Quote of the Day: James Freeman on Reparations for Slavery

 

Last week, in his Wall Street Journal “Best of the Web” newsletter, James Freeman discussed Elizabeth Warren’s call for a “thorough national conversation on Reparations.” Here is what he said:

The basic idea is that the federal government will apportion among the citizens living now the historical guilt for heinous acts committed by people long dead against other people long dead. Then money would flow from people who have not been convicted of any crime to people who have not been found by any court to have been victimized by a crime.

That sounded like a very clever description of what the idea of current US taxpayers paying so-called reparations to existing black US citizens.

And do you notice, Democrats call for “conversations” about any number of hot-button issues, yet they try very hard to shut up anyone who might have opinions other than theirs?

Published in History
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 38 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. David Carroll Thatcher
    David Carroll
    @DavidCarroll

    Sweezle (View Comment):

    Kay of MT (View Comment):

    How about knowing that at least 3/4 of all Americans at the time didn’t even own any slaves. Do your work and know that on each census year the slaves were counted and who own slaves. Then check the total populations.

    I can’t imagine the process that the government would have to undertake to decide who were legitimate descendants of slaves.

    @kayofmt, I’m afraid you overestimate the rationality of the progressive mindset.  It doesn’t matter if the black person was actually descended from slaves.  Every black person has been harmed by the legacy of slavery.  So to qualify, one would would merely have to be black.  The question would be in what percentage of ancestry? 

     

    • #31
  2. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    David Carroll (View Comment):
    So to qualify, one would would merely have to be black.

    If this were done, I would have to identify as black and make my own claim.

    Transracial is the new black.

    • #32
  3. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Instugator (View Comment):

    David Carroll (View Comment):
    So to qualify, one would would merely have to be black.

    If this were done, I would have to identify as black and make my own claim.

    Transracial is the new black.

    You don’t understand. The money doesn’t go to you or any other individual. It goes to political advocacy organizations, who will use the money to elect people to congress, hire fake victims to attack judicial candidates, and attack capitalist oppression.

    • #33
  4. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Instugator (View Comment):

    David Carroll (View Comment):
    So to qualify, one would would merely have to be black.

    If this were done, I would have to identify as black and make my own claim.

    Transracial is the new black.

    You don’t understand. The money doesn’t go to you or any other individual. It goes to political advocacy organizations, who will use the money to elect people to congress, hire fake victims to attack judicial candidates, and attack capitalist oppression.

    No, the Pigford money went to “people who attempted to farm”.

    • #34
  5. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Instugator (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Instugator (View Comment):

    David Carroll (View Comment):
    So to qualify, one would would merely have to be black.

    If this were done, I would have to identify as black and make my own claim.

    Transracial is the new black.

    You don’t understand. The money doesn’t go to you or any other individual. It goes to political advocacy organizations, who will use the money to elect people to congress, hire fake victims to attack judicial candidates, and attack capitalist oppression.

    No, the Pigford money went to “people who attempted to farm”.

    Yeahbut, those Pigford people had to submit evidence that they experienced discrimination.  I don’t see how that works in the case of general reparations.  Also, leftist advocacy groups have traditionally asked for payouts on this or that issue. They’re not going to be satisfied not to get in on the loot even if they don’t get to administer all of it.  

    • #35
  6. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    The Reticulator (View Comment):
    Yeahbut, those Pigford people had to submit evidence that they experienced discrimination

    No they didn’t. Just an affidavit.

    • #36
  7. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Instugator (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):
    Yeahbut, those Pigford people had to submit evidence that they experienced discrimination

    No they didn’t. Just an affidavit.

    Are you telling me that wikipedia lied?  

    • #37
  8. Instugator Thatcher
    Instugator
    @Instugator

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Instugator (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):
    Yeahbut, those Pigford people had to submit evidence that they experienced discrimination

    No they didn’t. Just an affidavit.

    Are you telling me that wikipedia lied?

    See for yourself. This is the claim form. Note the standard of evidence for Track A.

    To be eligible for relief under Track A, the Claimant must satisfy the elements of Track A (Questions 7A-7H in this Claim Form) by “substantial evidence” (a lower burden of proof than required for Track B).

    If the Claimant satisfies the requirements for Track A, he or she is eligible for a cash payment of (1) up to $50,000 for claims based on discrimination in a loan program, regardless of the number of credit claims the Claimant has, and/or (2) up to $3,000 for claims of discrimination in a non-loan benefit program, regardless of the number of non-loan claims the Claimant has; an additional payment in recognition of outstanding USDA Farm Service Agency (USDA/FSA) Farm Loan Program debt, which will be paid directly to the USDA on the Claimant’s behalf; and (3) an income tax payment worth 25% of the total of the cash payment plus 25% of the total of the
    principal amount of the loan award, which will be paid directly to the IRS on the Claimant’s behalf. These amounts are subject to reduction, depending on the amount of funding available and the number of prevailing claims. No payments will be made until all claims have been evaluated.

     

    • #38
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.