Exposing The Man Behind The Curtain

 

The pattern has been exposed. There are white hats in the entrenched government apparatus that have been making symmetrical ‘leaks’ of truth to counteract the ‘leaks’ of lies that have been fast and furious for many years, going well back into the Obama administration. Following the tsunami mid-term election losses in 2010, Lois Lerner and others in the federal government apparatus were weaponized. Cabinet officials had fake bogus identities and email accounts to coordinate the propaganda. They have also been caught spying on members of the press – James Rosen, Sheryl Attkinson and who knows how many others on the 0bama enemies list.

Back in the day, there was a so-called military/industrial complex to be fearful of. That was debatable. Today, there is an embedded liberal federal government/media complex that is to be feared and confronted. It is not debatable. The so-called ‘Fourth Estate’ has been exposed to be nothing more than the mouthpiece of the DNC. There is your real “collusion”. Leni Reifenstahl, meet Zoe Barnes. Sad.

Thanks to the white hat leaks, we have received incontrovertible evidence that top officials of the CIA, NSA, FBI, DNI, etc. have their own direct media contacts (and get hired by these same media outlets following departure from the cushy colluding government positions). That these regular brazen contacts and relationships include perks and payoffs. They have been caught red-handed at this by the Inspector General. Yet all we get are yawns. SRSLY?!

It is a plot straight out of House of Cards. The DNC invents the story and their media slaves dutifully print it out exactly as planted. They are manipulating the news in complete collusion. The same words, phrases, and talking points. This is not speculation. This is an obvious truth.

Here’s the latest. The Weissman report* landed with a thud. This Dud’s for you. Liberal media was apoplectic. A new story must be invented. So, they go to their ‘bible’ and consult the little Red book. Of course, go to rule 13. And the target is the new Attorney General. Here’s the story …

Mueller wrote … complaining that Barr  “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of Mueller’s report, according to a copy of the letter reviewed Tuesday by The Washington Post.

Horse hockey. Former U.S. Attorney Joe diGenova pulls back the curtain …

An abusive, outrageous, vindictive, unethical, unprofessional letter by Weissman …

The truth will set us free. Heads need to roll. Justice needs to be served.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 24 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. EDISONPARKS Member
    EDISONPARKS
    @user_54742

    It is rather Orwellian/scary that if the MSM/(D) complex dig in on a narrative it is astonishing how they are able to maintain said narrative even in the face of facts clearly proving the narrative to be, not just inaccurate, but provide overwhelming evidence the entire narrative was a fabrication designed to frame United States citizens of crimes they did not commit.

    • #1
  2. WI Con Member
    WI Con
    @WICon

    From your post to G*ds ears. 

    I don’t know what to make of DiGenova & Teonsing. I love what they say and their fighting spirit, I just question how ‘plugged in’ they truly are. Seems like their predictions seldom come to pass.

    I’d love to be wrong on this though. These people need to be taken down.

    • #2
  3. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    WI Con (View Comment):

    From your post to G*ds ears.

    I don’t know what to make of DiGenova & Teonsing. I love what they say and their fighting spirit, I just question how ‘plugged in’ they truly are. Seems like their predictions seldom come to pass.

    I’d love to be wrong on this though. These people need to be taken down.

    The Face of the Deep State …

    • #3
  4. EODmom Coolidge
    EODmom
    @EODmom

    @user_54742 and @columbo   I think the only thing one has to remember is that this crew DOES NOT CARE about facts, circumstances or what others think about their actions. (Think back to Obama’s flagrant flinging of words at will – but to the same purpose.) They respond to changes in their battlefield by throwing more ammunition from their infinite store of poisonous stuff. The stuff changes, but the poison is consistent. Their goal (in this case) is to destroy Barr’s case. The principle goal is power. And they never ever surrender the field. We cannot be surprised any more. Barr’s behaviour serves as an excellent example of stipulating to reality – out loud and without reserve. It has to be done. I also submit that Barr has to be protected at all costs.

    • #4
  5. EDISONPARKS Member
    EDISONPARKS
    @user_54742

    WI Con (View Comment):

    From your post to G*ds ears.

    I don’t know what to make of DiGenova & Teonsing. I love what they say and their fighting spirit, I just question how ‘plugged in’ they truly are. Seems like their predictions seldom come to pass.

    I’d love to be wrong on this though. These people need to be taken down.

    I noticed that about Joe too.

    I love him and agree 100% with his take on all this, but I do not share his confidence that those responsible for this historical debacle will be held accountable.

