Your friend Jim George thinks you'd be a great addition to Ricochet, so we'd like to offer you a special deal: You can become a member for no initial charge for one month!
Ricochet is a community of like-minded people who enjoy writing about and discussing politics (usually of the center-right nature), culture, sports, history, and just about every other topic under the sun in a fully moderated environment. We’re so sure you’ll like Ricochet, we’ll let you join and get your first month for free. Kick the tires: read the always eclectic member feed, write some posts, join discussions, participate in a live chat or two, and listen to a few of our over 50 (free) podcasts on every conceivable topic, hosted by some of the biggest names on the right, for 30 days on us. We’re confident you’re gonna love it.
The internet features lots of snark, but precious little wit. Spend any time on social media, and you’ll find that most confuse the two.
I agree that the reign of snark seems over now, but the impulses are still there–it is not merely that on a partisan basis, this is how Americans deal with each other. It’s also at a more basic, private level–that hasn’t died out & it won’t until some more serious things change. I believe the tendency to reply in sarcastic terms is a show of bitterness. Conservatives blame it all on liberals, who’ve never done anything for their country; liberals blame it on conservatives. But both sides have come to agree that there’s no future–the future is only about blaming the other side. This substitute for a future is really bitter & not all of charity.
People do not see a way out, an American future in which they can live together with the friendship of citizenship. So the sarcasm continues.
I think that’s now supposed to be part of what’s called being presidential. Very well stated.
I hate the laziness of snark. It’s an invitation for the listener to provide the joke. Some hack comic throws out a “Sarah Palin is so dumb. amirite?” the crowd “Wooooo”s and claps uproariously. But no joke was provided. The audience is supposed to bring their own joke. I thought that was the job of the comedian.
Why hasn’t anyone cited Al Franken as another case in point?
Weaponized sarcasm in the service of partisanship under the protection of artistic license as I see it.
Setting Al Franken aside I have been disappointed by Garrison Keillor in recent years. Nowadays any skit on Prairie Home Companion that includes a character who is an acknowledged gun owner or even an acknowledged opponent of new taxes is targeted for the most humorless vituperation.
Maybe it depends on who you associate with and also where you live. I work in IT, where many of those people are infected with snark. I don’t actually work in Silicon Valley, but I see and hear a lot of that in some of the podcasts that originate from there.
But, living in Fairbanks, Alaska, and working in a niche part of IT (electrical industrial controls) where I deal a lot with power engineers and power plant blue collar workers, I find an amazing lack of faux sophistication and more directness. Maybe because I’m dealing with a workforce that’s predominantly male, still mostly unfeminized, yet mostly without the crude humor that I saw in the nineteen-eighties.
And even the younger IT workers who deal in the more traditional corporate space are less cynical than their predecessors still in management.
I saw the same thing when I volunteered as a firefighter. The department I volunteered at had a lot of young firefighters come through who were gaining experience on their way to making it a career. Over time, I saw less cynicism and snark there as well.
I take it, the younger generation is less given to sarcasm? That seems plausible to me, but not as yet explained.
Stop trying to make “snark” happen, Jon.
I’m not sure I’d agree. Snark seems renewed and revitalized by ironic, affected hipsterism. This Oonion video hilarious (and snarkily?) captures it at its best/worst:
Ironically, the picture of Amy Poehler on a Weekend Update snark reminds me of her show, Parks and Recreation, which had a noted lack of cynicism, and the fun it poked was light hearted. The characters all had their foibles and vulnerabilities and weren’t superior to each other.
Perhaps the first season was a rough start with Andy Dwyer portrayed as a very unlikable bum, but by the second season they had worked out the kinks.
I especially liked the way they portrayed Jerry, who they were mean to, but who ended up having a home life that was the envy of everyone.
And I loved Amy Poehler’s smile.
As with many things, CS Lewis is prescient:
But flippancy is the best of all. In the first place it is very economical. Only a clever human can make a real Joke about virtue, or indeed about anything else; any of them can be trained to talk as if virtue were funny. Among flippant people the Joke is always assumed to have been made. No one actually makes it; but every serious subject is discussed in a manner which implies that they have already found a ridiculous side to it. If prolonged, the habit of Flippancy builds up around a man the finest armour-plating against the Enemy that I know, and it is quite free from the dangers inherent in the other sources of laughter. It is a thousand miles away from joy it deadens, instead of sharpening, the intellect; and it excites no affection between those who practice it,
Your affectionate uncle
SCREWTAPE
Such a great quote.
Actually, I think most millennials – and others – see Letterman as retired. :-)
More to the point, they do not see him.
Jon, well said. I’ve had similar thoughts on the subject. What you’re talking about in this post seems to have become a larger part of American pop culture. You mentioned snide. I would also add the word “catty” into the mix. I suppose some people feel that this is edgy or displaying how they’re really ‘with it’, but I think this has become too pervasive in society making it a more unpleasant place and corrosive.
A Twitter follower shared this sketch which nails snark perfectly. (Slight CoC violation at the link.)