“Call Me Ishmael”

 

I love to read. Always have. I’ve probably read hundreds of books. Starting with our family’s World Book encyclopedias and aging Tom Swift melodramas through a forest of sci-fi and non-fiction. Plus, whenever I drive, I love to listen to books. I’ve used Audible to listen to the latest offerings and LibriVox for older in-the-public-domain works.

Recently turning 58, I started to think it was high time I tackled some of the classics that I’ve shunned my entire life. Why have I shunned these tomes? I’m ashamed to say they looked too heavy, in literary depth as well as weight. But, chastising myself for being such a lazy lout, I’ve started to take on these “serious” titles. For instance, I’m a few pages into the infamous War and Peace after having read a scholarly volume about the Napoleonic wars from a Russian viewpoint.

But, getting back to the title of my post, I’ve just completed listening to Melville’s Moby Dick, or the Whale as read by a wonderful reciter by the name of Stewart Wills. If it had not been for the precise and melodious elocution of Mr. Wills, I don’t think I could have gotten through those 135 chapters and epilogue.

I’m no literary scholar and I won’t attempt to parse Melville very deeply other than to say that he must have been an interminable bore at parties. I mean, whole chapters dedicated to whales as captured in art through history? Another on every aspect of the word “white?” It goes on and on. Yet, I was riveted by every word. And it came to me, by the end, that this book has nothing and everything to do with 19th-century whaling.

How could it be both? I don’t know, but Melville must have been a genius. I now feel as though I have enough whaling knowledge to match any salty Nantucketer. But also, never, in any horror movie, have I been closer to simultaneously understanding and abhorring a man’s descent into insanity. My previous popular-but-vague perception of Ahab had been that he was an evil tyrannical ship’s captain bent on destroying himself and his crew. But I knew nothing. Melville’s depiction of a man’s mind being torn in two left me unexpectedly moved. I was motivated to pity him, to loathe him, to empathize with him.

How do I sum this ramble up? First, I whole heartedly recommend this LibriVox recording. Thank you Mr. Wills. Secondly, Melville, you magnificent [expletive], I read your book (or at least listened to it.) Third, maybe I’ll have given someone else the courage to take on a long-avoided work of literature.

Published in Literature
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by a Ricochet Editor at the recommendation of Ricochet members. Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 48 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Doctor Robert Member
    Doctor Robert
    @DoctorRobert

    LC (View Comment):
    I have nothing to say about Moby-Dick mainly because I never read past the first chapter. It was a crashing bore and I read Marcel Proust’s.

    Marcel Proust’s what?  Did you fall asleep typing?

    Read it, you will come out better for the experience.

    • #31
  2. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Doctor Robert (View Comment):
    Cynics like Randy who object to the length and tempo of the book

    Even the people who know me best would hardly call me a cynic.  I suppose that we’re just going to have to disagree about the merits of Moby Dick.

    • #32
  3. Skyler Coolidge
    Skyler
    @Skyler

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Doctor Robert (View Comment):
    Cynics like Randy who object to the length and tempo of the book

    Even the people who know me best would hardly call me a cynic. I suppose that we’re just going to have to disagree about the merits of Moby Dick.

    My family is from Nantucket, so it’s against the law for me to say something bad about Herman Melville or his works.

    But it is a, ahem, challenge to read that leaves most readers with the impression, accurate, that Melville was paid for length, not brevity.

    • #33
  4. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Skyler (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Doctor Robert (View Comment):
    Cynics like Randy who object to the length and tempo of the book

    Even the people who know me best would hardly call me a cynic. I suppose that we’re just going to have to disagree about the merits of Moby Dick.

    My family is from Nantucket, so it’s against the law for me to say something bad about Herman Melville or his works.

    But it is a, ahem, challenge to read that leaves most readers with the impression, accurate, that Melville was paid for length, not brevity.

    When you’re paid by the word, you’re going to use a lot of them.  Not saying that Melville was, you understand.

    • #34
  5. Skyler Coolidge
    Skyler
    @Skyler

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Skyler (View Comment):

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Doctor Robert (View Comment):
    Cynics like Randy who object to the length and tempo of the book

    Even the people who know me best would hardly call me a cynic. I suppose that we’re just going to have to disagree about the merits of Moby Dick.

