Supreme Court Rules Against First Amendment

 
stormans

The Stormans family.

The left has won the culture war, and now they’re roaming the countryside shooting the wounded. The Supreme Court quietly endorsed progressives’ mop-up operation by refusing to hear the case of Kevin Stormans who had his life turned upside-down by government bureaucrats in Washington state.

The Stormans family pharmacy has served Olympia residents for four generations. But in 2007, they ran afoul of the state’s pharmacy board which mandated that every pharmacy stock and dispense the “morning-after” pill, an abortifacent. This violated Stormans’ religious, moral, and ethical beliefs, so he challenged the regulations in court.

If women wanting a Plan B pill called in a prescription, he would gladly refer them to one of the 30 other pharmacies within a five-mile radius supplying the drug. No one was harmed or prevented from receiving the pill, while Stormans was allowed to freely practice his faith.

This wasn’t acceptable to state bureaucrats, who insisted that every man and woman bend their knee to a strange new god, Planned Parenthood. After years of litigation, a federal court agreed with Stormans. The state immediately appealed to the famously liberal 9th Circuit which sided with the bureaucrats.

Earlier this week, the Supreme Court had the opportunity to enforce the first amendment and ensure that an all-powerful government cannot prohibit the free exercise of religion. Instead, they abstained, refusing to even hear the case.

Representing the constitutional minority on the Court, Justice Samuel Alito (joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Clarence Thomas) registered his disapproval with the majority:

This case is an ominous sign. At issue are Washington State regulations that are likely to make a pharmacist unemployable if he or she objects on religious grounds to dispensing certain prescription medications. There are strong reasons to doubt whether the regulations were adopted for—or that they actually serve—any legitimate purpose. And there is much evidence that the impetus for the adoption of the regulations was hostility to pharmacists whose religious beliefs regarding abortion and contraception are out of step with prevailing opinion in the State. Yet the Ninth Circuit held that the regulations do not violate the First Amendment, and this Court does not deem the case worthy of our time. If this is a sign of how religious liberty claims will be treated in the years ahead, those who value religious freedom have cause for great concern.

Great concern, indeed. This anti-constitutional interpretation might as well insist that kosher delis serve bacon and Hindu-owned restaurants sell hamburgers. But that comes later. For now, the left’s social warriors are focused on stamping out the scourge of “live and let live” Christians like Kevin Stormans. Every knee must bow before the strange new god.

For more background on the case, Alliance Defending Freedom, which represented Stormans, created this video:

https://youtu.be/gSpH6EU1YM0

Published in Law
Like this post? Want to comment? Join Ricochet’s community of conservatives and be part of the conversation. Join Ricochet for Free.

There are 73 comments.

Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.
  1. Eric Hines Inactive
    Eric Hines
    @EricHines

    Merina Smith: ADF–Alliance Defending Freedom, by the way, is an amazing organization that takes these cases free of charge. There are other organizations that do this, but they are the main one. They have an excellent win record of 80% in spite of the horrible, hostile climate in which we live. They are all people of faith who are committed Christians who see defending religious freedom as their mission. I think of them right now as the rebel alliance going up against The Empire.

    An excellent organization.  So is First Liberty (nee Liberty Institute) which has a 90% win record on religious freedom cases.

    Eric Hines

    • #61
  2. Irregardless Member
    Irregardless
    @

    KC Mulville: We are thus a nation of men, not laws.

    So what is the difference between the U.S. and Iran?  One pretend to have elections, but in reality is ruled by an oligarchic council of black-robed elders and the other is ruled by an oligarchic council of black-robed elders but pretends to have elections.

    • #62
  3. Miffed White Male Member
    Miffed White Male
    @MiffedWhiteMale

    Lily Bart:

    Miffed White Male:It’d be a darn shame if they had a lot of ordering and delivery problems that made it difficult to keep the product in stock. Is there a requirement to keep a certain amount on hand, or can they order one unit, then wait at least 2 or 3 weeks to order a replacement after it’s used.

    Is the stuff shelf-stable, or is it likely to be rendered unusable if it gets to warm or too cold in storage? Maybe there’s a heat vent in the stock room where the box gets put. Or it inadvertantly got put in the refrigerator.

