Contributor Post Created with Sketch. #NotMyFirstLady

 

It is well known that dictatorial regimes employ religious symbolism to appropriate God to their secular causes. The National Socialists in Germany in the ’30s (i.e., the Nazis) were an outstanding example of this, endorsing “positive Christianity” and asserting that “God is with us” on propaganda posters. The Trump regime has now taken the next step on their road to ultimate power by sending the First Lady of the United States, whom many until now regarded as an innocent, simpleton concubine of the great leader, to lead a mass rally of sheep in the Lord’s Prayer as a preliminary to a Trump rally.

So it begins.

Ms. Trump’s choice of prayer, also known to Christians as the “Our Father,” was clearly a deliberate attempt to invoke the idea of the Fatherland. The prayer is filled with autocratic, monarchial imagery of a subservient people, thanking the leader for a crust of bread and begging for pardon from the king. Numerous observant SJWs noted that Melania Trump, dressed in bright red reminiscent of the Nazi flag, appeared to read the prayer, and that her middle European accent was comical when it wasn’t blood chilling. Some even suggested that her hair was more blonde than usual.

Leni Riefenstahl could not have arranged a better motif and more convincing imagery for a dictatorship rally. But free Americans standing together for the rights of all races and creeds, for immigrants and for women and for the oppressed LGBTQ community are not duped by this vulgar circus. The case for impeachment is even stronger now with the wanton attempt by the First Lady to establish a state religion in violation of the first amendment.

Now is not the time to falter or sleep. Now is the time to maintain the #Resistance.

#NotMyFirstLady! Right on!

[On this week’s edition of the Harvard Lunch Club Political Podcast we will be joined by Washington Examiner columnist Byron York. Tune in!]

 

There are 103 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Kay of MT Member

    I neither know nor remember what every member post on Ricochet. Being hearing impaired I do not listen to the podcast or radio type input. So what anyone post is what I read and will comment on. It might be helpful if at the end of your post you state it is satire. And to be honest, I am sick to death of all the negative snark and “satire” regarding our President and his First Lady.

    • #31
    • February 20, 2017, at 11:51 AM PST
    • Like
  2. Stad Coolidge

    Kay of MT (View Comment):
    If you have nothing better to do than to insult our First Lady, then find a food bank or something to volunteer your services.

    Kay, it’s satire – like my recent song parody was. I think Melania Trump is a 100% class act, so the Left is trying to denegrate her as tabloid headline fodder in the grocery store checkout line. Rest assured, Michelle Obama is nowhere near Melania when it comes to poise, good taste, and . . . okay, this is superficial . . . good fashion sense.

    • #32
    • February 20, 2017, at 11:53 AM PST
    • Like
  3. She Reagan
    SheJoined in the first year of Ricochet Ricochet Charter Member

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Columbo (View Comment):
    All together now … I’m Michael Henry the 8th I Am …

    Darn it, Columbo–now I’m going to be singing that stupid song all afternoon!

    It is an earworm, that’s for sure. Did you know the original of that song is over a hundred years old?

    • #33
    • February 20, 2017, at 11:58 AM PST
    • Like
  4. Jules PA Member

    MarciN (View Comment):

    Michael Stopa (View Comment):

    JLocked (View Comment):
    To be fair, I just always side-swipe on account of Harvard. I do feel bad for Mr. Stopa — first the back 9 and now this shank — some days it isn’t worth climbing down from your Pennyfarthing.

    (one more)

    *Shank!!!* A touch! The red stream flows.

    Look at it this way, half the people thought I was serious.

    You did such a good job that you fooled me too, at least halfway through.

    I’m glad you did it. It showed me how serious the problem is right now with what the Democrats are writing and reading.

    I think that is the part that takes me aback: that there are people who believe, and look for, and promote those kinds of connections, as truth.

    I understand the satire, but angry mobs, not so much.

    • #34
    • February 20, 2017, at 12:06 PM PST
    • Like
  5. Michael Stopa Contributor
    Michael Stopa

    Damocles (View Comment):
    Everybody who (a) was fooled or (b) had a great laugh should go buy Michael a cup of coffee now!

    http://harvardlunchclub.com

    Damocles: your cut is in the mail!

    • #35
    • February 20, 2017, at 12:21 PM PST
    • Like
  6. Crazy Horse Inactive

    Michael Stopa (View Comment):

    Damocles (View Comment):
    Everybody who (a) was fooled or (b) had a great laugh should go buy Michael a cup of coffee now!

    http://harvardlunchclub.com

    Damocles: your cut is in the mail!

