How to Build a Computer 5: Fundamental Chemistry

 

I know I promised simple transistor uses last time. Thinking about it though, I’d rather go into a bit more detail about the electron golfing I described earlier. It’s a neat analogy, but it doesn’t cover some things you can do with diodes. Interesting things. Therefore we’re gonna dive in for a deeper understanding of chemistry, atoms, and cartoons. Let’s look at a model of an atom using common household objects:

You all have your Ricochet mugs, right?

An atom consists of protons and neutrons in the middle and electrons outside. The common picture of an atom has those electrons whizzing in neat, well-defined orbits. That’s wrong. It’s closer to electrons having spaces they hang out in. We’re on the level of quantum mechanics here, so odd stuff happens. It’s not actually possible to tell where an electron is; it’s small enough that you can only give probabilities. Hmm… let me try it again.

Suppose you’re in a grocery store with 10 aisles. You find a toddler wailing for his lost mommy. Where is his mom? She’s in one of the ten aisles, so you could assign her 1/10th chance of being in any particular aisle. You can raise the probability for the dairy aisle (kid looks like he drinks a lot of milk if you catch my meaning), and lower those probabilities generally when you remember to include the deli and check out lanes. You can drop some probabilities to zero when you’ve checked that aisle already, and eventually raise her chance of being in a given location to 100% once you find her in aisle six (canned goods.)

That pink section in the middle is

The produce section counts as an aisle, and I’ll sock anyone who says otherwise.

One of the funky things that quantum mechanics does to us is that we can’t actually ever raise the probability of the electron’s location to 100%. Something called the Uncertainty Principle puts an upper bound on it. (I tend to think of uncertainty as a prank God played on the physicists. “This’ll really get their goat!”) When you’re talking about an electron in an atom you can talk in terms of where you’re likely to find it (this little shell around the nucleus) and where you’re unlikely to find it (everywhere else in the universe. Especially New Jersey). Each individual electron is stuck in something called an orbital. Which sounds similar to but is different from an orbit.

Let’s say you’ve purchased a Build-Your-Own-Atom kit from Πkea. It comes with one silicon nucleus (Fourteen protons, sixteen neutrons. Looks like you lucked into one of the heavy ones. Nice!), fourteen electrons, a pair of super sharp tweezers and a single Allen wrench. You carefully tweezer your first electron into place. It settles into the 1s orbital.

The what now? The first orbital is a spherical shell around the nucleus. Sort of boring looking. You’d think that “s” stands for spherical, but actually it stands for sharp, for historical reasons and not really worth remembering. Okay, one electron into the 1s orbital. That’s the lowest energy state it can manage and it always fills up first. Like the parking spots near the door. Nature, it pays to remember, is fundamentally lazy. If it can find a lower energy state you better believe it’s going to sit there. Rocks are especially lazy; they just sit on the ground and hardly ever fly around hitting things. Same principle applies in an atom; your electrons will get to the lowest energy level (closest to the nucleus) it can manage.

You can fit another electron into the 1s shell, so long as you remember to spin it the opposite way. Something called the Pauli Exclusion principle, named after a German physicist who didn’t get invited to many parties. Your third and fourth electron go into the 2s shell. It’s much like the 1s shell, only larger.

Your fifth electron goes into the 2p orbital. Now that you’re far enough out of the nucleus the electrons get a little creative in locations. P-orbitals look like figure eights; balloons extending on either side of the nucleus. Dumbbells that… just look at the darned picture. You can stack three different p-orbitals into a shell; one going up-down, one going left-right, and one going back-forth. They’ll fit six electrons total.

While we're at it, that 3p orbital ought to have all six petals. There are two electrons, but you could find them in any of the six slots.

The darned picture. The p-orbitals are the flower petal looking things. They should be extending into all three dimensions, and would be if they had a competent artist.

Ten electrons down, only four to go. Good thing too; all this tweezering is giving you eye strain. Two more electrons go into the 3s orbital. Put the last two into the 3p orbital. Voila! A neutral silicon atom. Supposing they had included an extra electron; you could have added a third to the 3p orbital and get a negatively charged silicon ion (it has one more electron than it has protons). Meanwhile, the sap who lost his electron has a positively charged ion (one less electron). Ions of one sort or another come up a lot in computer building.

