Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 39 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. blood thirsty neocon Inactive
    blood thirsty neocon
    @bloodthirstyneocon

    The memo’s help the President:  No obstruction; no collusion; no porn stars.

    • #1
  2. James Gawron Inactive
    James Gawron
    @JamesGawron

    Jon,

    It looks like Comey is the biggest Zero ever to run a major Washington Agency much less the FBI.

    Truly the Comey Comeleon.

    Regards,

    Jim

    • #2
  3. AltarGirl Member
    AltarGirl
    @CM

    He is a strange man. Is this normal for the FBI? The memos are very personal.

    • #3
  4. contrarian Inactive
    contrarian
    @Contrarian

    This didn’t age well:

    • #4
  5. blood thirsty neocon Inactive
    blood thirsty neocon
    @bloodthirstyneocon

    Pres. Trump reminds me of some of the smartest people I know who happen to be over 60 years old:  he says the same things over and over again, and he asks the same questions over and over again. I’m not passing judgement on that. It is what it is.

    • #5
  6. blood thirsty neocon Inactive
    blood thirsty neocon
    @bloodthirstyneocon

    I read the whole thing. It was not a page turner.

    • #6
  7. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Isn’t just amazing that there are zero records on Madame Clinton.  No recordings, memo’s, nothing.  

    For Brutus is an honourable man;

    So are they all, all honourable men–

    • #7
  8. Jules PA Inactive
    Jules PA
    @JulesPA

    I quit reading after a few pages. 

    it reads like a diary that of petty note taking, retelling in a deliberately condescending manner.

    Example, conversation by jigsaw puzzle. 

    Comey doesn’t hide his agenda well, and, as someone else pointed out, is it odd nothing, zero, zilch, nada, on her highness Hillary?

    • #8
  9. Chuckles Coolidge
    Chuckles
    @Chuckles

    Tell me again why these were held back?

    • #9
  10. Eustace C. Scrubb Member
    Eustace C. Scrubb
    @EustaceCScrubb

    I would take the time to read the memos but I need to clean my cat’s litter box.

    • #10
  11. EJHill Podcaster
    EJHill
    @EJHill

    Comey: I sat there in the airplane, looked into my paper cup and contemplated my whine…

    • #11
  12. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Eustace C. Scrubb (View Comment):

    I would take the time to read the memos but I need to clean my cat’s litter box.

    Well hand me them memos, I gotta freshen up the parrot cage. 

    • #12
  13. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    blood thirsty neocon (View Comment):

    Pres. Trump reminds me of some of the smartest people I know who happen to be over 60 years old: he says the same things over and over again, and he asks the same questions over and over again. I’m not passing judgement on that. It is what it is.

    It’s the same for some of us not “the smartest people” you know, too.

    • #13
  14. Fred Houstan Member
    Fred Houstan
    @FredHoustan

    Jules PA (View Comment):
    it reads like a diary that of petty note taking, retelling in a deliberately condescending manner.

    At the gym this morning, excepts from the memo were front and center on CNN, for nearly the entire 5:30 – 6:30 AM time I was on the treadmill. They did their earnest best t0 find whatever dirt they could. CNN has a history of being shrill, this, however, was fumblingly dreadful catty nothingness.

    • #14
  15. blood thirsty neocon Inactive
    blood thirsty neocon
    @bloodthirstyneocon

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    blood thirsty neocon (View Comment):

    Pres. Trump reminds me of some of the smartest people I know who happen to be over 60 years old: he says the same things over and over again, and he asks the same questions over and over again. I’m not passing judgement on that. It is what it is.

    It’s the same for some of us not “the smartest people” you know, too.

    I think it’s wise to repeat yourself. Scott Adams says it’s an essential element of persuasion. You ask the same questions over and over again to see if the answer changes, especially if yo didn’t like the answer the last time you asked.

    • #15
  16. Jamie Lockett Member
    Jamie Lockett
    @JamieLockett

    Sure am glad Trump and Putin discussed the quality of Russian prostitutes. 

    • #16
  17. Jamie Lockett Member
    Jamie Lockett
    @JamieLockett

    Am I the only person who read those memos and thought: Comey has been entirely consistent in his public statements so far? 

