Turning the Tables on Sen. Warren

 

sen warrenSen. Elizabeth Warren grilled Wells Fargo’s CEO when he appeared before Congress Tuesday. The bank’s head, John Stumpf, came to Washington to answer for Wells Fargo employees who created millions of unauthorized bank and credit card accounts in the past five years. This earned the bank extra fees, of which the customers were unaware, while making Wells Fargo look like a great investment to Wall Street.

Warren thinks that the bank firing the 5,300 employees responsible is just window dressing. “You should resign,” Warren told Stumpf. “You should be criminally investigated.” A video of the exchange captivated struggling Americans angry at the elites who keep getting richer while they’re looking for change in their sofa to keep the lights on.

As one of those Americans, it was cathartic to see a greedy banker get his comeuppance. But a few minutes into the video, I was stunned at Sen. Warren’s hypocrisy. Instead of hauling CEOs before a Senate Banking Committee, I wish citizens could drag politicians before a Taxpayer Politicians Committee. So I slightly edited the transcript of Warren’s exchange to turn the tables on the high-spending progressive.


Taxpayer: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Sen. Warren, the US Constitution, which you swore to support and defend, says “We the People” are directed to “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.” So, let’s do that. Washington’s massive years-long scam has resulted in a debt of $19.5 trillion. Senators and Congressmen have said repeatedly: “I am accountable to the voters.” But what have you actually done to hold yourself accountable? Have you resigned as a US Senator?

Warren: The voters — I serve —

Taxpayer: Have you resigned?

Warren: No, I have not.

Taxpayer: Alright. Have you returned one nickel of the millions of dollars that you earned while this scam was going on?

Warren: Well, first of all, this was because of Republican obstructionism and…

Taxpayer: That’s not my question. This is about responsibility. Have you returned one nickel of the millions of dollars that you earned while this scam was going on?

Warren: The voters will take care of that.

Taxpayer: Have you returned one nickel of the money you earned while this scam was going on?

Warren: And the voters will do —

Taxpayer: I will take that as a no, then. Have you called for the firing of a single senior bureaucrat? And by that, I don’t mean some regional manager in the Cleveland office. I’m asking about the people who actually made these spending decisions.

Warren: We’ve made a change in our regional — to lead our regional offices —

Taxpayer: I just said I’m not asking regional managers. I’m not asking about regional offices. I’m asking if you have fired senior officials, the people who actually led us to this $19.5 trillion debt, who oversaw this fraud, or those who were in charge of making sure that the budgets were balanced.

Warren: Well, Harry Reid —

Taxpayer: Did you fire any of those people?

Warren: No.

Taxpayer: No. OK, so you haven’t resigned, you haven’t returned a single nickel of your personal earnings, you haven’t fired a single senior official. Instead evidently your definition of “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity” is to push the blame to low-level employees who don’t have the status for a fancy press office to defend themselves. It’s gutless leadership. In your time as a member of the Senate Banking Committee and the Economic Policy Committee, the federal government has been famous for overspending. This debt-driven overspending is one of the main reasons that Washington has become one of the wealthiest cities in the world. In fact, four of the five richest counties in the US surround the Beltway.

Warren: No. “Overspending” is just shorthand for deepening relationships with our constituencies. We only do well —

Taxpayer: Let me stop you right there. You say no? Loudon, Fairfax, Howard, and Arlington counties, all got richer as this scam was going on. I would like to submit them for the record if I may, Mr. Chair. Thank you.

Chair: No objections.

Taxpayer: Thank you, Mr. Chair. When voters saw propped-up economic numbers — they did, while this scam was going on — that was very good for you, personally, wasn’t it, Sen. Warren? Do you know how much your net worth increased while this scam was underway?

Warren: First of all, it was not a scam. And overspending is a way of deepening relationships. When voters…

Taxpayer: We’ve been through this, Sen. Warren. I asked you a very simple question. Do you know how much your net worth went up while this scam was going on?

Warren: It’s…. all of my compensation is on the public record—

Taxpayer: Do you know how much it was?

Warren: It’s all in the public records.

Taxpayer: You’re right. It is all in the public records because I looked it up. While this scam was going on, your net worth grew to an estimated $14.5 million, including your $5 million home, retirement fund, and salaries. Your leader, Sen. Reid, and many other senators are now multimillionaires, despite living on a government salary most of their adult lives.

You know, here is what really gets me about this, Sen. Warren. If one of your constituents hid a handful of $20 bills from the IRS, they probably would be looking at criminal charges. They could end up in prison. But you squeezed us taxpayers to the breaking point so that we’re desperate for those $20 bills, all so you could put millions of dollars in your own pocket. And when it all blows up, you keep your job, you keep your multimillion-dollar home, and you go on television to blame bankers for bringing us to this sorry state. This is about accountability. You should resign.