    I understand the strategy, but it still doesn’t allow the person their religious rights / freedom.

    The unions call it “working to rule”.  You do exactly what the letter of the law allows/requires, no more.  Sabotage the system from inside, until sanity prevails.

    • #63
  4. Sabrdance Member
    Sabrdance
    @Sabrdance

    Miffed White Male:

    Lily Bart:

    Miffed White Male:It’d be a darn shame if they had a lot of ordering and delivery problems that made it difficult to keep the product in stock. Is there a requirement to keep a certain amount on hand, or can they order one unit, then wait at least 2 or 3 weeks to order a replacement after it’s used.

    Is the stuff shelf-stable, or is it likely to be rendered unusable if it gets to warm or too cold in storage? Maybe there’s a heat vent in the stock room where the box gets put. Or it inadvertantly got put in the refrigerator.

    I understand the strategy, but it still doesn’t allow the person their religious rights / freedom.

    The unions call it “working to rule”. You do exactly what the letter of the law allows/requires, no more. Sabotage the system from inside, until sanity prevails.

    I’m happy to call for outright wrecking at this point, if it will do any good.  Swing an Andrew Ryan and torch the pharmacy rather than see it fall into the Government’s hands.

    • #64
  5. Merina Smith Inactive
    Merina Smith
    @MerinaSmith

    I believe the edict came from above, not below.  The pharmacy board in the state was inclined to let it go, but the governor ousted one of the members and planted her own so that she could go with the rules PP wanted.  At any rate, PP seeks out such cases and governors willing to be the hammer.

    • #65
  6. Merina Smith Inactive
    Merina Smith
    @MerinaSmith

    Teresa Mendoza:

    Merina Smith: ADF–Alliance Defending Freedom, by the way, is an amazing organization that takes these cases free of charge. There are other organizations that do this, but they are the main one. They have an excellent win record of 80% in spite of the horrible, hostile climate in which we live. They are all people of faith who are committed Christians who see defending religious freedom as their mission. I think of them right now as the rebel alliance going up against The Empire.

    Well said, Merina. This is an awesome institution standing athwart the atheist, “progressive,” illiberal juggernaut of the Left. It deserves our generous, full-throated support. (I am an allied attorney, so feel free to take what I say with a grain of salt. Do your own research — and then donate!)

    Teresa, my hat is off to you. I’ve been told that being an allied attorney means you commit to thousands of hours of pro bono work.  Thank you from the bottom of my heart for being one of these generous and courageous people.

    • #66
  7. Brad2971 Member
    Brad2971
    @

    Nick Stuart:Just a reminder: however stinky the choice may seem, it will be either Trump or Clinton making SCOTUS appointments, executive branch appointments, overseeing national security, etc. Who do you prefer?

    Neither, for it makes little difference in and of itself. I prefer getting better at legal strategies that prevent stuff like what happened to the Stormans.

    Are you listening, Alliance Defending Freedom?

    • #67
  8. Merina Smith Inactive
    Merina Smith
    @MerinaSmith

    Brad2971:

    Nick Stuart:Just a reminder: however stinky the choice may seem, it will be either Trump or Clinton making SCOTUS appointments, executive branch appointments, overseeing national security, etc. Who do you prefer?

    Neither, for it makes little difference in and of itself. I prefer getting better at legal strategies that prevent stuff like what happened to the Stormans.

    Are you listening, Alliance Defending Freedom?

    Brad, ADF took this case and did all they could.  Believe me, they are very good at strategies, but the problem is that Scalia died at a very bad time.  Had he been around, they would have taken the case.  It takes 4 justices to grant cert to hear cases.  The blame can be laid at the feet of the feckless Kennedy, where a great deal of blame already resides.

    • #68
  9. Brad2971 Member
    Brad2971
    @

    Merina Smith:

    Brad2971:

    Nick Stuart:Just a reminder: however stinky the choice may seem, it will be either Trump or Clinton making SCOTUS appointments, executive branch appointments, overseeing national security, etc. Who do you prefer?

    Neither, for it makes little difference in and of itself. I prefer getting better at legal strategies that prevent stuff like what happened to the Stormans.

    Are you listening, Alliance Defending Freedom?