    • #17
  18. TBA Coolidge
    TBA
    @RobtGilsdorf

    Jamie Lockett (View Comment):

    Sure am glad Trump and Putin discussed the quality of Russian prostitutes.

    We need to address the Prostitute Gap before it damages our credibility on the world stage. 

    • #18
  19. Umbra of Nex, Fractus Inactive
    Umbra of Nex, Fractus
    @UmbraFractus

    TBA (View Comment):

    Jamie Lockett (View Comment):

    Sure am glad Trump and Putin discussed the quality of Russian prostitutes.

    We need to address the Prostitute Gap before it damages our credibility on the world stage.

    There are so many responses I can come up with here, but none of them are CoC compliant.

    • #19
  20. Chuckles Coolidge
    Chuckles
    @Chuckles

    Jamie Lockett (View Comment):

    Am I the only person who read those memos and thought: Comey has been entirely consistent in his public statements so far?

    You mean he hasn’t said anything worth hearing?

    • #20
  21. Jamie Lockett Member
    Jamie Lockett
    @JamieLockett

    Chuckles (View Comment):

    Jamie Lockett (View Comment):

    Am I the only person who read those memos and thought: Comey has been entirely consistent in his public statements so far?

    You mean he hasn’t said anything worth hearing?

    No, just that his story is pretty consistent. Consistency is usually something to look for when determining truthfulness. 

    • #21
  22. Unsk Member
    Unsk
    @Unsk

    Jamie Lockett:

    “Am I the only person who read those memos and thought: Comey has been entirely consistent in his public statements so far?”

    Apparently so.  Let us hear from the joint statement of Representatives Nunes, Gowdy and Goodlatte:

    ‘These memos are significant for both what is in them and what is not,” begins the joint statement, which goes on to completely dress down the FBI and James Comey: 

    • Former Director Comey’s memos show the President made clear he wanted allegations of collusion, coordination, and conspiracy between his campaign and Russia fully investigated.
    • The memos also made clear the ‘cloud’ President Trump wanted lifted was not the Russian interference in the 2016 election cloud, rather it was the salacious, unsubstantiated allegations related to personal conduct leveled in the dossier. 
    • The memos also show former Director Comey never wrote that he felt obstructed or threatened. he never once mentioned the most relevant fact of all, which was whether he felt obstructed in his investigation.”
    • The memos also make certain what has become increasingly clear of late: former Director Comey has at least two different standards in his interactions with others. He chose not to memorialize conversations with President Obama, Attorney General Lynch, Secretary Clinton, Andrew McCabe or others, but he immediately began to memorialize conversations with President Trump. It is significant former Director Comey made no effort to memorialize conversations with former Attorney General Lynch despite concerns apparently significant enough to warrant his unprecedented appropriation of the charging decision away from her and the Department of Justice in July of 2016
    • These memos also lay bare the notion that former Director Comey is not motivated by animus. He was willing to work for someone he deemed morally unsuited for office, capable of lying, requiring of personal loyalty, worthy of impeachment, and sharing the traits of a mob boss. Former Director Comey was willing to overlook all of the aforementioned characteristics in order to keep his job. In his eyes, the real crime was his own firing.
    • The memos show Comey was blind to biases within the FBI and had terrible judgment with respect to his deputy Andrew McCabe. On multiple occasions he, in his own words, defended the character of McCabe after President Trump questioned McCabe.
    • Finally, former Director Comey leaked at least one of these memos for the stated purpose of spurring the appointment of Special Counsel, yet he took no steps to spur the appointment of Special Counsel when he had significant concerns about the objectivity of the Department of Justice under Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
    • “As we have consistently said, rather than making a criminal case for obstruction or interference with an ongoing investigation, these memos would be Defense Exhibit A should such a charge be made.”

     

     

    • #22
  23. Jamie Lockett Member
    Jamie Lockett
    @JamieLockett

    Unsk (View Comment):

    Jamie Lockett:

    “Am I the only person who read those memos and thought: Comey has been entirely consistent in his public statements so far?”

