True Confessions of a Ricochetti

 

On another thread, one of our members admitted something:

I always confuse Horace Greeley with William Jennings Bryan.

I’ve seen a few other comments like this over the years I have been here. When Ricochetti go wild and make their true confessions, it usually isn’t the sort of thing you would see on Facebook or Jeff Bezos’ diary. How many people on your Facebook feed even know who Horace Greeley and William Jennings Bryant are? This is a high-class joint with high-class true confessions.

My true confession: the older I get, the more trouble I have with homonyms. I tend to write out loud. I once found an error in one of my books where I had used the word “clamber” instead of “clamor,” for instance.

What’s your most Ricochet-style true confession?

 

Published in Humor
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 299 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    I listened to two by Tolstoy, War and Peace and Anna Karenina (I thought War and Peace better) and two by Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov and Crime and Punishment. My main takeaway was that the Russians sure are wordy.

    It’s the 19th century, not just the Russians.  Most authors from that century expand their narratives further than moderns.  It’s not so much wordiness but scenes are more detailed and there are more cumulative events.

    • #271
  2. Boss Mongo Member
    Boss Mongo
    @BossMongo

    I just started Steven Pressfield’s No One Wants To Read Your Sh*t.

    Pressfield is the author of Gates of Fire, the best novel I’ve ever read.

    • #272
  3. EJHill Podcaster
    EJHill
    @EJHill

    I’m waiting for the inevitable mashup where the crew and passengers of the S.S. Minnow get picked up by a whaling ship with a maniacal female captain obsessed with a whale whose coloring is a representation of the oppression of the pigment-challenged patriarchy.

    Christina Ahab’s problems are exacerbated by her brooding and depressed all-Russian crew, most of whom are under indictment by the Special Counsel for bad Tweets and misleading Facebook posts.

    By the time the ship reaches America they are blocked from entering by a massive wall, where a singular figure is charging it with a lance from the back of an old donkey. When he takes off his helmet it’s revealed that it’s really Gomer Pyle, USMC who then proceeds to sing “The Impossible Dream.”

    At the end, Thurston Howell III turns to “Lovey” and says, “Well, it’s been the best of times and the worst of times…” She puts a finger to his lips and she whispers, “It’s OK, darling, let’s go back to the cabin and you can draw me like one of your little French girls.”

    The final shot is a pullback on the crane that reveals a giant iceberg on the horizon…

    • #273
  4. EDISONPARKS Member
    EDISONPARKS
    @user_54742

    TGR9898 (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):
    “Ginger” isn’t her full name?

    Ginger Grant.

    She is one of the easy ones since they used her full name many times, along with the Howell’s.

    The rest were each named at least twice during the run of the show. Once at the end of the first episode – when they all listen to a radio report that lists each of them as “missing”. Each character also had their full name mentioned in episodes specific to their character – MaryAnne when her fiance decided to remarry, The Skipper & Gilligan when they heard the Skipper was on Trial (in absentia) for the loss of the Minnow, and the Professor during a discussion about an academic rival.

    (And the reason the Professor couldn’t “fix the boat” – as has been lampooned in many places – was explained in an early episode: they did fix the boat with Gilligan’s glue-like pancake batter, but the glue dissolved in Salt Water and the Minnow was sunk when Skipper & Gilligan were testing it).

    Our true areas of expertise and bottomless volumes of knowledge are revealed in the True Confessions of Ricochetti.

    • #274
  5. The Scarecrow Thatcher
    The Scarecrow
    @TheScarecrow

    Judge Mental (View Comment):

    I never read Don Quixote, but I did read the Reader’s Digest version of Don Quixote, U.S.A.

    I never read Don Quixote, but I’m pretty sure I am living his life.

    • #275
  6. TGR9898 Inactive
    TGR9898
    @TedRudolph

    EDISONPARKS (View Comment):

    TGR9898 (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):
    “Ginger” isn’t her full name?

    Ginger Grant.

    She is one of the easy ones since they used her full name many times, along with the Howell’s.

    The rest were each named at least twice during the run of the show. Once at the end of the first episode – when they all listen to a radio report that lists each of them as “missing”. Each character also had their full name mentioned in episodes specific to their character – MaryAnne when her fiance decided to remarry, The Skipper & Gilligan when they heard the Skipper was on Trial (in absentia) for the loss of the Minnow, and the Professor during a discussion about an academic rival.

    (And the reason the Professor couldn’t “fix the boat” – as has been lampooned in many places – was explained in an early episode: they did fix the boat with Gilligan’s glue-like pancake batter, but the glue dissolved in Salt Water and the Minnow was sunk when Skipper & Gilligan were testing it).