    • #5
  6. James Gawron Inactive
    James Gawron
    @JamesGawron

    Columbo,

    So let’s review. First, a scenario that is absurd on its face that the Russians could have actually changed the results of 2016 given if their entire effort had been against Hillary (which it was not) given if their efforts could be considered highly effective (which they were not). The totality of the effort was an eyedropper in the ocean of the internet. Second, the premise of the origination of the investigation was a falsified dossier that resulted in an illegitimate FISA warrant. Even with this obscenity glaring Mueller in the face he went ahead and spent two years of the nations time on this garbage only to find no justification for any indictment, the only job that his investigation had.

    For this entire period, the Democrats screamed that poor Mueller was untouchable no matter how many of his subordinates were found to be grossly biased or how false was the basis of the entire investigation. Now that the investigation has been completed and a new highly experienced/qualified AG is in place, a new whine comes from the Democrats based on nothing but a vague unprofessional bit of phrasing left in Mueller’s report.

    The President doesn’t need to be impeached nor does the AG need to be impeached. Maxine Waters needs to be put in a straight jacket.

    Regards,

    Jim

    • #6
  7. unsk2 Member
    unsk2
    @

    Columbo:”Thanks to the white hat leaks, we have received incontrovertible evidence that top officials of the CIA, NSA, FBI, DNI, etc. have their own direct media contacts (and get hired by these same media outlets following departure from the cushy colluding government positions). That these regular brazen contacts and relationships include perks and payoffs. They have been caught red-handed at this by the Inspector General. Yet all we get are yawns. SRSLY?!”

    A good synopsis in a nutshell of the essence of the monumental problem we now face as a nation, which as you allude to that appears to have  two parts:

    1. The weaponization of our bureaucracy and the instruments of government action that have been either primed to be used/ and or actually  have been used against literally half the citizenry is almost beyond one’s normal comprehension. It is simply so vast and extensive, it is  hard to believe we have so many evil traitors and scum in our midst. But here we are on the brink of a terrible tyranny – one if we do not cut out this cancer  upon our nation to it’s core immediately,  we may soon never enjoy our freedoms again .
    2. Since this weaponization is so beyond one’s normal comprehension, with so  many of our populace so anesthetized by our media, our schools and our culture to the diabolical workings of the Progressives, whole swaths of the population either cannot get a handle on this terrible threat to our liberties, or simply do not want to believe it exists.  Many have been so brainwashed and made to hate the “deplorable” portion of the population – you know those in middle and working classes that still believe in America, American values and our Constitutional Republic, that these brainwashed simply don’t care what happens to the”deplorables” as long as it’s bad.  We have it coming somehow.
    • #7
  8. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    Andrew McCarthy: Mueller’s letter to Barr – A neat trick … by the Wapo before Senate hearing …

    This reeks of a bad plot from House of Cards … Frank planting a story with Zoe.

    • #8
  9. EODmom Coolidge
    EODmom
    @EODmom

    unsk2 (View Comment):

    A good synopsis in a nutshell of the essence of the monumental problem we now face as a nation, which as you allude to that appears to have two parts:

    1. The weaponization of our bureaucracy and the instruments of government action that have been either primed to be used/ and or actually have been used against literally half the citizenry is almost beyond one’s normal comprehension. ……
    2. Since this weaponization is so beyond one’s normal comprehension, with so many of our populace so anesthetized by our media, our schools and our culture to the diabolical workings of the Progressives, whole swaths of the population either cannot get a handle on this terrible threat to our liberties, or simply do not want to believe it exists. ………

    My husband and I talked about this the other night: I said that as a result of my academic work (long ago and I don’t practice without a license…) I knew and believe that the 1930’s and ’40’s German population – and later descendants – certainly knew what the National Socialists were doing, both on a civil level and criminally against the Jewish and other “disreputable” populations, and went on with their days. That was academic knowledge. I never ever ever thought it possible that I would live in a political and social environment where such civic and social corruption would be systemic in my country. I do – and, as you say @unsk2, there are whole swaths of the population with hands over their ears and eyes – hearing and seeing no evil. I think it’s beyond difficult for the average individual to acknowledge such things, much less respond when someone speaking with authority – repeatedly, over time and from innumerable sources – posits things that are repugnant, obvious falsehoods or otherwise socially malevolent. Most people don’t want to take the risk that someone won’t like them or a family argue with them and they won’t know what to say or something, much less that they will have livelihoods or worse threatened. They hunker down and go about their days. So – I’ll work a little harder on our (small) town’s Republican committee for 2020. I’m not registered that way, but Seacoast NH lost some R seats in the State House in 2018 and the implications are getting uglier by the day: for example, a new D Rep argued in a Legislature speech that the proposed tax on wages isn’t a tax on income for purposes of the State Constitution. (It’s not really about the tax, it’s about the right to ignore the Constitution.) So I’ll go about my day differently for the next 18 months.