    Apparently so. Let us hear from the joint statement of Representatives Nunes, Gowdy and Goodlatte:

    ‘These memos are significant for both what is in them and what is not,” begins the joint statement, which goes on to completely dress down the FBI and James Comey:

    • Former Director Comey’s memos show the President made clear he wanted allegations of collusion, coordination, and conspiracy between his campaign and Russia fully investigated.
    • The memos also made clear the ‘cloud’ President Trump wanted lifted was not the Russian interference in the 2016 election cloud, rather it was the salacious, unsubstantiated allegations related to personal conduct leveled in the dossier.
    • The memos also show former Director Comey never wrote that he felt obstructed or threatened. he never once mentioned the most relevant fact of all, which was whether he felt obstructed in his investigation.”
    • The memos also make certain what has become increasingly clear of late: former Director Comey has at least two different standards in his interactions with others. He chose not to memorialize conversations with President Obama, Attorney General Lynch, Secretary Clinton, Andrew McCabe or others, but he immediately began to memorialize conversations with President Trump. It is significant former Director Comey made no effort to memorialize conversations with former Attorney General Lynch despite concerns apparently significant enough to warrant his unprecedented appropriation of the charging decision away from her and the Department of Justice in July of 2016.
    • These memos also lay bare the notion that former Director Comey is not motivated by animus. He was willing to work for someone he deemed morally unsuited for office, capable of lying, requiring of personal loyalty, worthy of impeachment, and sharing the traits of a mob boss. Former Director Comey was willing to overlook all of the aforementioned characteristics in order to keep his job. In his eyes, the real crime was his own firing.
    • The memos show Comey was blind to biases within the FBI and had terrible judgment with respect to his deputy Andrew McCabe. On multiple occasions he, in his own words, defended the character of McCabe after President Trump questioned McCabe.
    • Finally, former Director Comey leaked at least one of these memos for the stated purpose of spurring the appointment of Special Counsel, yet he took no steps to spur the appointment of Special Counsel when he had significant concerns about the objectivity of the Department of Justice under Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
    • “As we have consistently said, rather than making a criminal case for obstruction or interference with an ongoing investigation, these memos would be Defense Exhibit A should such a charge be made.”

    Sorry, which ones of these points demonstrates that Comey has been inconsistent in his statements? These are the interpretations of Nunes, Gowdy and Goodlatte, I think based on what I read in the memo some of them are valid and others aren’t. Then again I’m old enough to remember when Gowdy’s name was mud around here (that is I’m more than a week old).

    • #23
  24. DrewInWisconsin Member
    DrewInWisconsin
    @DrewInWisconsin

    Hee.

    The Comey Memos Read Like The Diary Entries Of A Young Teenager

     

    • #24
  25. Columbo Inactive
    Columbo
    @Columbo

    EJHill (View Comment):

    Comey: I sat there in the airplane, looked into my paper cup and contemplated my whine…


     

    • #25
  26. Kozak Member
    Kozak
    @Kozak

    Unsk (View Comment):
    The memos also make certain what has become increasingly clear of late: former Director Comey has at least two different standards in his interactions with others. He chose not to memorialize conversations with President Obama, Attorney General Lynch, Secretary Clinton, Andrew McCabe or others, but he immediately began to memorialize conversations with President Trump. It is significant former Director Comey made no effort to memorialize conversations with former Attorney General Lynch despite concerns apparently significant enough to warrant his unprecedented appropriation of the charging decision away from her and the Department of Justice in July of 2016

    This. 

    A Thousand Times This.

    • #26
  27. Unsk Member
    Unsk
    @Unsk

    From Sean Davis:

    “As it turns out, however, the information leaked by Comey was classified, and the records in his possession were clearly government records which Comey was not authorized to possess or distribute. How do we know the information was classified? Because the FBI itself told Congress as much. In fact, the information leaked by Comey was so sensitive that members of Congress were not even allowed to read the memos he wrote outside of a Special Compartmented Information Facility, or SCIF, a highly secure room or area designed to prevent classified information consumed within from being improperly distributed.”

