Retired Marine Sergeant Major John Canley: Our Latest Medal of Honor Recipient

 

Wednesday afternoon, retired Sergeant Major John Canley became the 300th Marine to be awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor. President Trump presented the award to the 80-year-old Marine, who is still straight of back and clear-voiced, standing tall in his sharp dress uniform. Sergeant Major Canley was belatedly recognized for one especially noteworthy episode in a long career.

Canley, who spent 28 years in the service, left El Dorado, Arkansas, at the age of 15 to join the Marines. [He used his brother’s documents to enlist two years below the youngest recruiting age!]

He was deployed to Vietnam several times from 1965 to 1970 and his efforts saved the lives of many men, earning him the Navy Cross.

The repeated deployments were common for the non-commissioned officer corps, both Marine Corps and Army. These were the military professionals whose experience held units together and saved lives. The Marine Corps briefly summarized Sergeant Major Canley’s career. His actions were originally recognized with a Navy Cross but the facts in the file cried out for the highest recognition, prompting a long upgrade review process. Here is what then Gunnery Sergeant John L. Canley did in 1968 (Medal of Honor Citation):

The President of the United States, in the name of Congress, takes pleasure in awarding the Congressional Medal of Honor to Gunnery Sergeant John L. Canley, United States Marine Corps, for conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty in action against the enemy while serving as Company Gunnery Sergeant, Alpha Company, First Battalion, First Marines, First Marine Division, from 31 January to 6 February 1968, in the Republic of Vietnam.

Alpha Company fought off multiple vicious attacks as it rapidly moved along the highway toward Huế City to relieve friendly forces that were surrounded by enemy.

Despite being wounded in these engagements, Gunnery Sergeant Canley repeatedly rushed across fire-swept terrain to carry his wounded Marines to safety.

After his commanding officer was severely wounded, Gunnery Sergeant Canley took command and led the company into Huế City.

At Huế City, caught in deadly crossfire from enemy machine gun positions, he set up a base of fire and maneuvered with a platoon in a flanking attack that eliminated several enemy positions.

Retaining command of the company for three days, he led attacks against multiple enemy fortified positions while routinely braving enemy fire to carry wounded Marines to safety.

On 4 February, he led a group of Marines into an enemy-occupied building in Huế City. He moved into the open to draw fire, located the enemy, eliminated the threat, and expanded the company’s hold on the building room by room. Gunnery Sergeant Canley then gained position above the enemy strongpoint and dropped in a large satchel charge that forced the enemy to withdraw.

On 6 February, during a fierce firefight at a hospital compound, Gunnery Sergeant Canley twice scaled a wall in full view of the enemy to carry wounded Marines to safety.

By his undaunted courage, selfless sacrifice, and unwavering devotion to duty, Gunnery Sergeant Canley reflected great credit upon himself and upheld the highest traditions of the Marine Corps and the United States Naval Service.

.

Published in Military
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 42 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    We’re lucky we still produce men like this.

    • #1
  2. She Member
    She
    @She

    I am still reeling from the fact that this wonderful gentleman is 80 years old.  I was in junior high and high school during the years that he served, and headed up many projects to send CARE packages, Christmas packages, and Lord-knows-what-other-sorts-of-packages to the troops.  In addition, we wrote letters back and forth to soldiers in the field.

    In my mind, those young men have never aged.  Some of them, I know for a fact, never came home.  Many, many did and lived wonderful productive lives.  Some of them didn’t do quite as well.   

    Bless them all.

    • #2
  3. The Scarecrow Thatcher
    The Scarecrow
    @TheScarecrow

    I am the same species as this man. I couldn’t be more proud of one who makes us look this good. 

    • #3
  4. Clifford A. Brown Member
    Clifford A. Brown
    @CliffordBrown

    The Congressional Medal of Honor, as presently defined, represented a significant change in eligibility, according to the Congressional Medal of Honor Society.

    The Medal of Honor was born in 1862, but it was the act of 9 July 1918 that defined the future of the award, while further eliminated the Certificate of Merit while establishing the new “Pyramid of Honor” providing for lesser awards (The Distinguished Service Cross, The Distinguished Service Medal, and the Silver Star). A key difference between the levels of awards was spelled out, “That the President is authorized to present, in the name of the Congress, a medal of honor only to each person who, while an officer or enlisted man of the Army, shall hereafter, in action involving actual conflict with an enemy, distinguish himself conspicuously by gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty.” The lesser awards were authorized for presentation by the President, “BUT NOT IN THE NAME OF CONGRESS.”

