Me neither. Perot’s foray into presidential politics is a cautionary tale.
Since the invention of today, there have been but three great Richochet chortles*. This one left them all behind.
*Boss Mongo said something really funny this morning in Things I Learned (he was playing the role of Boss Mongo and no one does it better), and whoever responded to it got me again.
They started it.
(Sorry, Ross and kin. Ross, you were a real American.)
George H.W. Bush spitting in our faces and telling us it was sunshine gave us Bill Clinton. Period.
But for whatever actually happened around his daughter, Perot may well have held his lead and given the Republican establishment a badly needed beating, perhaps generating something like the Tea Party movement in the midterms.
The Republican’s fear of Trump being another Perot led to the loyalty oath that all would support the nominee. When Trump got the nomination, the others did not like it so much.
I felt the same way as EB and Barfly for many years. The thing that many years did for me was perspective.
Serious question . If GHWB had won that election, can you honestly say the country would not have been ratcheted any less left than it is today ? My answer is, No!
Accept for a generation thinking a BJ was not sex, there wouldn’t of been a dimes difference in the two administrations.
Disagree. Newt and the Contract with America probably would not have happened under GHWB. “Clinton” did things like reforming welfare because he had a powerful Republican Congress.
And that’s why Perot was a good thing. I remember the days when it was unthinkable that the Republicans could actually control the House. ’94 changed it all and control of the House was finally opened to both parties and it hotly contested every two years. Never would have happened if Bush reelected. And from 94 to 98 it worked pretty well with an R Congress and a chastened Bill Clinton (one big difference between Bill and Barack, is it was impossible to chasten Barack – he didn’t change course after 2010) before the GOP decided to get stupid about Lewinsky.
The Bible verse that comes to mind is Genesis 50:20.
A good one!
I’m not so sure the GOP was stupid about Lewinsky. When the news of the dress first broke a dedicated Clinton loving friend said to me “if it’s true he’ll have to resign”. But then the left went into massive fight mode and weathered the storm. And don’t forget the role of “centrists” like Arlen Specter. Clinton changed the rules, forever. In fact, Clinton enabled Trump. Must make HRC wake up and throw lamps, again.