May 13, 1940: The Day the English Language Was Mobilized and Sent Into Battle

 

Seventy-nine years ago, on Monday, May 13, 1940, a man who had been the Prime Minister of England for just three days, and who’d only ascended to the position as the candidate of last resort after internecine squabbling within his own party, and only with the reluctant support of his King, made his maiden speech to Parliament (excerpt follows, entire speech here):

Sir, to form an Administration of this scale and complexity is a serious undertaking in itself, but it must be remembered that we are in the preliminary stage of one of the greatest battles in history, that we are in action at many points in Norway and in Holland, that we have to be prepared in the Mediterranean, that the air battle is continuous and that many preparations have to be made here at home. In this crisis I hope I may be pardoned if I do not address the House at any length today. I hope that any of my friends and colleagues, or former colleagues, who are affected by the political reconstruction, will make all allowances for any lack of ceremony with which it has been necessary to act. I would say to the House, as I said to those who have joined the government: “I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat.”

We have before us an ordeal of the most grievous kind. We have before us many, many long months of struggle and of suffering. You ask, what is our policy? I will say: It is to wage war, by sea, land and air, with all our might and with all the strength that God can give us; to wage war against a monstrous tyranny, never surpassed in the dark and lamentable catalogue of human crime. That is our policy. You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word: victory; victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival. Let that be realized; no survival for the British Empire, no survival for all that the British Empire has stood for, no survival for the urge and impulse of the ages, that mankind will move forward towards its goal. But I take up my task with buoyancy and hope. I feel sure that our cause will not be suffered to fail among men. At this time I feel entitled to claim the aid of all, and I say, “Come then, let us go forward together with our united strength.”

The speech was brief (less than six minutes) and urgent. Its most famous line was cobbled together and borrowed, bits from Teddy Roosevelt, and bits from Giuseppe Garibaldi. Its message was clear. Britain was on the ropes. Appeasement had failed. Hitler was winning. Disunity at home would not be suffered to continue. A governing coalition, composed of all leaders of all parties would go forward together, with the country on a firm war footing, with victory, at any and all cost, the aim.  (Although Churchill’s message for public consumption was one of “buoyancy and hope,” he was under no illusion about what was to follow, remarking to his Chief Miltary Assistant, General “Pug” Ismay, “Poor people, poor people. They trust me, and I can give them nothing but disaster for quite a long time.”  And so it seemed.)

With the exception of his own Conservative Party, many of whose members clapped politely, while others sat on their hands, Winston Churchill’s speech was greeted with a rapturous ovation by the crowd at Westminster, and by the British public, which longed to hear someone speak in terms other than platitudes of appeasement and cooperation with “Herr Hitler,” and which desperately wanted a leader they could follow, and a champion of whom they could be proud.  The man had met the moment, and the rest is history.

I sometimes wonder if such national unity, sense of purpose, and resolve against seemingly impossible odds will be ever seen again in the West.

Published in History
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 33 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Hang On (View Comment):

    She (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    About the only things the British had going for them were an extraordinary leader and a people who wouldn’t quit.

    Sometimes, that’s enough

    The British had a leader who recognized that Britain had much going for it than that. They had a fleet second to none. They were an island that had to be invaded en masse. They had an air force with the advantages of interior lines of communication. They had Chain Home (which evidently the Germans didn’t know about). They had Spitfires. They broke German codes and cipher capability second to none. And they did have indomitable spirit. But indomitable spirit by itself would not have been enough even with a great leader. (Finland had both – and still lost to the Soviets.)

    All that stuff, plus US Navy assistance far exceeding proper neutral status, plus 100-odd WWI-era destroyers traded for basing rights in Bermuda, wasn’t keeping the shipping lanes open.

    It was a damned close-run thing, as Wellington might have said.

    • #31
  2. barbara lydick Inactive
    barbara lydick
    @barbaralydick

    She (View Comment):
    The most famous photo of Churchill is probably the one by Karsh of Ottawa, from 1941. I’ve always read that Yousuf Karsh had just grabbed Churchill’s cigar and put it out, which irritated Winston no end; hence his scowl:

    @She – You’re absolutely correct about the cigar and the ensuing scowl.  Years ago, I had purchased the book, Karsh Portraits by Yousuf Karsh, as a Christmas gift for a friend.  In looking through the book of those marvelous portraits (all in black and white which added to the magnificence of his work) I was pleased to notice that the page with each photo was accompanied by a facing page that Karsh used to share his encounter with  the subjects on the day of the photo.  So interesting.  And yes, he did say that Churchill was annoyed which resulted in that perfect photo of Churchill.

    For years afterwards, I tried to find a copy of the book for myself but with no luck.  Today, after reading your comment, a thought struck me.  Amazon.  My copy is due to arrive 28 May!! (Understand, my gift purchase was years before the Internet…)

    • #32
  3. She Member
    She
    @She

    barbara lydick (View Comment):

    She (View Comment):
    The most famous photo of Churchill is probably the one by Karsh of Ottawa, from 1941. I’ve always read that Yousuf Karsh had just grabbed Churchill’s cigar and put it out, which irritated Winston no end; hence his scowl:

    @She – You’re absolutely correct about the cigar and the ensuing scowl. Years ago, I had purchased the book, Karsh Portraits by Yousuf Karsh, as a Christmas gift for a friend. In looking through the book of those marvelous portraits (all in black and white which added to the magnificence of his work) I was pleased to notice that the page with each photo was accompanied by a facing page that Karsh used to share his encounter with the subjects on the day of the photo. So interesting. And yes, he did say that Churchill was annoyed which resulted in that perfect photo of Churchill.

    For years afterwards, I tried to find a copy of the book for myself but with no luck. Today, after reading your comment, a thought struck me. Amazon. My copy is due to arrive 28 May!! (Understand, my gift purchase was years before the Internet…)

    Lovely!  How we got from there to here is one of the reasons I love this site.  Glad you’ve finally found yourself a copy of the book.

    • #33
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.