    The act of July 9th further established time limits to avoid problems like those encountered with Civil War veterans seeking the award. Recommendations for Medals of Honor had to be made within 2 years of the act of heroism for which it was to be awarded, and the Medal was to be presented within 3 years.

    • #4
  5. Goldwaterwoman Thatcher
    Goldwaterwoman
    @goldwaterwoman

    Thank you for letting us know about this fine man. He sure doesn’t look like he’s 80!

    • #5
  6. Clifford A. Brown Member
    Clifford A. Brown
    @CliffordBrown

    Goldwaterwoman (View Comment):

    Thank you for letting us know about this fine man. He sure doesn’t look like he’s 80!

    • #6
  7. Jim McConnell Member
    Jim McConnell
    @JimMcConnell

    Thanks for the reminder that our country produces men like Sgt. Canley. With men like him, hope is not lost.

    • #7
  8. JosePluma Coolidge
    JosePluma
    @JosePluma

    Clifford A. Brown (View Comment):

    Goldwaterwoman (View Comment):

    Thank you for letting us know about this fine man. He sure doesn’t look like he’s 80!

    I saw him on the TeeVees and said “My G-d, is he still on  active duty?”

    • #8
  9. EJHill Podcaster
    EJHill
    @EJHill

    What the hell took them so long?

    • #9
  10. Nanda Panjandrum Member
    Nanda Panjandrum
    @

    God bless you, thank you, Semper Fidelis and OohRah, Sgt.Major Canley! (Thank you, as well, @cliffordbrown, for the motivation in this post.) 

    • #10
  11. dnewlander Inactive
    dnewlander
    @dnewlander

    Ooh-Rah!

    • #11
  12. Mike "Lash" LaRoche Inactive
    Mike "Lash" LaRoche
    @MikeLaRoche

    Now there is a man who can claim the title of United States Marine!

    • #12
  13. Valiuth Member
    Valiuth
    @Valiuth

    Is it common to give out a Medal of Honor so late after the relevant action?

    Edit: Darn you phone keyboard.

    • #13
  14. Patrick McClure Coolidge
    Patrick McClure
    @Patrickb63

    Damn.  Truly a man’s man.

    • #14
  15. Skyler Coolidge
    Skyler
    @Skyler

    My pedant alarms are going off full blast right now.

    It’s the Medal of Honor.  There’s no such thing as a “Congressional” Medal of Honor.  It’s awarded by the President and the Congress has no input, and that’s not its name.

    There is a society formed by Congress called the Congressional Medal of Honor Society, but that is a society formed by Congress for those who have been awarded the Medal of Honor.

    I’m flabbergasted that the introduction to the citation refers to Congress and a “Congressional” Medal of Honor.  That is just plain old wrong.

    • #15
  16. Skyler Coolidge
    Skyler
    @Skyler

    Valiuth (View Comment):

    Is it common to give out a Medle of Honor so late after the relevant action?

    Obviously no.  But it does happen.  The trend has been to upgrade or recognize minorities who, at least tacitly, suggest that racism kept their recognition subdued.  But, no, this is not common.  It takes a lot of work and political wrangling to do this.

    • #16
  17. John Davey Member
    John Davey
    @JohnDavey

    Semper Fi.

    • #17
  18. Penfold Member
    Penfold
    @Penfold

    I’ve printed it before on Ricochet, but it bears repeating:

    In James Michener’s book “The Bridges at Toko-Ri,” he writes of an officer waiting through the night for the return of planes to a carrier as dawn is coming on. And he asks, “Where do we find such men?” Well, we find them where we’ve always found them. They are the product of the freest society man has ever known. They make a commitment to the military—make it freely, because the birthright we share as Americans is worth defending. God bless America.

    Citation: Ronald Reagan: “Radio Address to the Nation on Armed Forces Day ,” May 15, 1982.

    • #18
  19. Valiuth Member
    Valiuth
    @Valiuth

    Skyler (View Comment):

    Valiuth (View Comment):

    Is it common to give out a Medle of Honor so late after the relevant action?