    My family is from Nantucket, so it’s against the law for me to say something bad about Herman Melville or his works.

    But it is a, ahem, challenge to read that leaves most readers with the impression, accurate, that Melville was paid for length, not brevity.

    When you’re paid by the word, you’re going to use a lot of them. Not saying that Melville was, you understand.

    You know, I had always assumed that it was published as a serial, as was Dickens.  I guess it’s not true.  Melville wasn’t paid for monthly installments like Dickens.  He’s just monstrously wordy without that encouragement.  :)

    • #35
  6. Seawriter Contributor
    Seawriter
    @Seawriter

    Randy Webster (View Comment):
    When you’re paid by the word, you’re going to use a lot of them. Not saying that Melville was, you understand.

    Alexandre Dumas was paid by the column inch. That is why a lot of his paragraphs have one sentence with one to three words. Stuff like:

    “He said that?”

    “Yes”

    “Incredible”

    “It’s true!”

    What to do, then?”

    Why, charge!

    Twelve words – one column inch.

    Seawriter

    • #36
  7. J. D. Fitzpatrick Member
    J. D. Fitzpatrick
    @JDFitzpatrick

    Unmentioned as of yet is all the humor in Moby Dick. In particular, the chapters on whaling satirize the pretensions of the narrator, or perhaps the pretensions of the typological biblical criticism of Melville’s day.

    Akin to the adventure of Perseus and Andromeda—indeed, by some supposed to be indirectly derived from it—is that famous story of St. George and the Dragon; which dragon I maintain to have been a whale; for in many old chronicles whales and dragons are strangely jumbled together, and often stand for each other. “Thou art as a lion of the waters, and as a dragon of the sea,” saith Ezekiel; hereby, plainly meaning a whale; in truth, some versions of the Bible use that word itself. Besides, it would much subtract from the glory of the exploit had St. George but encountered a crawling reptile of the land, instead of doing battle with the great monster of the deep. Any man may kill a snake, but only a Perseus, a St. George, a Coffin, have the heart in them to march boldly up to a whale.

    How can you not smile the whole time you are reading this? :)

    • #37
  8. J. D. Fitzpatrick Member
    J. D. Fitzpatrick
    @JDFitzpatrick

    BTW, if you ever thought A Tale of Two Cities was boring, get the Audible edition read by Andrew Sachs. Absolutely brilliant vocal acting.

    • #38
  9. Skyler Coolidge
    Skyler
    @Skyler

    J. D. Fitzpatrick (View Comment):
    BTW, if you ever thought A Tale of Two Cities was boring, get the Audible edition read by Andrew Sachs. Absolutely brilliant vocal acting.

    I’ll pass. I still have flashbacks of wading through that in high school.  Dickens is the most over rated author since Melville.  (Don’t tell my family I said that.)

     

    • #39
  10. SParker Member
    SParker
    @SParker

    Seawriter (View Comment):
    It put me to sleep commuting to work in the morning on Beltway 8. (Not advised.)

    No doubt about it, certain books aren’t good in certain situations.  I can personally recommend never reading The Death of Ivan Illych on an airplane.  Tolstoy didn’t have a lot to say about air travel, but his depiction of death is just way too convincing.  Similarly never give The Magic Mountain to someone in bed with a chest cold or the flu.  You may think you’re doing them a favor.  But you’re not.  You sadistic bastard.  Why not give them a recording of La Boheme to play when they’ve tired of reading while you’re at it if you really hate them?  Also The Metamorphosis or Bartleby the Scrivener or the Aubrey/Maturin book where Maturin has whatever godawful fever it was (did this to myself a couple of years ago racked with fever and chills) will not cheer an invalid, it simply won’t.  On the other hand E.T.A. Hoffmann stories in combination with codeine cough syrup and a high fever is interesting.   But really gilding the lily, like taking LSD and going to see Fantasia.

    • #40
  11. Stina Member
    Stina
    @CM

    J. D. Fitzpatrick (View Comment):
    BTW, if you ever thought A Tale of Two Cities was boring, get the Audible edition read by Andrew Sachs. Absolutely brilliant vocal acting.

