Alfie’s Legacy

 

Alfie Evans graced this world less than twenty-four months. I say grace because during the months of his short, precious life, he silently spoke volumes from his fragile hospital bed, as though he had a megaphone.

Alfie Evans was born a healthy, happy baby to Tom Evans, 21 and Kate James, 20 of Liverpool, England. As an infant, Alfie received several vaccines all at once along with “other medications”, as was reported. He started showing symptoms of illness at about six months with seizures and then his brain began to deteriorate.  Some have speculated that he had a reaction to the vaccines, but that has never been proven.  The hospital in England could not make a diagnosis, and Alfie was eventually put on life support. When the hospital decided nothing more could be done, even though no diagnosis was ever found, they informed the parents he would be removed from life support. His young parents pleaded that life support continue, but they said no.

It was at that point that Bambino Gesu Catholic children’s hospital in Rome, Italy, just a few hundred yards from Vatican City, offered to take Alfie and continue to care for him. “Rome’s Vatican-owned pediatric hospital Bambino Gesù has offered to treat the 23-month-old boy, who has a serious undiagnosed brain condition. The government in Rome has granted Alfie Italian citizenship in a bid to bring him to Italy and beat rulings to let him die.”

I was struck by several profound events that occurred in the final days. First, why would the Italian hospital and doctors give hope to this young couple if there was no hope? They would not offer their services or hospital, with the Pope granting Italian citizenship to Alfie within days to cut through the red tape, unless there was something they had to offer, beyond the British hospital where Alfie lay. At the very least, they seemed to say they would continue to care for him until the parents decided that there was nothing more that could be done.

Second, there was an outcry from thousands in support of the rights of the parents over the hospital, who not only ignored the parents’ request to continue life support, but who wanted to go to Italy to try to save their little boy. I followed the almost daily emails from Dr. Robert Moynihan, who writes The Moynihan Letters and is Editor of ‘Inside the Vatican’ Magazine. I almost hesitated each morning, yet anticipated – hoped – for just a thimble of good news upon opening my email.

Alfie was expected to die within minutes of the removal of his life support. He lived for five days, and they pressed on during those days. They had to beg for water, then nourishment. Candlelight vigils began in St. Peter’s Square in Rome, rosaries prayed for Alfie.  Dr. Moynihan said the following in one email:

As the world’s eyes turn toward England, and the choice the English authorities will make in this case…  …many are also turning inward, in prayer, to construct the ramparts of an impregnable interior castle… …an impregnable interior castle, against any world order or legal system which will diminish or deny the primary right of parents to care for their children……and, with the help of expert doctors, provide them the best possible, loving care, until they are called from this life by God, not man… 

To this end, a rosary will be prayed tonight in St. Peter’s Square, as last night, and the night before, and will be prayed for another six days, making a nine-day novena.

 The prayer, though obviously for young Alfie, is also for Asia Bibi, a 51-year-old Pakistani Christian who was wrongly sentenced to death by hanging for blasphemy in 2010, and has been in prison ever since while her sentence is appealed (link), and for all who suffer attacks against their human dignity and human rights. It is also for own interior conversion, that our actions may not fall short of the high ideal set for us in the Beatitudes, to support those who mourn, to be meek, to be peace-makers…” Dr. Robert Moynihan – The Moynihan Letters April 23, 2018

Moynihan continued via email April 26th:

“The prayer ended. The crowd began to disperse. I said to the Italian woman next to me: “Well, even from his hospital bed, Alfie is changing the world. Even if we can no longer talk about him, and he cannot speak, he’s doing it…” She looked at me quizzically. “We must stop what is happening all over the world, what they are doing to the children,” she replied, quite firmly, with a quite serious look, in a decisive voice…”

Third, I was struck by the movement to pray for our own condition and that of our neighbor, for those imprisoned for their beliefs, and for simply, freedom of the human spirit. This was bigger than Alfie. There was an acknowledgement that an S.O.S was needed from above, that our human condition was also on life support.

What are they doing to the children? What is secular society doing to the rights of families, religion, the fragile and frail among us? Who decides life and death?