The full list of orbitals filled in a silicon atom goes like this: 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p2. Or you can shortcut it and say [Ne] 3s2 2p6, using the previous noble gas to avoid writing the less interesting inner orbitals. The ones on the outside are the ones which make chemistry happen. That’s where the action is.

Now let’s probe the sucker. Take a photon and shoot it at the atom. What happens? Nothing if your aim is that lousy. Supposing you hit it though, the question is, how much energy is in that photon? Let’s say that you hit one of the electrons in the 2s orbital. Your photon gives the electron a bunch of energy; it jumps out of the 2s orbital and straight into the 4f orbital, much like Yosemite Sam getting his pants lit on fire. There are d and f orbitals that fill up if you’ve got a heavier atom; technically the smaller atoms have them too but an electron that finds itself in one doesn’t long stay in one. Much like Yosemite Sam once he’s wandered off a cliff edge. Didn’t think you were learning science from cartoons, did you? And all that time you were watching because they’re funny. So was I.

Not pictured: Any copywritten cartoon characters what could get me sued.

But much like a Loony Tune off a cliff edge, that falling energy has to go somewhere. In the cartoon, it’s expressed as a small puff of dust as well as spontaneously-appearing bandages and casts. An electron doesn’t have that option. It emits a photon. Didn’t we just stick a photon in there? Yeah; and this maintains the balance. The electron loses the photon when its energy level drops again, sending it off in whatever direction.

Fun and all, but what does that have to do with anything? Recall last week when we were talking diodes. The electricity you’re pumping through the diode causes holes to open up and drops electrons into them. Only now we know that those ‘holes’ are open orbitals spots and that dropping an electron into that hole makes a photon. In your standard silicon diode, there isn’t much of an energy change; all you get are low energy, Jeb Bush-like infra-red photons. Let’s say you made your diode out of a different base material. It takes more electricity to pull an electron out of its hole, but you get a more energetic photon when you drop it back in. How much more energetic? With the right materials, you get a photon that shows up as visible light. Bingo, you’ve got a Light Emitting Diode, or LED.

Now here’s the really clever bit. Suppose you’ve got a diode hooked up without a power source. Its electrons have combined with its holes (again, as we discussed last week) and there’s a zone in there where there’s an electric field generated by the dopant nuclei. What happens then, if you poke your diode with a photon? A strong enough photon comes in knocks an electron out of it’s orbital. The electron would normally drop back into place, but now you’ve got this electric field that’s suggesting it move off in the positive direction. The newly-freed electron heads that way, the hole heads towards the opposite side. You don’t get a photon back out, you get electricity. Sound like anything? That’s right; you’ve invented a solar cell. Don’t you feel proud?

Beyond the basics of the diode technology, solar cells really have very little to do with computers. LEDs show up all over the place but again aren’t essential. Still, the time was right for a detour, and who’s driving this bus? I am, that’s who, and we’ll stop where I please, thankyouverymuch. Next week we’ll get back to simple transistor circuits in “Asleep at the Switch”, or “Boolean Foolishness”

This is part five of my ongoing series on building a computer, the “it’s not for sissies” way. You may find previous parts here: 1 (silicon) 2 (crystallography) 3 (doping) 4 (diodes and transistors), or all of them under the tag How to Build a Computer. This week’s post has been brought to you by the Diner. For boomerang-pattern Formica and eclectic jukebox selections choose the Diner.

[First] [Previous] [Next]

Published in Science & Technology
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 30 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Jules PA Inactive
    Jules PA
    @JulesPA

    Like. 

    • #1
  2. GLDIII Reagan
    GLDIII
    @GLDIII

    This photon to electron feature is what is used for imaging “cameras” that is the basis for all remote sensing by DoD, NASA, and increasingly the commercial mapping enterprises. Silicon is the favor of choice for wavelengths that we are familiar with (visible from blue(ish) to red). A lot of the interesting processes that can be observed from space happen in the infrared wavelength 3 to 5 μm and the 8 to 12 μm (some go to 14.5 μm). Here we depart from Si and go to heavier element combinations as the de jour diodes for these wavelenghts. Mercury, Cadium, and Teluride “grown” on a wafer base of pure crystaline of Cadium/Teluride. 