    Our true areas of expertise and bottomless volumes of knowledge are revealed in the True Confessions of Ricochetti.

    I blame my older sister, who claimed control of the TV and made me watch every episode of Gilligan’s Island and the Brady Bunch, rather than Bugs Bunny & McHale’s Navy like I wanted.

    Outside of those topics I’m generally useless in Polite Society 

    • #276
  7. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Manny (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    I listened to two by Tolstoy, War and Peace and Anna Karenina (I thought War and Peace better) and two by Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov and Crime and Punishment. My main takeaway was that the Russians sure are wordy.

    It’s the 19th century, not just the Russians. Most authors from that century expand their narratives further than moderns. It’s not so much wordiness but scenes are more detailed and there are more cumulative events.

    I’m not sure if that’s true or not.  In Crime and Punishment, I think, Satan went on for about an hour (listening time) on something totally tangential to the story line, as far as I could tell.

    • #277
  8. Judge Mental Member
    Judge Mental
    @JudgeMental

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    I listened to two by Tolstoy, War and Peace and Anna Karenina (I thought War and Peace better) and two by Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov and Crime and Punishment. My main takeaway was that the Russians sure are wordy.

    It’s the 19th century, not just the Russians. Most authors from that century expand their narratives further than moderns. It’s not so much wordiness but scenes are more detailed and there are more cumulative events.

    I’m not sure if that’s true or not. In Crime and Punishment, I think, Satan went on for about an hour (listening time) for something totally tangential to the story line, as far as I could tell.

    I’m definitely not an expert, but my understanding is that while Western lit is story centered, Russian lit is character centered.  That hour was probably meant to explain the character, regardless of the story line.

    • #278
  9. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Judge Mental (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    I listened to two by Tolstoy, War and Peace and Anna Karenina (I thought War and Peace better) and two by Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov and Crime and Punishment. My main takeaway was that the Russians sure are wordy.

    It’s the 19th century, not just the Russians. Most authors from that century expand their narratives further than moderns. It’s not so much wordiness but scenes are more detailed and there are more cumulative events.

    I’m not sure if that’s true or not. In Crime and Punishment, I think, Satan went on for about an hour (listening time) for something totally tangential to the story line, as far as I could tell.

    I’m definitely not an expert, but my understanding is that while Western lit is story centered, Russian lit is character centered. That hour was probably meant to explain the character, regardless of the story line.

    It may just be that it was too subtle for me.

    • #279
  10. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    The Scarecrow (View Comment):

    Judge Mental (View Comment):

    I never read Don Quixote, but I did read the Reader’s Digest version of Don Quixote, U.S.A.

    I never read Don Quixote, but I’m pretty sure I am living his life.

    I think you’re just tilting at windmills.

     

    • #280
  11. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    My co-workers used to give me a hard time about my tendency to challenge the corporate hierarchy. One in particular called it “tilting at windmills”. When I retired, I was given this as a “career epitaph”. 

    —no burden for his shoulders, nor subject for his frozen wit: whom, if perchance thou shouldst come to know him, thou shalt warn to leave at rest where they lie the weary mouldering bones of Don Quixote, and not to attempt to carry him off, in opposition to all the privileges of death, to Old Castile, making him rise from the grave where in reality and truth he lies stretched at full length, powerless to make any third expedition or new sally; for the two that he has already made, so much to the enjoyment and approval of everybody to whom they have become known, in this as well as in foreign countries, are quite sufficient for the purpose of turning into ridicule the whole of those made by the whole set of the knights-errant; and so doing shalt thou discharge thy goat calling, giving good counsel to one that bears ill-will to thee. And we shall remain satisfied, and proud to have been the first who has ever enjoyed the fruit of his rantings as fully as he could desire; for our desire has been no other than to deliver over to the detestation of mankind the false and foolish tales of the books of chivalry, which, thanks to that of our true Don Quixote, are even now tottering, and doubtless doomed to fall for ever. Farewell.

    • #281
  12. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    I listened to two by Tolstoy, War and Peace and Anna Karenina (I thought War and Peace better) and two by Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov and Crime and Punishment. My main takeaway was that the Russians sure are wordy.

    It’s the 19th century, not just the Russians. Most authors from that century expand their narratives further than moderns. It’s not so much wordiness but scenes are more detailed and there are more cumulative events.

    I’m not sure if that’s true or not. In Crime and Punishment, I think, Satan went on for about an hour (listening time) on something totally tangential to the story line, as far as I could tell.

    I think that was The Brothers Karamzov, but yes, 19th century novels can have digressions.  I’m currently reading Victor Hugo’s Les Miserables and it’s full of digressions.  The modern novel has eliminated that.  You’ll have to get used to them unfortunately.