    This is my favorite Dickens novel.

    It is Great Expectations I struggle with. Moby Dick is a good story, I just don’t think I can wade through the words to understand what Melville wants me to take away. Same as GE. Maybe when I am older, and time and distraction are not issues, I may appreciate both more, like Doctor Robert. But for now, the scant attention I can pay to a wall of text kind of necessitates points arising quickly.

    • #41
  12. Larry Koler Inactive
    Larry Koler
    @LarryKoler

    Eugene Kriegsmann (View Comment):
    However, my favorite moments in the book come when Ishmael and Quequeg share the room in the inn, and the sermon in the Nantucket church.

    I love this performance of Father Mapple by Orson Welles:

    • #42
  13. Eugene Kriegsmann Member
    Eugene Kriegsmann
    @EugeneKriegsmann

    Larry Koler (View Comment):
    I love this performance of Father Mapple by Orson Welles:

    I first saw the movie sited when I was too young to read the novel. The scene with Orson Welles remained permanently was embedded in my mind so that each time I read the book I see Orson Welles as he played the character. The entire scene is extremely true to the text right down to the minister climbing ratlines to get up to his pulpit. It was a marvelous film. Gregory Peck’s Ahab was a work of genius.

    • #43
  14. Skyler Coolidge
    Skyler
    @Skyler

    Larry Koler (View Comment):

    Eugene Kriegsmann (View Comment):
    However, my favorite moments in the book come when Ishmael and Quequeg share the room in the inn, and the sermon in the Nantucket church.

    I love this performance of Father Mapple by Orson Welles:

    I’m sorry, but I really like Orson Welles and even he couldn’t make that scene not be excruciatingly boring.

    • #44
  15. Penfold Member
    Penfold
    @Penfold

    Boring?    Boring?  I’m a few chapters into “War and Peace” now and if I have to read through one more French-laden scene of these boring characters visiting each other in their salons, I’m gonna need resuscitation.  W&P makes MD read like an action-packed car chase from cover to cover.

    • #45
  16. Randy Webster Inactive
    Randy Webster
    @RandyWebster

    Penfold (View Comment):
    Boring? Boring? I’m a few chapters into “War and Peace” now and if I have to read through one more French-laden scene of these boring characters visiting each other in their salons, I’m gonna need resuscitation. W&P makes MD read like an action-packed car chase from cover to cover.

    I didn’t think W&P was that bad, though I listened to it rather than read it.  I liked it better than I liked Anna Karenina.  I have to say that I wasn’t ready for a two hour disquisition on free will at the end.

    • #46
  17. Doctor Robert Member
    Doctor Robert
    @DoctorRobert

    I don’t understand you guys.

    Moby Dick isn’t boring.

    There’s a couple hundred pages of exposition, character setting, mood defining and whale learning.  Followed by 100 pages of the most thrilling dramatic writing in the American canon.

    I read the three days of The Chase (chapters 133-35 in MD) in three days the first time. This time, I intend to do it at one sitting.

    And Melville was not paid by the word nor was MD a serial novel.  He wrote it in longhand in Pittsfield MA, sending copies to publishers in London and NYC. Meaning that he had to copy it out at least thrice…unless he hired Bartelby the Scrivener to help!

    • #47
  18. Front Seat Cat Member
    Front Seat Cat
    @FrontSeatCat

    Your ramble is music to my ears! I’m late to this post, but I love books too.  I too, have started grabbing books that have graced my bookshelves for years, thanks to my sister.   She scours libraries sales, Goodwill, yard sales. throughout the backwoods of the mountain towns and Amish country of MD and PA. I’m the recipient of her goldmines. I love Agatha Christie, have found spy novels, novels on WWII written by those who were there, the Peter Mayle series, now I just started Station Wagon in France by Francis Parkinson Keyes. I grab books by Ellery Queen, Mother Theresa, C.S. Lewis, Brad Thor, lots of CIA history books, American history, and even children’s books with wonderful drawings like The Wind and the Willows – I’m catching up too – and enjoying every minute. The back porch on an autumn afternoon is a great place to catch up!!

    • #48
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.