    I’m sorry, I can’t let this one just float over home plate

    • #36
    • February 20, 2017, at 12:24 PM PST
    • Like
  7. MJBubba Inactive

    Vance Richards (View Comment):

    Misthiocracy (View Comment):

    I thought this was pretty obviously humor . . . although we do have a couple of contributors who could post this word for word while maintaining a straight face.

    Which is why it is so easy to read it straight up. It is not so much different from anti-Trump posts we have seen on the Ricochet main feed.

    • #37
    • February 20, 2017, at 2:07 PM PST
    • Like
  8. Damocles Inactive

    MJBubba (View Comment):

    Vance Richards (View Comment):

    Misthiocracy (View Comment):

    I thought this was pretty obviously humor . . . although we do have a couple of contributors who could post this word for word while maintaining a straight face.

    Which is why it is so easy to read it straight up. It is not so much different from anti-Trump posts we have seen on the Ricochet main feed.

    And it was by a Ricochet podcaster, that’s two points in favor of it being real!

    • #38
    • February 20, 2017, at 2:09 PM PST
    • Like
  9. Crazy Horse Inactive

    I do feel bad for always throwing Mr. Stopa shade as I enjoy the podcast and he’s good about minimal preening and hand-steepling for a Crimson dude. But still, it’s Harvard, and I took a solemn oath to always kick sand.

    • #39
    • February 20, 2017, at 2:15 PM PST
    • Like
  10. RushBabe49 Thatcher

    Henry the Eighth is prominent in my internal tape that plays in my head all day. I like to practice my cockney accent when singing it in my head or out loud when nobody’s around.

    • #40
    • February 20, 2017, at 2:44 PM PST
    • Like
  11. Michael Stopa Contributor
    Michael Stopa

    RushBabe49 (View Comment):
    Henry the Eighth is prominent in my internal tape that plays in my head all day. I like to practice my cockney accent when singing it in my head or out loud when nobody’s around.

    But what’s next on the album? “Mrs. Brown You’ve Got a Lovely Daughter?” If I sing Henry VIII through it should just come to me.

    • #41
    • February 20, 2017, at 2:59 PM PST
    • Like
  12. Crazy Horse Inactive

    • #42
    • February 20, 2017, at 3:26 PM PST
    • Like
  13. Percival Thatcher
    PercivalJoined in the first year of Ricochet Ricochet Charter Member

    JLocked, my dad still has that album.

    • #43
    • February 20, 2017, at 4:30 PM PST
    • Like
  14. Crazy Horse Inactive

    Percival (View Comment):
    JLocked, my dad still has that album.

    Because real Gs listen to The Kingston Trio!

    • #44
    • February 20, 2017, at 4:32 PM PST
    • Like
  15. GrannyDude Member

    I like Melania’s accent. And she seems like a good Mum.

    I do have a question though: why didn’t her family come to the Inauguration? Where are they?

    • #45
    • February 20, 2017, at 6:10 PM PST
    • Like
  16. Jules PA Member

    Kate Braestrup (View Comment):
    I like Melania’s accent. And she seems like a good Mum.

    I do have a question though: why didn’t her family come to the Inauguration? Where are they?

    Is her family in the states?

    • #46
    • February 20, 2017, at 6:16 PM PST
    • Like
  17. WinterMute Coolidge

    I liked it. I do worry about Mike’s mental state given that he could produce such a perfect simulacrum of leftist hysteria, though. I’ll chip in a few bucks to the HLC Psychiatric Fund as my good deed for the day.

    • #47
    • February 20, 2017, at 6:24 PM PST
    • Like
  18. Chuck Thatcher

    JLocked (View Comment):

    Please tell Yakov Smirnoff that he’s better than this.

    Great show that guy has!

    • #48
    • February 20, 2017, at 6:39 PM PST
    • Like
  19. Randy Webster Member

    Misthiocracy (View Comment):

    You need to pay more attention.

    • #49
    • February 20, 2017, at 6:42 PM PST
    • Like
  20. MJBubba Inactive

    WinterMute (View Comment):
    I liked it. I do worry about Mike’s mental state given that he could produce such a perfect simulacrum of leftist hysteria, though. I’ll chip in a few bucks to the HLC Psychiatric Fund as my good deed for the day.

    Well, we learned long ago that conservatives do much better at predicting Leftist reactions than Leftists do at predicting conservatives’ reactions.