    Brad, ADF took this case and did all they could. Believe me, they are very good at strategies, but the problem is that Scalia died at a very bad time. Had he been around, they would have taken the case. It takes 4 justices to grant cert to hear cases. The blame can be laid at the feet of the feckless Kennedy, where a great deal of blame already resides.

    Merina, I wonder what ADF’s position would be regarding Muslim cab drivers refusing to pick up blind people with seeing-eye dogs, due to dogs being considered unclean in Islam? Those Muslim cab drivers do possess a government-issued license to operate a public conveyance, after all, much like the Stormans possess a WA state license to operate a pharmacy.

    • #69
  10. Hoyacon Member
    Hoyacon
    @Hoyacon

    Merina Smith:

    Brad2971:

    Nick Stuart:Just a reminder: however stinky the choice may seem, it will be either Trump or Clinton making SCOTUS appointments, executive branch appointments, overseeing national security, etc. Who do you prefer?

    Neither, for it makes little difference in and of itself. I prefer getting better at legal strategies that prevent stuff like what happened to the Stormans.

    Are you listening, Alliance Defending Freedom?

    Brad, ADF took this case and did all they could. Believe me, they are very good at strategies, but the problem is that Scalia died at a very bad time. Had he been around, they would have taken the case. It takes 4 justices to grant cert to hear cases. The blame can be laid at the feet of the feckless Kennedy, where a great deal of blame already resides.

    Considering the compositi0n of this Court, I’m not sure that certiorari would have been a good thing.  There are still other Circuits out there.  See #35, above.

    Edit:  BTW, I hope that this rather pragmatic approach doesn’t indicate that I’m not sympathetic to the Stromans.  They’re victims of authoritarianism, which is never good.

    • #70
  11. Merina Smith Inactive
    Merina Smith
    @MerinaSmith

    Brad2971:

    Merina Smith:

    Brad2971:

    Nick Stuart:Just a reminder: however stinky the choice may seem, it will be either Trump or Clinton making SCOTUS appointments, executive branch appointments, overseeing national security, etc. Who do you prefer?

    Neither, for it makes little difference in and of itself. I prefer getting better at legal strategies that prevent stuff like what happened to the Stormans.

    Are you listening, Alliance Defending Freedom?

    Brad, ADF took this case and did all they could. Believe me, they are very good at strategies, but the problem is that Scalia died at a very bad time. Had he been around, they would have taken the case. It takes 4 justices to grant cert to hear cases. The blame can be laid at the feet of the feckless Kennedy, where a great deal of blame already resides.

    Merina, I wonder what ADF’s position would be regarding Muslim cab drivers refusing to pick up blind people with seeing-eye dogs, due to dogs being considered unclean in Islam? Those Muslim cab drivers do possess a government-issued license to operate a public conveyance, after all, much like the Stormans possess a WA state license to operate a pharmacy.

    They’d be sympathetic for sure.  They can’t take all cases, however, and they are a Christian organization.  They might at some point decide that taking a Muslim case is a good strategy.  They certainly choose their cases carefully.  The Stormans, for example, have very good facts supporting them, and have been longstanding and upstanding community members.  Baronelle Stutzman, whose case they have taken, is a Washington Florist who got sued by a longtime customer for not doing his gay wedding flowers, and she is about as appealing a person as they could possibly defend.  They have sympathy for all people suffering under religious intolerance, but they have to pick the cases most likely to win in order to set precedents.  The right case might come along so that they will defend a Muslim client, who knows.  Their big picture is religious freedom.  I know the Becket Fund has taken Muslim cases.  Not sure about ADF so far.

    • #71
  12. EHerring Coolidge
    EHerring
    @EHerring

    Abortion is a crime against humanity and nobody should be forced to become a part of it.  Maybe it is time to go on the warpath and condemn as evil anyone involved in it and anyone who supports it.  Time to rent billboards that equate these people as every bit as evil as Nazis.

    • #72
  13. Tuck Inactive
    Tuck
    @Tuck

    Sabrdance: Explain to me again why the proper response is not:
    “Kill the Masters.”

    Civility is more important than liberty, in the minds of many…

    • #73
Become a member to join the conversation. Or sign in if you're already a member.