    • #9
  10. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    Don’t look now, but this story is getting more traction. And not only in the so-called “ultra-conservative” inner webs … from The Hill … Nellie Ohr’s ‘Hi Honey’ emails to DOJ about Russian collusion should alarm us all …

    A real life DC ‘Power Couple’ thinking themselves as mimicking Frank and Claire …

     

    • #10
  11. EODmom Coolidge
    EODmom
    @EODmom

    @columbo. I’m beginning to think I should have watched this series (I don’t even recognize the names) but there are no new stories. Or feuds. Or intrigues and connivances. Just ask VDHanson. 

    • #11
  12. EODmom Coolidge
    EODmom
    @EODmom

    I’ve said this before but I will bet – a lot- that there were similar “projects” on the other main GOP contenders. There were low caliber shots across the bows early on for Cruz and Rubio and I KNOW that Mr Nice Guy Works with the Other Guys Romney would not have been spared. The Clintons take the long view and had plenty of money to spread around. Especially since so much of it was taxpayer money. They were just ready to go when Trump ran the table. 

    • #12
  13. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    EODmom (View Comment):

    @columbo. I’m beginning to think I should have watched this series (I don’t even recognize the names) but there are no new stories. Or feuds. Or intrigues and connivances. Just ask VDHanson.

    I never watched it in real time. I heard about it from multiple sources who discussed its real portrayals of actual people behind the scenes. Like it was a very accurate depiction of the people, the lying viciousness and intrigue. Somewhat recently, I binge-watched Season 1. I made myself finish it to see the ‘ending’ (which wasn’t an end of course, just Season 1) and I vowed never to watch any of the rest of it. I felt pulled and drug into their muck and corruption. ‘Be careful little eyes, what you see ….’ and all.

    • #13
  14. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    EODmom (View Comment):

    I’ve said this before but I will bet – a lot- that there were similar “projects” on the other main GOP contenders. There were low caliber shots across the bows early on for Cruz and Rubio and I KNOW that Mr Nice Guy Works with the Other Guys Romney would not have been spared. The Clintons take the long view and had plenty of money to spread around. Especially since so much of it was taxpayer money. They were just ready to go when Trump ran the table.

    Think back to the first Romney vs. 0bama debate. Romney cleaned his clock.

    Debate #2 was a total 180. Who knows what clandestine tools were used to spy on Romney’s debate prep.

    And we all know that Candy colluded with her heartthrob ….

    • #14
  15. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    D.C. whispers ……………

    • #15
  16. EDISONPARKS Member
    EDISONPARKS
    @user_54742

    Columbo (View Comment):

    EODmom (View Comment):

    I’ve said this before but I will bet – a lot- that there were similar “projects” on the other main GOP contenders. There were low caliber shots across the bows early on for Cruz and Rubio and I KNOW that Mr Nice Guy Works with the Other Guys Romney would not have been spared. The Clintons take the long view and had plenty of money to spread around. Especially since so much of it was taxpayer money. They were just ready to go when Trump ran the table.

    Think back to the first Romney vs. 0bama debate. Romney cleaned his clock.

    Debate #2 was a total 180. Who knows what clandestine tools were used to spy on Romney’s debate prep.

    And we all know that Candy colluded with her heartthrob ….

    Candy seems to have disappeared … she seemed to do just fine in her CNN role as a typical Lefty journo/commentator, but a bit miscast given she had a face truly meant for radio(or podcast?).

     

    • #16
  17. Goldwaterwoman Thatcher
    Goldwaterwoman
    @goldwaterwoman

    The big, big mistake in the entire investigation was making it about one political party rather than about Russian involvement in all political parties and social media. 

    • #17
  18. Sweezle Inactive
    Sweezle
    @Sweezle

    Goldwaterwoman (View Comment):
    The big, big mistake in the entire investigation was making it about one political party rather than about Russian involvement in all political parties and social media.

    Are you kidding? There would not be any investigation unless Trump was elected President. And no Mueller investigation if the Republicans didn’t have political power in Congress. The MSM only cover topics that make Republicans look bad.

    • #18
  19. toggle Inactive
    toggle
    @toggle

    Goldwaterwoman (View Comment):
    The big, big mistake in the entire investigation was making it about one political party rather than about Russian involvement in all political parties and social media.

