BuzzFeed Targets HGTV Hosts for Attending Christian Church

 
Joanna and Chip Gaines

Joanna and Chip Gaines, hosts of “Fixer Upper” on HGTV.

So Buzzfeed reporter Kate Aurthur wrote a post about popular HGTV hosts Chip and Joanne Gaines which informed the world that the Gaineses’ have a pastor who is opposed to same-sex marriage. This post had one purpose and one purpose alone: to harm the couple. The post served no news purpose—even Aurthur concedes she never learned the Gaines’ view of same-sex marriage. The post cannot be termed “activism” since it fails at every level to persuade readers of the rightness of the same-sex marriage cause. Even the most generous alternate topic of Aurthur’s post, “Texas pastor opposes same-sex marriage,” is as dog-bites-chew-toy as a news item can be. The only conceivable purpose of targeting the popular television couple in this manner was to cost them viewers and, perhaps, their jobs.

To forestall the protestations, there can be no serious doubt that Aurthur specifically targeted the Gaineses as the object of her post. The headline, subhead, and first, second, third, and fourth paragraphs were solely about the Gaineses, their popular HGTV show “Fixer Upper,” and the fact that they are (gasp!) openly Christian. Only in the fifth paragraph does Aurthur wander into the question of whether gay people will appear on their television show (like with other HGTV programming), and the rest of the piece is about the Gainses’ pastor’s views.

The word for Buzzfeed publishing this garbage is “harassment.” Even as Aurthur (and her boss) hide behind a pretense of journalistic standards, there is no journalistic content in the piece. The Gainses cannot be blamed for declining to volunteer themselves as victims for Aurthur’s bullying. After years of contemptuous boycotts and Twitter outrage storms directed at individuals and companies over their views on same-sex marriage, harassers like Aurthur have taught many of their victims — reasonably! — to hunker down and say nothing.

Worse, harassment will never be a good tool of persuasion. Aurthur presumably supports same-sex marriage and would like more people to join her side of that cultural split. But by targeting the Gaines’ livelihood this way, without even knowing the couple’s views of marriage, Aurthur has made her own cause appear mean and and her publisher petty. Bystanders, watching this little drama can learn but one thing: a perfect stranger with a media platform can try to ruin your livelihood because of religious beliefs she imputes to you, and there isn’t a darn thing you can do about it. Perhaps people have a good reason not to respond to requests for comment from Buzzfeed reporters.

At the end of all this, Arthur has harmed the Gaineses, harmed her own cause, harmed her colleagues, and harmed her own reputation. And we still don’t know the Gaines’ view on marriage or why it is important to know the religious beliefs of reality television hosts. Given the month-long outcry over “fake news” swaying a presidential election, one would hope Buzzfeed takes more care in the future not to publish more fake news of its own.


A Ricochet welcome to a new contributor! Gabriel Malor is an attorney and writer in Washington, D.C. Follow him on Twitter.

Published in Entertainment, Religion & Philosophy
Tags: , ,

Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 67 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. goldwaterwoman Thatcher
    goldwaterwoman
    @goldwaterwoman

    I adore Chip and Joanna and watch nearly all their shows. Not too long ago I believe they did a house for a gay couple. Their whole family is wonderful to watch, and Chip is totally zany. That a writer could pick on these sweet people without even knowing them just makes me ill. It’s so unfair!

    • #31
  2. Isaac Smith Member
    Isaac Smith
    @

    Western Chauvinist: I’m an anti-fifth-column fourth-estate bigot.

    I think I agree with you, I’m just not sure what this means.

    • #32
  3. Isaac Smith Member
    Isaac Smith
    @

    Mate De:

    Lily Bart:What ever happened to ‘live and let live’?

    The left doesn’t believe in live and let live. They believe in conformity.

    And up against the wall with you if you won’t conform.

    • #33
  4. Isaac Smith Member
    Isaac Smith
    @

    Domer61:Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Tim Kaine all belong to the Roman Catholic Church. BuzzFeed should check out the official position of the their church on same-sex marriage.

    Yes, well.  I suspect that BuzzFeed, like the rest of us, understand that their higher god is the Democrat Party and they will trim and shape their religious views as necessary to conform.  Seems bass-ackwards to me, but then I’m deporable*.

     

    *My spelling is especially deplorable.

    • #34
  5. I Walton Member
    I Walton
    @IWalton

    They are solid, extremely competent, strong family people, good humored, attractive, extraordinarily successful based on their own talents so of course the left hates them.  It has nothing to do with a pastor who believes in the things his church teaches.  Won’t this help ratings?

    • #35
  6. Seawriter Contributor
    Seawriter
    @Seawriter

    Quake Voter:Fine post … now give the man a Friday morning podcast.

