Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
A Proposal on Embassy Locations
128 countries have decided that they have every right to tell another nation what can and cannot be its capital city. Each of these countries marked in green has said that Jerusalem is not Israel’s capital city and that agreeing with Israel that it is should be punished.
Let us extend the principle. If one nation can tell another nation what its capital is, then it follows that the United States can declare for those nations where their capitals are. Instead of having to put our embassies close to their governments and where they think their capitals are, we can put our embassies in places convenient for us.
- Oh, look, the United Kingdom has endorsed this principle. So, we can move our embassy to their new capital, according to us, of Brighton. Less traffic, fewer people, lower real estate prices, and it’s a nice seaside town.
- Who else do we have? Japan? New capital on the island of Iwo Jima, perhaps?
- Zimbabwe? Nobody wants to actually be in Zimbabwe. Let’s move their capital to somewhere more convenient, like Newark, New Jersey. Nobody wants to be there, either, but it’s much more convenient than Harare.
- The Principality of Andorra? Wait, we don’t have an embassy or other mission in Andorra. Well, that’s okay. We’ll move the capitals of both Spain and France there, and then we will have an embassy there.
If they complain, we just say, “But in the UN, you said…”
Published in Humor
To save time for all involved we should move every Muslim nation’s embassy to Malmo, Sweden.
Or as it is more correctly now known as Malmo D.I.–District of Islam
Is that what the US statement said? That Jerusalem is unitary, and cannot be divided?
Palestine doesn’t have borders because Palestine doesn’t exist.
Why does South Korea vote against the USA on this? What is their involvement in the Middle East? I say the USA declare Busan
the capital of South Korea. It’s right on the ocean…lovely. Besides, Seoul is indefensible. We have 25ooo troops “defending” that city. Actually our troops are but canaries in that coal mine. This world in which we live is crazy and our leaders have allowed it to be crazy for far too many years. Another win for President Trump…that is what this is.
Here’s some creative thinking I can endorse.
I was with you until this point. Brighton is full of leftist SJWs who would just make trouble protesting at our embassy. They favored Remain about 70/30. I suggest the Isle of Wight instead, just a bit west of Brighton. Consider the following advantages:
Plus the fact that it’s Isle of White. It’ll make the left crazy.
The way I understand it, many Palestinian Arabs voluntarily left their homes, expecting to reclaim them when the Arabs won the war. It didn’t quite work out.
I hated that song.
Good thing that guy’s sinister.
That’s not what Nicky Haley said.
I was thinking kind of hot.
Non sequiter.
The “sinister” was for Arahant’s benefit. I meant left-handed.
From the 6 December statement by President Trump: “We are not taking a position of any final status issues, including the specific boundaries of the Israeli sovereignty in Jerusalem …”
That doesn’t read, to me like a stance that Jerusalem cannot be divided between Israel and an Arab Palestinian state. It appears to be leaving the door open to some sort of partition.
Okay. I’m with you.
Zafar, my friend, no matter how much we disagree, including on what sex is hot, I love you, man. You just gave me a great laugh.
Well, he is now.
So is breaking and entering in that case, so long as one watches the television one stole.
No, it’s really not.
I didn’t think so, either.
According to the American Friends Service Committee:
Helpfully:
It’s probably not very important to you, but the “Right of Return” would destroy Israel. Maybe they should compensate those Palestinians who lost property. Maybe they have.
You’re right. I don’t have any belief in the right of states to exist, and I have no sympathy for ethno-religious states – be they Israel or Saudi or whatever. I don’t see this as a morally important argument, and perhaps it isn’t meant as one?
Imho I, as an individual, have the right to exist and so do you – but wo do not have the right to exist by displacing other people so that we can live in some sort of ethn0-religious majority state – that’s stretching my individual right to exist so that it takes away yours, iow.
I’m pretty sure they haven’t. I mean they’re still arguing about angels on pinheads wrt someone running away due to fear of violence isn’t a refugee the way someone who was forced away by the barrel of a gun is a refugee. What next? Only people who’ve lost limbs qualify?
It doesn’t give me a lot of confidence in their good faith, just saying.
Are you completely certain that the Israeli authorities are making any arguments like this? What some of us may be chatting about, from a considerable distance, and no actual skin in the game, based on hearsay from other people similarly situated – may not track closely with the real details.
Well, I guess that pretty much settles that one then. Since the “Palestinians” don’t recognize the right of Israel to exist, and they celebrate the murders of Israeli citizens, they clearly don’t wish to live “at peace” with their neighbors, and thus the rest of what you cite does not apply.
Or maybe not so helpful, at least in the way you intend it. If they were not “forced” to flee, but instead left voluntarily, in order to clear the way for their friends to drive the Israelis into the sea, intending to return as soon as the land had been rendered Judenfrei, then they don’t fit the definition.
@miffedwhitemale
So would you accept proof that individual Palestinians wish to live in peace, and that many Palestinians really were driven or frightened away in 1948 by outfits like the Stern Gang, as meaning that Israel should let this Palestinians return to their homes in Jaffa and Haifa?
Iow: are your outcomes based on principles, or are your principles selected to suit outcomes?
I admit this is a surprising thing to hear from a a citizen of a country that sends Israel almost $4 billion a year. I would have imagined you’d never more interested in the details.
Anyway, here is a reasonably constructive paper which I think is quite interesting:
https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/files/chathamhouse/field/field_document/20140305IsraeliPerspectivesPalestinianRefugee.pdf
But the Palestinians have made it clear that there will be no room for “Israelis” (Jews) in any Palestinian State. Or as Mahmoud Abbas- that great man of peace- might put it, there will be no Jews with their “filthy feet” in Palestine. Is there any other place in the World where the international community would support/demand the creation of a State where a group of people would be completely excluded by reason of their religion or ethnicity?