Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
Civility in Politics: All Bets are Off
I couldn’t help rolling my eyes at this well intentioned definition of civility:
Civility is about more than just politeness, although politeness is a necessary first step. It is about disagreeing without disrespect, seeking common ground as a starting point for dialogue about differences, listening past one’s preconceptions, and teaching others to do the same. Civility is the hard work of staying present even with those with whom we have deep-rooted and fierce disagreements. It is political in the sense that it is a necessary prerequisite for civic action. But it is political, too, in the sense that it is about negotiating interpersonal power such that everyone’s voice is heard, and nobody’s is ignored.
And civility begins with us.
Good grief. There was a time when I would embrace this definition of civility; now I can only shake my head in disappointment because it is so alien to our current politics.
While Democrats call for civility, they bang on the doors of the Supreme Court, accost legislators in front of their homes and in elevators, shoot at them at bi-partisan baseball practices, and brutally attack them at their homes. The delusion that the Democrats speak from is mind-boggling. Hillary Clinton made this statement:
Clinton told CNN’s Christine Amanpour that one cannot be civil with a political party that ‘wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about.’
‘That’s why I believe, if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and/or the Senate, that’s when civility can start again,’ Clinton asserted. ‘But until then, the only thing that the Republicans seem to recognize and respect is strength.’
I’m not a psychologist, but this comment is not only delusional; I assert that it is a classic state of projection: everything that Clinton said was a spot on description of the Progressives; they want to destroy everything that this country stands for. And that she thinks that civility can be turned back on like a light switch if the Democrats were to win the election is ridiculous, even frightening.
So here’s my take on civility in politics: it will not be practiced by the Democrats–period. They not only do not understand the concept; they don’t care about honoring it. The word “civility” is a whip to beat up the Republicans about what they are not doing: the Republicans are not caving in to Democrat demands; they are not being bullied by intimidation tactics; and they are refusing to legitimize the expectations of the other side. The Democrats will also play the victims of the incivility they demonstrate: it’s Donald Trump’s fault; it’s Mitch McConnell’s fault; it’s Susan Collins’ fault. All of these people and many others justify the incivility of the Left. I think we have to assume that for the foreseeable future, especially if the Republicans come out ahead in the mid-terms, the Democrats will not only continue to be uncivil, but they may very well escalate into violence.
So what can the Republicans do? Forge ahead with their plans. Continue to hammer repeatedly on the Justice Department for the information legislators are entitled to receive. Run political ads that highlight the appalling behavior, not only of protestors, but of the Democrats, too. Start to act like Conservatives by continuing efforts to cut back regulations. Refuse to support legislation that expands entitlement programs and the power and size of the federal government. Discern when Democrats should be ignored and when they should be called out. Speak out in support of Trump’s programs, such as building the wall and the new NAFTA agreement. Put your petty grievances aside for the good of the country. Demonstrate to everyone that the unity of the Republican Party is not an illusion, but the new reality.
It’s time to notify the country, not just Trump supporters but independents and disgruntled Democrats, too, that the New Republican party is here to stay.
Civility may be a casualty of the Democrat party, but the country can continue to move forward successfully, without their blessing.
It’s our time.
Published in Politics
*and the leftists always always always vote, whereas the normal people don’t always vote.
But the Constitution does not lead to judicial supremacy in Constitutional interpretation.
Judicial review of standing law, yes. But that’s not the same thing.
It’s unConstitutional governance that leads to an unaccountable judiciary.
More on my post on who can interpret the Constitution. Link on my profile.
I understand, but the soup we are in is different. How to correct that is one of my biggest concerns.
Civility does not mean being unwilling or unable to confront someone when they are way out of line. This can be done with a measure of good humor but must be unstintingly direct to be effective. No weasel words or backtracking. In my opinion Graham handled the situation exactly right. Unfortunately, President Trump does not do so as a general rule. Personal attacks are not only not necessary, they are counter productive since they gender sympathy for the target of correction. And correction, not derision, must be the objective.
Works for me, @judithanncampbell2
It’s worth remembering that the “polarization” that upsets everyone isn’t because the Republicans moved to the right.
It’s because the Democrats have moved hard Left.
Stacy McCain writes:
The key word in the last sentence is sentimental. They are motivated by the sentiment that the false ideas give them, and will destroy whatever threatens that. By any means necessary. Civility… not really.
Here’s the Oregonian with a timeline of the brawl in Portland between Proud Boys and friends and Antifa.
Great quote, @ontheleftcoast. And we can’t turn back time . . .
Thanks. Keeping the sentiment going requires considering classes of people as objects by means of which one can gratify oneself. This works on a micro scale too. It can be seen in the extreme case (which makes the process more evident) of an adult who sexually abuses a child: the adults must value the feeling they get over the children’s value as a human being.
My goodness, this is true in every aspect of life!! This is what made the Holocaust possible. This is what allows people to hate anyone else–your views, beliefs, preferences all supersede anything else about the other person. It allows one person/group to dehumanize the other. So sick.
Dear Tommy and Cassy,
Please take your definition of civility and shove it up your [Redacted].
And what is one to do when the person confronted (without weasel words or backtracking) looks like he is ready, willing, and able to ‘go full chimp’ on your a55?
That’s a tough one, ST. For me, I hope I wouldn’t push a situation to that point!
Then how might one go about not backtracking if push comes to shove?
Correct and that is how we arrive at “rule” by mob intimidation and force.
ST, I just finished watching “Paul, Apostle of Christ” (the relationship of Paul and Luke as teacher and student figures prominently in it.) Though the screenwriters insist that love has a power all its own in Christ, I can’t help thinking that a can of bear spray/pepper spray might be something to keep in one’s reach, if persuasion misfires. These are bullies and thugs, are they not? (Not forgetting the ”1% gold star” an earlier poster mentioned employing, too.
Nanda you should never purchase pepper spray to take with you when you leave your home. I would advise most people to at least consider it.
I recently gave a (made in USA) pepper spray to a ‘skoy’ that was trying to get out of the lifestyle.
What do you think of the Kimber Pepperblaster II OC gel gun?
I prefer something that barks here, bites there, and puts the ‘dog’ down humanely with a sudden impact.
P.S. But I can also see the need for non-lethal sometimes (or maybe not).
Copy that, ST…My brother is trying to work out what style will be effective for my dexterity/mobility, etc.