October Surprises Breaking Republicans’ Way?

 

It is axiomatic that, each October, the media will unveil embarrassing, negative, damaging things about Republican candidates. The timing is intended to hurt Republicans and help Democrats at the ballot box. If the media doesn’t do it, a Republican self-sabotages. 2018 is different.

Media Revelations 

In Texas, “Beto” O’Rourke, was hit with a bad DUI story, including him trying to flee the scene.

In Tennessee, staffers were caught on video saying Bredesen lied about his willingness to confirm Kavanaugh, to trick moderate voters.

In Arizona, multiple videos appeared, in which Kyrsten Sinema calls Arizonans “crazy,” Arizona the “meth lab of democracy,” and goes beyond the pink tutu anti-war image to apparently condoning Americans going to fight for the Taliban. When Martha McSally challenged her, during their debate, on the Taliban comment, Sinema refused to answer. CNN not only did not deny this, they ran the clip and had a commentator explain Sinema used to be more progressive, even Green Party, but now was running as a centrist. To which, Scott Johnson of PowerLine says:

Andrew McCarthy now lays out the facts regarding Sinema’s promotion of terrorist lawyer Lynne Stewart.

Lynne Stewart didn’t just represent terrorists. She took on their cause as her own. She herself supported terrorism and went to prison for it.

Sinema promoted Stewart’s campus appearances in 2003 while she was under indictment. […] [Stewart] was utterly unapologetic about her behavior. Indeed, she was proud of it. […]

Sinema and Ellison deploy the same generic lies to misrepresent their own past support of the terrorist lawyer (in Sinema’s case) and cop killers (in Ellison’s case). They are two peas in a pod, perfect faces of the Democratic Party.

Self-sabotage 

In Florida, Bill Nelson’s campaign mass email provided links for Hurricane Michael relief donations. Except Nelson’s email reportedly pointed to ActBlue sites, Democrat political fundraising pages. Then his colleague said “hold my beer.”

Heidi Heitkamp thought she had a great hammer to smash her way back to office, with an ad about believing and respecting sexual assault victims. Except she did not have permission to use several of these victims’ names or faces! Her Twitter feed became a stream of abject apologies.

With the Kavanaugh circus, the entire Senate Democratic caucus inflicted a massive hit on their members, and would be members, running for the Senate this year. It is not over. Senator Susan Collins’ husband opened a threatening letter, at their home, that claimed to be contaminated with ricin.

Collins has received a rash ofcriticism in the wake of the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation process. She said her “yes” vote on Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the United States Supreme Court“ranks right up there” with the hardest votes she has ever cast in the senate. Her spokesperson said that the letter is just the latest in a “series of threats” against the Senator and her loved ones.

Meanwhile, alumni and faculty at St. Lawrence University, Collins’ alma mater, are calling on university officials to rescind an honorary degree awarded to her as punishment for voting to confirm Kavanaugh.

But what is next?

See the source imageSurely there is more. What of Mueller? It turns out that President Trump is now holding a ten-pound sledgehammer over the heads of Mueller, Rosenstein, and our special friends across the pond, complicit in the Russia Hoax. If he orders immediate and full compliance with long-standing Congressional demands for complete, unredacted document production, there will be a scandal with more damage to the image of the FBI than was caused by the Church Committee revelations. It isn’t over until the last ballot is cast, and counted, but 2018 is not going according to the usual script. @ejhill likely has it right: “The Great Unknown is Us.”

Published in Elections
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 68 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. RightAngles Member
    RightAngles
    @RightAngles

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Watch her face when she says she ran for office in Arizona….

     

     

    I don’t understand how anyone in AZ could vote for this person.

    • #61
  2. Seawriter Contributor
    Seawriter
    @Seawriter

    RightAngles (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Watch her face when she says she ran for office in Arizona….

     

    I don’t understand how anyone in AZ could vote for this person.

    Maybe they moved there from Florida.

    • #62
  3. Susan Quinn Contributor
    Susan Quinn
    @SusanQuinn

    Seawriter (View Comment):

    RightAngles (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Watch her face when she says she ran for office in Arizona….

     

    I don’t understand how anyone in AZ could vote for this person.

    Maybe they moved there from Florida.

    Good riddance!

    • #63
  4. Clifford A. Brown Member
    Clifford A. Brown
    @CliffordBrown

    Seawriter (View Comment):

    RightAngles (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Watch her face when she says she ran for office in Arizona….

     

    I don’t understand how anyone in AZ could vote for this person.

    Maybe they moved there from Florida.

    More like the Californication of Arizona.

    • #64
  5. OccupantCDN Coolidge
    OccupantCDN
    @OccupantCDN

    She’s the gift that keeps on giving:

    “These women who act like staying at home, leeching off their husbands or boyfriends, and just cashing the checks is some sort of feminism because they’re choosing to live that life,” Sinema told Scottsdale nightlife magazine 944 in 2006.

    Is she doing her version of a Trump impersonation? Insult all possible ethnic and social groups? (the daily caller quoted above)

    • #65
  6. Clifford A. Brown Member
    Clifford A. Brown
    @CliffordBrown

    The Kavanaugh Effect, indirect evidence:

    More evidence of a Kavanaugh effect

    A new poll by NBC News/Wall Street Journal finds that likely voters in the most hotly contested House races favor Kavanaugh’s confirmation by a significant margin. To be specific, in districts rated as “toss up” or “leans” by the Cook Political Report, voters favor Kavanaugh’s confirmation 43 percent to 33 percent.

    How does that compare to likely voters nationwide? The same poll found that these voters also favor Kavanaugh’s confirmation, but only by a 40-36 margin.

     

    • #66
  7. Clifford A. Brown Member
    Clifford A. Brown
    @CliffordBrown

    The surprises keep breaking Republicans’ way. I’ve posted an update.

    • #67
  8. HankMorgan Inactive
    HankMorgan
    @HankMorgan

    cirby (View Comment):

    I work with a number of hard-left folks – people who really do support Bernie, and still think he would have beat Trump. Even those guys aren’t able to muster much energy defending the current Democrat crap. None of them can even name who they’re going to vote for, except for the governor’s race (it’s Florida, so they’re going to vote for the socialist).

    Meanwhile, most of the people who are centrist to right wing are getting pretty fired up, which is unheard of for a midterm race…

    I could post this word for word and be entirely accurate. The defenses of Gillum are amusingly roundabout.

    • #68
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.