    As an added engineering twist these crystals are only “quantum sensitive“ when they are cooled to ~70 K to 100 K depending on your sensitivity desires. Some of us have managed to learn to design systems that provide “that one neat trick” with focal plane detector cooling that provide everything from enemy surveillance, targeting systems, crop health, who is growing pot in their remotely located barns, and hourly weather prediction.

    It has been an interesting and gratify path to chart for the last 40 years developing these cooling system, and I have all of you fine taxpayers for that opportunity. It still amazes me how we go from the simple filling of electron holes in these semi conducting elements, to system that image everything from silly selfies to studying the origins of the stars.

    • #2
  3. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Hank Rhody, Possibly Mad: Πkea

    How does one pronounce that? Is the Π silent?

    • #3
  4. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Hank Rhody, Possibly Mad: Didn’t we just stick a photon in there?

    Wait, you said photon? I thought you said proton. But I didn’t have any individual protons handy, so I used an α and hit the nucleus. I have a bad feeling about this.

    • #4
  5. Hank Rhody, Possibly Mad Contributor
    Hank Rhody, Possibly Mad
    @HankRhody

    GLDIII (View Comment):
    Here we depart from Si and go to heavier element combinations as the de jour diodes for these wavelenghts. Mercury, Cadium, and Teluride “grown” on a wafer base of pure crystaline of Cadium/Teluride. 

    As the kind of dork who still carries around his high school pocket periodic table, one of the things I love about this whole branch of science is that you get to use all those weird elements from the odd corners of the periodic table. If an organic chemist is feeling frisky he’ll stick a bromine on one of his methyl groups. Semiconductors? “Let’s mix some Ytterbium in there, see how that works out.”

    • #5
  6. Hank Rhody, Possibly Mad Contributor
    Hank Rhody, Possibly Mad
    @HankRhody

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Hank Rhody, Possibly Mad: Didn’t we just stick a photon in there?

    Wait, you said photon? I thought you said proton. But I didn’t have any individual protons handy, so I used an α and hit the nucleus. I have a bad feeling about this.

    Seeing as you started with Si 30, and assuming you got your alpha particle to stick you’ve now got Sulfur 34, which is thankfully stable.

    • #6
  7. Judge Mental Member
    Judge Mental
    @JudgeMental

    This is more my speed.

     

    • #7
  8. Hank Rhody, Possibly Mad Contributor
    Hank Rhody, Possibly Mad
    @HankRhody

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Hank Rhody, Possibly Mad: Πkea

    How does one pronounce that? Is the Π silent?

    You treat the Pi symbol as a separate word. Pi-kea.

    • #8
  9. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Hank Rhody, Possibly Mad (View Comment):
    Seeing as you started with Si 30, and assuming you got your alpha particle to stick you’ve now got Sulfur 34, which is thankfully stable.

    Stick? Maybe I shouldn’t have shot it into the atom quite so fast.

    • #9
  10. Nanda Pajama-Tantrum Member
    Nanda Pajama-Tantrum
    @

    Loving it, @hankrhody…The Diner’s sponsorship is a perfect fit, too.  (How can we get some solo @jameslileks around here again, anyway?)

    • #10
  11. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Hank Rhody, Possibly Mad (View Comment):
    You treat the Pi symbol as a separate word. Pi-kea.

    The interesting thing about IKEA is the base language is not English, so the way it is pronounced in its home country does not take the Great Vowel Shift into account, and is ee-kay-ah, rather than how English speakers say it as I-key-eh. But ΠKEA is a whole nother matter.

    • #11
  12. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Why aren’t their any coffee stains on that coffee cup?  

    • #12
  13. Hank Rhody, Possibly Mad Contributor
    Hank Rhody, Possibly Mad
    @HankRhody

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Why aren’t their any coffee stains on that coffee cup?

    Tragic disuse. I’m really not that big on coffee.

    • #13
  14. Nanda Pajama-Tantrum Member
    Nanda Pajama-Tantrum
    @

    Hank Rhody, Possibly Mad (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Why aren’t their any coffee stains on that coffee cup?

    Tragic disuse. I’m really not that big on coffee.

    Tea works well, too, Hank, just sayin’…

    • #14
  15. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Hank Rhody, Possibly Mad (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Why aren’t their any coffee stains on that coffee cup?

    Tragic disuse. I’m really not that big on coffee.

    Well, nobody’s perfect.   Good chemistry lesson, anyway. 

