Trump: Disrupter-In-Chief

 

Well, just what exactly did you expect?

Trump the Candidate was a loud, braggadocious, outrageous, counterpunching, reality show celebrity/businessman who never let an attack go unanswered. To refresh your recollection, you should go  do a search for “2016 Republican debate highlights.”

You’ll see Big D lashing out at each of the 16 other Republican candidates, but only after they take a shot at him. Highlights include his takedown of Rand Paul at the beginning of the first debate after Paul lashed out at Big D at the outset. Then there’s the “little Marco” moment; the “low energy Jeb” jibe; the “lyin’ Ted Cruz;” and his disarming of Carly Fiorina by accurately pointing out her disastrous reign as CEO of Hewlett-Packard.

I agree with what you are saying. Many of these moments are cringeworthy. But his labels resonate—e.g., “Crooked Hillary.” And they stick.

Trump is not nice. Republicans tried “nice” with Mitt Romney in 2012. They tried “experienced and professional” with John McCain in 2008. Both lost. One of the reasons? No matter who is the Republican candidate, the Democrat politicians, and the heavily-Democrat media are not going to be nice nor professional. They’re going to say and do whatever it takes.

In the general election, it was Trump against Hillary and the Clinton army’s $2 billion war chest. Aiding Clinton and debasing Trump were the usual liberal, leftist suspects: Hollywood, the music industry, 90% of the mainstream media, pollsters, academics, and the vast majority of Deep Swampsters, including 100% opposition from the public employee unions like SEIU and the national teachers’ unions.

Big D also had against him the “never-Trumpers” in the GOP, including John McCain, who personally dispatched an aide to fly to London to pick up the Steele Dossier and return it to D.C., where McCain personally delivered it on December 6, 2016 to now-disgraced FBI Director Jim Comey. McCain fully admits this dossier gambit in his recent autobiography, “The Restless Wave.”

Trump voters were labeled “deplorables” by Hillary. Peter Strzok referred to them as smelly WalMart shoppers in an email to girlfriend Lisa Page. But, even after the vulgar Billy Bush tape, Trump voters, whom Obama described as “clinging to their guns and bibles,” voted for Donald J. Trump in droves on November 6, 2016, resulting in an electoral landslide.

If you expected these left-wing losers to lick their wounds and walk away, you fail to understand their self-righteous, quasi-religious zealotry. Before and after Big D’s inauguration, top management at Obama’s DOJ, FBI, and State Department implemented what Peter Strzok called their “insurance policy.” FBI used non-agent informants to spy on Trump’s campaign and his transition team. These informants entrapped the hapless wannabes, Carter Page and George Papadopoulos, and FISA warrants were issued based on false allegations in the Steele Dossier, paid for by HRC and the DNC, and made up out of whole cloth.

These same Democrat interests who fought Trump in the campaign, continued post-election, to fight their dirty war against President Trump. The falsified Russia collusion claim was promoted by Deep Staters Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Ohr (Bruce and Nellie), Brennan, Clapper and others, aided and abetted by Rosenstein and Mueller.

The elements leading up to the Mueller appointment: Jeff Session’s recusal, the rise to power of Rosenstein, the Comey/Clapper leak of the Steele Dossier to CNN, who handed it off to BuzzFeed for publication, were orchestrated seamlessly by these Swampsters.

This “insurance policy” could not have been pulled off without significant advanced planning and coordination. Of course, all developments were breathlessly reported by a mainstream media fed by incessant leaks from the Swamp.

So, when Big D demeans others who attack him (e.g., traitorous John Brennan, Omarosa, Schumer), or when he says something gauche or vulgar; or when he does anything that makes you wince, just remember that Trump would never have beaten his Republican opponents or HRC if he were a conventional politician.

And if Trump had lost, we would not have enjoyed 4% GDP growth in the last quarter. There would have been no tax cuts and no massive deregulation. The military would have continued to deteriorate; Big Government would have continued to expand.

So, just look the other way while Trump is “draining the Swamp.” The Swamp is not going to give up without a fight. And Big D is a fighter par excellence.

Published in Politics
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 71 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    How old are you? I am 66, having been born in 1952.

    Younger, Gary, and not even a lawyer, which is why this thread is making me laugh so hard.

    • #61
  2. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    How old are you? I am 66, having been born in 1952.

    Younger, Gary, and not even a lawyer, which is why this thread is making me laugh so hard.

    This is the joy of Ricochet!  

    • #62
  3. Bob Thompson Member
    Bob Thompson
    @BobThompson

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Yea, but did he copyright it? If not, it is fair game!

    Good luck with enforcing that on a phrase that has been in common parlance for at least forty years. And I suspect he picked it up when he was in the army in the Fifties.

    Since I had never heard it before, it was only just invented!

    By me!

    Kids these days. They think the world was invented the day they were born.

    How old are you? I am 66, having been born in 1952.

    Gary, isn’t  @Arahant just responding appropriately to your last comment?

    • #63
  4. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    Yea, but did he copyright it? If not, it is fair game!

    Good luck with enforcing that on a phrase that has been in common parlance for at least forty years. And I suspect he picked it up when he was in the army in the Fifties.

    Since I had never heard it before, it was only just invented!

    By me!

    Kids these days. They think the world was invented the day they were born.

    How old are you? I am 66, having been born in 1952.

    Gary, isn’t @Arahant just responding appropriately to your last comment?

    Yes.  Absolutely!

    • #64
  5. Django Member
    Django
    @Django

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    How old are you? I am 66, having been born in 1952.