    Obviously no. But it does happen. The trend has been to upgrade or recognize minorities who, at least tacitly, suggest that racism kept their recognition subdued. But, no, this is not common. It takes a lot of work and political wrangling to do this.

    Hm. I’m curious now. There is a review board for these things ins’t there? Who and how are things submitted. The way I thought it worked was that commanding officers submit names of subordinates. But for such re reviews is there a process? Or is there some third party now that goes through the records and picks out interesting cases. 

    You mention political wrangling, so was this the project of some congressman to make sure this man got the full honors he deserved or was this a White House initiative. 

    • #19
  20. Phil Turmel Inactive
    Phil Turmel
    @PhilTurmel

    Skyler (View Comment):

    My pedant alarms are going off full blast right now.

    It’s the Medal of Honor. There’s no such thing as a “Congressional” Medal of Honor. It’s awarded by the President and the Congress has no input, and that’s not its name.

    There is a society formed by Congress called the Congressional Medal of Honor Society, but that is a society formed by Congress for those who have been awarded the Medal of Honor.

    I’m flabbergasted that the introduction to the citation refers to Congress and a “Congressional” Medal of Honor. That is just plain old wrong.

    Did you read comment #4?

    • #20
  21. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    There are rules about the amount of time that can happen between the incident and the award, but they have been waived before.

    Eddie Rickenbacker was flying alone one fine day in 1918 when he spotted five Fokkers escorting two Halberstadts on a photo recon mission over American lines. Eddie thought to himself  “Huh. Seven Germans. Guess I’ll go mess with them. He shot down a Fokker and a Halberstadt before the rest of them ran for it.

    Eddie got his Medal of Honor in 1931.

    • #21
  22. Skyler Coolidge
    Skyler
    @Skyler

    Phil Turmel (View Comment):

    Skyler (View Comment):

    My pedant alarms are going off full blast right now.

    It’s the Medal of Honor. There’s no such thing as a “Congressional” Medal of Honor. It’s awarded by the President and the Congress has no input, and that’s not its name.

    There is a society formed by Congress called the Congressional Medal of Honor Society, but that is a society formed by Congress for those who have been awarded the Medal of Honor.

    I’m flabbergasted that the introduction to the citation refers to Congress and a “Congressional” Medal of Honor. That is just plain old wrong.

    Did you read comment #4?

    Yeah, it’s a bunch of nonsense that is not supported by any reference I can find.  That is, it is not called the “Congressional Medal of Honor.”

    Edit:  And yes, I’m trying to back track quietly on the “in the name of congress” line, which appears correct.

    • #22
  23. Valiuth Member
    Valiuth
    @Valiuth

    Percival (View Comment):

    Eddie Rickenbacker was flying alone one fine day in 1918 when he spotted five Fokkers escorting two Halberstadts on a photo recon mission over American lines. Eddie thought to himself “Huh. Seven Germans. Guess I’ll go mess with them. He shot down a Fokker and a Halberstadt before the rest of them ran for it.

    Eddie got his Medal of Honor in 1931.

    Really, that got a Medal of Honor? While reckless, and potentially impressive feat of dog fighting, some how that doesn’t seem that worthy to me. It was a superfluous action. That he lived through (granted), but could easily  have gone bad for him, and I doubt he would have gotten the meddle posthumously for that action had he been shot down. I get that he was our greatest fighter ace of the war (WWI that is), and maybe people thought because of that he should get the Medal of Honor too on top of his other decorations. I just feel that compared to something like Sgt. York”s Medal this doesn’t really hold a candle to it. But maybe that isn’t a fair comparison. 

    • #23
  24. Skyler Coolidge
    Skyler
    @Skyler

    Valiuth (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    Eddie Rickenbacker was flying alone one fine day in 1918 when he spotted five Fokkers escorting two Halberstadts on a photo recon mission over American lines. Eddie thought to himself “Huh. Seven Germans. Guess I’ll go mess with them. He shot down a Fokker and a Halberstadt before the rest of them ran for it.

    Eddie got his Medal of Honor in 1931.