    • #282
  13. EJHill Podcaster
    EJHill
    @EJHill

    Manny: I think that was The Brothers Karamzov, but yes, 19th century novels can have digressions.

    Please keep off digress.

    • #283
  14. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Manny (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    I listened to two by Tolstoy, War and Peace and Anna Karenina (I thought War and Peace better) and two by Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov and Crime and Punishment. My main takeaway was that the Russians sure are wordy.

    It’s the 19th century, not just the Russians. Most authors from that century expand their narratives further than moderns. It’s not so much wordiness but scenes are more detailed and there are more cumulative events.

    I’m not sure if that’s true or not. In Crime and Punishment, I think, Satan went on for about an hour (listening time) on something totally tangential to the story line, as far as I could tell.

    I think that was The Brothers Karamzov, but yes, 19th century novels can have digressions. I’m currently reading Victor Hugo’s Les Miserables and it’s full of digressions. The modern novel has eliminated that. You’ll have to get used to them unfortunately.

    I liked Les Miserables better than any of the Russians.

    • #284
  15. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Randy Webster (View Comment):
    I think that was The Brothers Karamzov, but yes, 19th century novels can have digressions. I’m currently reading Victor Hugo’s Les Miserables and it’s full of digressions. The modern novel has eliminated that. You’ll have to get used to them unfortunately.

    Yeah, you’re right.  It was The Brothers Karamazov.

    • #285
  16. EDISONPARKS Member
    EDISONPARKS
    @user_54742

    TGR9898 (View Comment):

    EDISONPARKS (View Comment):

    TGR9898 (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):
    “Ginger” isn’t her full name?

    Ginger Grant.

    She is one of the easy ones since they used her full name many times, along with the Howell’s.

    The rest were each named at least twice during the run of the show. Once at the end of the first episode – when they all listen to a radio report that lists each of them as “missing”. Each character also had their full name mentioned in episodes specific to their character – MaryAnne when her fiance decided to remarry, The Skipper & Gilligan when they heard the Skipper was on Trial (in absentia) for the loss of the Minnow, and the Professor during a discussion about an academic rival.

    (And the reason the Professor couldn’t “fix the boat” – as has been lampooned in many places – was explained in an early episode: they did fix the boat with Gilligan’s glue-like pancake batter, but the glue dissolved in Salt Water and the Minnow was sunk when Skipper & Gilligan were testing it).

    Our true areas of expertise and bottomless volumes of knowledge are revealed in the True Confessions of Ricochetti.

    I blame my older sister, who claimed control of the TV and made me watch every episode of Gilligan’s Island and the Brady Bunch, rather than Bugs Bunny & McHale’s Navy like I wanted.

    Outside of those topics I’m generally useless in Polite Society

    I have similar areas of expertise (ie: Leave it to Beaver, Flintstones, Speed Racer, etc. …or should I say the Professor and MaryAnne).

    • #286
  17. danys Thatcher
    danys
    @danys

    Matt Balzer, Straw Bootlegger (View Comment):

    danys (View Comment):

    RightAngles (View Comment):

    Seawriter (View Comment):

    Even though I love nautical literature, I have never been able to finish Moby Dick. I think I have started it more times than Sam Clemens quit smoking but it always puts me to sleep. Once I tried listening to it as an audio book during my daily commute and it almost put me to sleep as I was going down Beltway 8 at 65 mph. Quit listening to it, and switched to Space Viking.

    Oh good, I’m not the only one! Thank goodness, and thank goodness it’s you. We had to read it in high school, and all my life it’s been called the greatest novel in the English language, but WHY? I mean I have a college degree. It’s not like I’m not well read or anything, but I just don’t get why.

    I teach high school English and cannot get through Moby Dick. I’ve tried & gave up on page 2.

    A friend of mine read it to spite our HS English teacher.

    I don’t mind if a student thinks he can spite me that way. “Have fun,” I’d say.

    Students recoiled when I revealed that I found the Harry Potter books unreadable. But then, I like Lord of the Rings, and Beowulf.

    • #287
  18. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    danys (View Comment):
    Students recoiled when I revealed that I found the Harry Potter books unreadable. But then, I like Lord of the Rings, and Beowulf.

    I don’t find liking LOTR and Harry Potter irreconcilable.  It’s been a long time since I read Beowulf, so I can’t say about it.  I probably didn’t read it in the original language anyway.

    • #288
  19. OldDanRhody Member
    OldDanRhody
    @OldDanRhody

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):
    I think that was The Brothers Karamzov, but yes, 19th century novels can have digressions. I’m currently reading Victor Hugo’s Les Miserables and it’s full of digressions. The modern novel has eliminated that. You’ll have to get used to them unfortunately.