    Younger, Gary, and not even a lawyer, which is why this thread is making me laugh so hard.

    I would guess I heard it first from my old buddy Redneck Bob about 35 or 40 years ago. I could throw out a few more of his choice terms and phrases if: 1) they didn’t violate the CoC, 2) we weren’t on the main feed. 

    • #65
  6. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Django (View Comment):

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):
    How old are you? I am 66, having been born in 1952.

    Younger, Gary, and not even a lawyer, which is why this thread is making me laugh so hard.

    I would guess I heard it first from my old buddy Redneck Bob about 35 or 40 years ago. I could throw out a few more of his choice terms and phrases if: 1) they didn’t violate the CoC, 2) we weren’t on the main feed.

    Point taken.  We are on the Main Feed.  Thanks for the gentle reminder.  Ciao.

    • #66
  7. Doctor Robert Member
    Doctor Robert
    @DoctorRobert

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Almost any Republican was going to win in 2016. It was our year. Unfortunately, instead of nominating a conservative, we decided to nominate a populist. Hopefully we can remedy that mistake in the 2020 primaries and nominate a conservative like Nikki Haley.

    Must you persist with this here? You are entitled to any opinion you choose to hold, but, on the numerous other occasions you’ve made this point, it’s been debated ad nauseam and effectively. I find it disrespectful of the several people who have taken considerable time to offer a contrary opinion. It’s not really even necessary in this thread.

    The argument that only Trump could have won in 2016 is flatly wrong is perhaps the most pernicious argument that gets repeated over and over again.

    I believe that in 2016, the Mitt Romney of 2012, the John McCain of 2008, or the Bob Dole of 1996 would all beaten Hillary Clinton.

    Likewise, I believe that in 2008, the Hillary Clinton of 2016, or the John Kerry of 2004, or the Al Gore of 2000 would all have beaten John McCain.

    I am fighting against the fallacious and perhaps fatal argument that the only way Republicans can win in the future is to be Mini-Trumps.

    Politics runs in a cycle, and it is damn hard to overcome the prevailing winds.

    Can you please hang this us, Gary?

    I’ve stopped posting about Obama being treasonous.

    • #67
  8. Gary Robbins Member
    Gary Robbins
    @GaryRobbins

    Doctor Robert (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    Gary Robbins (View Comment):

    Almost any Republican was going to win in 2016. It was our year. Unfortunately, instead of nominating a conservative, we decided to nominate a populist. Hopefully we can remedy that mistake in the 2020 primaries and nominate a conservative like Nikki Haley.

    Must you persist with this here? You are entitled to any opinion you choose to hold, but, on the numerous other occasions you’ve made this point, it’s been debated ad nauseam and effectively. I find it disrespectful of the several people who have taken considerable time to offer a contrary opinion. It’s not really even necessary in this thread.

    The argument that only Trump could have won in 2016 is flatly wrong is perhaps the most pernicious argument that gets repeated over and over again.

    I believe that in 2016, the Mitt Romney of 2012, the John McCain of 2008, or the Bob Dole of 1996 would all beaten Hillary Clinton.

    Likewise, I believe that in 2008, the Hillary Clinton of 2016, or the John Kerry of 2004, or the Al Gore of 2000 would all have beaten John McCain.

    I am fighting against the fallacious and perhaps fatal argument that the only way Republicans can win in the future is to be Mini-Trumps.

    Politics runs in a cycle, and it is damn hard to overcome the prevailing winds.

    Can you please hang this us, Gary?

    I’ve stopped posting about Obama being treasonous.

    I am decreasing my frequency.  Trump won in accordance with the Constitution.  I just have a problem with the argument that Trump is the only person who could have won, and that we should never be like McCain or Romney.  Still, I have made my point quite a few times.

    Thank you for not posting about Obama being treasonous.  

    I will seriously consider your request.

    • #68
  9. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Doctor Robert (View Comment):
    I’ve stopped posting about Obama being treasonous.

    Why? I never cared for applying the term “treason” to the bad things Obama did, but I hope we never stop talking about the bad things he did that provoked some people to use the term treason.  

    • #69
  10. John Seymour Member
    John Seymour
    @

    Django (View Comment):
    That is the way it should work. A lot of people suffering from cranio-rectal inversion criticize Trump for trying to make the system work as it is supposed to. 

    These folks are outraged because the rules aren’t supposed to apply to them.  Just to the minions like thee and me.  My clearance was suspended when I left NSA, as it was supposed to be.  Had I gone to work for a defense contractor or rotated over to the civilian side, it would have been reinstated, as long as I had a need to know, but my special accesses would only have been reinstated had I continued to have a need to know.  But those rules aren’t supposed to apply to our self-anointed betters.  Because, what  would we do without them  and their guidance?

    • #70
  11. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    John Seymour (View Comment):

    Django (View Comment):
    That is the way it should work. A lot of people suffering from cranio-rectal inversion criticize Trump for trying to make the system work as it is supposed to.

    These folks are outraged because the rules aren’t supposed to apply to them. Just to the minions like thee and me. My clearance was suspended when I left NSA, as it was supposed to be. Had I gone to work for a defense contractor or rotated over to the civilian side, it would have been reinstated, as long as I had a need to know, but my special accesses would only have been reinstated had I continued to have a need to know. But those rules aren’t supposed to apply to our self-anointed betters. Because, what would we do without them and their guidance?

    I dunno. We don’t have titles of nobility or a landed aristocracy, so the least we can do to compensate is let our betters hang on to their security clearances for life.

    • #71
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.