    Really, that got a Medal of Honor? While reckless, and potentially impressive feat of dog fighting, some how that doesn’t seem that worthy to me. It was a superfluous action. That he lived through (granted), but could easily have gone bad for him, and I doubt he would have gotten the meddle posthumously for that action had he been shot down. I get that he was our greatest fighter ace of the war (WWI that is), and maybe people thought because of that he should get the Medal of Honor too on top of his other decorations. I just feel that compared to something like Sgt. York”s Medal this doesn’t really hold a candle to it. But maybe that isn’t a fair comparison.

    SgtMaj Canley (at the time of the action, Gunnery Sergeant Canley) seems to be partially violating the modern rule for the Medal of Honor.  It seems like if you’re not jumping on a grenade or saving people then you don’t get the Medal of Honor.  He does a little of that, but he also does some ballsy offensive actions.  

    I think attacking a flight of seven enemy aircraft single handedly is pretty darned offensive and that’s what the award should be for.  He could have turned tail and fled and no one would have thought ill of him at all.  He went above and beyond the call of duty.  I suspect he wouldn’t have been given that award today, but politics come into play and he was a famous flyer and flying was very new and mysterious.  I still think he earned it, though.  A few of the modern awards seem more questionable to me.  A woman is more likely to be awarded a higher award than a man, both because we don’t really expect much of women, and because it’s politically popular to promote women in combat.

    • #24
  25. Percival Thatcher
    Percival
    @Percival

    1st Sgt. Harry J. Adams and his lieutenant were down below somewhere rounding up German prisoners. When they got to eighty, the lieutenant decided to escort them to the rear and told Adams to see if he could find any more. Adams spotted one diving through the doorway of a dugout, so he sent a pair of shots in through the door with his pistol and told the German to come out with his hands up. Out he came, then another one, and another one, then about three hundred more. Adams lined them up and marched them in, covering them with his M-1911 — his empty M-1911. The two rounds that he had just fired were the last two that he had. He marched them in, bluffing all the way.

    That was worth a Distinguished Service Cross.

    • #25
  26. Skyler Coolidge
    Skyler
    @Skyler

    Percival (View Comment):

    1st Sgt. Harry J. Adams and his lieutenant were down below somewhere rounding up German prisoners. When they got to eighty, the lieutenant decided to escort them to the rear and told Adams to see if he could find any more. Adams spotted one diving through the doorway of a dugout, so he sent a pair of shots in through the door with his pistol and told the German to come out with his hands up. Out he came, then another one, and another one, then about three hundred more. Adams lined them up and marched them in, covering them with his M-1911 — his empty M-1911. The two rounds that he had just fired were the last two that he had. He marched them in, bluffing all the way.

    That was worth a Distinguished Service Cross.

    Yeah, and there’s likely not a single Marine on Iwo Jima or Peleliu whose actions wouldn’t today merit a silver star or more, but who went the entire four years of multiple amphibious landings and all they got was an Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal. 

    • #26
  27. Clifford A. Brown Member
    Clifford A. Brown
    @CliffordBrown

    Skyler (View Comment):

    Phil Turmel (View Comment):

    Skyler (View Comment):

    My pedant alarms are going off full blast right now.

    It’s the Medal of Honor. There’s no such thing as a “Congressional” Medal of Honor. It’s awarded by the President and the Congress has no input, and that’s not its name.

    There is a society formed by Congress called the Congressional Medal of Honor Society, but that is a society formed by Congress for those who have been awarded the Medal of Honor.

    I’m flabbergasted that the introduction to the citation refers to Congress and a “Congressional” Medal of Honor. That is just plain old wrong.

    Did you read comment #4?

    Yeah, it’s a bunch of nonsense that is not supported by any reference I can find. That is, it is not called the “Congressional Medal of Honor.”

    You don’t look very hard before venting.