Alfie brought people out to pray in the public square for their own interior conversion, for each other, for the world. A little angel barely 24 months of age, unable to speak, made life, holiness and hope a priority again. God bless you Alfie.

Published in General
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 45 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Front Seat Cat (View Comment):

    Also the story reflected the hospital’s refusal to 1. keep Alfie on life support, 2. transfer him to the hospital in Italy where all preparations were done and 3. finally, when the parents wanted to bring him home when 1 and 2 were refused, they were also denied. The biggest outrage seemed to be the loss of control that parents had over their child – and at what point does full socialized medicine take control of such decisions? Are we headed there?

    Yes.

    • #31
  2. Western Chauvinist Member
    Western Chauvinist
    @WesternChauvinist

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Front Seat Cat (View Comment):

    Also the story reflected the hospital’s refusal to 1. keep Alfie on life support, 2. transfer him to the hospital in Italy where all preparations were done and 3. finally, when the parents wanted to bring him home when 1 and 2 were refused, they were also denied. The biggest outrage seemed to be the loss of control that parents had over their child – and at what point does full socialized medicine take control of such decisions? Are we headed there?

    Yes.

    Agreed. We just heard a campaign ad from the Democrat running for governor of Colorado (Jared Polis). He actually says “universal healthcare — Medicare for all”  — as if that’s a good thing!

    • #32
  3. Jules PA Inactive
    Jules PA
    @JulesPA

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Front Seat Cat (View Comment):

    Also the story reflected the hospital’s refusal to 1. keep Alfie on life support, 2. transfer him to the hospital in Italy where all preparations were done and 3. finally, when the parents wanted to bring him home when 1 and 2 were refused, they were also denied. The biggest outrage seemed to be the loss of control that parents had over their child – and at what point does full socialized medicine take control of such decisions? Are we headed there?

    Yes.

    My like on that comment simply reflects my agreement that we are headed that direction. However, I do not like the fact.

    • #33
  4. Jules PA Inactive
    Jules PA
    @JulesPA

    Western Chauvinist (View Comment):
    He actually says “universal healthcare — Medicare for all”

    This calls for a dislike button. 

    • #34
  5. The Reticulator Member
    The Reticulator
    @TheReticulator

    Doctor Robert (View Comment):
    Now I’m elderly, a cancer survivor, exposed at work to many sick people, so I know that my risks of the flu are greater than yours. Since my first cancer I have always taken my flu shots.

    I’m a cancer survivor, elderly by some people’s definition, and haven’t started taking flu shots yet. I can see why working around sick people would matter, but I’m curious as to why the cancer would make a difference in your decision.  (In my case the cancer was prostate cancer.) 

    • #35
  6. Doctor Robert Member
    Doctor Robert
    @DoctorRobert

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Doctor Robert (View Comment):
    Now I’m elderly, a cancer survivor, exposed at work to many sick people, so I know that my risks of the flu are greater than yours. Since my first cancer I have always taken my flu shots.

    I’m a cancer survivor, elderly by some people’s definition, and haven’t started taking flu shots yet. I can see why working around sick people would matter, but I’m curious as to why the cancer would make a difference in your decision. (In my case the cancer was prostate cancer.)

    Great question.  Cancer history is associated with a greater likelihood of elderly pneumonia and flu.  Whether this requires a history of chemotherapy or radiation is not differentiated.

    • #36
  7. CarolJoy Coolidge
    CarolJoy
    @CarolJoy

    AltarGirl (View Comment):

    Doctor Robert (View Comment):
    Reflex anti-vaccinationism gives libertarians and granola crunchers of all stripes a bad name. And it endangers individuals and society alike

    Nobody here has said they were anti-vax.

    We said *cautious*.

    Just because I don’t think my child should get 4 vaccinations in one visit at 3 months old doesn’t mean they aren’t vaccinated.

    For my first, I limited each visit to 2 vaccinations. If there were more, I came back 2 weeks later.

    My last had issues early on which threw his schedule way off. He’ll be up to date this month (after his 3rd birthday).

