My Geek Credentials

 

I was perusing, and enjoying, The Week In Pictures at Power Line when I encountered the image below.  It produced the only audible chuckle of the entire post. I’m a geek. Case closed.

If you don’t understand the humor, you’re normal.  Lucky you.

Published in Humor
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 71 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Gary McVey Contributor
    Gary McVey
    @GaryMcVey

    Fritz (View Comment):

    First I had to overcome a brief flashback to Mr. Natural (sorry, I am of the Woodstock and R Crumb comix generation)

    Tell me about it, pal…

     

    • #31
  2. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Gary McVey (View Comment):

    Fritz (View Comment):

    First I had to overcome a brief flashback to Mr. Natural (sorry, I am of the Woodstock and R Crumb comix generation)

    Tell me about it, pal…

     

    Isn’t that the fifth Monkee?

    • #32
  3. Gary McVey Contributor
    Gary McVey
    @GaryMcVey

    Percival (View Comment):

    Gary McVey (View Comment):

    Fritz (View Comment):

    First I had to overcome a brief flashback to Mr. Natural (sorry, I am of the Woodstock and R Crumb comix generation)

    Tell me about it, pal…

     

    Isn’t that the fifth Monkee?

    When Valerie takes that Last Train to Clarksville, I want to be there. 

    • #33
  4. Bryan Van Blaricom Member
    Bryan Van Blaricom
    @BryanVanBlaricom

    Doppler shift and Lorenz contraction combined – relativistic effects at highway speeds. A geek joke for sure :-).

    • #34
  5. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    It was the Sci-fi reading that enabled me to puzzle it out.

    • #35
  6. Gary McVey Contributor
    Gary McVey
    @GaryMcVey

    Certain highway jokes don’t work unless you have a subconscious ability to grasp intuitive math. For example, a single panel of a Fabulous Furry Freak Brothers comic strip of the Seventies: three bushy-bearded men are staring out a car windshield at a California freeway sign: Disneyland 1 Mile. “Aww…I guess we’d better smoke these last three joints”. The laugh is based on the incongruence between two facts:

    1. at highway speed, that means they’ll be at the turnoff in one minute; and

    2. Even for the Fabulous Furry Freak Brothers, this is a preposterously short amount of time to do it in. 

    • #36
  7. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Gary McVey (View Comment):

    Certain highway jokes don’t work unless you have a subconscious ability to grasp intuitive math. For example, a single panel of a Fabulous Furry Freak Brothers comic strip of the Seventies: three bushy-bearded men are staring out a car windshield at a California freeway sign: Disneyland 1 Mile. “Aww…I guess we’d better smoke these last three joints”. The laugh is based on the incongruence between two facts:

    1. at highway speed, that means they’ll be at the turnoff in one minute; and

    2. Even for the Fabulous Furry Freak Brothers, this is a preposterously short amount of time to do it in.

    Maybe the joke is that they wouldn’t be going at highway speeds.

    • #37
  8. Gary McVey Contributor
    Gary McVey
    @GaryMcVey

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Gary McVey (View Comment):

    Certain highway jokes don’t work unless you have a subconscious ability to grasp intuitive math. For example, a single panel of a Fabulous Furry Freak Brothers comic strip of the Seventies: three bushy-bearded men are staring out a car windshield at a California freeway sign: Disneyland 1 Mile. “Aww…I guess we’d better smoke these last three joints”. The laugh is based on the incongruence between two facts:

    1. at highway speed, that means they’ll be at the turnoff in one minute; and

    2. Even for the Fabulous Furry Freak Brothers, this is a preposterously short amount of time to do it in.

    Maybe the joke is that they wouldn’t be going at highway speeds.

    I might buy that, but let’s do the opposing math. Three experienced Seventies hippies, three joints…a reasonable guess is each one takes one and spends 20 minutes on it. One mile in twenty minutes is 3 mph. So my logical and utterly humor-blind guess is, that’s not it. 

    • #38
  9. Muleskinner, Weasel Wrangler Member
    Muleskinner, Weasel Wrangler
    @Muleskinner

    Terry Mott: I’m a geek. Case closed.

    That’s some credential you got there.

    • #39
  10. Quietpi Member
    Quietpi
    @Quietpi

    Gary McVey (View Comment):
    Three experienced Seventies hippies, three joints…a reasonable guess is each one takes one and spends 20 minutes on it. One mile in twenty minutes is 3 mph.

    This is a multi – thread joke.  Three joints in one minute to be sure.  But: ’70’s / L.A. “freeways:” No, three mph or less isn’t a bit out of the question.

    I got it as soon as I realized it was the same car.  But somebody suggested the observer’s nose should be longer in frame two.  Why would that be?  Was he thinking speed-of-light / time warp?

    One flaw though – the green foliage changes, albeit slightly.

    Somebody tell the joke about the speeding physics student, the cop and the traffic light. With the answer.

    Ya, I’ve been accused of being a geek.  But I have a geek friend who constantly proves that I’m no more than a geek wanna-be.

    I’m sending him the picture.

    • #40
  11. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    DonG (View Comment):

    Not funny, because the panels don’t demonstrate that it is the same car. A license plate would help. It is a cartoon, so it is not intuitive to assume anything from elongation of the wheels. Maybe on the opening slide of an astrophysics presentation, there would be some context.

    • #41
  12. Skyler Coolidge
    Skyler
    @Skyler

    Very subtle.  Them young whippersnappers always driving too fast. 

    • #42
  13. Stad Coolidge
    Stad
    @Stad

    Henry Racette (View Comment):
    Whatever: it’s a safe bet that the driver is exceeding the speed limit

    I have a tee shirt with a drawing of Einstein in a police uniform.  It says, “186,000 miles per second is not only a good idea – it’s the law.”