    Or rather, making it about one political party was the purpose of their actions—pursuant to their string of setups before and after the election.
    A week, or so, after having recommended to Trump the termination of Comey, the same person opened the can of worms for Mueller to feed to the media all the way through the midterm elections.
    Agents of the same domestic agency that spun a web of foreign contacts to concoct a pretext for intelligence surveillance on Americans prior to the election are quick to trick Flynn with their “off the record” entrapment a week, or so, after Trump takes office (as Comey admitted : they took advantage of the confusion inherent in any POTUS transition).
    Then, the innuendo contained in the report sets up what the Ds are using now to deflect attention from their swamp enforcement acolytes’ culpability in political domestic spying.

    • #19
  20. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    WI Con (View Comment):These people need to be taken down out and shot.

     

    • #20
  21. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    Victor Davis Hanson contributes … 

    Russians likely fed salacious but untrue allegations about Trump to ex-British spy Christopher Steele, who was being paid in part by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to find dirt on Trump.

    The Russians rightly assumed that Steele would lap up their fantasies, seed them among Trump-hating officials in the Barack Obama administration and thereby cause hysteria during the election, the transition, and, eventually, the Trump presidency.

    Russia succeeded in sowing such chaos, thanks ultimately to Clinton, who likely had broken federal laws by using a British national and, by extension, Russian sources to warp an election. Without the fallacious Steele dossier, the entire Russian collusion hoax never would have taken off.

    Without Steele’s skullduggery, there probably would have been no Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Court–approved surveillance of Trump aide Carter Page. There might have been no FBI plants inserted into the Trump campaign. There might have been no subsequent leaking to the press of classified documents to prompt a Trump collusion investigation.

    Given the Steele travesty and other past scandals, it is inexplicable that Clinton has not been indicted.

    • #21
  22. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    Cross posting … Did Ben Rhodes Concoct The False Russian Collusion Narrative for the FISA Court?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPX85LMuBFs

     

    • #22
  23. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    Columbo (View Comment):
    Victor Davis Hanson contributes …

    Russians likely fed salacious but untrue allegations about Trump to ex-British spy Christopher Steele, who was being paid in part by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to find dirt on Trump.

    The Russians rightly assumed that Steele would lap up their fantasies, seed them among Trump-hating officials in the Barack Obama administration and thereby cause hysteria during the election, the transition, and, eventually, the Trump presidency.

    Russia succeeded in sowing such chaos, thanks ultimately to Clinton, who likely had broken federal laws by using a British national and, by extension, Russian sources to warp an election. Without the fallacious Steele dossier, the entire Russian collusion hoax never would have taken off.

    Without Steele’s skullduggery, there probably would have been no Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Court–approved surveillance of Trump aide Carter Page. There might have been no FBI plants inserted into the Trump campaign. There might have been no subsequent leaking to the press of classified documents to prompt a Trump collusion investigation.

    Given the Steele travesty and other past scandals, it is inexplicable that Clinton has not been indicted.

    More VDH ….

    For Clinton now to project that the president should be indicted suggests she is worried about her own potential indictment. And she is rightly concerned that for the first time in 40 years, neither she nor her husband is serving in government or running for some office, and therefore she could be held accountable.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tx94428MYcc

    • #23
  24. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    Columbo (View Comment):

    Columbo (View Comment):
    Victor Davis Hanson contributes …

    Russians likely fed salacious but untrue allegations about Trump to ex-British spy Christopher Steele, who was being paid in part by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to find dirt on Trump.

    The Russians rightly assumed that Steele would lap up their fantasies, seed them among Trump-hating officials in the Barack Obama administration and thereby cause hysteria during the election, the transition, and, eventually, the Trump presidency.

    Russia succeeded in sowing such chaos, thanks ultimately to Clinton, who likely had broken federal laws by using a British national and, by extension, Russian sources to warp an election. Without the fallacious Steele dossier, the entire Russian collusion hoax never would have taken off.

    Without Steele’s skullduggery, there probably would have been no Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Court–approved surveillance of Trump aide Carter Page. There might have been no FBI plants inserted into the Trump campaign. There might have been no subsequent leaking to the press of classified documents to prompt a Trump collusion investigation.

    Given the Steele travesty and other past scandals, it is inexplicable that Clinton has not been indicted.

    More VDH ….

    For Clinton now to project that the president should be indicted suggests she is worried about her own potential indictment. And she is rightly concerned that for the first time in 40 years, neither she nor her husband is serving in government or running for some office, and therefore she could be held accountable.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tx94428MYcc

    Watch the linked video above. This was at the Republican National Convention on July 18, 2016. Tell me that Hillary Clinton (with Barack’s full support) did not order the DOJ/FBI/CIA/DNI…. to take down General Michael Flynn after this performance. And voila … let’s hope that this General has his own Montezuma’s revenge in the near future ….

    • #24
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.