When Will This Fad End?

 

This topic has been bouncing around my head for a while, but I’ve never gotten around to writing it. Someone on Ricochet will mention something, Jay Nordlinger months ago on a podcast complained about tattoos or a user whose name I forget recently said he was up for a good tattoo rant. Other times I see someone and think why?

I noticed markings on Dana Loesch’s arm in a Parkland CNN screenshot or a cross on a pastor’s back at a church swim party. Tattoos seem to be everywhere and there is no demographic that is exempt. This will come across as a get-off-my-lawn rant, but here we go.

I guess I’m a Generation X person. I still remember that about the only people who had tattoos were military veterans or criminals and they might only have one or two, no sleeves or multiple ones covering a lot of the body. Others might have had them, but they were in a private location. Maybe it was just where I grew up.

Some point along the way, tattoos became more mainstream. In the ’90s a lot of girls were getting lower back tattoos, but they were derided as “tramp stamps”. Then it seemed as though they exploded on the scene and everyone had one. Yes it’s me, but I have yet to see a tattoo that improves a woman’s appearance. As G. Gordon Liddy used to say, putting a tattoo on a woman is like putting a bumper sticker on a BMW. I will be glad when I don’t see ink everywhere I look.

Maybe things are changing. I saw this on Twitter. I don’t know what drove it, but we might be on the downward side of the trend. I can hope.

.

Published in Culture
Tags:

This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 279 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    She (View Comment):
    So, I agree that there’s a considerable “showing off” factor here, even if all you’re showing off is your own (or your tattoo “artist’s”) illiteracy, like the girl in the photo accompanying the OP.

    I wouldn’t jump to any conclusions there… The person in the photo has a remarkably prominent Adam’s apple for a girl and appears to have tattoos on his/her knuckles — maybe even some facial hair. Just because it’s wearing diamond gauges and long hair does not make it a girl…

    • #241
  2. Misthiocracy, Joke Pending Member
    Misthiocracy, Joke Pending
    @Misthiocracy

    Mister Dog (View Comment):

    I made it through 24 years in the Navy with no tattoos. Before I went in my grandfather, who was fully tatted up from his service time, took me aside and said “Don’t do this. One day you’ll be an old man and hate them.” Made sense to me.

    Another good point: If you ever plan on leaving the group where the tattoos have utility, you’re probably better off not getting the tattoo.

    • #242
  3. She Member
    She
    @She

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    She (View Comment):
    So, I agree that there’s a considerable “showing off” factor here, even if all you’re showing off is your own (or your tattoo “artist’s”) illiteracy, like the girl in the photo accompanying the OP.

    I wouldn’t jump to any conclusions there… The person in the photo has a remarkably prominent Adam’s apple for a girl and appears to have tattoos on his/her knuckles — maybe even some facial hair. Just because it’s wearing diamond gauges and long hair does not make it a girl…

    Excellent point. Illiteracy knows no boundaries of sex, or even indeterminate gender.  Or, perhaps, actually, the more indeterminate and vague the gender, the more propensity for lack of clarity and, even, illiteracy . . . who knows.  Thanks for the caution!

    • #243
  4. Bishop Wash Member
    Bishop Wash
    @BishopWash

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    She (View Comment):
    So, I agree that there’s a considerable “showing off” factor here, even if all you’re showing off is your own (or your tattoo “artist’s”) illiteracy, like the girl in the photo accompanying the OP.

    I wouldn’t jump to any conclusions there… The person in the photo has a remarkably prominent Adam’s apple for a girl and appears to have tattoos on his/her knuckles — maybe even some facial hair. Just because it’s wearing diamond gauges and long hair does not make it a girl…

    I’d seen that photo for a number of years used to represent bad choices. When I searched for it to include in the article, I was surprised to discover that it is from the movie We’re the Millers. I haven’t seen the film and didn’t know that. The character is played by Mark L. Young.