    But, but, but  weren’t we  told that Comey was “entirely consistent” in his public statements?  It’s sad but the truth is always  relative to the closed mind of the Leftist Progressive and because of that he or she will never admit that truth particularly when it hurts the Progressive cause.

    • #27
  28. Jamie Lockett Member
    Jamie Lockett
    @JamieLockett

    As it turns out the Memos were apparently classified in December 2017. After Comey was fired and long after he leaked them. They were marked confidential: the lowest level of classification.  Since Comey was an OCA himself at most this amounts to a judgement call and no criminal action. It also appears that someone marked the memos classified after Comey left and after the existence of the memos became public with the express purpose of undermining them once they were released. 

    • #28
  29. Chuckles Coolidge
    Chuckles
    @Chuckles

    Jamie Lockett (View Comment):

    As it turns out the Memos were apparently classified in December 2017. After Comey was fired and long after he leaked them. They were marked confidential: the lowest level of classification. Since Comey was an OCA himself at most this amounts to a judgement call and no criminal action. It also appears that someone marked the memos classified after Comey left and after the existence of the memos became public with the express purpose of undermining them once they were released.

    I don’t know about the motive of the person or persons that marked them “Confidential”, and it maybe different now, but in my time “Confidential” was almost nothing.  Getting clearance for access to confidential material was pretty much just a matter of filling out a form.

    • #29
  30. Unsk Member
    Unsk
    @Unsk

     

    From Zero Hedge:

    “Attorney General Jeff Sessions told the White House recently that he might quit if his President Trump fires Deputy AG, Rod Rosenstein.

    Sessions reportedly warned White House counsel Donald McGahn of his position in a phone call last weekend according to the WaPo, while President Trump’s rage at Rosenstein grew over the Deputy AG’s approval of a raid on Trump attorney Michael Cohen’s home, office and hotel room on April 9 – requested by Special Counsel Robert Mueller. “

    Great! We the people could get a wonderful  two-fer.

    The Constitution demands that Donald Trump “take care” to enforce the laws of these United States.  He has been failing in his job to enforce the law.  He has allowed a cabal of current and previous government officials including Sessions, Rosenstein, Mueller, Comey, Brennan, Lynch et al,  to collude and conspire to  massively obstruct justice in too many numerous ways to count.

     

    Trump should fire Rosenstein immediately to further the cause of justice. Rosenstein has broken the law and cannot in any way continue  lawfully in his role as Deputy Attorney General. 

    Rosenstein approved the extension of a obviously fraudulent FISA warrant and became yet another DOJ/FBI official to commit crimes in the unlawful collusion against Trump. He has a clear conflict of interest in his appointment of his friend  Mueller, with also an obvious bias to protect the many officials he knows and has worked with who should also be prosecuted.  His actions raise serious concerns of  illegal   advocate-witness prohibitions and furthermore he  has also failed to properly supervise the  malicious prosecutorial  conduct of  Mueller.

    Thirteen House Republicans have called  on Attorney General Jeff Sessions to appoint a second special counsel to investigate the actions of Hillary Clinton and her staff, to investigate the Clinton email probe, and the start of the investigation into Russia’s election meddling and alleged surveillance abuses by the FBI.

    Sessions refuses to appoint this absolutely justified  Special Counsel investigating  these incredibly  serious allegations  of massive wrongdoing by government officials. These allegations have been backed by mountains  of evidence, so it would be a serious miscarriage of justice and an incredible assault  against the rule of law if such lawbreaking  were allowed to go unpunished. But that is exactly what Sessions has tried to do.  Sessions has tried to avoid and stymie  almost any attempt at investigating these horrendously illegal abuses  of the FBI and DOJ.  Jeff Sessions has purposely avoided his responsibility to take care to enforce the law and as such he should be fired immediately. So if he quits over the firing of Rosenstein, so be it.  

    Furthermore, if Rosenstein is fired,  the new Solicitor General and Trump appointee Noel Francisco takes over the supervision  of the  seriously troubled Mueller investigation and could call for a new Special Counsel investigating the DOJ/FBI abuses. We could only hope that happens and that we may have finally some justice  coming out of our “Department of Justice”.

    • #30
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.