    • #43
  14. Hang On Member
    Hang On
    @HangOn

    When I saw the cartoon, I was reminded of the costume Sheldon wore to Penny’s Halloween Party on Big Bang. Everybody thought he was a zebra. That was funny too.

    • #44
  15. Barfly Member
    Barfly
    @Barfly

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    What does this have to do with Trump?

    Even physics knows that lefties have the blues ’cause Trump is right.

    • #45
  16. EHerring Coolidge
    EHerring
    @EHerring

    One of the cleverest cartoons in a while. We got a chuckle when we saw it on PL.

    • #46
  17. Hank Rhody, Meddling Cowpoke Contributor
    Hank Rhody, Meddling Cowpoke
    @HankRhody

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):

    My first thought was “that is one hell of a speeding ticket”

    Casey and Andy covered it.

    • #47
  18. Bishop Wash Member
    Bishop Wash
    @BishopWash

    Heisenberg gets pulled over for speeding.

    The cop asks him, “Do you know how fast you were going?”

    Heisenberg replies, “No, but I know exactly where I am!”

    The officer looks at him confused and says “you were going 78 miles per hour!”

    Heisenberg throws his arms up and cries, “Great! Now I’m lost!”

    • #48
  19. Richard Finlay Inactive
    Richard Finlay
    @RichardFinlay

    Shouldn’t the top of the tires (in the right panel) be redder?  I suppose in the left column they should be less blue.  Or maybe the bottoms should be less red/more blue.  And the length distortion should reflect the difference in velocity ….

    Geeky jokes invite extrapolation.

    • #49
  20. Blue State Blues Member
    Blue State Blues
    @BlueStateBlues

    Not to quibble with a joke, but shouldn’t the car be shortened in both panels?   Lorentz contraction (as I understand it) is a function of v/c only, not direction of travel.

     

    • #50
  21. Richard Finlay Inactive
    Richard Finlay
    @RichardFinlay

    Blue State Blues (View Comment):

    Not to quibble with a joke, but shouldn’t the car be shortened in both panels? Lorentz contraction (as I understand it) is a function of v/c only, not direction of travel.

     

    Jokes like this are meant to be quibbled with.

    • #51
  22. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Blue State Blues (View Comment):

    Not to quibble with a joke, but shouldn’t the car be shortened in both panels? Lorentz contraction (as I understand it) is a function of v/c only, not direction of travel.

     

    I’ll confess.  I don’t know anything about that. I just figured that red wavelengths are longer, so maybe the car should be, too.

    • #52
  23. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Barfly (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    What does this have to do with Trump?

    Even physics knows that lefties have the blues ’cause Trump is right.

    I was being self-deprecating and making fun of myself.

    Not everything has to do with Trump; it was nice to have a break from all things Trump.

    • #53
  24. Steve C. Member
    Steve C.
    @user_531302

    Fritz (View Comment):

    First I had to overcome a brief flashback to Mr. Natural (sorry, I am of the Woodstock and R Crumb comix generation) but then I got it. Yeah, it took a few extra seconds, but then, I was a Eng Lit major.

    Cheers!

    Keep on Dopplering.

    • #54
  25. Podkayne of Israel Inactive
    Podkayne of Israel
    @PodkayneofIsrael

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):

    My first thought was “that is one hell of a speeding ticket”

    Yeah, my husband’s response was that according to the laws of physics, you shouldn’t be driving that fast.

    • #55
  26. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    Podkayne of Israel (View Comment):

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):

    My first thought was “that is one hell of a speeding ticket”

    Yeah, my husband’s response was that according to the laws of physics, you shouldn’t be driving that fast.

    Escape velocity is only a little above 25,000 mph, so you won’t stay on the surface for very long.

    • #56
  27. Full Size Tabby Member
    Full Size Tabby
    @FullSizeTabby

    Percival (View Comment):

    Podkayne of Israel (View Comment):

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):

    My first thought was “that is one hell of a speeding ticket”

    Yeah, my husband’s response was that according to the laws of physics, you shouldn’t be driving that fast.

    Escape velocity is only a little above 25,000 mph, so you won’t stay on the surface for very long.

    You guys who take cartoons so literally must be a lot of fun (sarcasm) watching a James Bond or similar movie. :-) 

    • #57
  28. Bishop Wash Member
    Bishop Wash
    @BishopWash

    Full Size Tabby (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Podkayne of Israel (View Comment):

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):

    My first thought was “that is one hell of a speeding ticket”

    Yeah, my husband’s response was that according to the laws of physics, you shouldn’t be driving that fast.

    Escape velocity is only a little above 25,000 mph, so you won’t stay on the surface for very long.

    You guys who take cartoons so literally must be a lot of fun (sarcasm) watching a James Bond or similar movie. :-)

    Well, my alma mater’s mascot made it into a Bond movie. That was cool to see, even if he’s working for the Russians. Now that I’m supporting the directed energy field, I haven’t gone back to watch Goldeneye and see how much they got wrong. Or maybe what they got right.

    • #58
  29. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Full Size Tabby (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Podkayne of Israel (View Comment):

    OmegaPaladin (View Comment):

    My first thought was “that is one hell of a speeding ticket”

    Yeah, my husband’s response was that according to the laws of physics, you shouldn’t be driving that fast.

    Escape velocity is only a little above 25,000 mph, so you won’t stay on the surface for very long.

    You guys who take cartoons so literally must be a lot of fun (sarcasm) watching a James Bond or similar movie. :-)

    Well, some members of my family won’t watch movies with me.

    • #59
  30. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    Podkayne of Israel (View Comment):
    Yeah, my husband’s response was that according to the laws of physics, you shouldn’t be driving that fast

    Shouldn’t, Couldn’t, and Wouldn’t are very different things.

    I would vote couldn’t.

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.