    • #244
  5. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    She (View Comment):
    So, I agree that there’s a considerable “showing off” factor here, even if all you’re showing off is your own (or your tattoo “artist’s”) illiteracy, like the girl in the photo accompanying the OP.

    I wouldn’t jump to any conclusions there… The person in the photo has a remarkably prominent Adam’s apple for a girl and appears to have tattoos on his/her knuckles — maybe even some facial hair. Just because it’s wearing diamond gauges and long hair does not make it a girl…

    Which can only be followed by…

    • #245
  6. Frozen Chosen Inactive
    Frozen Chosen
    @FrozenChosen

    One of my favorite stories surrounding the making of the Lord of the Rings movies was when the actors who played the leading characters decided to all get commemorative tattoos to symbolize their bonding during the movie shoot.  When they asked Ian Holm – who played Bilbo Baggins – if he wanted to get a tattoo with them he told them to grow up.

    • #246
  7. Ed G. Member
    Ed G.
    @EdG

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    She (View Comment):
    So, I agree that there’s a considerable “showing off” factor here, even if all you’re showing off is your own (or your tattoo “artist’s”) illiteracy, like the girl in the photo accompanying the OP.

    I wouldn’t jump to any conclusions there… The person in the photo has a remarkably prominent Adam’s apple for a girl and appears to have tattoos on his/her knuckles — maybe even some facial hair. Just because it’s wearing diamond gauges and long hair does not make it a girl…

    It keeps the tattoo off it’s skin or it gets the hose again.

    • #247
  8. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    One of my favorite websites….

    Ugliest Tattoos

    • #248
  9. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    She (View Comment):
    So, I agree that there’s a considerable “showing off” factor here, even if all you’re showing off is your own (or your tattoo “artist’s”) illiteracy, like the girl in the photo accompanying the OP.

    I wouldn’t jump to any conclusions there… The person in the photo has a remarkably prominent Adam’s apple for a girl and appears to have tattoos on his/her knuckles — maybe even some facial hair. Just because it’s wearing diamond gauges and long hair does not make it a girl…

    Looks a bit like Holly Hunter.

    • #249
  10. RightAngles Member
    RightAngles
    @RightAngles

    Kozak (View Comment):

    One of my favorite websites….

    Ugliest Tattoos

    Oh dear. A couple of those seem to be designed to cause a potential rapist to lose erectile function. Brilliant plan or stupid dumbasses? We may never know.

    animals songs and song lyrics tramp stamps words - 4631407616

     

    https://i.chzbgr.com/full/3470074624/h52BBD78D/

    • #250
  11. E. Kent Golding Moderator
    E. Kent Golding
    @EKentGolding

    Get Off My Lawn!

    • #251
  12. Mister Dog Coolidge
    Mister Dog
    @MisterDog

    @she “like the girl in the photo accompanying the OP.”

    I’m pretty sure from the neck and hands that that is a dude. But I fully admit that you may be correct.

    • #252
  13. JudithannCampbell Member
    JudithannCampbell
    @

    Mister Dog (View Comment):

    @she “like the girl in the photo accompanying the OP.”

    I’m pretty sure from the neck and hands that that is a dude. But I fully admit that you may be correct.

    He is a guy, saw the movie :)

    • #253
  14. JustmeinAZ Member
    JustmeinAZ
    @JustmeinAZ

    RightAngles (View Comment):

    Kozak (View Comment):

    One of my favorite websites….

    Ugliest Tattoos

    Oh dear. A couple of those seem to be designed to cause a potential rapist to lose erectile function. Brilliant plan or stupid dumbasses? We may never know.

    animals songs and song lyrics tramp stamps words - 4631407616

     

    https://i.chzbgr.com/full/3470074624/h52BBD78D/

    Eeeewww!

    • #254
  15. J Ro Member
    J Ro
    @JRo

    CB Toder aka Mama Toad (View Comment):

    Bob W (View Comment):

    Not everyone with a tattoo is a criminal, but almost all criminals are tattooed.

    In Japan, in public baths, girls would clutch at each other when they saw my little inoffensive butterfly and murmur, “Yakuza!” with horror.