    Here is Audie Murphy’s MOH order. Relevant section (emphasis added):

    By direction of the President, under the provisions of the act of Congress approved 9 July 1918 (WD Bul. 43, 1918), a Medal of Honor for conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of life above and beyond the call of duty was awarded by the War Department in the name of Congress to the following-named officer: Second Lieutenant Audie L. Murphy

    Here is the current law:

    10 USC 8741: Medal of honor: award

    Text contains those laws in effect on August 12, 2018

    Pending Updates: Pub L. 115-232 (8/13/2018) [View Details]

    From Title 10-ARMED FORCES Subtitle D-Air Force PART II-PERSONNEL CHAPTER 857-DECORATIONS AND AWARDS

    §8741. Medal of honor: award
    The President may award, and present in the name of Congress, a medal of honor of appropriate design, with ribbons and appurtenances, to a person who, while a member of the Air Force, distinguishes himself conspicuously by gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his life above and beyond the call of duty-

    (1) while engaged in an action against an enemy of the United States;

    (2) while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing foreign force; or

    (3) while serving with friendly foreign forces engaged in an armed conflict against an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.

    (Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 540 ; Pub. L. 88–77, §3(1), July 25, 1963, 77 Stat. 94 .)

    Historical and Revision Notes
    Revised section 8741
    Source (U.S. Code) 10:1403.
    Source (Statutes at Large) July 9, 1918, ch. 143, (8th par. under “Ordnance Department”), 40 Stat. 870.

    The words “That the provisions of existing law relating to the award of medals of honor to officers, noncommissioned officers, and privates of the Army be, and they hereby are, amended so that”, in the Act of July 9, 1918, ch. 143 (8th par. under “Ordnance Department”), 40 Stat. 870, are not contained in 10:1403. They are also omitted from the revised section as surplusage. The word “member” is substituted for the words “officer or enlisted man”. The word “only” is omitted as surplusage. The word “award” is inserted for clarity, since the President determines the recipient of the medal in addition to presenting it.

    Amendments
    1963-Pub. L. 88–77 enlarged the authority to award the medal of honor, which was limited to those cases in which persons distinguished themselves in action involving actual conflict with an enemy, to permit its award for distinguished service while engaged in an action against an enemy of the United States, while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing foreign force, or while serving with friendly foreign forces engaged in an armed conflict against an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.

     

     

    • #27
  28. Nanda Panjandrum Member
    Nanda Panjandrum
    @

    Skyler (View Comment):

    Percival (View Comment):

    1st Sgt. Harry J. Adams and his lieutenant were down below somewhere rounding up German prisoners. When they got to eighty, the lieutenant decided to escort them to the rear and told Adams to see if he could find any more. Adams spotted one diving through the doorway of a dugout, so he sent a pair of shots in through the door with his pistol and told the German to come out with his hands up. Out he came, then another one, and another one, then about three hundred more. Adams lined them up and marched them in, covering them with his M-1911 — his empty M-1911. The two rounds that he had just fired were the last two that he had. He marched them in, bluffing all the way.

    That was worth a Distinguished Service Cross.

    Yeah, and there’s likely not a single Marine on Iwo Jima or Peleliu whose actions wouldn’t today merit a silver star or more, but who went the entire four years of multiple amphibious landings and all they got was an Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal.

    Do we not want to be reminded of where they did/what they did, @skyler? Honest question.

    • #28
  29. Clifford A. Brown Member
    Clifford A. Brown
    @CliffordBrown

    Valiuth (View Comment):

    Skyler (View Comment):

    Valiuth (View Comment):

    Is it common to give out a Medle of Honor so late after the relevant action?

    Obviously no. But it does happen. The trend has been to upgrade or recognize minorities who, at least tacitly, suggest that racism kept their recognition subdued. But, no, this is not common. It takes a lot of work and political wrangling to do this.

    Hm. I’m curious now. There is a review board for these things ins’t there? Who and how are things submitted. The way I thought it worked was that commanding officers submit names of subordinates. But for such re reviews is there a process? Or is there some third party now that goes through the records and picks out interesting cases.

    You mention political wrangling, so was this the project of some congressman to make sure this man got the full honors he deserved or was this a White House initiative.

    There are two processes, one entirely within the Executive branch, another involving Congress and the Executive:

    Part 2 of the Department of Defense (DoD) Medal of Honor Process

    Part 1 of the Department of Defense (DoD) Medal of Honor Process

    • #29
  30. Clifford A. Brown Member
    Clifford A. Brown
    @CliffordBrown

    Skyler (View Comment):
    A woman is more likely to be awarded a higher award than a man, both because we don’t really expect much of women, and because it’s politically popular to promote women in combat.

     Care to substantiate this slur?

    • #30
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.