    Isn’t Friday morning when AoS Podcast comes out? Malor is on that. AoS Podcast is not Ricochet C0C compliant. (I listened up to the last few months so things might have changed.)

    Seawriter

    • #36
  7. Kim K. Inactive
    Kim K.
    @KimK

    Your post was linked on Challies. The influence of Ricochet continues to spread.

    • #37
  8. DrewInWisconsin Member
    DrewInWisconsin
    @DrewInWisconsin

    I know I shouldn’t be vindictive or desire vengeance, but . . . man wouldn’t it be great to see someone bring a lawsuit against Buzzfeed for this, given that the obvious goal of the piece was to personally destroy and harm the Gaines’ livelihood?

    Nice to see Ricochet stealing good writers from The Federalist, rather than the other way around! ; )

    And speaking of The Federalist, I think this piece goes hand-in-hand with Kate Aurthur’s piece:

    Don’t Let Chip and Joanna Gaines Destroy Your Marriage!

     

    • #38
  9. Jamie Lockett Member
    Jamie Lockett
    @JamieLockett

    @exjon was all over this yesterday in Twitter and it was hilarious.

    • #39
  10. RightAngles Member
    RightAngles
    @RightAngles

    Gee, I wonder how many Muslims’ careers Kate Arthur has tried to destroy because their religion forbids same-sex marriage?

    • #40
  11. Marythefifth Inactive
    Marythefifth
    @Marythefifth

    Waco and its environs seem the epitome of flyover country which is another reason for the Left to hate the show.

    • #41
  12. Mate De Inactive
    Mate De
    @MateDe

    Marythefifth:Waco and its environs seem the epitome of flyover country which is another reason for the Left to hate the show.

    That’s the thing, leftists LOVE the show. Which is why The Gaines’ must be destroyed because they are conservative (even if not politically per se but hey Christian, small businesses owner. They at least live that way) and the left can’t have their doctrine that “all conservatives are evil bigots” to be shattered. The church of the left cannot allow this kind of heresy. They must be destroyed

    • #42
  13. Lance Inactive
    Lance
    @Lance

    Caught this on RealClearPolitics  and was half-way through before I realized I had clicked  over to Ricochet.  I think the rate of Ricochet’s appearance on RCP is a barometer into it’s impact on the conversation at large.  Nice job.

     

    • #43
  14. Teresa Mendoza Inactive
    Teresa Mendoza
    @TeresaMendoza

    Quake Voter:Fine post … now give the man a Friday morning podcast.

    I see what you did there.

    • #44
  15. RightAngles Member
    RightAngles
    @RightAngles

    I just left her a comment. The dumbass.

    • #45
  16. Warren Lynch Inactive
    Warren Lynch
    @WarrenLynch

    I know it has been mentioned in other places, but I eagerly await the Buzzfeed article on Nancy Pelosi’s church and Keith Ellison’s mosque holding the exact same views.

    • #46
  17. Mark Coolidge
    Mark
    @GumbyMark

    Jamie Lockett:@exjon was all over this yesterday in Twitter and it was hilarious.

    Very funny and the perfect way to turn the table on Buzzfeed and the author of the article.

    • #47
  18. Fred Houstan Member
    Fred Houstan
    @FredHoustan

    Speaking of inconsistency, Rep Ellison’s imam is in the news, sort of:

    If this social-media-mob-stirring, guilt-by-association, drive-out-the-heretics philosophy is how the game is going to be played now… I’d like the folks at BuzzFeed to turn their attention to Imam Makram El-Amin, leader of Masjid Al-Nur mosque in Minneapolis.

    “Our religion is clear about this matter. It’s not a lifestyle that we accept as being part of the natural way of things for human beings. When it comes to that, that’s my position, and that’s Islam’s position. And this incident as tragic and terrible as it is that does not change that,” he said.

    …and the crickets are now louder than your tinnitus.

    • #48
  19. Barry Jones Thatcher
    Barry Jones
    @BarryJones

    Gabe, Welcome to Ricochet. I miss the podcasts on Ace and the last few without you and then without John lost a little luster but were still fun and periodically eye opening. I am looking forward to reading more from you!

    • #49
  20. Barkha Herman Inactive
    Barkha Herman
    @BarkhaHerman

    Does Kate Arthur know that ALL Muslims have Imams that oppose same sex marriage?  What are her views on ALL Muslims?

    • #50
  21. Sweezle Inactive
    Sweezle
    @Sweezle

    BuzzFeed has strong political agendas. Lets hope this doesn’t make it to the MSM and this couple gets fired for having incorrect political views.

    • #51
  22. Paul Dougherty Member
    Paul Dougherty
    @PaulDougherty

    Sweezle:BuzzFeed has strong political agendas. Lets hope this doesn’t make it to the MSM and this couple gets fired for having incorrect political views.