    ‘Inoffensive’ (not unpleasant or objectionable, not arousing distaste) to you.  

     

    • #255
  16. Doctor Robert Member
    Doctor Robert
    @DoctorRobert

    This is why I’m not getting tattooed.

    • #256
  17. Chris O. Coolidge
    Chris O.
    @ChrisO

    Probably at least half of my friends going back to college have tattoos. Nothing in your face, just smaller, hidden lizards and Chinese character type things. My cousin’s wife had a big hangup about hers as it was visible in her wedding dress. I recall Mom saying something about it, but the rest of us just celebrated the joy of the event. Which of those reactions is weird?

    By the way, Ed G. wins this page of comments:

    Ed G. (View Comment):
    It keeps the tattoo off it’s skin or it gets the hose again.

     

    • #257
  18. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    CB Toder aka Mama Toad (View Comment):

    Bishop Wash: a user who’s name I forget recently said he was up for a good tattoo rant.

    Anyone else up for a good grammar rant?

    “Who’s” is the contraction for “who is” or “who has.”

    “Whose” is the possessive pronoun and the word you were looking for but failed to find.

    Learn it. Live it. Love it.

    I have a tattoo.

    I also have serious school-marm cred.

    Thanks for the catch. I thought I’d done due diligence before hitting publish, but this one slipped through. In the last few years I’ve noticed more of these types of errors when I proofread my stuff. I usually catch them, but wonder why they’re creeping into my drafts.

    I would hazard that it is creeping into your writing because misspellings and bad grammar are omnipresent in the online-o-sphere and eventually the muscles that twitch when you read le mal mot get worn out. 

    • #258
  19. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Misthiocracy, Joke Pending (View Comment):

    So, the popularization of tattoos is a double-edged sword.

    Peeps who get tattoos with a double-edged sword are hard core. 

    • #259
  20. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Keith SF (View Comment):

    Shouldn’t be too much work to fix that up…

    Love it! 

    • #260
  21. Nanda Pajama-Tantrum Member
    Nanda Pajama-Tantrum
    @

    TBA (View Comment):

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    CB Toder aka Mama Toad (View Comment):

    Bishop Wash: a user who’s name I forget recently said he was up for a good tattoo rant.

    Anyone else up for a good grammar rant?

    “Who’s” is the contraction for “who is” or “who has.”

    “Whose” is the possessive pronoun and the word you were looking for but failed to find.

    Learn it. Live it. Love it.

    I have a tattoo.

    I also have serious school-marm cred.

    Thanks for the catch. I thought I’d done due diligence before hitting publish, but this one slipped through. In the last few years I’ve noticed more of these types of errors when I proofread my stuff. I usually catch them, but wonder why they’re creeping into my drafts.

    I would hazard that it is creeping into your writing because misspellings and bad grammar are omnipresent in the online-o-sphere and eventually the muscles that twitch when you read le mal mot get worn out.

    And, let us not forget the inability of diktatation software and the ever-present Autoincorrect to misuse/misconstrue homophones [sound-alike words]…

    • #261
  22. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    She (View Comment):

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):

    She (View Comment):
    So, I agree that there’s a considerable “showing off” factor here, even if all you’re showing off is your own (or your tattoo “artist’s”) illiteracy, like the girl in the photo accompanying the OP.

    I wouldn’t jump to any conclusions there… The person in the photo has a remarkably prominent Adam’s apple for a girl and appears to have tattoos on his/her knuckles — maybe even some facial hair. Just because it’s wearing diamond gauges and long hair does not make it a girl…

    Excellent point. Illiteracy knows no boundaries of sex, or even indeterminate gender. Or, perhaps, actually, the more indeterminate and vague the gender, the more propensity for lack of clarity and, even, illiteracy . . . who knows. Thanks for the caution!

    Illiteracy used to know boundaries of sex – I well remember when pretty much every female could spell and rather few males could. 