    • #50
    • February 20, 2017, at 6:58 PM PST
    • Like
  21. The Reticulator Member

    I thought it was pretty funny – good satire – even though I just posted comment this in another thread:

    Early in his administration Bill Clinton flashed his Bible and then climbed into a pulpit and proclaimed his crime bill to be the will of God. I’ve criticized and mocked that behavior many times since then.

    When politicians do that sort of thing or use public prayer to attach God’s name to their own agenda, it’s a violation of Executive Order #2: “Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain.” (Some religious groups may use a different numbering system for these orders.)

    • #51
    • February 20, 2017, at 7:02 PM PST
    • Like
  22. Hypatia Inactive

    MJBubba (View Comment):

    Vance Richards (View Comment):

    Misthiocracy (View Comment):

    I thought this was pretty obviously humor . . . although we do have a couple of contributors who could post this word for word while maintaining a straight face.

    Which is why it is so easy to read it straight up. It is not so much different from anti-Trump posts we have seen on the Ricochet main feed.

    Yes. It really frightened me–but the relief when I realized it was satire was like waking from a nightmare! So THAT was a pleasure!

    • #52
    • February 20, 2017, at 7:15 PM PST
    • Like
  23. Quake Voter Inactive

    Misthiocracy (View Comment):

    First paragraph is finest parody of Jay Nordlinger I’ve read to date.

    • #53
    • February 20, 2017, at 7:17 PM PST
    • Like
  24. Profile Photo Member

    Michael Stopa (View Comment):

    JLocked (View Comment):
    To be fair, I just always side-swipe on account of Harvard. I do feel bad for Mr. Stopa — first the back 9 and now this shank — some days it isn’t worth climbing down from your Pennyfarthing.

    (one more)

    *Shank!!!* A touch! The red stream flows.

    Look at it this way, half the people thought I was serious.

    I recall @roblong writing about the difficulty of satirizing the Clinton administration because every time he came up with a ridiculous idea for a column they would do something even more outlandish.

    • #54
    • February 20, 2017, at 7:25 PM PST
    • Like
  25. Michael Stopa Contributor
    Michael Stopa

    WinterMute (View Comment):
    I liked it. I do worry about Mike’s mental state given that he could produce such a perfect simulacrum of leftist hysteria, though. I’ll chip in a few bucks to the HLC Psychiatric Fund as my good deed for the day.

    After a few leftist diatribes you start to wonder why you needed touch with the ground in the first place. We’re all crackers in this box.

    • #55
    • February 20, 2017, at 7:43 PM PST
    • Like
  26. drlorentz Member
    drlorentzJoined in the first year of Ricochet Ricochet Charter Member

    JLocked (View Comment):
    Please tell Yakov Smirnoff that he’s better than this.

    What a country!

    • #56
    • February 20, 2017, at 7:57 PM PST
    • Like
  27. Doctor Robert Member

    the fact that so many ricochetti were duped by this utterly transparent satire shows how deranged are both the Left and the unforgiving Never Trumpers

    • #57
    • February 20, 2017, at 8:03 PM PST
    • Like
  28. Damocles Inactive

    Doctor Robert (View Comment):
    the fact that so many ricochetti were duped by this utterly transparent satire shows how deranged are both the Left and the unforgiving Never Trumpers

    I think there’s some correlation between not being able to get a joke and misunderstanding certain kinds of communication.

    In both cases, there’s a certain insistence on literal-mindedness.

    Imagine explaining things to Margo Dumont (the lady in the Marx Brothers movies)… kinda like explaining things to the Nevers, right?

    • #58
    • February 20, 2017, at 8:08 PM PST
    • Like
  29. Randy Webster Member

    Doctor Robert (View Comment):
    the fact that so many ricochetti were duped by this utterly transparent satire shows how deranged are both the Left and the unforgiving Never Trumpers

    I don’t follow you. I thought it was “The Lord’s Prayer,” and she acted like she meant it. What’s to be deranged about?

    • #59
    • February 20, 2017, at 8:09 PM PST
    • Like
  30. Damocles Inactive

    Randy Webster (View Comment):

    Doctor Robert (View Comment):
    the fact that so many ricochetti were duped by this utterly transparent satire shows how deranged are both the Left and the unforgiving Never Trumpers

    I don’t follow you. I thought it was “The Lord’s Prayer,” and she acted like she meant it. What’s to be deranged about?

    I think the satire being referred to is the OP.

    • #60
    • February 20, 2017, at 8:25 PM PST
    • Like

Comments are closed because this post is more than six months old. Please write a new post if you would like to continue this conversation.