Ricochet is the best place on the internet to discuss the issues of the day, either through commenting on posts or writing your own for our active and dynamic community in a fully moderated environment. In addition, the Ricochet Audio Network offers over 50 original podcasts with new episodes released every day.
#NotMyFirstLady
It is well known that dictatorial regimes employ religious symbolism to appropriate God to their secular causes. The National Socialists in Germany in the ’30s (i.e., the Nazis) were an outstanding example of this, endorsing “positive Christianity” and asserting that “God is with us” on propaganda posters. The Trump regime has now taken the next step on their road to ultimate power by sending the First Lady of the United States, whom many until now regarded as an innocent, simpleton concubine of the great leader, to lead a mass rally of sheep in the Lord’s Prayer as a preliminary to a Trump rally.
So it begins.
Ms. Trump’s choice of prayer, also known to Christians as the “Our Father,” was clearly a deliberate attempt to invoke the idea of the Fatherland. The prayer is filled with autocratic, monarchial imagery of a subservient people, thanking the leader for a crust of bread and begging for pardon from the king. Numerous observant SJWs noted that Melania Trump, dressed in bright red reminiscent of the Nazi flag, appeared to read the prayer, and that her middle European accent was comical when it wasn’t blood chilling. Some even suggested that her hair was more blonde than usual.
Leni Riefenstahl could not have arranged a better motif and more convincing imagery for a dictatorship rally. But free Americans standing together for the rights of all races and creeds, for immigrants and for women and for the oppressed LGBTQ community are not duped by this vulgar circus. The case for impeachment is even stronger now with the wanton attempt by the First Lady to establish a state religion in violation of the first amendment.
Now is not the time to falter or sleep. Now is the time to maintain the #Resistance.
#NotMyFirstLady! Right on!
[On this week’s edition of the Harvard Lunch Club Political Podcast we will be joined by Washington Examiner columnist Byron York. Tune in!]
That’s so meta! Not getting what the OP was the satirical part.
Those who made it past “Some even suggested that her hair was more blonde than usual” and didn’t realize the point of it! Wow. It’s the conservative with no humor that also lacks any notion of a slow, incremental success. Mock thine enemy, or at least your ideological foe.
Maybe it’s “fake satire”, no?
Not very good satire. Or possibly lousy satire.
Usually when something is satire, since the internet lacks intonation, there is an indication of satire found somewhere on the page – in a category listing, before or after the column, etc.
But thank you to those who pointed out that this is satire. I was about to bust a cap in Michael Stopa’s rear-end.
Do better.
Anyone who could read this post and not instantly get the joke really needs to take a step away from the internet for a week or two.
This was so obviously satire, it was closer to parody. I checked if it’s a full moon today (not even close), then I understood that Ricochetti are mad with grief at Milo’s, brutal, Matthew Sheppard-like treatment by CPAC. There is a time for humor, and a time for sackcloth and ashes; this is the later. Even Leno waited a week before doing jokes again after 9/11. Mr. Stopa, you could at least show that much restraint.
The problem is other posts by distinguished contributors that should be satire, but are serious. Takes satire to another level here.
This one struck me as about as subtle as George Carlin’s seven words you can’t say on television.
I can’t tell whether the people who are claiming that they didn’t recognize this post as satire are themselves engaged in satire, or not. Such is the world in which we have come to find ourselves. I’m very sure, though, that if this was posted on Facebook it would go viral as it was shared by people who take it dead seriously.
So, you’re saying “too soon”?
Doesn’t one need to know the contributor to recognize satire? We have other contributors at Ricochet for whom such recognition would not occur. Since it was not of the @michaelhenry style I kept waiting for the turnabout since I do know @Michael Stopa
Actually, some of the best satire I’ve read here. The OP sustained it all the way through without faltering.
A technique to inspire conversation?
On the contrary, It’s possibly too good. It nestles right up against Poe’s Law. If Michael Stopa wasn’t the author and/or I read it over at Salon, I would think it was completely in earnest.
And on the main feed it gets readers of all political persuasions and perhaps causes some who otherwise would not to read more Ricochet. And the commentary is better than what we would see if it were one of our contributors doing a serious post.
Personally I think the writers who are the greatest at satire here are Zubrin and Epstein.
The Lightbringer!
Is it satire or performance art on their part?
That’s his gesture for slowing the rising of the oceans. Or healing our planet. Or hailing a cab. One of those.
Susan Quinn (View Comment):
I got married to the widow next door. She’s been married seven times before.
And every on was an ‘enery; ‘ENERY!!! Never was a Willie or a Sam.
Would someone please tell me what the hell we are talking about? Tks. MH
OK. Now I get it. Thanks for your patience. My thinking is a bit muddled because I’ve just left the my dentist. He gives out these little cannisters of Nitrous Oxide now instead of mini-tubes of Colgate and dental floss. I’m seeing him once a week, now. Teeth are fine, but he has some serious gas(N.O. variety).
See what I mean?
The reference to the “oppressed LGBTQ community” was the give-away. Not even the most anti-Trump conservative could write that.
This post could, however, have been placed word for word on many leftist sites, without raising the slightest suspicion that it was trollery. I’m not sure something that pitch-perfect can be seen as successful satire. What if I plagiarized an actual post from some leftist site and posted it here, or on another leftist site? Would I be able to claim I had successfully trolled someone if they took it seriously, given that its original author had intended it to be taken seriously? There has to be some clue in there, beyond the identity of the poster and everyone’s foreknowledge of how that poster thinks, that the post is satire.
That said, since I know Michael’s writing, I had a good laugh. Sometimes it seems that leftist ranting is beyond parody anyway.
You are one sick puppy.
Grow up, you see what you are programmed to see.
I thought it was nice.
No, I have been conditioned by reading the Washington Post to truly believe this could be a leftist theory.
I am actually still unsure it is satire.
It is a falsehood that the Nazis had any interest in religion, they were an odd bunch, but religious: no.
The Christian Churches were not cooperative and so they started their own version, to try to marginalize the churches. The Positive Christianity of Kerrl’s Minister for Church Affairs removed the Jewish roots and became an anti-Jewish voice.
The Confessing Church, which included Martin Niemöller and Dietrich Bonhoeffer were strident opponents.