You should give back the money that you “earned” while this scam was going on and you should be criminally investigated by the Department of Justice. This just isn’t right. A taxpayer who hides a handful of twenties is held accountable. But Washington politicians never hold themselves accountable. Not now, and not in 2008 when they crushed the worldwide economy. The only way that Washington will change is if politicians and bureaucrats face jail time when they preside over massive frauds. We need tough new laws to hold rich politicians personally accountable and we need tough prosecutors who have the courage to go after people at the top. Until then, it will be business as usual. And at giant institutions like the federal government that seems to mean cheating as many taxpayers, voters, and citizens as they possibly can. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Published in Domestic Policy, Economics, Politics
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 16 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. MarciN Member
    MarciN
    @MarciN

    Jon Gabriel, Ed.: Taxpayer: I just said I’m not asking regional managers. I’m not asking about regional offices. I’m asking if you have fired senior officials, the people who actually led us to this $19.5 trillion debt, who oversaw this fraud, or the those who were in charge of making sure that the budgets were balanced.

    This scenario can be seen so vividly on the town, city, and state levels. Management has been negotiating with government employee unions to forgo cash raises in the short term in favor of accepting increases in pension benefit promises to be paid out over the next twenty years. It is increasingly unlikely that many cities and towns and states will be able to keep these promises.

    • #1
  2. Casey Inactive
    Casey
    @Casey

    Nice work, Chief Jon.

    • #2
  3. Israel P. Inactive
    Israel P.
    @IsraelP

    Silly. Should have focused on “our posterity.”

    Stumpf should have said “You first.”

    • #3
  4. Scott Wilmot Member
    Scott Wilmot
    @ScottWilmot

    Very, very good Jon. It’s a shame that your scenario will never happen.

    • #4
  5. genferei Member
    genferei
    @genferei

    A hit, Jon, a palpable hit.

    I have a particular contempt for legislators who moralize against citizens who follow the laws they, the legislators, have written — whether it’s termed a ‘loophole’ or otherwise.

    • #5
  6. Arahant Member
    Arahant
    @Arahant

    genferei:A hit, Jon, a palpable hit.

    I have a particular contempt for legislators who moralize against citizens who follow the laws they, the legislators, have written — whether it’s termed a ‘loophole’ or otherwise.

    That and candidates and elected Federal officials who declaim loudly about CEOs and board members and their compensation and perqs.

    • #6
  7. PHCheese Inactive
    PHCheese
    @PHCheese

    And how many Vets died waiting for care  Pocahontas ?

    • #7
  8. rico Inactive
    rico
    @rico

    Great work Jon! Excellent first draft of “Taxpayers vs. Warren,” modeled on the show trial Senator Warren conducted yesterday.

    Now, add some self-righteousness to the Taxpayer script. Also, make sure it is shrill, dripping with vitriol, and that it oozes condescension.

    Like this:

    • #8
  9. Freesmith Member
    Freesmith
    @

    You just overlooked one thing, Jon. John Stumpf did announce that he was accountable.

    Elizabeth Warren never has.

    • #9
  10. Jules PA Inactive
    Jules PA
    @JulesPA

    Today is the first time in a long time that I read and enjoyed THREE consecutive posts from my member feed.

    Thank you for giving us hope. Now, how can we make this legislative inquisition begin in real life?

    • #10
  11. Paul Erickson Inactive
    Paul Erickson
    @PaulErickson

    She was good, though, wasn’t she?  At least until she called for more legislation.

    • #11
  12. tigerlily Member
    tigerlily
    @tigerlily

    Jon Gabriel, Ed.:sen warren


    Taxpayer: Let me stop you right there. You say no? Loudon, Fairfax, Howard, and Arlington counties, all got richer as this scam was going on. I would like to submit them for the record if I may, Mr. Chair. Thank you.

    Chair: No objections.

    Taxpayer: Thank you, Mr. Chair. When voters saw propped-up economic numbers — they did, while this scam was going on — that was very good for you, personally, wasn’t it, Sen. Warren? Do you know how much your net worth increased while this scam was underway?

    Warren: First of all, it was not a scam. And overspending is a way of deepening relationships. When voters…

    Well done Jon. My guess is those counties, which I think contain some of the wealthiest zip codes in the nation, are either reliable Democrat counties, or at least vote more Democratic than in the past.

    • #12
  13. Randal H Member
    Randal H
    @RandalH

    I guess all those Wells Fargo LGBT commercials and active outreach didn’t buy them much good will from their fellow lefties.

    • #13
  14. Ray Kujawa Coolidge
    Ray Kujawa
    @RayKujawa

    Not a bad living for a Native American with high cheekbones.

    • #14
  15. Functionary Coolidge
    Functionary
    @Functionary

    I kind of agree with her and I don’t think conservatives should be excusing fraud.  I don’t really care about her hypocrisy or double standards.  Wells Fargo has apparently committed fraud on a mass scale.  She was unfair, because she didn’t let him talk, and that reduced the impact.  But, why are so many of us defending this guy?

    • #15
  16. rico Inactive
    rico
    @rico

    Functionary:I kind of agree with her and I don’t think conservatives should be excusing fraud. I don’t really care about her hypocrisy or double standards. Wells Fargo has apparently committed fraud on a mass scale. She was unfair, because she didn’t let him talk, and that reduced the impact. But, why are so many of us defending this guy?

    I don’t have the impression that anyone was defending him.

    Speaking for myself, Warren was grandstanding for her political crusade — a Leftist agenda that extends far beyond the subject of the hearing.

    • #16
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.