    • #15
  16. Gary McVey Contributor
    Gary McVey
    @GaryMcVey

    My weekly knowledge fix! Hank Rhody’s ruminations are sponsored by Harry’s Shave, for conservative men who put good grooming first! By Fairchild Semiconductor: “Founded by a happy old lecher. What of it?” And by International Rectifier’s diode division. Our motto is, “Maybe you go both ways, but we don’t”. 

    • #16
  17. Matt Balzer Member
    Matt Balzer
    @MattBalzer

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Hank Rhody, Possibly Mad (View Comment):
    You treat the Pi symbol as a separate word. Pi-kea.

    The interesting thing about IKEA is the base language is not English, so the way it is pronounced in its home country does not take the Great Vowel Shift into account, and is ee-kay-ah, rather than how English speakers say it as I-key-eh. But ΠKEA is a whole nother matter.

    It’s an acronym. I bet you pronounce GIF jif too.

    • #17
  18. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Matt Balzer (View Comment):
    I bet you pronounce GIF jif too.

    It’s the only proper way.

    • #18
  19. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Gary McVey (View Comment):
    Hank Rhody’s ruminations are sponsored by Harry’s Shave, for conservative men who put good grooming first!

    His avatar looks like it could use a good shave. 

    • #19
  20. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    The Reticulator (View Comment):
    His avatar looks like it could use a good shave. 

    You should see him in real life, although perhaps he could start shaving…his head.

    • #20
  21. GLDIII Reagan
    GLDIII
    @GLDIII

    • #21
  22. Matt Balzer Member
    Matt Balzer
    @MattBalzer

    Arahant (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):
    His avatar looks like it could use a good shave.

    You should see him in real life, although perhaps he could start shaving…his head.

    Give it a some time and he won’t have to.

    • #22
  23. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Matt Balzer (View Comment):
    Give it a some time and he won’t have to.

    He’ll always have that fringe.

    • #23
  24. Judge Mental Member
    Judge Mental
    @JudgeMental

    Arahant (View Comment):

    Matt Balzer (View Comment):
    Give it a some time and he won’t have to.

    He’ll always have that fringe.

    He could go for the two step badass process, shave it off.  He already has the goatee.

    • #24
  25. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    Judge Mental (View Comment):
    He could go for the two step badass process, shave it off. He already has the goatee.

    I thought about posting the video, but it has a few non-CoC terms. Save it for the PIT.

    • #25
  26. John Hanson Coolidge
    John Hanson
    @JohnHanson

    Hank Rhody, Possibly Mad (View Comment):

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Why aren’t their any coffee stains on that coffee cup?

    Tragic disuse. I’m really not that big on coffee.

    My mug is unused (mostly) as well, but I drink a lot of coffee, my problem is the mug is too small.  I need a larger mug wish Ricochet had them!

    • #26
  27. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    John Hanson (View Comment):
    I need a larger mug wish Ricochet had them!

    I use mugs I bought through Stash Tea. They hold a full pint. It’s not quite a beer stein, but much better than the typical coffee cup.

    • #27
  28. WillowSpring Member
    WillowSpring
    @WillowSpring

    This is a great series.  I remember my Freshman Physics professor – in the late 60s – describing the newly discovered laser ability of semiconductor diodes.  He said that it was an interesting phenomenon, but had no practical use at all.  A lot has changed since then.

    • #28
  29. RossC Inactive
    RossC
    @Rossi

    Man now you tell us, I had to study up on electron orbital theory back when you were showing us cookies and M&Ms.

    • #29
  30. Hank Rhody, Possibly Mad Contributor
    Hank Rhody, Possibly Mad
    @HankRhody

    RossC (View Comment):

    Man now you tell us, I had to study up on electron orbital theory back when you were showing us cookies and M&Ms.

    If you’d like to engage in further study, the other analogy I considered was a bar room. The taps are the nucleus, the patrons are electrons. Energy states are based on how far you have to travel to get a drink. The regulars are in 1s orbitals; take a lot to knock one out of their seat. If you’re sitting at a table with your girl you’re in a higher energy state and chemistry can occur.

    Figuring out what the photon means is a bit harder. I guess you could model it as the beer itself; a man receives a photon and migrates to a higher energy state by the urinals, until he emits the photon and settles back onto his bar stool.

    Further research is required.

    • #30
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.