    Yeah, you’re right. It was The Brothers Karamazov.

    So… How do you pronounce it?

    KARamazov?
    KaRAMazov?
    KaraMAZov?
    KaramaZOV?

    • #289
  20. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    OldDanRhody (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):
    I think that was The Brothers Karamzov, but yes, 19th century novels can have digressions. I’m currently reading Victor Hugo’s Les Miserables and it’s full of digressions. The modern novel has eliminated that. You’ll have to get used to them unfortunately.

    Yeah, you’re right. It was The Brothers Karamazov.

    So… How do you pronounce it?

    KARamazov?
    KaRAMazov?
    KaraMAZov?
    KaramaZOV?

    I only listened to it, and he used #3.

    • #290
  21. kylez Member
    kylez
    @kylez

    The Skipper & Gilligan when they heard the Skipper was on Trial (in absentia) for the loss of the Minnow,

    Did a newspaper wash up or something? Otherwise shouldn’t whoever told them have helped them off?

    • #291
  22. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    kylez (View Comment):

    The Skipper & Gilligan when they heard the Skipper was on Trial (in absentia) for the loss of the Minnow,

    Did a newspaper wash up or something? Otherwise shouldn’t whoever told them have helped them off?

    I think it was over the radio. They had radio reception but no transmission. 

    • #292
  23. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Manny (View Comment):

    kylez (View Comment):

    The Skipper & Gilligan when they heard the Skipper was on Trial (in absentia) for the loss of the Minnow,

    Did a newspaper wash up or something? Otherwise shouldn’t whoever told them have helped them off?

    I think it was over the radio. They had radio reception but no transmission.

    And good batteries.

    • #293
  24. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    OldDanRhody (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):
    I think that was The Brothers Karamzov, but yes, 19th century novels can have digressions. I’m currently reading Victor Hugo’s Les Miserables and it’s full of digressions. The modern novel has eliminated that. You’ll have to get used to them unfortunately.

    Yeah, you’re right. It was The Brothers Karamazov.

    So… How do you pronounce it?

    KARamazov?
    KaRAMazov?
    KaraMAZov?
    KaramaZOV?

    I only listened to it, and he used #3.

    I don’t really know. I read it as #1 but I’m probably wrong. 

    • #294
  25. Saint Augustine Member
    Saint Augustine
    @SaintAugustine

    Manny (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    OldDanRhody (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):
    I think that was The Brothers Karamzov, but yes, 19th century novels can have digressions. I’m currently reading Victor Hugo’s Les Miserables and it’s full of digressions. The modern novel has eliminated that. You’ll have to get used to them unfortunately.

    Yeah, you’re right. It was The Brothers Karamazov.

    So… How do you pronounce it?

    KARamazov?
    KaRAMazov?
    KaraMAZov?
    KaramaZOV?

    I only listened to it, and he used #3.

    I don’t really know. I read it as #1 but I’m probably wrong.

    Image result for linus reading brothers karamazov

    • #295
  26. Manny Coolidge
    Manny
    @Manny

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Manny (View Comment):

    kylez (View Comment):

    The Skipper & Gilligan when they heard the Skipper was on Trial (in absentia) for the loss of the Minnow,

    Did a newspaper wash up or something? Otherwise shouldn’t whoever told them have helped them off?

    I think it was over the radio. They had radio reception but no transmission.

    And good batteries.

    The Professor did something with coconuts to create battery juice…lol. 

    • #296
  27. Matt Balzer, Straw Bootlegger Member
    Matt Balzer, Straw Bootlegger
    @MattBalzer

    OldDanRhody (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):
    I think that was The Brothers Karamzov, but yes, 19th century novels can have digressions. I’m currently reading Victor Hugo’s Les Miserables and it’s full of digressions. The modern novel has eliminated that. You’ll have to get used to them unfortunately.

    Yeah, you’re right. It was The Brothers Karamazov.

    So… How do you pronounce it?

    KARamazov?
    KaRAMazov?
    KaraMAZov?
    KaramaZOV?

    The third one.

    • #297
  28. Lois Lane Coolidge
    Lois Lane
    @LoisLane

    Okay.  I couldn’t leave it alone.  For some reason, I was inspired to open The Lord of the Rings on page one and start reading again.  :)

    I also thought a little about my many decades long relationship with this book and wrote about that if anyone is interested or has had a similar relationship.  

    • #298
  29. Fredösphere Inactive
    Fredösphere
    @Fredosphere

    There are so many books I want to read, I can’t hardly imagine re-reading anything. I’d make an exception for Donna Tartt’s novels, but that’s it.

    • #299
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.