    Your reflexive condemnation of caution when it comes to our children is unwarranted.

    But that is all they have – the assigning of a label. So it is reminiscent of when Rush Limbaugh stated that when the opposition  brings out the “racist” mantra, you know you are winning.

    The sad thing is, some of those assigning such labels end up at the “Vaccine Safety” Facebook groups, after their child’s life was ruined by the multiple vaccines in one day. Then they are “Oh if only I had listened.” But by then it is too late.

    Sure it is inconvenient to have to come back to the doctors several weeks later. But not anywhere near the inconvenience of having to attend your 15 month olds’ funeral.

    • #37
  8. CarolJoy Coolidge
    CarolJoy
    @CarolJoy

    The Reticulator (View Comment):

    Doctor Robert (View Comment):
    Now I’m elderly, a cancer survivor, exposed at work to many sick people, so I know that my risks of the flu are greater than yours. Since my first cancer I have always taken my flu shots.

    I’m a cancer survivor, elderly by some people’s definition, and haven’t started taking flu shots yet. I can see why working around sick people would matter, but I’m curious as to why the cancer would make a difference in your decision. (In my case the cancer was prostate cancer.)

    I think they tell cancer survivors that their risk of the flu is greater, as the cancer or its treatments leave the individual with a compromised immune system. They also spout off the same thing about elderly people.

    What they don’t tell the public is how often their flu vaccines are released even though the vaccines are determined to be  less effective than a placebo. In 2014-15, I think it was, the flu vaccine was determined to be pointless in terms of dealing with the influenza viral strain that would be present during that flu season. The vaccine had a 23% efficacy rate, while placebos often score 24% or higher.

    • #38
  9. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    I don’t think there were four vaccines that I could be given when I was that age.  Though when we went to France when I was about 7, we got two shots a day twice a week for seven weeks, if I remember correctly.

    • #39
  10. Matt Balzer Member
    Matt Balzer
    @MattBalzer

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    I don’t think there were four vaccines that I could be given when I was that age. Though when we went to France when I was about 7, we got two shots a day twice a week for seven weeks, if I remember correctly.

    It seems to have worked from what I can tell.

    • #40
  11. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Matt Balzer (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    I don’t think there were four vaccines that I could be given when I was that age. Though when we went to France when I was about 7, we got two shots a day twice a week for seven weeks, if I remember correctly.

    It seems to have worked from what I can tell.

    I’m still alive, if that’s what you mean.

    • #41
  12. Matt Balzer Member
    Matt Balzer
    @MattBalzer

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Matt Balzer (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    I don’t think there were four vaccines that I could be given when I was that age. Though when we went to France when I was about 7, we got two shots a day twice a week for seven weeks, if I remember correctly.

    It seems to have worked from what I can tell.

    I’m still alive, if that’s what you mean.

    Well, that and you didn’t get come down with a case of Frenchness.

    • #42
  13. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Matt Balzer (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Matt Balzer (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    I don’t think there were four vaccines that I could be given when I was that age. Though when we went to France when I was about 7, we got two shots a day twice a week for seven weeks, if I remember correctly.

    It seems to have worked from what I can tell.

    I’m still alive, if that’s what you mean.

    Well, that and you didn’t get come down with a case of Frenchness.

    @concretevol tries to disagree, but it’s a stretch.

    • #43
  14. Front Seat Cat Member
    Front Seat Cat
    @FrontSeatCat

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    I don’t think there were four vaccines that I could be given when I was that age. Though when we went to France when I was about 7, we got two shots a day twice a week for seven weeks, if I remember correctly.

    That’s a lot – 14 shots – what was it for? 

    • #44
  15. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Front Seat Cat (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    I don’t think there were four vaccines that I could be given when I was that age. Though when we went to France when I was about 7, we got two shots a day twice a week for seven weeks, if I remember correctly.

    That’s a lot – 14 shots – what was it for?

    Who knows?  All I know is that those airmen giving the shots didn’t give a damn about how they felt to you.

    • #45
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.