    • #262
  23. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    JudithannCampbell (View Comment):

    Mister Dog (View Comment):

    @she “like the girl in the photo accompanying the OP.”

    I’m pretty sure from the neck and hands that that is a dude. But I fully admit that you may be correct.

    He is a guy, saw the movie :)

    Are you sure he isn’t the dude playing the girl playing the dude? 

    • #263
  24. CB Toder aka Mama Toad Member
    CB Toder aka Mama Toad
    @CBToderakaMamaToad

    J Ro (View Comment):

    ‘Inoffensive’ (not unpleasant or objectionable, not arousing distaste) to you.

     

    But apparently objectionable to you.

    Let it all out, now, don’t let it fester in there!

    • #264
  25. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    Nanda Pajama-Tantrum (View Comment):
    And, let us not forget the inability of diktatation software and the ever-present Autoincorrect to misuse/misconstrue homophones

    Homophobe

     

    • #265
  26. Hank Rhody, Total Rip-off Contributor
    Hank Rhody, Total Rip-off
    @HankRhody

    Went out to listen to the band playing last night. Saw a girl in a flowery sun dress, cut off at the shoulder. She had a large flowery tattoo on her shoulder; it matched rather well with the dress, but still wasn’t what I’d call an improvement on the original.

     

    • #266
  27. RightAngles Member
    RightAngles
    @RightAngles

    CB Toder aka Mama Toad (View Comment):

    J Ro (View Comment):

    ‘Inoffensive’ (not unpleasant or objectionable, not arousing distaste) to you.

     

    But apparently objectionable to you.

    Let it all out, now, don’t let it fester in there!

    There’s a member of the British aristocracy who has a tattoo. I forget her name, but she was a model in the 1970s and had her tattoo back then.

    • #267
  28. Hank Rhody, Total Rip-off Contributor
    Hank Rhody, Total Rip-off
    @HankRhody

    Hank Rhody, Total Rip-off (View Comment):

    Went out to listen to the band playing last night. Saw a girl in a flowery sun dress, cut off at the shoulder. She had a large flowery tattoo on her shoulder; it matched rather well with the dress, but still wasn’t what I’d call an improvement on the original.

    She was sitting with the girl who had the short, electric blue hair. Not exactly bad looking, but not a patch on the wavy-haired brunette with the subtle highlights on the other side of the venue.

    Now if you’ll excuse me, I’ve got something I really ought to get back to…

    • #268
  29. Bishop Wash Member
    Bishop Wash
    @BishopWash

    TBA (View Comment):

    Bishop Wash (View Comment):

    CB Toder aka Mama Toad (View Comment):

    Bishop Wash: a user who’s name I forget recently said he was up for a good tattoo rant.

    Anyone else up for a good grammar rant?

    “Who’s” is the contraction for “who is” or “who has.”

    “Whose” is the possessive pronoun and the word you were looking for but failed to find.

    Learn it. Live it. Love it.

    I have a tattoo.

    I also have serious school-marm cred.

    Thanks for the catch. I thought I’d done due diligence before hitting publish, but this one slipped through. In the last few years I’ve noticed more of these types of errors when I proofread my stuff. I usually catch them, but wonder why they’re creeping into my drafts.

    I would hazard that it is creeping into your writing because misspellings and bad grammar are omnipresent in the online-o-sphere and eventually the muscles that twitch when you read le mal mot get worn out.

    I like that idea better than the thought that my mental facilities are starting to fail. Maybe it’s like the story told about how counterfeit finders are taught. They are only shown the genuine articles and study them intently so that fakes pop out instead of studying fakes. I’ve seen so many incorrect articles that I subconsciously type the wrong version of my thoughts.

    • #269
  30. Postmodern Hoplite Coolidge
    Postmodern Hoplite
    @PostmodernHoplite

    Kozak (View Comment):

    Hmm…interesting.

    So: Who do I go to at the IRS to get back all of those taxes I’ve been paying since I’ve got tattoos  on my forearms? Is there, like a specific form I need to file, or something?

    • #270
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.