    It seems to be an exclusively right leaning story du jour so far (Federalist, PJ Media etc), much like the North Dakota pipeline protests for the left.

    • #52
  23. goldwaterwoman Thatcher
    goldwaterwoman
    @goldwaterwoman

    Sweezle: BuzzFeed has strong political agendas. Lets hope this doesn’t make it to the MSM and this couple gets fired for having incorrect political views.

    If you read the comments almost everywhere this story has appeared, it’s clear the public is incensed over the deliberate attempt to destroy this highly respected couple and their show. The backlash is amazing and will probably result in a huge upswing in viewership.

    • #53
  24. DrewInWisconsin Member
    DrewInWisconsin
    @DrewInWisconsin

    goldwaterwoman:

    Sweezle: BuzzFeed has strong political agendas. Lets hope this doesn’t make it to the MSM and this couple gets fired for having incorrect political views.

    If you read the comments almost everywhere this story has appeared, it’s clear the public is incensed over the deliberate attempt to destroy this highly respected couple and their show. The backlash is amazing and will probably result in a huge upswing in viewership.

    If it doesn’t result in the firing of Kate Aurthur and the destruction of Buzzfeed, I will be a bit sad.

    • #54
  25. Richard Hanchett Inactive
    Richard Hanchett
    @iDad

    Barkha Herman:Does Kate Arthur know that ALL Muslims have Imams that oppose same sex marriage? What are her views on ALL Muslims?

    Didn’t Buzzfeed publish a similar piece on the TLC show All-American Muslim?

    Of course not.

    • #55
  26. Rapporteur Inactive
    Rapporteur
    @Rapporteur

    Welcome Gabriel! I’m another (occasional) ‘ron and (somewhat less occasional) Ricochet participant.

    Also, what’s Buzzfeed? Is that like Rolling Stone — one of them “fake news” places that has everybody so wee-wee’d up?

    • #56
  27. RightAngles Member
    RightAngles
    @RightAngles

    DrewInWisconsin:

    goldwaterwoman:

    If you read the comments almost everywhere this story has appeared, it’s clear the public is incensed over the deliberate attempt to destroy this highly respected couple and their show. The backlash is amazing and will probably result in a huge upswing in viewership.

    If it doesn’t result in the firing of Kate Aurthur and the destruction of Buzzfeed, I will be a bit sad.

    It’s the same on all the Yahoo “News” hit pieces. You see the story and get so mad, but then when you read the comments, you realize people are on to them and you feel better.

    • #57
  28. Jules PA Inactive
    Jules PA
    @JulesPA

    goldwaterwoman:

    Sweezle: BuzzFeed has strong political agendas. Lets hope this doesn’t make it to the MSM and this couple gets fired for having incorrect political views.

    If you read the comments almost everywhere this story has appeared, it’s clear the public is incensed over the deliberate attempt to destroy this highly respected couple and their show. The backlash is amazing and will probably result in a huge upswing in viewership.

    I can imagine Chip and Joanna being kind and forgiving to this malicious journalist.

    Perfect example of this verse from Genesis:

    “You intended to harm me, but God intended it for good to accomplish what is now being done…”

    • #58
  29. claire lunaire Inactive
    claire lunaire
    @clairelunaire

    Mary Katharine Hamm wrote a lovely piece about Chip and Joanna Gaines on Election Day which made me smile and seemed, frankly, like an excellent idea… 7-reasons-we-should-just-give-america-to-chip-and-joanna-gaines-after-tuesday

    I’m a Fixer-Upper fan. Flimsy, mean-spirited ‘news’ like this says way more about the writer’s narrow view than the subject — and it smells like mildew and dry rot to me.

    • #59
  30. lowtech redneck Coolidge
    lowtech redneck
    @lowtech redneck

    Aaron Miller:As a traditional Christian, a Catholic, my beliefs regarding divorce are also out of style. In short, I believe sacramental marriage is permanent and to “re-marry” by civil standards is a form of adultery.

    Obviously, that belief is similarly infuriating to people who don’t share it. But countless such couples have been willing to tolerate it to sustain our friendship — a friendship which is not defined by any simple litmus test.

    Why is this one issue — homosexuality — uniquely unquestionable and disagreement intolerable?

    Generations have been exploited to forcefully impose the Left’s norms. I hope some realize how they are being manipulated.

    That’s precisely how I, an agnostic and more or less socially libertarian conservative, view religious opposition to same-sex marriage.  My great-grandfather’s family actually disowned him for marrying my (divorced) great-grandmother, yet unlike the Left my mother’s family managed not to lose their minds over tens of millions of Americans having different beliefs on this issue.  The social totalitarianism that this is but one small example of is simply disgusting.

    • #60
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.